• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

chinabald

Members
  • Content count

    12,301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-1 Asshat

About chinabald

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Recent Profile Visitors

11,520 profile views
  1. WTF is up with this obsession with skin color??

    We have a senator like that here. Only its being a native american she claims
  2. WTF is up with this obsession with skin color??

    Assuming that means you self identify as the race you actually are.
  3. Jones wins.... what now?:

    "everyday variety blacks" just when you think one has seen everything this place has to offer.
  4. i want one ...

    What's it rate?
  5. This is an example of why we don't trust Gun Grabberz

    So you constantly ask people to reference learned people whose writings can prove that we have the right to bear arms. Meanwhile you already know the Supreme Court has decided. So there are your people with doctorate degrees who have written in favor. And they are the ones who count. On the second answer I do recall your stating ownership of guns. If you truly believe that we shouldn't have that right. Why do you own guns?
  6. "National Cleavage Day"

    Bra-vo
  7. "National Cleavage Day"

    Variety is the spice of life. Look at them all for the beauty they have, not the beauty they don't.
  8. That's not the article linked. Those aren't the people mentioned in the article. My reading skills are fine enough to see through your bait and switch.
  9. This is an example of why we don't trust Gun Grabberz

    At some point in time a man has to be willing to answer a simple question. I suppose it would be dangerous to answer a simple question if it makes him look hypocritical. Do you believe the second amendment gives us the right to own guns? Do you own any guns?
  10. What's the connection to the NRA? I read the article and it mentions a member of the NRA, it mentions setting up a meeting around the NRA convention, but where the actual connection to the NRA? For $35 anyone can be a member, and a convention of that size makes sense to have a meeting nearby. Sort of disguises the reason for being there. I'm a member of AAA, does my membership mean that my actions reflect on the American Automobile Association? Are my opinions the opinion of AAA? What if I met someone at an Auto convention, would my actions be the actions of AAA?
  11. This is an example of why we don't trust Gun Grabberz

    I don't think he knows. I don't think most of what he posts are his words or ideas. I already established that he keeps a searchable database of quotes and opinions that he has lifted from these threads, so if one day Jeff says his favorite color shirt is blue, Joe can pull a post from 2012 where you said a white shirt is the best shirt. I believe he cuts and pastes into a separate searchable database opinions of others from other forums. Ones that support the anti gun side. Then when presented with a question he searches for that in his anti gun database of opinions and he cuts and pastes the appropriate academic response. Unfortunately no one else can provide him with the answer to the question "what do you think?" So being incapable of independent thought, he can't answer.
  12. This is an example of why we don't trust Gun Grabberz

    Its interesting that not one soul on PA has debated a single historical fact... and then you, when presented with a simple yes or no question have bounced all around it and have not given CM the answer to the most basic of questions in this topic. Do you believe that individuals have a constitutional right to own a gun in the USA? Its either yes or no.
  13. NFL 2017

    How about this for a "never saw that before" moment. The Detroit Lions on defense played a down with 9 players. No one noticed to call a time out.
  14. This is an example of why we don't trust Gun Grabberz

    Because when seconds count the police are just minutes away. LEO carry weapons for their own protection. Protecting anyone else is a secondary benefit