• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Wandering Geo

Members
  • Content count

    1,359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Wandering Geo

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0
  1. Never even seen a C scow but Harken have. http://www.harken.com.au/DeckLayout.aspx?id=46471
  2. Cone.
  3. ?? Looked to me like ETNZ pulled the pin twice. In the first, after they nearly lunched it at 12:20 and AR caught them. In the second when AR pulls out, looks to me like they cross ETNZ in the background already head to wind. I will have to go back and see if I can pick the mark rounding, but ETNZ may have an edge upwind and gets ground down downwind in those vids. Who knows what the real situation is. Love the wing only stuff tho. Looks like a big A.
  4. Flair?
  5. Might have to explain that to our non league playing posters.
  6. AR matt black wing? Which one is it
  7. If you are changing the angle of attack for lift, wouldn't the board be curved front to rear rather than helical. Helical to me implies changing lateral resistance as the board goes up and down. Guess there is no reason why it can't be both. They certainly have appeared to be well on the right side of the speed/handling line so far.
  8. Few more match racing videos up from 16 May. OR quicker than SBJT twice AR quicker than GTF (best foiling tack by AR at about 5:15 I have seen any team do) ETNZ quicker than GTF
  9. From the commentary, I was wondering if I was watching a different video. To me LBAR looked very competitive with ETNZ (about the same speed or slightly faster) but not as neat turning the corners. I hope ETNZ are still using old foils or this is may not be pretty.
  10. Now that is what I have been waiting to see. Nice.
  11. Apparently yes. Looks like they need a set of peddles on the bowsprit tho. Having troubles keeping the windward kinked lightwind foil out of the water upwind when archimedian. Nice to see them trying a few different things in the light. May have a significant effect in some races if the forecasts are correct (or will foiling first win it in the light stuff).
  12. Artemis seem to have figured out how to sail stably (albeit a long way out of the water) with all 4 foils down = good control in turns. They also seem to have a bit more articulation in wing than OR. At 2:07, hugh camber in lower section, possibly negative camber in top section, reconfigures at 2:12, then smokes OR on the reach. OR breaks down about 2:45.
  13. Thats not really a useful timing for the impact of a tack or gybe. Far more useful is windward foil down to new windward foil up. Different teams will have different processes, the crew position doesn't neccessarily reflect how fast the boat is tacking, a team could easily send the first guy across 20 seconds before the tack and the performance hit would be pretty negligible, but if it saved them several seconds of having two foils in the water the gains would be quite significant. Noted. Many ways to measure. I don't see why they would send someone across until they absolutely had too (more RM). Surely board up/down completely controllable from both sides (ie no need to send someone early). My thinking was that it just a clearly definable start/end point. Will have a look a couple of board down/ups when next viewing.
  14. Well based on a few videos, ETNZ appears to be playing in the same ball park as the others. No blinding speed shown, no supreme board/wing control, but up there. ETNZ complete tacking/gybing 5-10 secs slower based a very small sample. Bring on the racing foils.
  15. Noted, but it is shot from a long way off and they are not that far apart = relatively small parrallex error