• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About TJSoCal

  • Rank
  1. Thank you both. I wish I had more time to contemplate and respond. I was at Jury Duty all day and now find my self on a week long (projected) criminal trial. Oh boy, I will do my civic duty. Glen, I would love to know who the West Coast Group (contacts) that were involved are. They need to be talked too about their actions. RazR, like I said, "You cannot legislate STUPID." I fear Small Boat (30' to 24') Coastal Sailing is dead for the foreseeable future until something is done with the USS SER. give me a week. Having prepped a 23'9" boat for coastal and offshore sailing, I don't think any thing in the SER is that hard to meet. Do I love having 18" lifeline, no, but it its that hard to have two sets (bay and ocean). With new triducers (temp, depth and speed) you only need one thru-hull. Renting a raft and EPIRB are not that big of a deal. I remember back in the day NOSA published their own N2E safety requirements and as I recall they required some form of a raft. SER Coastal requirements don't, and I don't see anything in N2E NOR or SIs that add it--so for N2E I don't think a raft is required unless doing the Long Course.
  2. Blaming low N2E participation on SER makes only slightly more sense than blaming it on their not advertising on SA. Read the category definitions, N2E is clearly Coastal. And other than the requirement for a newish VHF and an EPIRB it doesn't seem like there would be that much additional expense for the average boat. Heck, NOSA doesn't even make you buy PFD leg straps...
  3. Bicycle riders tend to be the same way about helmets - if you're wearing one you're safe, if not you're pretty much dead. Ignoring that the helmet doesn't really protect legs, shoulders, collarbones, internal organs, etc.. I generally wear a helmet, but they practically didn't exist when I was a kid and we did a lot crazier stuff on our bikes back then than I do today. But heaven forbid we should make our own decisions (and take our own responsibility for them) about our own personal safety...
  4. I did say "roughly nobody." So rounded to the nearest 3...
  5. Despite my respect for the knowledge and opinions expressed by all on SA and various other internet forums, there's your answer right there... Maybe see about a second (medical) opinion from someone who specializes in sports medicine--would probably be more up to speed on latest treatments and also more sympathetic to you wanting to regain full function and get back on the water as soon as possible.
  6. Transpac may be having an effect, There was some uncertainty about the Safety at Sea requirement but it was formally waived for this year back in February so I doubt that was a deterrent. Online Coastal course is now available and costs $50--less than a decent bottle of scotch. One thing I'm fairly certain of is that roughly nobody said "well if Sailing Anarchy isn't promoting N2E, I'm not going..."
  7. If you just do it search you can find all the content on cougars and how they ruined the party you can stand...
  8. What kind of ego does it take to lose to Dennis Conner and blame it on him cheating the class rules?
  9. All good discussion but...weather? For the race?
  10. Any weather updates? Definitely not too early now...
  11. On a typical SoCal spring evening (light to moderate southwesterlies) sailing into King Harbor under jib alone is probably a piece of cake. My guess is this boat and crew have done it dozens of times. But in that breeze and swell you probably can't get the bow around without the main. Seems like they might have been better off keeping the main up at least until they were behind the breakwater. That said, anyone who's never found themselves being complacent when conditions indicate they shouldn't please raise your hand. Mine is staying down. Still hoping we get the full story from the folks onboard.
  12. I'm impressed that the crew were wearing PFD's, I suspect a lot of us complacent SoCal sailors might not have been. But I shudder to think what that would have looked like if those guys had been tethered.
  13. Not going to second-guess because I wasn't on the boat, but I'm looking forward to hearing the story from someone who was - and glad they're all still around to tell it.
  14. This is an instance where common sense should prevail. It's a simple math error. Everyone should want an equitable outcome for all involved. I agree that a "fair outcome" would be to simply correct the math error. If races are re-handicapped based on elapsed time from previous races this should be fairly simple, but if the handicap adjustments are based on corrected time for previous races then errors in earlier races will have a cascading effect on corrections. Still, just math...
  15. I think the denial was incorrect: 62.1 A request for redress or a protest committee’s decision to consider redress shall be based on a claim or possibility that a boat’s score or place in a race or series has been or may be, through no fault of her own, made significantly worse... Note that the rule says "a boat's score" was made worse, but not that the requesting boat's score was made worse. So as I read it any boat can request redress for herself or any other boat as long as one of the conditions fo 62.1 ( a ) thru ( d ) are met. Race committee or a technical committee may also request redress for a boat.