• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Dog

Contact Methods

  • ICQ

Recent Profile Visitors

11,643 profile views
  1. Next up, Bill Clinton!

    But who are the fooling? Their obvious duplicity already makes them what they hate.
  2. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    My response would be the same? What response of mine are you talking about?
  3. Climate news

    In a nutshell "It should be stated plainly: It’s capitalism that is at fault". https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/opinion/climate-capitalism-crisis.html?smid=tw-share
  4. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Dude...I believe Trump's "locker room talk" was a pathetic excuse for the Access Hollywood tape. I don't go around talking like that nor do I know guys that do.
  5. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Oh please...What I compared were two rationalizations. I compared Trump's dismissal of the access Hollywood tape as "locker room talk" and your dismissal of the violation of Leeann Tweeden as a "stupid attempt to get a cheap laugh among a bunch of boys". You have to admit they are very similar.
  6. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

  7. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Just out of curiosity, what makes you think I don't believe Moore's accusers.
  8. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    You're making things up, I never compared the two. For what it's worth I think trying to fuck someone else's wife is worse than grabbing boobs. But I have to ask, you believe Trump to be a compulsive liar why is he believable on this?
  9. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    This is how Raz'r agrees with me.
  10. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    "It's obvious how Leeann would feel violated by that picture" Al Franken. Does that sound to you like Al's refuting it?
  11. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Oh...it was just a "cheap laugh among a bunch of boys". That rationalization belongs in the garbage along with Trump's "locker room talk" excuse. If some asshole pulled that shit on your wife I doubt you would be so cavalier. As to the accuser's credibility, what does it say about her credibility on the subject that there is photographic evidence supporting it and that Franken himself does not refute it?
  12. Next up, Bill Clinton!

    Yeah well now they need absolution, they need to clean their own house as a political predicate to their pursuit of Trump and Moore.
  13. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Of course it's not true....Have a nice day.
  14. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    Your claim that you determined the credibility of Roy Moore's accusers by watching and listening to them is not true is it?
  15. Roy Moore 3rd rail?

    "It's obvious how Leeann would feel violated by that picture" Al Franken And BTW I can see for myself how that picture is a violation...Can't you?