• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Dog

Members
  • Content count

    23,762
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Dog

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0

Recent Profile Visitors

11,649 profile views
  1. Next up, John Conyers

    Neither did Moore, but I still think he should get out. Truth is, I don't know if the accusation against Conyers is credible, settling is not an admission of guilt. What pisses me off about his case is that he settled with our money.
  2. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    What about Family Values?
  3. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Character matters again.
  4. Next up, John Conyers

    Speaking of deflection. And BTW who do you think paid for the settlement?
  5. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    I fail to see the relevance but I think pussy grabbing is a worse offense than boob grabbing.
  6. https://apnews.com/d7e1192b89fa40d6a9c68d56e62cf2f8 In fairness to John Conyers in his case there were mitigating circumstances. His wife was in jail at the time for taking bribes while on the Detroit City Council.
  7. Next POTUS?

    Mark Cuban?
  8. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Correct you...I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. What do my responses suggest I would do, and how do they suggest I would do it?
  9. Next up, Bill Clinton!

    "It isn't in their chemistry", really you think your ilk is innately morally superior. Your self-righteousness is not reassuring, history is replete with examples of tremendous harm caused by those who believe in their own moral superiority....
  10. Next up, Bill Clinton!

    But who are the fooling? Their obvious duplicity already makes them what they hate.
  11. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    My response would be the same? What response of mine are you talking about?
  12. Climate news

    In a nutshell "It should be stated plainly: It’s capitalism that is at fault". https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/opinion/climate-capitalism-crisis.html?smid=tw-share
  13. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Dude...I believe Trump's "locker room talk" was a pathetic excuse for the Access Hollywood tape. I don't go around talking like that nor do I know guys that do.
  14. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Oh please...What I compared were two rationalizations. I compared Trump's dismissal of the access Hollywood tape as "locker room talk" and your dismissal of the violation of Leeann Tweeden as a "stupid attempt to get a cheap laugh among a bunch of boys". You have to admit they are very similar.
  15. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Fascinating.