• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Rennmaus

Members
  • Content count

    7,843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Rennmaus

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0

Recent Profile Visitors

13,524 profile views
  1. ? I'd love to watch DZ again, there's nothing better - fastest or not
  2. You wrote that you are afraid of being bored. 2 sentences later you ask, why you should watch a slower boat when faster ones exist. Following that logic, you should be bored by DZ, because you witnessed the AC72s.
  3. Were the AC72s faster than DogZilla? Certainly. Nevertheless, someone claiming that DZ is boring, because there were the faster AC72s in SF asks for serious mental examination.
  4. Probably pronounced "Luxury Yacht". EDIT: I got it wrong, it's pronounced "Throatwobbler Mangrove".
  5. Just re-read the article, and stumbled upon this paragraph as well. Had to laugh out loud, hilarious
  6. Of course I have to add this again... EDIT: From here, worth a read (for all who were not here during AC33 at least): http://www.cupinfo.com/en/4-1-08-story-cup-found.php
  7. Thanks, I've hidden my double post (the delete function is gone since the "upgrade")
  8. Yacht Racing Forum posted this on Facebook: Grant Dalton on the next America's Cup: -Fair, with clear rules. And for the general public. Not alienating like Bermuda, there even the sailors didn’t understand what was going on. -Large and powerful monohulls, a development class. -Grinders are coming back. -The Deed of Gift requires that mutual consent be the basis for working with the challenger’s representatives. Only that, dazed by years of the defender’s regime, and with marionettes as Challengers of Record, we had lost sight of this.
  9. I love that! Actually, all we need is a YC that has a boat challenging another, foreign YC that has a boat too. Plus a couple of buoys, a committee boat with commitee and a strip of water... Voilà, an AC match! Hmmmmmmm, apparently that's not what any Def and Chall want.
  10. Cute, "equal" is the word. I also agree with your 2nd paragraph, a bit of choice between two AC boats (both within CiC and measurement of course) per team would add suspense. Re. protocol: Wasn't the AC32 proto the benchmark for a long time? IIRC, it was good, and almost everybody hereabouts and the teams liked it.
  11. I remember oh so well. Together with the choice of Bermuda a main reason of disappointment with OR's conduct of the last AC. ??? Prolly or in fact? BTW, SR was talking about AC33, and the conversation as such was about the Def sailing with the Challs.
  12. ^ Looks like you never read Ernie's initial protocol for AC33. Alinghi wanted to sail with the Challs until deep into the CSS/LVC. It was at least as bad ar OR's.
  13. But it so painfully served certain world views... Maybe I can see the hidden smiley the next time and just reply with an "Outch!" (Thanks for the explanation anyway)
  14. You apparently still have no idea how women tick. We're in the 21st century, it's time to get some ecucation. Then you may be able to refrain from prejudice/stereotyping/misogyny posts. Thanks. Apparently some chaps still regard women as inferior to men, so that "accusing" someone for being a woman can be used as a term of abuse.