• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

invictus

Members
  • Content count

    89
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About invictus

  • Rank
    Anarchist
  1. There are a few options on tracks, but we think Ronstan do some useful specials. Getting front and back to move in unison will be essential but again, there should be a solution somewhere.
  2. The challenges are about handling and coordinating tacks and gybes. We had this debate but concluded that a prototype was the best way forward. The prototype will have a Tornado rig, or similar, but all else will be as per that original picture.
  3. But you would lose massive amounts of time stopping and reversing. Not a problem when you are sailing across the Atlantic on one or two tacks, but not racing round the marks.
  4. 400KEu! Hang on, let me check the back of the sofa. I hope someone has that kind of money. I don't think we have had a champion not defend their title before in C class.
  5. "unhinged British yacht design", - there has to be a pun there on John Downey's "the hinge", but I don't want to see SHC split his sides laughing. :-))
  6. I think it's less complicated than foiler like Groupama and hydros. I think it's less complicated than foiler like Groupama and hydros.
  7. Yeah, but being AC means we will never get to see it.
  8. Here's the early sketch
  9. Paul Larsen shoĊµed me happy feet when I shared the initial sketches (see picture). He had been thinking along parallel lines. Yes, LOTS of training, and getting wet a few times also! I'm not clever enough to do the maths to work out dynamic stability, but having long legs should help; it's easier to control a bike with a high cg rather than a low one, but we are just going to have to find out. T foils will also help I think, as they are still efficient in mid manoeuvre.
  10. Kites would be illegal in c class. I remember reading about a cat called Jacobs ladder (with stacked kites) at Weymouth speed week. The picture showed it heading to the heavens, and the pilot falling in mid air about 40ft above the waves As for shifting the geometry around, I think centralising everything is a matter of releasing a cleat, but we will need mechanical advantage to haul back out on the other side. Thank goodness this is a 2 man boat!
  11. Technically it is, but it's a foiler first and foremost. Measurement is interesting, but I have cleared it with our measurer. Hulls are usually sized to provide full buoyancy on one hull, but I need both hulls to stay afloat. I've kept cost down by making the hulls symmetrical about a horizontal plane, so I only need one piece of tooling.
  12. DS for tacking/gybing, yes, as you say, I think centralise, execute manoeuvre, then reset to opposite tack. We need some tips from canoe sailors! N
  13. Thanks Steve, we have made the tooling for hulls and beams and foils, and a few sponsorship leads following the show.
  14. THAT IS DIFFERENT! and much more conceptually valid. You will have a good time building it, I believe your structural team will be burning a lot of computer time because the mechanism is not trivial and the consequences are pretty unpleasant if it goes even slightly wrong.Good Luck. SHC THAT IS DIFFERENT! and much more conceptually valid. You will have a good time building it, I believe your structural team will be burning a lot of computer time because the mechanism is not trivial and the consequences are pretty unpleasant if it goes even slightly wrong.Good Luck. SHC
  15. Ok, the picture doesn't show everything clearly. Rigging - there isn't any (the lines u see are trapeze lines, but I forgot to draw the rings etc on the leeward ones), and RM, well the racks, hulls and beams slide on curved tracks on the inside faces of front and rear beams. Yes, the foils are a bit long, but not ridiculously so; our RM is not compromised. The drawing shown is v similar to Will Sunnucks Vampire conversion which appeared at Foiling week.