• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Sandstone

Members
  • Content count

    1,543
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Sandstone

  • Rank
    Anarchist
  • Birthday 12/01/1972

Profile Information

  • Location
    West MI
  1. Trail Cameras

    I understand beef ribs and pizza boxes work rather well.....
  2. I have to wholly agree with Gaytor, Chuck D, and the ilk on this one (although I do currently have a 102.5 fever). Piss poor decision. The SC completely disregarded that the "members" of corporations or other entities are NOT in any way prevented from exhibiting free speech. Has any group of people ever agreed on 100% of anything? What in the case of unions.......Do ALL of the constituents whom forceably contribute to a union agree with the Unions choice in politicians/causes to support or with a Union's "message" at all? What of free speech then? Is free speech expendable for individuals in favor of corporations? This was not a matter of free speech but a way in which to perpetuate corruption on a much grander scale.