• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Bruno

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

10,056 profile views
  1. Many high rises in the US built before sprinkler requirements have yet to be retrofitted, varies by location. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/06/15/risk-of-high-rise-fire-deaths-in-u-s-has-dropped/?utm_term=.cdfafb7b9169
  2. 10m is the height limit on flammable claddings in non UK codes. Height of most ladders. Draw your own conclusions but I would consider practicing rappelling.
  3. Wash well several times before sealing.
  4. 10m isn't very tall.
  5. "Somebody(s) wasn't paying attention." https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/23/world/asia/destroyer-fitzgerald-collision.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
  6. Yes, just moved my primaries outboard, for a fairer lead, seems good.
  7. I just don't get the sequence of actions or inactions required for this to happen. Even taking into consideration the gross negligence and bad seamanship detailed in some of the other incidents above (which are amazing), I am struggling to understand how a destroyer gets in this situation. Yes, the freighter may have been circling for a pilot, yes, the bridge watch may have been distracted, but there are supposed to be so many redundancies in a 300 man crewed Aegis destroyer that I just don't get it. If I was the Navy I would be making some changes rather than covering things up, but I'm not.
  8. Interviews, yeh, that's the ticket, just show the interviews. And stills from the race footage, yeh, lots of stills of the race footage. And more interviews and background pieces, yeh, that's the ticket. Because who wants to watch replays of the actual races? Losers, that's who, winners want to play the video re-enactment as true particiapnts always do, yeh.
  9. Exactly my original point, Aegis class have some the most developed detection systems going.
  10. thought collision was about 1600, at #1. I thought of GPS spoofing also.
  11. Probably fit 100+ immigrants on each.
  12. Btw, the first was due to a chart inaccuracy of 8 m, the latter two to lax watch keeping in narrow seas, one at periscope depth. This seems a bit different, though we've all seen and made our share of mistakes out there. There are just so many redundancies on the Burke class alone, never mind the container ship.
  13. My mistake, container ship described as 3x of Burke class, was on a very straight track at 18 k, then hard right turn to avoid probably reduced damage. Just not sure how watch keepers and radar failed to observe approach, not to mention AIS.
  14. I'm having trouble believing this was just human error.
  15. Terrible tragedy, what was the cause for two vessels like these to collide?