jzk

Members
  • Content count

    4,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jzk

  1. jzk

    I was right again.

    If working under the table were really an advantage, there would be nothing stopping an illegal from getting a work permit, becoming legal, and then continuing to work under the table.
  2. jzk

    I was right again.

    I don't think that is as big a problem as you say. Paying someone under the table means the business can't deduct it. Most illegals work with fake ss numbers, pay taxes, and then can't get the refund or benefits. I bet if you established a work visa program whereby all illegals would be legal, 95% of them would sign up in the first day.
  3. jzk

    I was right again.

    Let's make them legal. Work visas for everyone.
  4. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    The role of the FBI here is to do background checks on nominees for the purpose of ascertaining whether they are a national security risk. They are not there to investigate potential state crimes. And further, a potential witness before the Senate Committee has no business demanding FBI investigations into a nominee.
  5. jzk

    Question's surround Kavanaugh's accuser

    Don't forget the talk show circuit. Ellen. The View. And if she is really being threatened, those people should be arrested. Immediately.
  6. jzk

    Question's surround Kavanaugh's accuser

    How do you know her life was threatened? Are there any suspects? We should prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. It is not acceptable to threaten anyone's life. Who are they?
  7. jzk

    Question's surround Kavanaugh's accuser

    I think she gets a book deal. Like Anita Hill did.
  8. jzk

    Question's surround Kavanaugh's accuser

    She has agreed to testify provided that the Senate committee can ensure her safety.
  9. jzk

    Question's surround Kavanaugh's accuser

    Has this harassment and death threats been reported to the police? What is the police doing about it?
  10. jzk

    Question's surround Kavanaugh's accuser

    Not to mention the $200k go fund me raised for her "security."
  11. jzk

    Question's surround Kavanaugh's accuser

    What kind of treatment? She is going from a nobody to a household name. And she is being held up as some kind of champion. Maybe she will write a book like Anita Hill did and do the talk show circuit.
  12. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    A down vote for opposing racism, sexism and ageism. I guess it is ok to be a racist, a sexist, and an ageist as long as you are the right kind.
  13. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    Yeah, here you are in full support of negatively referring to someone's age, sex and race. Not surprising.
  14. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    So you are a racist, an ageist, and a sexist all in the same sentence. Nice job!
  15. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    Fuck off if you are racist, sexist, and ageist.
  16. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    You judge people by their race, age, and sex?
  17. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    Is that all you got? Pathetic. I support protecting people to the fullest extent possible. That is really the only true purpose of government.
  18. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    If someone is abusing women, report it right away. That way, you can help prevent other abuse. Don't wait 30 years until it is politically convenient for you and might land you a book deal with bookings on the Ellen show et al.
  19. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    If someone does something bad to you, report it, so that they don't do it to anyone else. If that is not justification for you, don't speak up 30 years later when it serves you politically and maybe financially.
  20. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    +1. Very well said.
  21. jzk

    Question's surround Kavanaugh's accuser

    Where did he argue both sides? I have not seen it. It seems he said that not all legal scholars refer to Roe as the "settled law of the land." What side is he arguing when he said that?
  22. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    Maybe she wants to write her version of "Speaking Truth to Power."
  23. jzk

    Kaven-No?

    If I, who strongly oppose your political career, come forward 30 years later to report that you were driving drunk 30 years ago, I suspect you wouldn't not be convicted of a DUI.
  24. Copy and past. You can't even formulate your own arguments.
  25. Yeah, so much for you presenting an actual argument for anything. Not all that uncommon around here frankly. If your copy and paste didn't work, then you are basically out of commission.