• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Mohammed Bin Lyin

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Mohammed Bin Lyin

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Location
    Dar Al Harb
  • Interests
    12 countries with Islam as the state religion have the death penalty for atheists (apostasy), consider that fact before calling someone a racist Islamophobic Xenophobic bigot for criticising Islam.

Recent Profile Visitors

3,178 profile views
  1. Eating the elephant one bite at a time

    The Africans eat these elephants, probably a long walk to a local KFC or Mc Donalds. The poorest people in the world rely on hunting to eat. Big job carving up elephants for the BBQ. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CdtOSPXADM
  2. Bring your gun to church week.

    Not many Australians go to church, Howard's gun laws outlawed shotgun weddings in 1996 along with owning guns for self defence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion_in_Australia
  3. The big swinging dick problem

    I guess some have swinging dick and knee problems.
  4. Eating the elephant one bite at a time

    The dim wits will tell us it's much better for a poor country to have rangers on minimum wages shooting these animals instead of fleecing wealthy white people who would do it. Since there is no outrage when black people in Africa cull these animals and severe butthurt and outrage when a wealthy white person pays for doing what would have been done anyway I can only guess those who oppose it are racists.
  5. Pachyderm disaster (poll)

    Zimbabwe is going to cull these animals anyway due to overpopulation, of course the leftards would prefer some black man on minimum wages culls these animals instead of having wealthy white men paying outrageous amounts of money to do it. The leftards like to think they're morally superior in telling Africa what they should do with these animals they prefer to take money away from poor black countries by trying to stop white people from spending their money shooting these animals that are going to be shot anyway. I like this video it claims Trump's sons kill a Triceratops on a hunting safari and the leftists believe it, I thought the lefties claimed to be smart they certainly show their idiocy for all to see in this video- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc4Mi4ocyDw
  6. Why the Focus on Gunz?

    I applaud your effort JBSF, but it fails. About 2500 people die in house fires every year, compared to less than a hundredth of that in the suburbs by unknown home invaders I keep a fire extinguisher near the kitchen, my missus does Kung Fu cooking she could kill you with one pork chop. I also have comprehensive car insurance and haven't made a claim for over 30 years yet I feel having car insurance is worthwhile, I can't use my guns for self defence that is prohibited with our laws yet Bows and Arrows are legal, if someone breaks in I will pin him to the wall and let my dog chew on him until the police arrive, since police response times are around 20 minutes it's going to be real messy by the time they arrive. Probably be easier to just shoot the cunt but I can't do that so have to improvise.
  7. Why the Focus on Gunz?

    Sticking with your own reference source, consider a later paper (2010, rather than the dusty 2003 one you found) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20402605 Your link says there was an increase in hanging suicides while firearm suicides declined which is exactly what the study I linked said, the gun grabbers never mention this fact when they cherry pick a decline in firearm suicides, as long as people are hanging themselves and not using a firearm the gun grabbers think they have achieved something. Suicides have been increasing looking at this data from 2007 to 2016, since hanging is the most common method perhaps this nanny state should regulate string and rope which is lethal considering over 55% of all suicidal people use this lethal method, is that the consideration to limit availability of lethal methods we should look at? http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by Subject/3303.0~2016~Main Features~Intentional self-harm: key characteristics~7
  8. Why the Focus on Gunz?

    Hanging has become the most common method for suicide in Australia, the gun grabbers never mention this fact when they cherry pick a reduction with firearm suicides. The gun grabbers think they have achieved something by quoting a reduction in firearm suicides in Australia since our 1996 gun laws, since they never mention the simultaneous increase with hanging suicides it's clear they don't give a fuck about those who hang themselves. Suicide should be treated as a separate issue it makes no difference what method they use.
  9. This is An Example of Why We Don't Trust Gun Nutterz

    Any of the gun grabbers care to comment on this article? Should there be stricter enforcement with banning those who do domestic violence from having guns since many of them have done mass shootings?
  10. This is An Example of Why We Don't Trust Gun Nutterz

    I think police shootings should be a separate category and not added to gun death figures, there are times when a good guy (cop) with a gun needs to shoot someone to stop them hurting anyone else. For some reason nobody really gives a fuck if the police shoot a white criminal who attacks police yet when the police shoot a black criminal who attacks the police it's a fucking outrage, perhaps this could be why some like to include justifiable homicides by police in gun death figures. When people are happy to include justifiable homicides by police in shooting criminals with gun death figures it shows me they aren't happy with police shooting people who in many cases were shooting at the police.To me it's clear these people are siding with criminals when they include justifiable homicides by police in gun death figures. In Australia the police are not required to have a firearm license should we count their suicides at their workplace in with firearm suicides when our firearms licensing makes them exempt from having a firearms license? http://www.news.com.au/national/afp-officer-workplace-suicides-headquarters-scene-of-second-tragic-death/news-story/9a5f32d96b34b696307f9b17d316fe32
  11. This is An Example of Why We Don't Trust Gun Nutterz

    If it doesn't work in Pusstralia what makes you think it will work there?
  12. I still call Australia home

    The top 9 electorates to vote NO are all held by Labor.
  13. This is An Example of Why We Don't Trust Gun Nutterz

    I thought California had an assault rifle ban along with magazine capacity restrictions, did these laws fail to prevent this? Can we add this guy to this list?
  14. This is an example of why we don't trust Gun Grabberz

    You are happy to ignore your constitution when it comes to the 2A. As Jeff suggested maybe looking at amending other constitutional rights might save more lives compared to amending the 2A, we have Firearm Prohibition orders here which allow the police to search anyone subjected to one without a warrant, since criminals don't register their guns would Firearm Prohibition orders be Kosher/Halal for you with removing firearms from those who should not have them? (2) A police officer may: (a) detain a person who is subject to a firearms prohibition order, or (b) enter any premises occupied by or under the control or management of such a person, or (c) stop and detain any vehicle, vessel or aircraft occupied by or under the control or management of such a person, and conduct a search of the person, or of the premises, vehicle, vessel or aircraft, for any firearms, firearm parts or ammunition. (3) In this section, premises includes any place, whether built on or not. https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/act/1996/46/part7
  15. This is an example of why we don't trust Gun Grabberz

    Registration cannot keep good guns out of bad hands , our NSW police minister says greater than 97% of all gun crime is done with unregistered firearms at 1 min 20 seconds- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKXLxKX8RgQ