• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.
    • B.J. Porter

      Moderation Team Change   06/16/2017

      After fifteen years of volunteer moderation at SA, I will no longer be part of the moderation team. The decision to step aside is mine, and has been some time in the works but we did not wish to announce it in advance for a number of reasons. It's been fun, but I need my time back for other purposes now. The Underdawg admin account will not be monitored until further notice, as I will be relinquishing control of it along with my administrative privileges. Zapata will continue on as a moderator, and any concerns or issues can be directed to that account or to the Editor until further notice. Anyone interested in helping moderate the forums should reach out to Scot by sending a PM to the Editor account. Please note that I am not leaving the community, I am merely stepping aside from Admin responsibilities and privileges on the site.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About KiwiJoker

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Location
    Auckland, NZ

Recent Profile Visitors

8,332 profile views
  1. Just watched Day Two, all three races. TNZ sure hit form with three perfect starts that morphed into three dominant races. Quite amazing really. Too bad they didn't really get it all together on Day One
  2. Fixed it for ya!
  3. Agreed. If it comes to that there is not sufficient loose cash in NZ to support a second defender candidate. To think otherwise is ludicrous. OTOH Ellison could have invited other defence candidates. He could even have offered generous terms and conditions. He didn't cos he didn't want to risk sharing.
  4. Scoop schmoop! Trifling tidbits from the Herald staff on assignment in Bermuda. So fucking shallow. For a decent and insightful read, check on what Kiwi Cup veteran Murray Jones believes. Take your time to read this article today from Suzanne McFadden in the Newsroom website: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/@sailing/2017/06/21/35239/oracle-wont-catch-us-team-nz-coach Oracle won’t catch us: Team NZ coach “Captain” Murray Jones doesn’t profess to be a mind-reader or a fortune teller, yet he thinks he has a fair idea of what will be going on inside the walls of Oracle Team USA right now. Whatever they’re plotting, Jones is sure it won’t be enough to overcome the all-round supremacy of his team, Emirates Team New Zealand in the 2017 America’s Cup match." No Suzanne is not writing from Bermuda. This is from her waterfront home office overlooking the upper reaches of Auckland's Waitemata Harbour. It's our loss that her newcomer media employer can't afford to fly her to Bermuda. It's our gain that despite that drawback she's so well-connected that her reports leave Dana's ramblings far astern.
  5. Unlike Sting I've just worked my way systematically through all the posts in this thread. Perhaps the most surprising and encouraging thing is the realisation that virtually all commentators here and elsewhere think that Oracle, Jimmy and co, are screwed. Near 100 per cent unanimity. Read the pieces from Brit sailors/sailing writers Mark Jardine and Matt Sheahan, both of whom hold faint hope for American chances. Sheehan's piece was particularly good. Oh, yes! Tom Ehman has reversed his prediction to a Kiwi win. Dana quotes Glenn Ashby after he observed the Americans back on the water today. He noted some changes in "sailing technique." whatever that means, and wing trim. For sure oracle now has four days of race video and performance info that they can analyse. No big boat changes though. The comparative performance characteristics of the two boats in wind speeds over 12-14 knots is still a mystery but the forecast is for light air. We may never know. Tactics may still be a hopeful avenue for Jimmy. He's bound to be aggressive but lacking speed he can't do a lot. With more demonstrated speed and agility plus three points in the bag, Burling can afford to play it cool in the start box.
  6. COR

    You're on the right track here but it won't be a "spectator boat." It will be the yacht occupied by the Commodore of the winning syndicate and his select guests. Strictly private. The pre-agreed challenge, aka the "Hip Pocket Challenge," is proffered and accepted as the finish gun sounds. Let history be our guide. It's well established that a potential challenger is selected by either competing team well in advance. One exception. Michael Fay's legitimate Deed of Gift challenge to SDYC in the absence of challenges after six months provided ample emphasis of the need for that. Oracle and ETNZ will already be deep into consultations with their preferred challengers. There will probably even be a draft Protocol outlining the boat designs and terms for AC36. Likely challengers if Jimmy pulls his chestnuts out of the fire? My guess is Japan and Dean Barker. Second choice BAR and Sir Ben. If ETNZ continues on its winning track it will be Italy's Patrizio Bertelli and Luna Rossa, assuming that the ageing Cup fan is up for one more joust.
  7. Draper and Outteridge commentary. That should be excellent value. I'm a Kenny Read fan but his commentary on the ACTV Sky feed here in NZ is flat and uninspired. I blame a direction team that is urging him to dumb it down. So does anyone have ideas how I can view the NBC feed here in NZ without jumping through all kinds of hoops. Doesn't even have to be live
  8. I agree ETNZ's crew will turn in a winning performance in heavy air. They have greater control over foils and the wing, after all. What I wonder about is the Kiwi foils vs Oracle. There's this nagging concern that the Defender might have an edge when it blows, given the computing, tech and construction resources they were able to call on for foil construction.
  9. I have to admire your persistence in defending LE. Who knows where he'll end up. A week or two back Coutts sent up a trial balloon saying he might step down. It could have won him a face-to-face with the money or an invitation to not let the door hit him in the arse. One thing is certain. If the Kiwis prevail there will be changes at Oracle Racing and they won't be tweaks!
  10. Jasus wept! You couldn't even get straight one of the great Aussie pub insults of all times it goes like this: "He wouldn't shout in a shark attack."
  11. OK, then, please enlighten us why Jimmy has been so circumspect in his starting manoeuvres? Dunno exactly what Indio had in mind when he said "Lack of hydraulic power for the close-quarters frequent manoeuvres" but I took it to mean that Jimmy was aware of his limited hydro vs the Kiwis and was thus husbanding his resources for further down the race track.
  12. OK, this is SA and anything goes. Still it's disappointing seeing the knee-jerk responses to a shallow and ingenuous query from a Newbie. Jesus wept! The team is only one race up. Time enough to debate if and when its on its way back to Auckland.
  13. So apart from your pathetic attempts at the English language and disdain for the sheila you've got it in for Gladwell. And only for the last 20 years. That makes you a newbie, Bruce. Tells us a lot. To repeat, fuck off Ocker!
  14. You are a fucking Ocker twit supreme! And an idiot to boot, Some of my best mates are Ozzers but you give the sunburnt country a bad name. Gladwell has a long and good reputation as a senior sailing jurist and breaks his balls bringing us fair and accurate coverage from all over the world 24/7. He's pure gold. And your "alleged female journalists"? Actually they are all real females, part of the pussy brigade, even if their questions are questionable. May all the chips, shitty or otherwise, fall on your empty and hapless head.
  15. Five or six posts with zero, zilch, nada, about the current thread. Not only that but the initial story is a six-year-old relic from an Aussie-owned newspaper that went nowhere. Dead easy to put you on ignore, sport. You're a waste of space.