• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Raz'r

Members
  • Content count

    31,857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Raz'r

  • Rank
    Anarchist
  • Birthday 09/28/1963

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    San Francisco Bay
  • Interests
    Rum

Recent Profile Visitors

21,046 profile views
  1. Who's screwing them over? 7 of the states with the highest rates of Medicaid and SNAP voted for Trump. Seems like they want to get punched in the gut. Like the lady who's husband was deported. Folks need to see that their votes have consequences.
  2. Have I liked it? No. I think that the wealth disparity is the biggest danger that the US of A faces. Am I experiencing a bit of shadenfreude in watching the deplorables take a fist right to the face, yeah. I voted for the leadership that would have raised my taxes, transferred that wealth to the bottom 50%, but probably wouldn't have taken on the wall street barons who pay cap gains rates on income. The deplorables voted for the leadership that wants to completely blow up the welfare state, except for some reason SS. Got to let them still think they're getting something I guess. And I will personally be better off than under the alternative. So my thanks to the deplorables for scraping together what little they have, and giving it to me.
  3. IMHO, the only workable solution I've seen for Jerusalem would be making it an international protectorate. But neither arguing party will buy into that.
  4. But your tax cut will be welcome, no?
  5. that's his point. ONLY a non-american would do it that way in casual correspondence. I guess I should turn in my passport...
  6. Actually, TMSail was sending out a dog whistle. Not that he thought it up originally, I won't give him that much credit, but I bet you'd find this criticism over on Drudge or one of the other trash right sites. the Whistle is aimed at the alt-right and goes something like this: "See! Obama really ISN'T an American - he doesn't write the date like a REAL american!" Likely Alt-right writer quote.
  7. I can guarantee you that we use the int'l standard in communications at the last 4 multinationals I've worked at. It's just easier to use a single standard. And no, I don't know if the engineers use Metric - given most distances discussed are down at the atomic level....
  8. Well, I for one am damn glad that the Deplorables are reaching deep so as to give me a tax cut. I promise to offer up a few more shekels on occasion to express my thanks.
  9. fuck. worse thing is, likely little to be done. they will probably find that the fucktards that did this were likely radicalized over the internet, and are home grown. The mayor is right in one way, I recall the "terrors" when it was catholics setting off pipe bombs in London. It wasn't that long ago. Further back it was the Blitz. The Brits have a mature way of dealing with this, which is to keep living life. probably the only real response. Yeah, the security cordons might get bigger, but there will ALWAYS be soft targets.
  10. Someone who understands that no one else uses the American 7-23 convention? because 7-4 could be July 4th, or the 7th of April? Is this a new conservative/liberal schism?
  11. Some things should just be private...
  12. Seems like he's found the limit of what hate people will tolerate.
  13. One closer to the ground
  14. Maybe. I think they are the actions of a man seeking widespread adoration. All he's gonna get is widespread derision. Funny thing is, the motive doesn't really matter. Obstruction is obstruction.
  15. They're jews. What's wrong with a little flesh?