• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About PYC

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Moth, A class, F16 & F18HT sailing.
  1. Absolutely. 10 seconds differences between two boats makes 35m at 7kts and 200m at 40 knots. Visually and tactically, it's not the same thing at all.
  2. BenchWarmer, you are right: so far no semi planning cat has shown superior performances (I still remember the F5, done in the 80's by Fred Frilloux...). But things might be different here. I think this is the first time a light cat, single handed with genaker has semi planning hull. All the parameters are good : very light boat + loads of power. Remember than before ETNZ found the right combinaison, no fully foiling multihull showed better performance than regular displacement boats. We'll see if ITA is right. Anyway, this project is too interesting to be trashed now.
  3. Watch the topics on the first page : weta, nacra 15, diam 24, phantom essential, whisper 18. All development class... Everybody has the right to create new one design boats except Petrucci ? I have raced nacra, hobie, international foiling moth, bimare and A class. I have more than 30 years of sailing behind me. I am not in the sailing business. And I am not racing anymore. If I want to buy a foiling boat from ita16 if he creates one that fits my needs, would you call this lack of objectivity, or experience? Last thing: nobody forces you to buy the S1. And if it is a good boat, then it is very interesting for the future.
  4. With people like you, WetnWild, the first catamaran would have never been created. The S1 could be a "modern" version of the Shadow, by Y. Loday. Many years ago, I was happy that Bimare created the 18HT (in fact I preferred the first version, with less sail area). Thanks to them, I was sailing a boat that was much easier for me and my wife than the big 180kg's F18. Now, I really enjoy sailing their X16F, which is perfect for us. Is the viper better? I don't know. Maybe. But I don't care, I enjoy sailing my bimare and it is enough for me. I would like to try their S9. This S1 seems to me very interesting. If I sail it one day and I don't like it, I will criticize. But now, I have no data showing me it is a bad boat. I hope one day they will do a double handed foiler. I will buy it immediately.
  5. I don't really believe they could be so wrong in every aspect. I suspect that either design or built was a complete mess, leading to sailing, personnel, schedule issues... etc.. I think that poor design was the starting point of all their problems: The whole project definitively failed when JK put his final signature to the drawings.