• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

benwynn

Members
  • Content count

    20,618
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About benwynn

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0

Recent Profile Visitors

10,381 profile views
  1. So it's okay for the President of the United States to tell a business who they should fire for what reason and to encourage customers to stop patronizing them, as long as they are not doing well already, Well done. It's almost as stupid as what Trump said. This Presidency is like a Twilight Zone episode with audience participation.
  2. I wish we had an adult in the WH. Even a 12 year old with above average maturity would be better than what we have right now.
  3. I wonder if show knows the words of a typical restaurant menu.
  4. Having a conversation with you being indicative of needing to "get a life" is a point worth consideration. Thank you.
  5. "Actually you have no clue as to the the definition of "core values" as evident by your lack thereof." "Core values are not something that change, that's why tiny hands the orange haired clown lost her support. " "I'm not here to defend Coulter's values " At this point, you are White House Press Secretary material. Consider sending your resume.
  6. NBC News released in February 2014 an undated Department of Justice White paper entitled "Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al Qa'ida or An Associated Force" in which the Obama Administration concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be "senior operational leaders" of al-Qaida or "an associated force" – even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.[129][130] However any such targeted killing operation by the United States would have to comply with the four fundamental law-of-war principles governing the use of force which are necessity, distinction, proportionality and humanity – i.e., the avoidance of unnecessary suffering. (Page 8 of [130]). The memo also discusses why targeted killings would not be a war crime or violate a U.S. executive order banning assassinations: "A lawful killing in self-defense is not an assassination. In the Department's view, a lethal operation conducted against a U.S. citizen whose conduct poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States would be a legitimate act of national self-defense that would not violate the assassination ban. Similarly, the use of lethal force, consistent with the laws of war, against an individual who is a legitimate military target would be lawful and would not violate the assassination ban."[129] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeted_killing This was back when President's got shit done, as opposed to tweeting about somebody hurting his fucking feelings on The View.
  7. Coulter on women who lost their husbands on 9/11 and who were critical of the Bush adminstration: "These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband's deaths so much." She'll say any despicable thing, as long as there's money in it. Core values, my ass.
  8. You're underestimating him. Moderate is an idiot capable of saying way more moronic shit than that. On this subject, he's probably just getting started.
  9. I think we should leave the fortune telling of complete strangers to Mickey Rat.
  10. But what is ironic is that they are future assholes who will be flipping people off. This making shit up about people isn't that tough.
  11. What the fuck? Do you have a resume on her or something?
  12. Looks like Alex Jones finally found someone he can beat up on. As long as it's not in person, as she'd probably kick his ass.
  13. At least Rush is breaking the monotony of Trump being the only one saying really stupid shit every day. Now we've got a tag team for Dolt of The Day.
  14. Probably around the same time they learn to write legibly and use punctuation. In the meantime, go fuck yourself. Bitch.
  15. I think the Dems finally figured it out. Trump doesn't give a shit about party or the country. He cares only about himself and those who stroke his ego. I figure it had to be tough with Obama, Bush, and those before. You had to do your homework, and make a case for something being good for the people and country. With Trump, you just tell him how great he is. Take him out to dinner and laugh at his jokes. Done deal. "That crowd size at your last rally was spectacular. The biggest I have ever seen! Oh... and by the way... Can you sign this?"