B.J. Porter

Did Clinton turn over documents?

Yes they do. Just not with jzk.

Trump is playing to his base. That's all that matters. He knows the Senate won't convict him. He knows his base will swallow any bull shit he feeds them. He knows his base will get very angry that those vicious Democrats are trying to invalidate their choice. Of course nobody else believes that BS. The question is, is Trumps base big enough to get him reelected? Will the Democrats actually nominate a candidate that can win? And Trump's lawyers are also playing to what he wants to hear. They know he will be watching Hannity and Fox & Friends for the highlights later, and they want to keep him happy.

Firing an employee that steals from you isn't "Reversing the hiring decision." It's holding them accountable for their actions after you gave them your trust.

See, we can find common ground on something if we look hard enough.

You skipped a step that is key to this conversation Sirica, acting on a request from Jaworski, issued a subpoena for the tapes of 64 presidential conversations to use as evidence in the criminal cases against indicted former Nixon administration officials. Nixon refused, and Jaworski appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to force Nixon to turn over the tapes. On July 24, 1974, the Supreme Court orderedNixon to release the tapes.[37] The 8–0 ruling (Justice William Rehnquist recused himself owing to having worked for Attorney General John Mitchell)[37] in United States v. Nixonfound that President Nixon was wrong in arguing that courts are compelled to honor, without question, any presidential claim of executive privilege.[37] So...we have established precedent at the supreme court level that Trump should have complied. You made our case for us. Thank you. Or are you expecting that the Democrats should be required to re-litigate something that is already established in case law to give Donny time to throw the election again with his Russian pals? Trump didn't even bother to claim privilege, he just gave Congress the finger and told them to get fucked. Some might call that contempt...

Trump - who seems to have no concept of security especially when he's bragging and self aggrandizing - is notorious for discussing shit in public at his clubs to impress people. If memory serves didn't he discuss bombing some country or other at Mar-a-lago with some paying members? Have we really created secure facilities at all his clubs? I don't think so.

The third choice is complicit Yes, that too.

Thank you Attorney Warbird.

The house has sole authority to conduct impeachment, they are not subordinate to the courts. And they are correct - there is no time to lose as Trump has already invited several other countries to interfere in our election.

Not the descriptor I'd use, but she is a complete piece of shit.

Well that was interesting. Apparently the Constitution is now unconstitutional.

FIFY I hope you'll be really proud of your grandchildren when they bring home their little paychecks from that sweatshop. - DSK While there is honor in low skill work, I aspire to more for my children.

Indeed. I will offer the defense the same respect that I wanted from the GOP. The GOP and the Republicans didn't give it - I doubt, for example, that my Fox Aunts watched more than a few minutes of the presentations. But I will watch today, and as much as I can next week. My only real challenge will be to remember this is not my TV, so I can't throw shit at it when they lie. Because if their initial presentations are the start are any indicator, the defense will mostly be lies, complaints about the process, personal attacks on Democrats, and smears on the Bidens. But we'll see. Maybe they'll surprise me.

Wait, Happy Jerk posted another Veritas pile of trash from convicted felon James O'Keeffe? Shocking. Pretty much anything Veritas does can be ignored, they are even LESS credible than our resident Ridgeline humper.