• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

crux

Members
  • Content count

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About crux

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Good input - sounds like they may have passed the 3 to 6 days of load testing in the shed. Should they do well against ET - a challenge I admit, we may have to put Jasper on suicide watch. Same old bollocks SWS. Rather than deal with the facts as they are presented to you, you dish out crap. AR will not do well, even if they can make it safely to the line. This is NOT what I want (I prefer a strong workup for ETNZ), but rather is something that could be easily predicted (as I did) from about October last year. Despite the avalanche of evidence available, you however chose to troll by suggesting they were a strong team that could take out the LVC. Even now, you choose to persist in this folly. Tell me, when does your Mea Culpa come to pass? Or does than not factor in your personality? SWS is/has become worse than a troll and seems to be a paid shill as he(they) are on the forum 24/7 with a quick comeback for any criticism of the defenders.
  2. Can you post a link to the video(s) that conclusively prove that please? Not sure video would prove it anyway. Given that it's the AC there's a possibility that AR was sandbagging. I know PC said they thought the match up had shown that semi foiling was not good enough. I am just wondering what they can change with the first boat to make it faster, assuming they can't get it to full foil (and further assuming not foiling is the issue). All I can think of is layout (getting all the grinders on the windward side, plus making it easier to sail) and drag reduction? Or are they going to try systems for full foiling (foil control?) but on a semi foiling boat? Confusing! I am sure that foiling will not be a problem. I think that the existing hull shape will not help promote early foiling like TNZ/LR. They will have to have new boards and rudders and re-engineer their control mechanisms. And while they are at they might remove the central pod.
  3. I believe that would be the mooring bouy.