• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

3to1

Members
  • Content count

    1,272
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

18 Whiner

About 3to1

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Recent Profile Visitors

19,126 profile views
  1. it'd be harder to drive down, but it would be the lesser of two weevils.
  2. yea, that traveller car went nuclear, looked too violent to my untrained eye. easy to say this from a couch, but why not blow a lot of vang, mostly center the traveller, then a hard grind on the mainsheet to bring the boom around with a big controlled sheet ease once it's past centerline? maybe dumping all that mainsheet fast enough would be tricky?
  3. Climate news

    he's willfully blind and is arguing just to argue. deep down, he knows he's wrong.
  4. Climate news

    you're quite the condescending but hilarious wise ass, old boy, and also wrong on this issue. why don't you try forgoing the holdout routine and err on the side of caution considering our role on this planet has essentially become that of a poisonous parasite; our greatest legacy here will be that we killed the fkn' place. doesn't get any darker than that.
  5. Climate news

    cult? like I said get real, you pulled that out of your crapper, exactly like you did assuming I don't sail. textbook flail.
  6. Climate news

    you're on to something legit here, they're all career liars. get real, wise ass.
  7. Climate news

    Jennifer Appel? nice flail, that means nothing here.
  8. Climate news

    sounds like Bates had a brain fart.
  9. Climate news

    just like you do with data that doesn't bolster your narrative, your article is only as 'interesting' as one chooses to make it, innit. in the end, I'd bet if a bunch of climate scientists read this thread, you'd officially become the shit poster.
  10. hey old boy, didn't that smug, pompous butt hole in your avatar go down with the ss titanic?
  11. seems like that'd be something hard to f up, and even harder to not correct.
  12. as usual, so eloquently full of patronizing shit. most of the country has zero interest in your 'discourse', but here's mine; how about instead, you stop voting for the poisonous rat bastards who'd sell everyone and everything down the road to attempt to satiate their sociopathic greed and further their corporatist agendas. because it's transparent, don't think for a second that people are fooled by the reich wing meat grinder.
  13. Climate news

    you're nothing more than a dime-a-dozen reich wing moral reject, fuck your petulant willful ignorance.
  14. probably best not to stress about it, this place will always be one part shit-show. personally, I think it's kind of funny while still being really informative, thanks to a few who put in the effort to make it so.