• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.
    • B.J. Porter

      Moderation Team Change   06/16/2017

      After fifteen years of volunteer moderation at SA, I will no longer be part of the moderation team. The decision to step aside is mine, and has been some time in the works but we did not wish to announce it in advance for a number of reasons. It's been fun, but I need my time back for other purposes now. The Underdawg admin account will not be monitored until further notice, as I will be relinquishing control of it along with my administrative privileges. Zapata will continue on as a moderator, and any concerns or issues can be directed to that account or to the Editor until further notice. Anyone interested in helping moderate the forums should reach out to Scot by sending a PM to the Editor account. Please note that I am not leaving the community, I am merely stepping aside from Admin responsibilities and privileges on the site.
Editor

J/111 Goes Sailing...

1,678 posts in this topic

I think your going to see this boat rating 3 to 6 sec/mi. slower than a 122.

 

My J/111 hull #4, the Invisible Hand, received its PHRF rating today of 36 (San Francisco Bay Area)

 

 

That seems fair.......I was guessing 33-36 for it........for your area ( windy ) I would of thought 33 while the PNW in a lighter venue, 36 ! Either way, I think it is competitive and fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your going to see this boat rating 3 to 6 sec/mi. slower than a 122.

 

My J/111 hull #4, the Invisible Hand, received its PHRF rating today of 36 (San Francisco Bay Area)

 

Congrats. From what I've seen, I think you will do very well with that rating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your going to see this boat rating 3 to 6 sec/mi. slower than a 122.

 

My J/111 hull #4, the Invisible Hand, received its PHRF rating today of 36 (San Francisco Bay Area)

 

 

That seems fair.......I was guessing 33-36 for it........for your area ( windy ) I would of thought 33 while the PNW in a lighter venue, 36 ! Either way, I think it is competitive and fair.

 

It may have helped that we were able to provide the ORR measurements and handicap we received for another race. More data, less opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your going to see this boat rating 3 to 6 sec/mi. slower than a 122.

 

My J/111 hull #4, the Invisible Hand, received its PHRF rating today of 36 (San Francisco Bay Area)

 

 

That seems fair.......I was guessing 33-36 for it........for your area ( windy ) I would of thought 33 while the PNW in a lighter venue, 36 ! Either way, I think it is competitive and fair.

 

It may have helped that we were able to provide the ORR measurements and handicap we received for another race. More data, less opinion.

 

 

Congrats for getting a rating of 39 for the Three Bridge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Congrats for getting a rating of 39 for the Three Bridge.
Not sure what your talking about...... Maybe the fact that they just put in a rating until the PHRF meeting Thursday when the 36 was issued. SSS has it entered @36 on the entry page:

 

http://www.jibeset.net/entrylist.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That seems fair.......I was guessing 33-36 for it........for your area ( windy ) I would of thought 33 while the PNW in a lighter venue, 36 ! Either way, I think it is competitive and fair.
From what I heard the other 111s have been rated 42 elsewhere.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Congrats for getting a rating of 39 for the Three Bridge.
Not sure what your talking about...... Maybe the fact that they just put in a rating until the PHRF meeting Thursday when the 36 was issued. SSS has it entered @36 on the entry page:

 

http://www.jibeset.net/entrylist.php

 

 

Rsults show it at 39. No dog in this fight just stating a fact.

 

11104 Frank Slootman Invisible Hand 39 16:38:11 16:38:11 16 Encinal J/111

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Results have been miss entered..... That's a fact. Again, check the entry sheet which is what the committee went by for the starts. Doesn't change a thing as we started the race with the 36.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Congrats for getting a rating of 39 for the Three Bridge.
Not sure what your talking about...... Maybe the fact that they just put in a rating until the PHRF meeting Thursday when the 36 was issued. SSS has it entered @36 on the entry page:

 

http://www.jibeset.net/entrylist.php

 

Yes, I entered the 39 in the online application when we did not have a rating yet. Else, it would not accept my application online, knowing it was subject to change. PHRF was issued as 36, and we started the race at the time indicated for boats rated 36.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But a 3rd place in class and 16th overall ain't too shabby! Well done.

 

We had a serious snafu on the J/111 with the head sail not wanting to unfurl the whole race. We set the code zero for as long as we could in lieu of having a working head sail. Our choice of bridges at the start was thereby determined by our head sail limitations. We were quite sure we'd have to give up after Red Rock as it was a beat back to TI. Solosailor managed to get the head sail to unfurl a lot further maybe about 80-85%. It looked like crap, tell tales wouldn't fly etc. but the boat was still pretty quick in spit of this. Still don't know what the furler problem is. We could not get the headsail down last night. For new/prospective 111 owners, keep an eye on this, we've had issues with the furler from day one. Not sure if we can fix or will replace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag - furler thoughts (excuse if you know this already, based on my experience with Harken which is generally excelent)

 

  • wash top and bottom drums through with water (could have dust/salt in them)
  • headsail design, how far is the top furler drum from full hoist (length of headsail luff determines this, I've had trouble with sails which set "too low" and the angle/length of halyard can stop the drum turning)
  • halyard tension

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag - furler thoughts (excuse if you know this already, based on my experience with Harken which is generally excelent)

 

  • wash top and bottom drums through with water (could have dust/salt in them)
  • headsail design, how far is the top furler drum from full hoist (length of headsail luff determines this, I've had trouble with sails which set "too low" and the angle/length of halyard can stop the drum turning)
  • halyard tension

 

If I had to guess it's related to your #2. Pure speculation though. The furler is brand new (Facnor), the bottom drum has no issues, and we completely released the halyard. Had we had a bosun chair on the boat, Solosailor would have gone up the mast to examine the snafu. I guess that is why they call this race a Fiasco.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lack of halyard tension can cause the snafu in the first place, releasing halyard usually makes it worse. At least that was my experience on my J109 (which had a harken furler) as well as my current ride (S-2 9.1) with a facnor...time spent checking all the sails on the furler, while pierside, with guy up the mast is well worth it. Check angle of halyard is right, check clearances, check for potential snags, check with backstay on hard, and with backstay released. Furlers like backstay tension. Dialed in, they are pretty good. but you need to spend the time to dial them in. Kinda like calibrating your instruments.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag - furler thoughts (excuse if you know this already, based on my experience with Harken which is generally excelent)

 

  • wash top and bottom drums through with water (could have dust/salt in them)
  • headsail design, how far is the top furler drum from full hoist (length of headsail luff determines this, I've had trouble with sails which set "too low" and the angle/length of halyard can stop the drum turning)
  • halyard tension

 

If I had to guess it's related to your #2. Pure speculation though. The furler is brand new (Facnor), the bottom drum has no issues, and we completely released the halyard. Had we had a bosun chair on the boat, Solosailor would have gone up the mast to examine the snafu. I guess that is why they call this race a Fiasco.

 

Please let us know what the issue turns out to be once you sort it out. thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you even have a furler?

 

In this particular race we wished we didn't have one ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag, you mentioned you have a Code Zero. What's the story with that? Namely

  • Who built it?
  • How are you flying it?
  • Do you see the need for a bobstay?
  • How does the boat like it?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag, you mentioned you have a Code Zero. What's the story with that? Namely

  • Who built it?
  • How are you flying it?
  • Do you see the need for a bobstay?
  • How does the boat like it?

Thanks

 

See picture of the setup attached. It was built by a frequent contributor to this forum. We just completed it this week, and flew the code zero a lot during the 3BF race. It has a bobstay as you can see. It is a great setup in light breeze, boat powers up rapidly with the big sail. The carbon fiber prod is affectionately known as the strap-on. It can come off for OD sailing if need be.

post-405-040751700 1296453183_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lack of halyard tension can cause the snafu in the first place, releasing halyard usually makes it worse. At least that was my experience on my J109 (which had a harken furler) as well as my current ride (S-2 9.1) with a facnor...time spent checking all the sails on the furler, while pierside, with guy up the mast is well worth it. Check angle of halyard is right, check clearances, check for potential snags, check with backstay on hard, and with backstay released. Furlers like backstay tension. Dialed in, they are pretty good. but you need to spend the time to dial them in. Kinda like calibrating your instruments.

 

My experience also, and agreed on the rest of this post.

 

Ragbag - I like the code-0 setup, I believe under IRC you'd get that rated for free assuming the sail measures as a spinnaker and is smaller than the largest kite, the strap-on is shorter than the normal bowsprit so that should attract no penalty.

 

Did you consider flying the zero off of the regular pole, I am thining you could partially extend it and have an adjustable bob-stay ?

 

Also the tack blocks (two for kite peels ?) are very small, strong enough ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lack of halyard tension can cause the snafu in the first place, releasing halyard usually makes it worse. At least that was my experience on my J109 (which had a harken furler) as well as my current ride (S-2 9.1) with a facnor...time spent checking all the sails on the furler, while pierside, with guy up the mast is well worth it. Check angle of halyard is right, check clearances, check for potential snags, check with backstay on hard, and with backstay released. Furlers like backstay tension. Dialed in, they are pretty good. but you need to spend the time to dial them in. Kinda like calibrating your instruments.

 

My experience also, and agreed on the rest of this post.

 

Ragbag - I like the code-0 setup, I believe under IRC you'd get that rated for free assuming the sail measures as a spinnaker and is smaller than the largest kite, the strap-on is shorter than the normal bowsprit so that should attract no penalty.

 

Did you consider flying the zero off of the regular pole, I am thining you could partially extend it and have an adjustable bob-stay ?

 

Also the tack blocks (two for kite peels ?) are very small, strong enough ?

 

I find choosing the fixed prod over flying it off the bowsprit to be an interesting decision as well. Sure I've seen the fixed, short, sprit on other boats before but my experience with these sails is that the farther out you can get it the better. Would you mind filling us in on who designed the sail and what their justification was for the fixed sprit over a flying it off the pole? I'm still trying to understand the different mindsets behind the many setups.

 

That said, the term "code zero" is remarkably broad with 5-6 radically different schools of design falling into the category, so I'm not surprised that I've stumbled across more examples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag - just spotted on large scale photo that you are not using blocks on spi-tack, so my question is irrelevant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lack of halyard tension can cause the snafu in the first place, releasing halyard usually makes it worse. At least that was my experience on my J109 (which had a harken furler) as well as my current ride (S-2 9.1) with a facnor...time spent checking all the sails on the furler, while pierside, with guy up the mast is well worth it. Check angle of halyard is right, check clearances, check for potential snags, check with backstay on hard, and with backstay released. Furlers like backstay tension. Dialed in, they are pretty good. but you need to spend the time to dial them in. Kinda like calibrating your instruments.

 

My experience also, and agreed on the rest of this post.

 

Ragbag - I like the code-0 setup, I believe under IRC you'd get that rated for free assuming the sail measures as a spinnaker and is smaller than the largest kite, the strap-on is shorter than the normal bowsprit so that should attract no penalty.

 

Did you consider flying the zero off of the regular pole, I am thining you could partially extend it and have an adjustable bob-stay ?

 

Also the tack blocks (two for kite peels ?) are very small, strong enough ?

 

You can't partially extend the pole and fly a code zero as the pole will not be in the middle of the boat. It is possible to fly off the fully extended pole, we were just worried about what kind of forces we would unleash on it. There is quite a bit of flex on the pole fully extended. The bobstay of course helps but there are side to side flexes as well as you trim on the sail. The code zero holds the middle between a headsail and a kite, the luff tension is considerable. This prod is insanely strong. We blow up the pole, we have no weapons left. It is a conservative approach that we took.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO:

If you flew it from the pole, it would most likely break (or bend too much) due to the halyard tension required.

Sail Safe!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ragbag,

 

How do you like the ferrules on your sprit? What brand and size did you use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is quite a bit of flex on the pole fully extended. The bobstay of course helps but there are side to side flexes as well as you trim on the sail.

 

This is troubling <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your going to see this boat rating 3 to 6 sec/mi. slower than a 122.

 

My J/111 hull #4, the Invisible Hand, received its PHRF rating today of 36 (San Francisco Bay Area)

 

That seems like a fair rating based on the KWRW performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But a 3rd place in class and 16th overall ain't too shabby! Well done.

 

We had a serious snafu on the J/111 with the head sail not wanting to unfurl the whole race. We set the code zero for as long as we could in lieu of having a working head sail. Our choice of bridges at the start was thereby determined by our head sail limitations. We were quite sure we'd have to give up after Red Rock as it was a beat back to TI. Solosailor managed to get the head sail to unfurl a lot further maybe about 80-85%. It looked like crap, tell tales wouldn't fly etc. but the boat was still pretty quick in spit of this. Still don't know what the furler problem is. We could not get the headsail down last night. For new/prospective 111 owners, keep an eye on this, we've had issues with the furler from day one. Not sure if we can fix or will replace.

 

We had a problem at first on the boat in SD. You need to use the skinny shackle on the top of the halyard swivel. Other shackles rub against the moving part of the swivel and bind it up. Once we put the tall, skinny shackle on the halyard we had no more issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How do you like the ferrules on your sprit? What brand and size did you use?
We've been using then on several rides..... they work great for static load applications like this. Hansen Rigging has numerous sizes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ad a problem at first on the boat in SD. You need to use the skinny shackle on the top of the halyard swivel. Other shackles rub against the moving part of the swivel and bind it up. Once we put the tall, skinny shackle on the halyard we had no more issues.
Had a body up the rig today to look for issues and roll/unroll and of course it just came right out!!! Tried everything Saturday, varied halyard tension of course. Narrow shackle sounds like the culprit. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why do you even have a furler?
Came with the boat.... class rules, although no class racing this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ad a problem at first on the boat in SD. You need to use the skinny shackle on the top of the halyard swivel. Other shackles rub against the moving part of the swivel and bind it up. Once we put the tall, skinny shackle on the halyard we had no more issues.
Had a body up the rig today to look for issues and roll/unroll and of course it just came right out!!! Tried everything Saturday, varied halyard tension of course. Narrow shackle sounds like the culprit. Thanks.

 

We had a narrow shackle, and it was replaced after we bent the narrow one on our first couple of sails. Will have to look at it being sufficient for the load.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you even have a furler?

 

The topic of furler/no furler can fill a thread all its own. I like them for short handed racing. One pull and the sail is gone. Safer on the ocean maybe with less hands having to leave the safety of the cockpit. Big downsides weight aloft and snafus like we had on race day. If I raced crewed mostly, I probably would do without. The boat does come standard equipped with it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is quite a bit of flex on the pole fully extended. The bobstay of course helps but there are side to side flexes as well as you trim on the sail.

 

This is troubling <_<

 

most people call it physics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is quite a bit of flex on the pole fully extended. The bobstay of course helps but there are side to side flexes as well as you trim on the sail.

 

This is troubling <_<

 

most people call it physics.

 

Bottom line is that J Boats designed this boat without a code zero. J Boats don't have an opinion on how to set it up. So, owners need to come up with conservative rigging scenarios so they don't break things. There will be dealers from what I have been told that are going to rig code zeros from the pole with a bobstay. We will see how well that does. We have our bow prod today, but it won't stop us down the road from going to a more aggressive setup if it proves out to be working well. Rule #1 in racing is to keep things in one piece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is quite a bit of flex on the pole fully extended. The bobstay of course helps but there are side to side flexes as well as you trim on the sail.

 

This is troubling dry.gif

 

most people call it physics.

 

Bottom line is that J Boats designed this boat without a code zero. J Boats don't have an opinion on how to set it up. So, owners need to come up with conservative rigging scenarios so they don't break things. There will be dealers from what I have been told that are going to rig code zeros from the pole with a bobstay. We will see how well that does. We have our bow prod today, but it won't stop us down the road from going to a more aggressive setup if it proves out to be working well. Rule #1 in racing is to keep things in one piece.

 

 

Well said..........I think a lot of it has to do with where you sail and what you truly will be doing with the zero.

 

Where you are it will be used as a blast reacher more so than a true upwind sail IMO .......that I would bet will mean less luff pressure required but the pole will under go more lateral movements. In the PNW where we would use the zero for true upwind sailing and it is critical then to get max vmg to grind the #$#@$@ out of the halyard, thus the pole would be pointing up and not last 15 minutes or the first decent wave.

 

I think I prefer the look of the boat with the fixed prod but off the pole will be faster.......if the pole survives that is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see NorCal PHRF has given the SC 37 a rating of 27. That means she gives the J111 (phrf 36) 9 seconds a mile. Should make for some interesting racing on SF Bay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good representation of the J-111 production line at CCF in Bristol RI. This image taken 19 January. #17 in the foreground is supposed to be completed by 18 February.

post-23683-044894900 1297225817_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question...

 

What's the deal with the holes in the aft cabins? So that you can get to the steering quadrant in a pinch and quickly? Why no covers... another issue with weight?

 

DG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question...

 

What's the deal with the holes in the aft cabins? So that you can get to the steering quadrant in a pinch and quickly? Why no covers... another issue with weight?

 

DG

 

It is an access issue. You can't install or get to your AP gear very well otherwise. We have now put canvas zippable covers on them so stuff can't accidentally get back there and get caught in steering mechanics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if that will become standard zip out like on the 105. Seems like a silly thing to leave out...

 

 

If it were me, I might have to go with a nice 3/8 inch sheet of ply with matching teak veneer, varnished, with a finger hole and couple of horns on the backside to let it drop in place and hold it there. Would dress up the space and make it look yachty. Might add about 5 lbs over the open mesh weave though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is quite a bit of flex on the pole fully extended. The bobstay of course helps but there are side to side flexes as well as you trim on the sail.

 

This is troubling dry.gif

 

most people call it physics.

 

Bottom line is that J Boats designed this boat without a code zero. J Boats don't have an opinion on how to set it up. So, owners need to come up with conservative rigging scenarios so they don't break things. There will be dealers from what I have been told that are going to rig code zeros from the pole with a bobstay. We will see how well that does. We have our bow prod today, but it won't stop us down the road from going to a more aggressive setup if it proves out to be working well. Rule #1 in racing is to keep things in one piece.

 

Why don't the J's just up the layout schedule on the prod? a couple more layers of CF and a bobstay would seem to be the ticket.

 

While a C0 isn't necessary for OD racing, anytime that thing bends up the Asail shape will suffer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is quite a bit of flex on the pole fully extended. The bobstay of course helps but there are side to side flexes as well as you trim on the sail.

 

This is troubling dry.gif

 

most people call it physics.

 

Bottom line is that J Boats designed this boat without a code zero. J Boats don't have an opinion on how to set it up. So, owners need to come up with conservative rigging scenarios so they don't break things. There will be dealers from what I have been told that are going to rig code zeros from the pole with a bobstay. We will see how well that does. We have our bow prod today, but it won't stop us down the road from going to a more aggressive setup if it proves out to be working well. Rule #1 in racing is to keep things in one piece.

 

 

 

Why don't the J's just up the layout schedule on the prod? a couple more layers of CF and a bobstay would seem to be the ticket.

 

While a C0 isn't necessary for OD racing, anytime that thing bends up the Asail shape will suffer.

 

I am not a composite engineer, but I expect that the pole would have to be reengineered to perhaps be shorter and completely rigid unlike the bendy pole we have today. It is what you see on all the bigger race boats that fly these sails.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am not a composite engineer, but I expect that the pole would have to be reengineered to perhaps be shorter and completely rigid unlike the bendy pole we have today. It is what you see on all the bigger race boats that fly these sails.

 

I talked with my sailmaker yesterday and he recommended tacking to the pole and shortening pole extension as wind increased. He said that is how many of the other J sprit boats handle the code 0 without problem. I do like the bomb-proof sprit you built though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hull #4, The Invisible Hand, on the cover of Yachting World this month!

 

I am a proud papa today! Kudos to Photoboy for his fancy photography!

post-405-079310200 1297376670_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am not a composite engineer, but I expect that the pole would have to be reengineered to perhaps be shorter and completely rigid unlike the bendy pole we have today. It is what you see on all the bigger race boats that fly these sails.

 

I talked with my sailmaker yesterday and he recommended tacking to the pole and shortening pole extension as wind increased. He said that is how many of the other J sprit boats handle the code 0 without problem. I do like the bomb-proof sprit you built though.

 

You can shorrten the pole but it will no longer be flown off the boat's center. May not be a huge issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hull #4, The Invisible Hand, on the cover of Yachting World this month!

 

I am a proud papa today! Kudos to Photoboy for his fancy photography!

 

Nice! Well done. Too bad you can't be seen in the photo. But, then again, who gives two shits about what you look like.

 

DG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hull #4, The Invisible Hand, on the cover of Yachting World this month!

 

I am a proud papa today! Kudos to Photoboy for his fancy photography!

 

For a shot like this there was certainly some "fancy Drivin" going on too ;0)) Great Stuff...Congrats Rag Bag!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hull #4, The Invisible Hand, on the cover of Yachting World this month!

 

I am a proud papa today! Kudos to Photoboy for his fancy photography!

 

For a shot like this there was certainly some "fancy Drivin" going on too ;0)) Great Stuff...Congrats Rag Bag!

 

Ironically Jim Z is visible in the shot, he is sitting on the right in the picture with the vang ready to release (sorry to blow your cover Jim ;-). Based on that, we have since led the vang line aft to both sides of the boat to a cleat so nobody has to stay on deck so close to the mast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hull #4, The Invisible Hand, on the cover of Yachting World this month!

 

I am a proud papa today! Kudos to Photoboy for his fancy photography!

 

For a shot like this there was certainly some "fancy Drivin" going on too ;0)) Great Stuff...Congrats Rag Bag!

 

Ironically Jim Z is visible in the shot, he is sitting on the right in the picture with the vang ready to release (sorry to blow your cover Jim ;-). Based on that, we have since led the vang line aft to both sides of the boat to a cleat so nobody has to stay on deck so close to the mast.

 

yeah, thats one of those things that bothered me about the 111, so many things were right, but the vang wasnt lead aft, and the clutches are split on either side of the companionway. granted you can put in crossfeeders etc, but still, it just simplifies things to have it all down the middle of the companion way. that and the roller furling...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am not a composite engineer, but I expect that the pole would have to be reengineered to perhaps be shorter and completely rigid unlike the bendy pole we have today. It is what you see on all the bigger race boats that fly these sails.

 

I talked with my sailmaker yesterday and he recommended tacking to the pole and shortening pole extension as wind increased. He said that is how many of the other J sprit boats handle the code 0 without problem. I do like the bomb-proof sprit you built though.

 

You can shorrten the pole but it will no longer be flown off the boat's center. May not be a huge issue.

 

I asked about that too and he said just that - not a big issue. So I'll ponder for a while.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hull #4, The Invisible Hand, on the cover of Yachting World this month!

 

I am a proud papa today! Kudos to Photoboy for his fancy photography!

 

Last time I checked that pole was on the starboard side!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer the clutches either side of the companionway as they are further aft. If they are in the center of the boat it's likely you have to stand on the steps to operate them. For short handed sailing that's a bad set up. Aft lead vang is better, with a release each side of the companionway next to the clutches, again that's driven by short handed sailing (the J92 is perfect in that you can release the clutch whilst helming). For boats focused on fully crewed racing then it's usual to have the vang-man sat on the rail in the middle of the boat. It's generally fairly simple to modify the vang release and return it to standard if required for OD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's also nice to be able to run a mini dodger over the companion way when you're at sea, and you need the clutches off center for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I talked with my sailmaker yesterday and he recommended tacking to the pole and shortening pole extension as wind increased. He said that is how many of the other J sprit boats handle the code 0 without problem. I do like the bomb-proof sprit you built though.
So he recommended tacking the Code-0 to the pole WITHOUT a bobstay? Good luck with that. Other "Js" I've seen have used a bobstay so shortening the pole extension as the wind builds would stiffen the pole but again, it will only be on center when the pole is fully extended, not the best solution. The pole will definitely flex a lot without a bobstay. Also, the sheeting angle with change quite a bit over 4+ feet of adjustment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your best bet is to build a sail for 0 to 8 knts of wind that flys on the pole all the way out. You will have very little need for the sail unless you race point to point (this boat is ideal for it). In breeze over 8knts w/apparent angle higher than 65deg the boat won't need anything bigger than a jib to haul the mail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've sailed on a J/120 with a code 0 that goes on a full-extension pole.

 

the pole is long enough, that the bobstay really isn't at a great angle for holding the pole tip down.

 

the thing scares me a bit offshore, as i am afraid the pole might break.

 

the 111 is probably a stiffer boat, but the 120 is reasonably stiff, and that huge sail can lay the boat over pretty easily if you're not on the ball...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also..., the AW is forward enough, that i doubt being off-center a bit will matter much in terms of a difference tack-to-tack.

 

i do think having a variable pole length might be a PITA, and i'm not sure how a bobstay would work in that setup...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10HotRB0795.JPG

 

10HotRB0804.JPG

 

 

A C0 is essentially a light to medium air sail, if you're laying the boat down with it - it's time to check the sail choice chart and make a change.

 

The above photo's demonstrate the real problem - masthead chute, maybe 20 kts, big bend on prod = horrible (and slow) shape.

 

I cannot believe that the people at Hall can't come up with a fix for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The above photo's demonstrate the real problem - masthead chute, maybe 20 kts, big bend on prod = horrible (and slow) shape.

 

I cannot believe that the people at Hall can't come up with a fix for that.

Well I just went through the 100s of shots taken by H2OShots when the boat was in 20-25k of steady breeze. This is the most flex I can find in any photos and it sure doesn't show to much sign of flex. If you want to see flex, ride and Antrim 27 in a Bay blow..... the bowsprit looks like the end of a hockey stick!

post-146-040643100 1297613830_thumb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The above photo's demonstrate the real problem - masthead chute, maybe 20 kts, big bend on prod = horrible (and slow) shape.

 

I cannot believe that the people at Hall can't come up with a fix for that.

Well I just went through the 100s of shots taken by H2OShots when the boat was in 20-25k of steady breeze. This is the most flex I can find in any photos and it sure doesn't show to much sign of flex. If you want to see flex, ride and Antrim 27 in a Bay blow..... the bowsprit looks like the end of a hockey stick!

 

 

Radically different halyard tensions - is the blue chute fully hoisted?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The above photo's demonstrate the real problem - masthead chute, maybe 20 kts, big bend on prod = horrible (and slow) shape.

 

I cannot believe that the people at Hall can't come up with a fix for that.

Well I just went through the 100s of shots taken by H2OShots when the boat was in 20-25k of steady breeze. This is the most flex I can find in any photos and it sure doesn't show to much sign of flex. If you want to see flex, ride and Antrim 27 in a Bay blow..... the bowsprit looks like the end of a hockey stick!

 

 

Radically different halyard tensions - is the blue chute fully hoisted?

Does this matter at all ? With a normal gennaker (luff length so much longer than the straight line between mast top and bowsprit tip) I see halyard tension having little or no influence...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The above photo's demonstrate the real problem - masthead chute, maybe 20 kts, big bend on prod = horrible (and slow) shape.

 

I cannot believe that the people at Hall can't come up with a fix for that.

Well I just went through the 100s of shots taken by H2OShots when the boat was in 20-25k of steady breeze. This is the most flex I can find in any photos and it sure doesn't show to much sign of flex. If you want to see flex, ride and Antrim 27 in a Bay blow..... the bowsprit looks like the end of a hockey stick!

 

 

Radically different halyard tensions - is the blue chute fully hoisted?

Does this matter at all ? With a normal gennaker (luff length so much longer than the straight line between mast top and bowsprit tip) I see halyard tension having little or no influence...

 

The boats are on different angles to the wind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The above photo's demonstrate the real problem - masthead chute, maybe 20 kts, big bend on prod = horrible (and slow) shape.

 

I cannot believe that the people at Hall can't come up with a fix for that.

Well I just went through the 100s of shots taken by H2OShots when the boat was in 20-25k of steady breeze. This is the most flex I can find in any photos and it sure doesn't show to much sign of flex. If you want to see flex, ride and Antrim 27 in a Bay blow..... the bowsprit looks like the end of a hockey stick!

 

 

Radically different halyard tensions - is the blue chute fully hoisted?

Does this matter at all ? With a normal gennaker (luff length so much longer than the straight line between mast top and bowsprit tip) I see halyard tension having little or no influence...

To expand a little on Cabady's reply, when going deep - like as far downwind as your speed guage will let you - you actually want soft luff tension when it's windy. But usually this is accomplished by easing the tack line. When reaching, or when using a C0, you want a very tight luff - max the halyard and crank on the backstay. You treat the asail more like a jib.

 

The bend-o-prod makes the latter difficult and kills the design shape of the sail. Again, this is probably not a big deal in OD - since everyone will be bending - but outside of OD, it's not good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Radically different halyard tensions - is the blue chute fully hoisted?

 

Yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I talked with my sailmaker yesterday and he recommended tacking to the pole and shortening pole extension as wind increased. He said that is how many of the other J sprit boats handle the code 0 without problem. I do like the bomb-proof sprit you built though.
So he recommended tacking the Code-0 to the pole WITHOUT a bobstay? Good luck with that. Other "Js" I've seen have used a bobstay so shortening the pole extension as the wind builds would stiffen the pole but again, it will only be on center when the pole is fully extended, not the best solution. The pole will definitely flex a lot without a bobstay. Also, the sheeting angle with change quite a bit over 4+ feet of adjustment.

yeah, that's my understanding. deal with the sheeting angle usuing tweakers. He emphasized the C0 is a light/moderate wind sail <15. the guy has built a ton of sails and is on his fourth set of J111sails. Thinking about the geometry of a bobstay on the sprit in a breeze really doesn't convince me it's that much better. i think your setup is indisputable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many many years ago, my kid would ask me these dumbass questions: "Dad, who would win a fight between a great white shark and a grizzly bear?"

 

I could never answer the question to his satisfaction.

 

So, who would win a fight between a J-111 and a 1D35?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to keep things rolling...a couple of updates for the west coast J-111 contingent...

 

1) Rag Bag's Hull #4, INVISIBLE HAND, will be on display (in her "Cabo Race" trim...sweet) at "Boat Fest" in Marina Village, Alameda CA 24-27 Feb. (Sail Ca. Dock).

 

2) Hull #17 is out of the barn and getting her underside dolled up at International Marine in Rhode Island. She should be arriving in SF early in March for final commissioning and sailing in early April. If all stays according to plan; she will be at Strictly Sail in Jack London Square 14 - 17 April at the Sail California dock at the show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many many years ago, my kid would ask me these dumbass questions: "Dad, who would win a fight between a great white shark and a grizzly bear?"

 

I could never answer the question to his satisfaction.

 

So, who would win a fight between a J-111 and a 1D35?

 

It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many many years ago, my kid would ask me these dumbass questions: "Dad, who would win a fight between a great white shark and a grizzly bear?"

 

I could never answer the question to his satisfaction.

 

So, who would win a fight between a J-111 and a 1D35?

 

It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense

 

Not in our experience thus far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, who would win a fight between a J-111 and a 1D35?
"There's a real big gap between getting your ass kicked and having a dancing, singing sprite fool you with trickery and then strike your throat before you even know you're in a fight"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense
What is happening in a few days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, who would win a fight between a J-111 and a 1D35?
"There's a real big gap between getting your ass kicked and having a dancing, singing sprite fool you with trickery and then strike your throat before you even know you're in a fight"

 

Hey G,

Exactly how much time do you spend watching chick flicks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NS it was no fight........ more like an bothersome kid selling chickletts on the streeet and scratching the paint on a new car!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

War Dog2?

 

Is the world big enough for two War Dogs?

 

Thanks for letting me have a look around the other day -- very nice boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pot calling the keddle black, no?

 

Oh no amigo, not me. I had to look that one up on Google.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense
What is happening in a few days?

Is this the 1D35 Turbo EWS is eluding to? The story is featured on the SA home page this AM. Cool project...

 

https://picasaweb.google.com/111226466348003368663/Feb212011?authkey=Gv1sRgCIjpjLvs_JuIkgE&feat=email#

 

But didn't the J111 KONTIKI 5 beat the 1D35 REVOLUTION in Key West (albeit the 111 had a 42 vs the 1D's 36 PHRF)this year?

 

Rag Bag's 111 is rating 36 here in SF...not sure what a 1D35's PHRF is here...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense
What is happening in a few days?

Is this the 1D35 Turbo EWS is eluding to? The story is featured on the SA home page this AM. Cool project...

 

https://picasaweb.go...kgE&feat=email#

 

But didn't the J111 KONTIKI 5 beat the 1D35 REVOLUTION in Key West (albeit the 111 had a 42 vs the 1D's 36 PHRF)this year?

 

Rag Bag's 111 is rating 36 here in SF...not sure what a 1D35's PHRF is here...

 

According to norcal phrf

 

36 with sym

42 with assy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense
What is happening in a few days?

Is this the 1D35 Turbo EWS is eluding to? The story is featured on the SA home page this AM. Cool project...

 

https://picasaweb.google.com/111226466348003368663/Feb212011?authkey=Gv1sRgCIjpjLvs_JuIkgE&feat=email#

 

But didn't the J111 KONTIKI 5 beat the 1D35 REVOLUTION in Key West (albeit the 111 had a 42 vs the 1D's 36 PHRF)this year?

 

Rag Bag's 111 is rating 36 here in SF...not sure what a 1D35's PHRF is here...

 

That's the boat I was refering to. Obviously not much 1d35 in it anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense
What is happening in a few days?

Is this the 1D35 Turbo EWS is eluding to? The story is featured on the SA home page this AM. Cool project...

 

https://picasaweb.go...kgE&feat=email#

 

But didn't the J111 KONTIKI 5 beat the 1D35 REVOLUTION in Key West (albeit the 111 had a 42 vs the 1D's 36 PHRF)this year?

 

Rag Bag's 111 is rating 36 here in SF...not sure what a 1D35's PHRF is here...

 

According to norcal phrf

 

36 with sym

42 with assy

 

There were two 1D35s in last weekend Corinthian Midwinters, one rated 36 (standard) and one rated 21. Neither one hung with the 111 on elapsed time, and we were sailing no where near our race potential for various reasons. I don't know what mods the 21 rated boat had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the boat has been rated at 33/27/18 in Socal without the square top main & 30/24/12 with the square top. Didn't mean to derail the J/111 thread so please continue on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense
What is happening in a few days?

Is this the 1D35 Turbo EWS is eluding to? The story is featured on the SA home page this AM. Cool project...

 

https://picasaweb.go...kgE&feat=email#

 

But didn't the J111 KONTIKI 5 beat the 1D35 REVOLUTION in Key West (albeit the 111 had a 42 vs the 1D's 36 PHRF)this year?

 

Rag Bag's 111 is rating 36 here in SF...not sure what a 1D35's PHRF is here...

 

According to norcal phrf

 

36 with sym

42 with assy

 

There were two 1D35s in last weekend Corintian Midwinters, one rated 36 (standard) and one rated 21. Neither one hung with the 111 on elapsed time, and we were sailing no where near our race potential for various reasons. I don't know what mods the 21 rated boat had.

 

The 21 should be the old Double Trouble. Square top main but with a shorter prod and OD ISP's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be the 1D35 Turbo.....few days and it will all make sense
What is happening in a few days?

Is this the 1D35 Turbo EWS is eluding to? The story is featured on the SA home page this AM. Cool project...

 

https://picasaweb.go...kgE&feat=email#

 

But didn't the J111 KONTIKI 5 beat the 1D35 REVOLUTION in Key West (albeit the 111 had a 42 vs the 1D's 36 PHRF)this year?

 

Rag Bag's 111 is rating 36 here in SF...not sure what a 1D35's PHRF is here...

 

According to norcal phrf

 

36 with sym

42 with assy

 

There were two 1D35s in last weekend Corinthian Midwinters, one rated 36 (standard) and one rated 21. Neither one hung with the 111 on elapsed time, and we were sailing no where near our race potential for various reasons. I don't know what mods the 21 rated boat had.

so maybe the 111 should rate between 18-27? :P or are you guys just that fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

so maybe the 111 should rate between 18-27? :P or are you guys just that fast.

 

The 1D35s vary greatly in performance depending who sails them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag -

 

When do you bring the boat down to Newport Beach or are you going to leave her in Long Beach before the race.

 

Cheers,

 

opusone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag -

 

When do you bring the boat down to Newport Beach or are you going to leave her in Long Beach before the race.

 

Cheers,

 

opusone

 

Boat is going down to Newport, don't know yet exactly when, depends on work still in progress and weather window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't mind sharing, what work are you having done? I saw the picture of the sprit that you posted earlier, but I am interested to know what has already broke or wasn't there that you felt you needed.

Ragbag -

 

When do you bring the boat down to Newport Beach or are you going to leave her in Long Beach before the race.

 

Cheers,

 

opusone

 

Boat is going down to Newport, don't know yet exactly when, depends on work still in progress and weather window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't mind sharing, what work are you having done? I saw the picture of the sprit that you posted earlier, but I am interested to know what has already broke or wasn't there that you felt you needed.

 

 

Nothing in particular, just a laundry list of items getting the boat ocean-ready and meeting all the requirements for race entry has been a very significant undertaking for a boat clean from the factory with so little time to get it all done. I am fortunate to have a ton of very capable assistance, or it wouldn't be happening. We heard the San Diego-based J/111 boat was going to enter the Cabo race at first, but then decided it was just too much work to get ready which we can sure relate to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragbag -

 

When do you bring the boat down to Newport Beach or are you going to leave her in Long Beach before the race.

 

Cheers,

 

opusone

 

Boat is going down to Newport, don't know yet exactly when, depends on work still in progress and weather window.

 

Any chance a Dark N' Stormy could persuade you for a quick tour???

 

Cheers,

 

opusone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any chance a Dark N' Stormy could persuade you for a quick tour???
That will likely be needed after the delivery.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the deal with Block Island Race Week? Is an OD start expected or will they be racing IRC?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm betting J/Boats at least ASKS the owners to sail PHRF for the same reason Kontiki V sailed PHRF at KWRW; they don't want the boat potentially getting spanked under IRC at a national event which could possibly slow down sales.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the deal with Block Island Race Week? Is an OD start expected or will they be racing IRC?

 

Yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now