• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Viscount

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

3,938 profile views
  1. At speed the breeze comes from the front apparently.
  2. .......Is it not common for franchises within American professional sport to be passed from rich owner to rich owner? And for those already in the game to vet and blackball any prospective owner/manager they are uncomfortable with. I.e to run the 'sport'/business like an old-boys-network/ego stroking machine with one-upmanship, rivalries and jealousies played out in a semi-public way. Taking the NBA precedent, for OR, Kiwi Black is the new Black.
  3. Leave it to sail world to send a pre-flintstone to interview the kids. Leave it to Sail-World to actually cover the event, with a highly-qualified crew, instead of largely ignoring it like other media outlets. Teams are thrilled. But hey, if you know better interviewers who are ready, willing and able to actually do a better job, then by all means send them to Sail-World. why is that highly qualified crew reading during the answers? Keeping up with the latest news on SA AC like all the other journos?
  4. Would it be in OR's interest for the RD to declare AR as being unsafe?
  5. ^^ everyone is thinking that!! AR comming clean would obviate the need for the RD to modify the class rule to allow OR to be more reliably competative. RC would have spent more hours on the minutiae of possible rule changes than LR/ETNZ in objecting. The 'safety' excuse, quite perversely imvho, creates the opportunity.
  6. Von Paulus, for history aficionados... Did he not surrender to a bunch of clod busters defending a Tractor Factory? (for tractor afficionados)
  7. I asked Sir David Attenborough for comment on the evolution of an AC 72 foiler. He was insightful in his response Evolution of an AC 72 OR 17.1: http://www.arthurgrosset.com/sabirds/photos/tacpat16461.jpg OR 17.1.5: http://lostworld.pair.com/trips/alaska2008/day7/IMG_1515.jpg OR 17.2.1 prototype http://www.flickr.com/photos/labavin/3939704589/ Artimis: http://www.joelhaasstudio.com/gooney.htm Meanwhile at ETNZ , G.D created NZ1: http://www.wilddelaware.com/wp-content/black-skimmer-10214.jpg
  8. That's just smart color coding. As everyone knows, man-parts are magnetically repelled by anything wearing leopard print. Looks like cougar print to me. They will be fully alert.
  9. I think the maroon was respondible for the paint job.
  10. + n
  11. Photoshopped.
  12. Skipper ®ejection device, IIRC.
  13. Portend!
  14. Make sure to get the 427 version. I love that commercial with the Vette ripping down the country roads. edit: also cool watching live in-car during the 24hrs of LeMans Saw a liitle of that too. In case you were curious, picked up a 6.2L version. Nicer than the photo'd one above but also a roadster, triple black. The 427's are just a touch too terrible unless you're a serious tracker. Love the Vette too (you know that), but this is what makes my heart beat extremely fast (and I'm not telling you whether the real toy is on the right or on the left side of the pic): See yours and raise you mine: (....and I am a tractor lover... cars like this should be R Rated)
  15. Approx 3 months