• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

bad sandwhich

Members
  • Content count

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About bad sandwhich

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Profile Information

  • Location
    pub
  1. So, anyone from the 'Foilgate' end of things want to chip in with some intelligent chat? or will someone start a 'he jettisoned it last night at some point' thread?? Bloody well done Alex and Armel - smashing last editions winning time and a few records in between, top job.
  2. It was all bullshit. Go back to sleep - you've missed nothing. ta kindly, night all.
  3. Cant be fucked to look back through this thread after being in a place with no internet for what feels like an eternity.... Did Alex have a broken foil or was it all bullshit?
  4. j-80 conforms to Category 'B' of the EU Recreational Craft Directive - something pointed out to the Cowes Combined Clubs about 7 years ago. So they have a bit of paper saying that the boat is ok in waves up to 4m and Beaufort 8.
  5. here is the first-hand info I have (so for you, second hand), cut and pasted directly from an email the footage will be awesome, cutting keels, cutting rigs, damn impressive show Well semantically a rig isn't necessarily the mast. Could refer to the standing rigging. But it seems less likely that the mast is intact given it was dropped whilst the boat was on the reef. But we will find out soon enough. Just seems a shame if they did cut it up. So Clean, when do get the full video nasty? that's what were really interested in. We want a full Coxy voiced directors cut of the rescue plan and how well they stuck to it followed by a camera in the shed to watch daily progress of the re-build.
  6. I'm no shipping expert, but why go Mauritius-Italy by way of Malaysia? Me neither, but here is is on the internet so it must be true http://www.volvooceanrace.com/en/news/8188_Off-the-rocks.html and here (http://www.volvooceanrace.com/en/news/8192_A-job-well-done.html) he is talking about which bits could go into a new boat. its all bollocks until they actually start mixing the glue........
  7. Intentionally? Well they didn't do it by fucking accident did they! well that is the point. How did they lower the mast while on the reef? And how well did it go. All we know is there is a pic of the boat on the reef with mast up, followed by one with no mast, and the mast is nowhere to be seen, then a report that it is in pieces. Seeing some IBC containers filled with water holding the mast down to allow the keel to be cut away AND a stage of scaffolding with some IBC containers weighing it down, here's my theory: Drum roll please...... 1. Using the mast, pull the boat all the way over onto its side (given that the hull is buggered - a fair assumption), using the chain hoist to approx 2000kg of ballast in the IBC's. The angle is just enough to get some lifting kit under the keel whilst it is gas axed off. 2. Once the keel has been removed, crank the (now lighter) boat all the way over to near 90 deg as possible. Secure it to the tower anchored to the reef and weighted by a few more IBC containers. 3. Add substantial water buoyancy tanks to the rig and chop away the standing rigging to let it fall - here's the gamble, it may survive the removal process, it may not - either way getting 500 kg of mast off the hull is going to help the hull off the reef (Vestas #1 goal) 4. Now the rig is away from the boat (in one piece or a few), the hull can now be lowered from the weighted tower back onto the reef in a controlled manner. Whilst its up there further strops and tanks could have been added to the hull for its journey to the mother-ship. The beauty of this system is that the hull structure has been used as a fulcrum with the mast as a lever. The genius use of IBC containers that were probably floated into position by hand and filled with a generator. well..... how'd I do?
  8. Its been said before but a #8 hull ready to go will be at the top of everyone's list for the next edition of the race - less miles under the keel but just as capable. I wonder why it wasn't done? With more boats planned to be in the next edition of the race, and the whole "fairytale story, came from nowhere...." (and marketing Dollar invested by Vestas) I think it is in the interest of Volvo and Vestas to do something about getting the blue girl racing again. If it weren't then why are they shipping it from Mauritius to Malaysia? If they were going to chop it up for landfill they'd have done it on the dock in Mauritius, bailed up the carbon and shoved it in a container to get it off the island to a responsible(ish) landfill site. BS
  9. my 2p I guess they are going to get the boat to Mauritius where someone from Greens will go over the whole lot with an ultra-sound and write a list of new parts required. Then the make the call on who makes the parts and where. Then they have to make their mind up where they glue it all together. Makes a lot of sense building it in Greens then a shakedown sail across the pond to join the race in Brazil or Newport. However, Greens, I believe is v busy building Alex Thomsons next ride and another Wally Cento With sailing time from UK to Brazil (Vestas made it to the same lat as Itajai in around 20 days on leg 1) , I make that 13 weeks for all of the above to happen (17 weeks for Newport). The shipping sounds a bit painful. Coxy quoted as saying that the boat will go from Mauritius to Malaysia, then to Europe. My rough estimate 12 days from Mauritius to Malaysia then 27 days for Malaysia to UK that puts the stricken boat in a yard for Jan 30/31st this is not counting loading/unloading delays. This gives and build team 8 weeks in the shed for the boat to leave on March 28th and/or 12 weeks if they want to joint the party in Newport. if they can get on with making the new hull WHILST the broken boat is shipping to the yard then its not that painful. Anyone hazard a guess as to how long it would take to build another entire hull with interior bits, fit electronics, engine and hydraulics? If money were no object then fly the hull back to the yard from Malaysia, it should fit in an an An-124, should take less than a week for the aircraft to get where it needs to be and build a flight crate. I guess its the old time vs money debate - we're not talking AC budgets here are we? My guess is they'll aim for Brazil with an entirely new hull below the deck with new keel structure and ballast tanks. Any building delays and they can bump it back to Newport, if more, Lisbon etc etc best of luck to 'em
  10. Out on her royal yacht the queen was enjoying the sea air when she spied a man in the water off the port bow - clearly being menaced by a very large shark. Through her binoculars she could see it was Christian Ronaldo, struggling frantically to free himself from the jaws of a 20 foot shark! The queen ordered the captain to change course to try and save the poor man, but she knew the yachts top speed would never get them there in time. At that exact moment a speedboat containing three men wearing white England tops sped into view. One of the men took aim at the shark and fired a harpoon into its ribs, immobilizing it instantly. The other two reached out and pulled Ronaldo from the water and, using long clubs, beat the shark to death. They bundled the bleeding, semi-conscious Ronaldo into the speedboat along with the dead shark and prepared for a hasty retreat, when they heard frantic calling ...... It was the Queen calling them to the yacht. On reaching the yacht the Queen went into raptures about the rescue and said, "I'll give you a knighthood for your brave actions. I thought the England team would hate Ronaldo after the world cup. But I see that the England team are true heroes and should serve as a model for sportsmanship to other countries." She knighted them and sailed away. As she departed Rooney asked the others, "Who was that?!" "That," Beckham answered, "was our Queen. She rules the Commonwealth and knows everything about our country." "Well," Rooney replied, "she knows **** ALL about shark fishing. How's the bait holding up?"