pond sailor

Members
  • Content count

    545
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7 Neutral

About pond sailor

  • Rank
    Anarchist
  1. https://www.nap.edu/read/10881/chapter/5
  2. TABLE 3-2 Estimated Number and Per Capita Ownership (rate per 1,000) of Firearms in the United States, 1950 to 1999 Year Total Firearms Handguns Firearms per 1,000 Persons Handguns per 1,000 Persons 1950 57,902,081 14,083,195 381.3 93.5 1960 77,501,065 18,951,219 430.6 105.4 1970 111,917,733 31,244,813 548.7 153.2 1980 167,681,587 51,707,269 737.9 227.5 1990 212,823,547 72,499,181 853.3 290.7 1999 258,322,465 93,742,357 925.8 336.0
  3. Something else that has changed.........
  4. pond sailor

    Birthright Citizenship

    So what type of citizenship does that ruling pertain to? The child gained citizenship by being birthed in the US, wouldn’t that be birthright citizenship?
  5. It's not 352, Gargle Blaster is it?
  6. pond sailor

    The Blue Wave?

    Yes
  7. pond sailor

    Another rich guy dumps Trump publicly

    Well said Austin!
  8. pond sailor

    Nike....

    Agree also, feel it has a tendency to lead to jingoistic nationalism
  9. pond sailor

    To the Spineless Twit who Wrote NYT Op Ed

    Douglas Adams... “The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”
  10. pond sailor

    Nuclear Codes .............

    These are guys that run scenarios for a living......you don't think there's a course of action in place?
  11. pond sailor

    Vote D? Why?

    "why" Personally, I am completely disgusted in both my state (Missouri....see Eric Greitens) and the national republican party. I have never simply voted a straight ticket but am seriously considering it this November. In the last presidential election the republicans nominated the only person that could require me to, in good conscience, vote for Clinton. They have done nothing in the interim to be worthy of my vote. "what will they do differently" Perhaps nothing, but I will not condone the last 2 years with my vote
  12. pond sailor

    Drip Drip Drip

    I agree, not a problem “unless you lose your job”. I did, company went tits up. My point is why we’re they pushing an adjustable rate product in times of low rates. It was only going to tick down a point or two max. Adjustable rate is a product for times of high interest. It was a con to earn the originators the highest commission. They knew better and still wanted to screw the customer.
  13. pond sailor

    Drip Drip Drip

    Not all of it. My experience in a refi was to have a interest only adjustable rate mortgage pushed hard on me (didn't bite) to the point of having three levels of executives call and try to sell me on that product. I have excellent credit and rates were at about 4 1/4%. They were pushing that subprime product because they could earn higher commissions on it. They made very convincing arguments for it. Someone with less knowledge very well could have bought in and ended upside down when the market went south.
  14. pond sailor

    The Trump Circle completes

    Bonny and Clyde robbed banks so it’s okay.