• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About BeachbumII

  • Rank
  • Birthday 11/30/1973

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Location
  1. Don't call it a Comeback

    I watched the vids also and I didn't catch any meaningful pumping done by mainsheet either. BUT: What if the pumping is done by "racking" as in Hobie 16 you yank the windward stay? If I recall correctly this was exspecially banned in the class rules. This technique would not have been show on the videos I looked at. The movement of the stay would not have to be very big to achieve meaningful movement at masttop. I would presume the loads are HUGE and it is technically very hard to achieve. I also dont know if the force cretated would cause forward movement. Those pumping claims sound like booksellers to me.
  2. Well, compared to this disaster, Tin Can actually did quite well.
  3. Artemis?

    The straight hull with the buyoancy on the low part of the hull and relatively flat bottom makes Artemis look sitting low in the water and draggy. Its probably a semi-foiler concept and the flat areas are needed for planing and the straight hull for planing earlier. Also the daggersboards are well front, wich indicates a semifoiler too. The main beam is a forward V because of the foil postition.
  4. espo is a dick

    And we care because......?