• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Uncooperative Tom

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Uncooperative Tom

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ
  • Skype

Profile Information

  • Location
    Punta Gorda FL
  • Interests

Recent Profile Visitors

22,893 profile views
  1. OK. 1. No. 2. I made no such statements. 3. Strangely erotic. Now, do you agree with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?
  2. So, Jocal, you agree with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?
  3. I wish. We're still stuck on feet per second.
  4. Uncooperative Californicators Only a couple more days for gun owners to comply and I doubt the attitude will change. Just as in Hartford, there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth when Uncooperative gun owners decide not to comply with the confiscation program. Some other things never change: Because locking more people up for longer is going to start working really, really soon and we'll get tired of winning the drug war. "Pro-gun" sheriff's happily enforce a stupid gun control law and then wonder how we get more of them.
  5. It occurs to me that Hodgkinson bought his guns legally in Illinois, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/washingtondc/news/press-releases/law-enforcement-shares-findings-of-the-investigation-into-the-june-14-alexandria-virginia-shooting Do you agree with jocal that Louisiana's laws caused those in Illinois? Or maybe you're on the same page as David Frum, who blamed Virginia's gun laws for the purchases in Illinois? Or do you believe that the gun laws in Illinois are "loose" and this is unrelated to other states?
  6. It goes to court if the administration tries spending money that it has been prohibited from spending. But that's not what will always happen. The administration might just not spend the money. I agree it won't become law but don't think the Israelis are the only reason. We have lots of politicians and allies who want to solve problems through war.
  7. Huh? I live every day under threat of death from nervous officers and so do you. Panic. Where have I tried to insist that gov't officals can impose death for lack of instant compliance? I don't believe that, have said anything like that. A proper straw man should have at least some passing resemblance to things the person has said.
  8. Hmm... the calm before the storm and fishing. I wonder what it's like to be incapable of boredom?
  9. So a strong wind hit and he cut a donated jib sheet. Some of the caulk and bungees were dislodged from the mainsail.
  10. This one goes between 26 and 27 knots with the 1986 15 hp Evinrude. It's terrifying.
  11. You neglected to mention where we can see your wife's knockers. Would you mind finding out to whom the $4k is owed? I suggested a GoFundMe to compensate unwilling enablers like the marina owner. And there's always the next rescue tow and the next unfortunate marina owner.
  12. Hmm... OK. Where in "the Midwest" exactly? Louisiana isn't the midwest, fyi.
  13. That wasn't the initial reaction related here, for example: That's consistent with my personal experience and with what I have heard from others who have been stopped while carrying a concealed gun. Some officers seem nervous, others seem not to care much at all, but all of them become very interested in your hands. I agree that there was not time for Yanez to see what, if anything, was being pulled out. His training told him not to wait to find out.
  14. Yes, I know the link I used. You should click it. You won't find much there to support your narrative but there's some chance you'll learn something.
  15. Sure, Joe. I guess since cert was denied and we're going to be stuck with it for a while, it's probably time I taught you what the case was about. The bolded part is where the court specifically says the issue they decided was not "about basic outdoor gun rights, if any." They carefully ignored that question to get to the result they wanted.