• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

weta27

Members
  • Content count

    544
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About weta27

  • Rank
    Anarchist

Recent Profile Visitors

560 profile views
  1. I actually thought Jimmy was reasonably humble in yesterday's presser - whether it was the loss, or not, dunno, but definitely easier to listen to
  2. I'm not talking about who is right and who is wrong, I'm saying the penalty was given by the Umpires for one thing (P/S), Green confirmed that's what the Umpire's App showed (P/S), then the 'wrong-call" apology was made by Slater for something different (make way). Whichever you 'believe', the Umpires stuffed up.
  3. Green was interviewed BEFORE Richard Slater said the above, so no team bias - he was just going by what he had seen on the App, evidence which he said showed why a Port/Starboard penalty was awarded, a very similar scenario from a previous AC45 regatta where they had discussed this with the Umpires.
  4. So was it Port/Starboard or making room???
  5. Luckily we have an event where the standards are set by the greatest Americas Cup sailors the world has ever known. Just think, what would Jimmy or Russell do?
  6. Well whoever it is that gets through, and its looking like either ETNZ or ART; these ding-dongs between them will leave the last man standing in good shape for the Cup.
  7. I am baffled by Slater's statement that the Umpires got it wrong - the call was clearly made by the Umpire (Slater?) on TV at the time as Port/Starboard. Now he's saying that after further review, the protest for Artemis not giving sufficient room should have been green flagged. Russell Green said its clear that the Umpire's App showed the same Port/Starboard scenario that happened in Portsmouth Seems like we're all wasting our time debating it on here if the Umpires can't decide what was going on ...
  8. Wow again, big difference between Richard Slater's comments and Russell Green's. Richard Slater - the penalty decision based on Artemis not giving sufficient room, now that its been reviewed, should have been green flagged. Russell Green - the penalty was correctly given, based on the Port/Starboard evidence of the Umpire's App. I can't understand Slater's statement - the call was clearly made by the Umpire on TV as Port/Starboard.
  9. Wow info from Bernasconi
  10. Barker said he thought it was a grinder handle that made the hole
  11. Those weren't the light foils ETNZ were on today though, those were the heavy set?
  12. So THAT'S what he looks like! Come to think of it, there are a few down the supermarket that have that look about them ...
  13. How could we ever forget?! Of course no-one's getting too cocky, how could they? ETNZ looked pretty much unstoppable after those first few races ..... ,
  14. +1 GD didn't have to say anything ...
  15. No, they will be unveiled in the first race against Oracle Team XEROX - complete with anther radical innovation, red foil socks