• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Bent Sailor

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Bent Sailor

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Location
    Lake Macquarie
  • Interests
    Software Development
    A Good Yarn with Mates
  1. It's not. Given that said "calling out" tends to be one sided, it is somewhat hypocritical however. I get it though, I've told jocal before he needs to tamp it down and having done my civic duty, generally scroll past his attempts to taunt Tom. Perhaps you've called out Tom in the past and are doing the same. Not yet, but give it time. You too, with a modicum of effort and no self respect, can join the ranks of Tedious Tom and Princess Jeffie if only you stick to being a dick at all times.
  2. Indeed
  3. Pretty much. I find the guy's need to deflect/distract from that pretty lame too, but that doesn't change the fact he was hoping to do so.
  4. Correct. If I rejected the use of another definition when it was offered, that would show a preference. I didn't do so. However, if you pretend the issue is that I somehow prefer something I have stated actively I do not, then you can continue quibbling about nothing rather than acknowledge the differential between our countries - the basis of why I am shocked by school shootings and you find them an excuse for amusing yourself. Nothing. I never said their was nor started the thread. Take your issues with whether it is political or not up with those arguing that. Or you could just continue making up people's positions, preferences, and beliefs for them. You haven't changed that schtick over the last seven years, why start now?
  5. Uh huh, and you're acting like you're on another bender looking for a target now BJ's not around to rile up. Do you have a point RD, or are you just using PA as a place to whine some more?
  6. Well, I suppose even a parrot can look intelligent if he repeats something intelligent. Well done, RD, that's a step up for you.
  7. Ah, so that explains why PA's foremost movie critic gets a pass. I get it, only so much time in the day and all that.
  8. "Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it." - George Santayana “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results” - Albert Einstein
  9. It's not close to Obama tapping Trump's phone. No.
  10. Bent does not prefer a definition. You are, once again, wrong.
  11. Yes, because that is exactly what they said they were doing. Well, it's a good thing you don't even claim basic street smarts. We'd never stop laughing.
  12. Because the vitriol my Irish friends have for the British from those days is quite bitter and they personally wouldn't countenance a statue of those officers. I'd also never heard of any memorials depicting the paramilitary groups in Ireland. Frenchie showed me I was wrong to conclude as I had from that. I was wrong. He was right. That makes it, by definition, one of those "you are right and I am wrong" things. It's exactly how those things work. Put the bottle down and take a look at what you're writing, RD. You're not making any sense.
  13. You're right frenchie. I was wrong and quite shocked the Irish continue to keep statues of their recent oppressors.