MR.CLEAN

what are you talking about?

put up a video robin.

No, he did not. He answered you clearly and concisely. You can't change something's meaning by asking about it 4000 times.

know what that executive order doesn't do? Anything. Trump: "I love the jews" Trump also: "Global elites are ruining america" Hmmm

Not you

That's not what it says. It says SailGP budgets 4M to run each event and they ask 'millions of dollars'. As the traditionally tight Danes have proven, only the biggest suckers pay anything close to that. Today we have learned that in the past 48 hours a majority in the Copenhagen City Finance Committee have approved a grant from their "Mega-Event pool" to help host the regatta in CPH 11-12 September. Reportedly the grant is only 2.7 million Danish Kroner, slightly more than $400,000. "Only" because the ask by Sail GP for a "host venue fee" is, one hears, millions of dollars, given that the per event cost to Sail GP is said to be $4 million. Presumably the balance is being made up by contributions from the Danish Sail GP team's sponsors and other local support, unless Sail GP is settling for less?

Fixed that.

are you pretending to know how to sail now?

wyoming

nope. you knew he was a scorpion when you picked him up.

No, it's largely the result of a republican party that's driven itself increasingly towards anti-science, anti-intellectualism, and anti-americanism in the guise of patriotism and religion. Hillary's arrogance helped though!

My Pyrenees did a similar thing to my landlord when I lived in Denver who was snooping around the house. He took a fold of landlord's pants in his mouth and pinned him against the side of the house until I got home. 150 pounds with fur like a bearskin rug.

no but i can edit thread titles

Weak case though IMO and there is that glaring inconsistency in the pleading (Clinton widely known to peddle baseless conspiracy theories and alleged as a nasty, unreliable, and vindictive person, but simultaneously widely believed and credible when claiming Tulsi is an asset). All Clinton has to do to prove "asset" is to provide jury with russian-linked tweets or FB posts positive on Tulsi, and there are quite a lot of those. Still, it will cost Clinton money and time to deal with it, which is probably what Tulsi wants besides trying to recover from her current invisibility. Tulsi likely drops it at discovery though.

From complaint: "Tulsi has been harmed by Clinton’s lies—and American democracy has suffered as well." has it?