• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

ezyb

Members
  • Content count

    824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About ezyb

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Recent Profile Visitors

3,197 profile views
  1. Team UK

    Ok, you go tell the families of the attack victims that joking about a car mowing down people is funny and they should quit being precious about their loved ones.
  2. Team UK

    WTF? They published that this week of all weeks?
  3. Lone wolf - have you read it.

    I didn't even finish it. I'll admit I didn't have high hopes going into it giving Jimmy's love of cliches, but I made it as far as the Dogzilla challenge before I just gave up. Can't really see myself picking it back up.
  4. AC36 Auckland NZ

    Uhhh, wtf? The majority of the flags were on public property, but you are right in the fact that OR (yes the team, not ACEA) employed personnel did remove flags from private property against the wishes of the property owners. How do I know? Because two friends who decided to support ETNZ threatened to bring a trespass and willful damage suit against Oracle if the flags weren't restored to their original spots. They were returned the next day.
  5. Teams?

    Lol, because Land/Range Rover's are only sold in Europe. Better call the local dealership and tell them to shut things down
  6. Team NYYC

    That's about the limit of my Auckland real estate knowledge from 9,000 miles away I'm sure one of the locals will have a better idea as to whether there's any suitable spots outside of the city
  7. Team NYYC

    I think that's only residential, and from what I understand all of the land around the Auckland waterfront is leasehold so you can't technically "buy" it so it shouldn't be an issue
  8. Lone wolf - have you read it.

    I could tell from the few snippets I read here that it was going to be a mess. Very disjointed and the use of quotes without quotation marks drove me crazy so I decided to pass on it knowing I probably wouldn't finish it if I bought it. I guess that's what you get when you write and publish a book in ~3 months.
  9. Oracle Team USA

    It's definitely a road
  10. Oracle Team USA

    But I have to cross the road like a commoner to get to my yacht!
  11. Oracle Team USA

    Meh, no direct dock access. No thanks
  12. Oracle Team USA

    Ok, in that case why did he tighten the purse strings for AC35? OR most certainly did not have a blank check to work with so why do you think a non-AC series would be different?
  13. Team NZ

    Wait, is that their new PM? Maybe AC36 won't be so bad after all ....
  14. AC 36 Protocol

    Ashby Sails
  15. AC 36 Protocol

    Why do you keep persisting with this? We've explained it a dozen different ways to Sunday why you're wrong, yet you keep throwing out this "deed non-compliant" BS. When you can show us that each "replacement challenger" as you call them has to file a new challenge with each passing of the torch, then you will have a basis for your argument.