• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

ntman

Members
  • Content count

    1,448
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About ntman

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0
  1. I've never fully understood the copyright argument. My understanding of copyright is that you own exclusive rights to the expression of the idea but not the underlying idea itself. ie an author of a communist manifesto will own the copyright to his words about communism but not the idea of communism itself. If this is the correct understanding, isn't isaf really just in the business of selling rule books as the copyright holder? if the club or association using the rrs doesn't actually republish them in anyway but uses them to run assailing race is it really a breach of copyright? Happy to be corrected on any of these ideas though by someone who knows more on this.
  2. bit of an issue to sort in the yard as well
  3. So one of the other classic Australian ocean races has opened entries to multihulls ( pittwater to coffs) and then all the multi owners who may be able to compete bitch and moan about the safety standards and how hard and expensive it all is and want the established standards changed.
  4. the best sorted one i know of is rolls ross' boat. he has an electric keel lifting winch. downwind in light air get the bum out of the water. downwind in heavy just put it where it feels right. they plane pretty happily but tight reaching in heavy air is hard work.
  5. 49er rig folded in the bay to bay - not sure of the reason but i can guess.
  6. sweden i believe or maybe denmark
  7. does that mean you don't know yet?? :-)
  8. I may have missed something from earlier in the thread but if everyone finishes where they are at 1200hrs how can the event be handicapped fairly if the boats don't sail the same course?
  9. it would be hard from a legal perspective to charge a backpacker to come on as race crew without the boats being in survey. perhaps a charter company might like to participate and perhaps commercial entries might pay a bigger entry or pay a percentage of takings or whatever.
  10. I would agree with GS. the purpose of the one lapper was to enable people who couldnt participate in the full event be able to race and feel like part of the bigger race and its higher ideals (raising money for a good cause). If as GS suggests it is a renaming or changing of an existing event then I would suggest that you encourage them to similarly make it a charity benefit event while keeping the HCW one lapper a part of the HCW 24hr regatta. however just my 2 cents.