• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

eric e

tnt34

184 posts in this topic

Is it just me - or did they somehow make that thing as ugly as they could?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

seems it's Polish, i think it is the extra width that makes it look odd

 

8.5mtr, seems to be a telescoping farrier system

 

http://www.all-about...folding-system/

 

1st the poles made a trimaran called the eXploder

 

and now 1 called the tnt...

 

 

This is a novel way to approach folding developed by J.Kostanski in 2009 and subject to patent.

The idea was to combine two movements into firstly sliding and then pivot as the beams are coming in via

60 cm long sleeve. Float is supported by water due to small designed buoyancy thus making folding

possible. On the trailer the floats are tacked away under the main hull without any disassembly .

The sleeve is acting as solid long holder once bolted to the deck (similar bolting takes place on Farrier

system). Once the beam is locked in the sleeve the float is fixed via cantilever to the main hull .To reduce forces a

S/S wire struts will be provided for each float. Sliding will be easy thanks Teflon strips inside the sleeve. The folding in will be also quick and effortless

due to using the winch on the deck . Boat hook will be used to unfold while float is displaced by its own

initial buoyancy .

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMl7tvYy0Lg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fvv8o9q1EE&feature=related

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm staring at this twin rudders on the vaka hull idea and going, Hmmmmmmm ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by unShirley, December 19, 2010 - I didn't realize that Motor Cat had started a differnt thread already

Check out the ornaments: Motor Cat 30 and 29. A good friend of mine has a Motor Cat 30. It is a pretty cool boat that we have had lots of good surf trips on.

It does have a wierd step under the waterline just ahead of the transoms, tho. I am not quite sure what that is about. The cockpit of the tri is very similar to the cockpit of the Motor Cat 30.

And why the twin rudders? Is that just to straddle the OB? Why not put them on the amas? Too expensive? Does one really need two operating stations (tiller and wheel)?

I'd crack a polish joke about some of the design features, but phreddo might lampoon it on the FP

Share this post


Link to post

Maybe it's done that way so he can mount an outboard motor in the middle. Why that would be important I don't know. MacGregor did a 26' mono like that: a huge OB on the transom and rudders either side. Makes a little more sense on a mono (heeling you know).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get the twin rudders either and the photos in the other thread make it look like the outboard wont tilt up, it has tiller and wheel steering and the telescoping mechanism shown in these videos wont work once the cabin top is installed?!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rudders should be moved to the amas and the outboard removable. Is this a cruiser, cruiser-racer (what isn't?) or a pure racer? The latter I would say is out based on the current rendering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by motorcat, December 20, 2010 - double posted

Rudders should be moved to the amas and the outboard removable. Is this a cruiser, cruiser-racer (what isn't?) or a pure racer? The latter I would say is out based on the current rendering.

This paricular unit is cruiser/racer (to beat DF 35 or F 36 or F 33 X) but with beam of 28 ft and 50 ft mast we can easily have racer /crusier

Tilting no problem

 

See the pictures with twin ruders and tillted 25 hp O/B

 

The advantages of this set up is as follows:

 

 

  • More ruder area less leeway

 

  • When heeled TnT still has better grip than single rudder

 

  • O/B is centered =better flow =speed 40-50 hp should give us 10-12 knots

Share this post


Link to post

Rudders should be moved to the amas and the outboard removable. Is this a cruiser, cruiser-racer (what isn't?) or a pure racer? The latter I would say is out based on the current rendering.

This paricular unit is cruiser/racer (to beat DF 35 or F 36 or F 33 X) but with beam of 28 ft and 50 ft mast we can easily have racer /crusier

Tilting no problem

 

See the pictures with twin ruders and tillted 25 hp O/B

 

The advantages of this set up is as follows:

 

 

  • More ruder area less leeway

 

  • When heeled TnT still has better grip than single rudder

 

  • O/B is centered =better flow =speed 40-50 hp should give us 10-12 knots

post-49251-053140600 1292842394_thumb.jpg

post-49251-075916800 1292842426_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Overall it really doesn't look too bad.

But I do not like the twin rudder/huge outboard idea.

 

With the sliding/folding system, what's the height on a trailer? Looks like it would be very high.

 

I think you'd be better recieved if you left out any mention of that stupid quadracat in your adverts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Overall it really doesn't look too bad.

But I do not like the twin rudder/huge outboard idea.

 

With the sliding/folding system, what's the height on a trailer? Looks like it would be very high.

 

I think you'd be better recieved if you left out any mention of that stupid quadracat in your adverts.

 

Outboard 15-50 hp.50 is huge but may give 12 knots which is double of "normal speeds"Twin rudder when TNT is heeled to 10 deg and more is a blessing.Many other tris loose grip at that angle.Also more rudder area less leeway=more speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the sliding/folding system, what's the height on a trailer? Looks like it would be very high.

 

I think you'd be better recieved if you left out any mention of that stupid quadracat in your adverts.

 

The height of TNT 34 on trailer with beams up is 14 feet.

 

 

Quad 28 was 1650 kg but wave resistance of narrow hulls (3) was less

than two hulls of tris .This is why Quad 28 came second in 3 hrs on a beam reach regatta in Vancouver in 1997 ahead of bigger tris ,cats and mono .

 

 

Maximum allowed height of a vehicle and its freight in the European Union is 4 m, you will need a special permit to transport the boat in this configuration. You won't pass under a lot of viaducts, so special planning of your itinerary is required as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Folding system slides well on workshop floor with wheels supporting the hull. How does it slide when the waves and the buyoancy on the hull in water disaligns the system a bit? I predict very short working life for the sleeves before the boat starts to twist due to the gap on sleeves and beams..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the sliding/folding system, what's the height on a trailer? Looks like it would be very high.

 

I think you'd be better recieved if you left out any mention of that stupid quadracat in your adverts.

 

The height of TNT 34 on trailer with beams up is 14 feet.

 

 

Quad 28 was 1650 kg but wave resistance of narrow hulls (3) was less

than two hulls of tris .This is why Quad 28 came second in 3 hrs on a beam reach regatta in Vancouver in 1997 ahead of bigger tris ,cats and mono .

 

 

Maximum allowed height of a vehicle and its freight in the European Union is 4 m, you will need a special permit to transport the boat in this configuration. You won't pass under a lot of viaducts, so special planning of your itinerary is required as well

 

Except France , UK , Sweden , Norway and most of US States ,where the heigth limit is 4,5 m . Anyway regarding to trailers at 2,9 m wide, towing will just require a permit , but this is usually a simple process. The problems started from 3,05 m beam , which beyond let to organize special transport , We have a hope as well that , when we proceed to the construction of the trailer, we will be closer to 4 than 4.5 m

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Folding system slides well on workshop floor with wheels supporting the hull. How does it slide when the waves and the buyoancy on the hull in water disaligns the system a bit? I predict very short working life for the sleeves before the boat starts to twist due to the gap on sleeves and beams..

 

do not worry please we have special reinforcments with 3 mm ss 5 strips on the beam and teflon inside the sleeve

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that trimarans loose steering because of the growing trend towards large capacity outer hulls. A deep rudder is really what is required, not two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that trimarans loose steering because of the growing trend towards large capacity outer hulls. A deep rudder is really what is required, not two.

 

In an ideal world two rudders but on floats not a main hull

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that trimarans loose steering because of the growing trend towards large capacity outer hulls. A deep rudder is really what is required, not two.

 

In an ideal world two rudders but on floats not a main hull

 

So why not on the TNT 34?blink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that trimarans loose steering because of the growing trend towards large capacity outer hulls. A deep rudder is really what is required, not two.

 

In an ideal world two rudders but on floats not a main hull

 

So why not on the TNT 34?blink.gif

 

To complicated for folding tri

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TNT 34 buiding progress :

230 – top view

 

766 – double rudder with space for O/B between them

 

804 - unfolded position to total 28 ft beam (8.5 m)

 

814 –marina beam of 13 ft(3.9 m)

 

934 – interior mock up , it will be spacious

 

 

976 - deck fits perfectly

 

post-49251-047583700 1299828488_thumb.jpg

post-49251-053577400 1299828498_thumb.jpg

post-49251-055113800 1299828513_thumb.jpg

post-49251-020206200 1299828527_thumb.jpg

post-49251-042477600 1299828681_thumb.jpg

post-49251-088925600 1299828692_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Final TNT 34 sails :

  • Main 57.5 m2
  • Jib 27.5 m2
  • Spi 125 m2
  • Genoa 80 m2

see You on water soon :rolleyes:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been recieving updates on this fine craft. looks awesome..

I couldnt imagine who would be able to afford one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

post-49251-007837500 1304364550_thumb.jpg

Final TNT 34 sails :

  • Main 57.5 m2
  • Jib 27.5 m2
  • Spi 125 m2
  • Genoa 80 m2

see You on water soon :rolleyes:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by motorcat, July 15, 2011 - mistakes

Sorry for keeping You silent but we must to slow down the project regarding to building the next power cats from our Motorcat line http://www.facebook.com/pages/Motorcat/105649256196055

 

Now we back to finish TNT 34 and hope to be ready for test in the second part of Septemebr

 

Folow the below link included the movie taken yesterday in the shipyard and see attached picture attached pictures

 

http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-New-Trimaran/182095355155213

 

 

 

post-49251-099341900 1310720894_thumb.jpg

post-49251-049038400 1310720914_thumb.jpg

post-49251-083428600 1310720932_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post

Sorry for keeping You silent but we must to slow down the project regarding to building the next power cats from our Motorcat line

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Motorcat/105649256196055

Now we back to finish TNT 34 and hope to be ready for test in the second part of Septemebr

Folow the below link included the movie taken yesterday in the shipyard and see attached pictures

http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Ne...55213&comments

post-49251-004438100 1310723825_thumb.jpg

post-49251-098816900 1310723859_thumb.jpg

post-49251-087723000 1310723887_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ready to paint and steering

 

why have the 2 rudders that close and parallel? interesting concept.

 

 

At least there is a choice for one or two as required to reduce drag

Shape \ DRAG for taller and thicker single rudder is about the same but now there is lesser loss of steering in hard heel

Plus loss of single you have nothing to steer

Plus o\b can fit between

Plus.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ready to paint and steering

 

why have the 2 rudders that close and parallel? interesting concept.

 

 

At least there is a choice for one or two as required to reduce drag

Shape \ DRAG for taller and thicker single rudder is about the same but now there is lesser loss of steering in hard heel

Plus loss of single you have nothing to steer

Plus o\b can fit between

Plus.....

 

But why parallel and why not on the outer hulls?

 

on Timberwolf In NZ we have gone from single rudder in the middle to one on each outer hull at 5 degrease.

 

I’m not being negative, just very curious.

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ready to paint and steering

 

why have the 2 rudders that close and parallel? interesting concept.

 

allows you to centrally mount the outboard?

Not worth it for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ready to paint and steering

 

why have the 2 rudders that close and parallel? interesting concept.

 

 

At least there is a choice for one or two as required to reduce drag

Shape \ DRAG for taller and thicker single rudder is about the same but now there is lesser loss of steering in hard heel

Plus loss of single you have nothing to steer

Plus o\b can fit between

Plus.....

 

But why parallel and why not on the outer hulls?

 

on Timberwolf In NZ we have gone from single rudder in the middle to one on each outer hull at 5 degrease.

 

I'm not being negative, just very curious.

 

thanks

 

Time will tell this system benefits

 

For folding tri float rudders ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See that the displacement is 1.5T - but I am shure the finished boat will be closer to 2.5T - as I have a very light buildt 35 feet trimaran myself that weights in at 1,3T

I can be pretty shure of this. See also you predict 10-12 knot with a 40-50hp engine - even the weight I thing it wil make that with ease.

 

The concept of having such a big engine in the rear will maybe cause some problems . It will be a fast sailer - and the big engine in the back is "against the concept".

 

I think a more innovative engine concept should be designed for such a boat; the engine (heavy) mounted in the centre og the hull - as a power plant for an light

electrical engine at the back - or a full electric motor with the batteris in the center - low down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See that the displacement is 1.5T - but I am shure the finished boat will be closer to 2.5T - as I have a very light buildt 35 feet trimaran myself that weights in at 1,3T

I can be pretty shure of this. See also you predict 10-12 knot with a 40-50hp engine - even the weight I thing it wil make that with ease.

 

The concept of having such a big engine in the rear will maybe cause some problems . It will be a fast sailer - and the big engine in the back is "against the concept".

 

I think a more innovative engine concept should be designed for such a boat; the engine (heavy) mounted in the centre og the hull - as a power plant for an light

electrical engine at the back - or a full electric motor with the batteris in the center - low down.

 

 

We going with 20 or 25 hp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

looking forward to the pics, sorry can't make the splash

 

do we have any anachisti? in poland?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First trail for a public 22 October on lake Bukowka , near the shipyard - turistic farm http://www.paprotki.pl/_eng/index.htm . If anybody interesting to visit us please write a msg to office@motorcat.com to 10 October at the latest . Welcome on board soon

post-49251-044694500 1317310326_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry - but the wheel, double rudders (why, oh why?) and the centerline engine in that rendering makes the boat look like a Mac 26.

 

 

20 HP should be enough - I've got a 20 on my Contour 34 - should be about the same displacement - and we hit max efficiency at about 3/4 throttle. It's nice having a little extra to punch in chop.

 

I hope you have good hatch boards - you will get pooped with that low transom on occasion, and you will take significant water into the cockpit. We're planning on rigging a canvas cover for our transom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry - but the wheel, double rudders (why, oh why?) and the centerline engine in that rendering makes the boat look like a Mac 26.

 

 

20 HP should be enough - I've got a 20 on my Contour 34 - should be about the same displacement - and we hit max efficiency at about 3/4 throttle. It's nice having a little extra to punch in chop.

 

I hope you have good hatch boards - you will get pooped with that low transom on occasion, and you will take significant water into the cockpit. We're planning on rigging a canvas cover for our transom.

 

Station with Wheel is designed to drive on power only

 

Tiller is the way to go and this what we promote

 

We installed 30 hp on this model but 10 15 20 or 25 are up to the owner

 

Double via slider makes sense under sail double via kick up not .

 

Countour will be havier vs TNT with much less beam and sail area . Not even close to TNT

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder about how the forces from the front beams and the mast is distributed ?

 

I see from the building pics that its no big bulkhead in that area - and the area is rather big with the two beams assymetrical and the mast behind the beams.

With the daggerboard on the floats it vil also make bigger forcer to the beams.

 

Are the daggerboard assymetrical - which could be an option when there are mounted on the amas?

 

Is this a ocean going design or more a sheltered water design?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder about how the forces from the front beams and the mast is distributed ?

 

I see from the building pics that its no big bulkhead in that area - and the area is rather big with the two beams assymetrical and the mast behind the beams.

With the daggerboard on the floats it vil also make bigger forcer to the beams.

 

Are the daggerboard assymetrical - which could be an option when there are mounted on the amas?

 

Is this a ocean going design or more a sheltered water design?

 

Forces are huge but controlled by two bulkheads. TNT will have CE ,class B.

There is no hydrofoils yet (50/50) and the main dagarboard has huge reinforcements

Our designers have engineering background an we take great care to calculate and distribute theforces trough out the TNT

post-49251-046988300 1317393764_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just guessing here but I think the idea is similar to the Mac 26. Two rudders allow for an oversized outboard to be placed between them. The idea with the 26 was to make a boat that could be sailed or motored, and motored at planning speeds. With the 26 the idea was a boat for the everyday man, something that does everything. However whenever you compromise.... But with a tri you aren't going to get in up on a plane under power, or I would hope not, so why the need for the huge outboard? I would think a tri would be faster under sail than power in almost all situations so why not save the drag and the weight associated with this system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just guessing here but I think the idea is similar to the Mac 26. Two rudders allow for an oversized outboard to be placed between them. The idea with the 26 was to make a boat that could be sailed or motored, and motored at planning speeds. With the 26 the idea was a boat for the everyday man, something that does everything. However whenever you compromise.... But with a tri you aren't going to get in up on a plane under power, or I would hope not, so why the need for the huge outboard? I would think a tri would be faster under sail than power in almost all situations so why not save the drag and the weight associated with this system.

 

 

Why all twin rudders boats seems to be Macgregors and why multihulls idea is compared to mono ?

As a builder of true power cats ( www.motorcat.com ) , we believe that 10 knots under power is needed and safe.

 

Twin rudder under sail give us so many options

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the only reason I can see for the twin rudders is to give room for the outboard. If it was a control issue they wouldn't be parallel and 3 feet apart. They would be set at the best angle to be vertical while healed. And generally on a tri you wouldn't do that anyway. If the design allows for lifting the center hull then the rudders are out on the amas. If the main hull stays wet then one, centered. 10 knts under power seems reasonable, just saying it looks like that is your reason for 2 rudders, a big engine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the only reason I can see for the twin rudders is to give room for the outboard. If it was a control issue they wouldn't be parallel and 3 feet apart. They would be set at the best angle to be vertical while healed. And generally on a tri you wouldn't do that anyway. If the design allows for lifting the center hull then the rudders are out on the amas. If the main hull stays wet then one, centered. 10 knts under power seems reasonable, just saying it looks like that is your reason for 2 rudders, a big engine.

 

 

Plus less leeway when under 10 knots under sails

 

More control of needed blade area

 

When heeled better grip

 

Two is better than one if one fails

 

List is long ..,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's your boat, build as you want. But looking at the size of the rudders I think you are way overdoing it on surface area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's your boat, build as you want. But looking at the size of the rudders I think you are way overdoing it on surface area.

 

 

Win Win with two rudders

post-49251-042152800 1317796854_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the wheel for on the back of the house?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the wheel for on the back of the house?

 

 

Station with Wheel is designed to drive on power

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rest my case about the rudders then!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last weekend test failed . Unfortunately in saturday when the weather was ok , the shipyard must to end fitting of the mast, what was a result of missing mast feet during the delivery .We must wait extra few days and couldn`t be ready for Saturday. The Sunday started at the lake , with heavy fog after the night with a minus grad Celsjus and about the noon we must to cancel event finally :o(. See the pictures taken last week in the shipayrd. We have a hope to be on the water within next two weeks , if the weather let . Keep You posted

post-49251-065515000 1319475325_thumb.jpg

post-49251-037688000 1319475346_thumb.jpg

post-49251-047956800 1319475428_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very nice

 

i wondered why the pics weren't appearing on your facebook page

 

not much time left in your sailing season

 

hopefully you'll get some valuable sailing data before the ice comes

 

and have it all ready for 2012

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

those are monster beams

 

can they be unbolted from the floats, will they fit into a 40' container?

 

those beams seem to be much more angled than in the drawings

 

is this because they are just hanging

 

do they need water under them supporting them to be flat like the drawings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

those are monster beams

 

can they be unbolted from the floats, will they fit into a 40' container?

 

those beams seem to be much more angled than in the drawings

 

is this because they are just hanging

 

do they need water under them supporting them to be flat like the drawings?

 

If anything like my boat - they need the rig tension to lift them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

those are monster beams

 

can they be unbolted from the floats, will they fit into a 40' container?

 

those beams seem to be much more angled than in the drawings

 

is this because they are just hanging

 

do they need water under them supporting them to be flat like the drawings?

 

Yes we can fit TNT into container . The 15 m mast is folding into 2 pieces

Beams were not fixed by bolts on the floor at the time of pictures.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Price ?

 

 

For the price requests please write to office@motorcat.com

 

We did 9 kts with a wind about 4-5 kts and 7 kts on power with 3500 rpm ( max 6000 rpm )

 

We need now a really wind and warmest weather . Keep You posted

post-49251-093876800 1321777478_thumb.jpg

post-49251-078093600 1321777498_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How tall are those beams when folded?

 

Joe

 

a litle bit more than 4 m , seating on the trailer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what's what's the limit where you are Joey?

 

looks to have nets aft of the rear beam like the similarly long tailed f32

 

woud be very interesting to see them sailing together someday...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a little tall for trailering in most places ain't it?

 

Joe

 

 

 

I think no . US - max trailering height is 4,30 ( 14 feet ) In Europe max trailering height is 4-4,1 m and depends to country . Height of the TNT itself with beam up is 3,73 , ( 12,2 feet )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a little tall for trailering in most places ain't it?

 

Joe

 

 

 

I think no . US - max trailering height is 4,30 ( 14 feet ) In Europe max trailering height is 4-4,1 m and depends to country . Height of the TNT itself with beam up is 3,73 , ( 12,2 feet )

 

While the max height in the US is 14 feet I can tell you that i have seen many bridges shorter than that. I think that the beams look absolutely huge, but when you put them in comparison to an F/C boat they are about the same.

 

Joe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a little tall for trailering in most places ain't it?

 

Joe

 

 

 

I think no . US - max trailering height is 4,30 ( 14 feet ) In Europe max trailering height is 4-4,1 m and depends to country . Height of the TNT itself with beam up is 3,73 , ( 12,2 feet )

 

While the max height in the US is 14 feet I can tell you that i have seen many bridges shorter than that. I think that the beams look absolutely huge, but when you put them in comparison to an F/C boat they are about the same.

 

Joe

 

I do not talk that are any bridges under the 4,3 m height . I wrote that trailering under the 4,3 m height is not prohibited on the US roads and do not required special permition . As always before trailering TNT will be required to find a road without height limits

post-49251-010243000 1321871280_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

While the max height in the US is 14 feet I can tell you that i have seen many bridges shorter than that. I think that the beams look absolutely huge, but when you put them in comparison to an F/C boat they are about the same.

 

Joe

 

The original F-27 is close to twelve feet, my F-36 is around 11' 6" and the third generation boats are lower yet.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My F32 stands at 11'7"

 

I thought that the F36 was demountable, not folding?

 

 

Sorry, I meant my F-31- bad typo.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TNT 34 -The New Trimaran – First Trial

 

 

The first sail trial of TNT 34 has happened on November 18 ,2011 on the small lake Bukowka(http://www.windguru.cz/int/index.php?sc=65606) surrounded by hills where wind speed that day was 5-9 knots. There was 5 people on board and not all sails and rigging were in place to attain higher speeds.

 

After launching the yacht by crane (no ramp available), the engine was started to stay against the wind and to hoist the sails .The daggerboard was lowered to 70 % of its length due to unknown and potentially shallow conditions .The following results were obtained :

 

 

  • TWS 7-9 knots, wind angle 70 deg ,boat speed 7,8 knots (TWS –True Wind Speed)
  • TWS 5-6 knots, wind angle 70 deg ,boat speed 6,5 knots

First tacks were quick and TNT easily crossed the wind line . Loss of boat speed was not more than 50 % (20 tacks were made) and yacht did not “hesitate “ or “stopped” crossing smoothly the wind line .

 

After up wind trial TNT started to tack with the wind and following results were obtained:

 

 

  • TWS 5-6 ,wind angle 120 deg ,boat speed 8-9 knots
  • TWS 7-9 ,wind angle 120 deg ,boat speed 9-10 knots

 

Jibing was easy too with only 20 % loss of boat speed .

 

Then series of tacks and jibes were performed on a beam reach. In both cases TNT 34 crossed easily the wind line and tack radius did not exceed 1.5 hull length .Also TNT performed flawlessly twice man overboard manoeuvre (mandatory for some EU skippers during exam ) .

 

 

Report by Piotr Adamowicz ,Yacht Captain

 

Piotr has sailed 58000 NM of which 38000 NM are in racing .14 times Polish Yacht Championships in different categories and yacht classes .Piotr has also participated 9 times in ¼ Ton World Cup (IOR) with being 5th, in 1995 and 6th in 1995.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

TWS 5-6 ,wind angle 120 deg ,boat speed 8-9 knots

 

 

Really? You are claiming boat speed @ 1.5X wind speed, off the wind with 80 degree gybing angles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

was the motor running ?

 

nice boat ... the last thing we need is overzealous incorrect marketing "facts"

 

thor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

TWS 5-6 ,wind angle 120 deg ,boat speed 8-9 knots

 

 

Really? You are claiming boat speed @ 1.5X wind speed, off the wind with 80 degree gybing angles.

 

If you are sailing at an angle of 120 deg to true wind, thats a broad reach and your gybe angle would be 120 deg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

TWS 5-6 ,wind angle 120 deg ,boat speed 8-9 knots

 

 

Really? You are claiming boat speed @ 1.5X wind speed, off the wind with 80 degree gybing angles.

 

If you are sailing at an angle of 120 deg to true wind, thats a broad reach and your gybe angle would be 120 deg

Wow, that hang-over lasted a while.

 

Pay no attention to my superior math skills... yes they are 60 off DDW and gybing through 120 deg as you said. Ouch.

 

Still doubt they were getting 1.5X (quickly double checking that...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still doubt they were getting 1.5X (quickly double checking that...)

 

We believe that next trials will confirm it and TNT 34 will be one of the fastest tri , but still fammily friendly . It is a simple theory of sailing :rolleyes:, that let sail fast than wind http://en.wikipedia....r_than_the_wind. TNT 34 in light wind has up to 160 m2 on 2200 kg boat and has an extreme sa/d ratio.

Bruce number is between 1,841,-1,89 against 1,693 of F33 for example. Keep You posted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It also has twin rudders and a big outboard

 

 

A 2 strokker outboard though - same weight as a 4 strokker smallish that is... twynn rudds - yeah' but they are not soo darn deep.-.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It also has twin rudders and a big outboard

like "that other" boat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Two new videos at Utube :

* Folding TNT 34 - outboard run - 8,9 Kts on 30 HP power - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQjXB1Ta_V4&list=UU-91P767gj-Z5X5mx8x9P2g&index=2&feature=plcp

* TNT 34 - folding on the water - starboard view - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH-ZSaLC9r0&feature=autoplay&list=UU-91P767gj-Z5X5mx8x9P2g&lf=plcp&playnext=1

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about a video of it sailing in 25 knts of breeze so we get an idea of how she goes.

Nobody really cares how fast it is with a 30hp motor. It is a sailing trimaran after all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about a video of it sailing in 25 knts of breeze so we get an idea of how she goes.

Nobody really cares how fast it is with a 30hp motor. It is a sailing trimaran after all.

 

 

 

According to winter weather here in Poland , we forward final test in "really" sailor conditions to the spring time near Gdansk ( Batic Sea ) . As TNT is new boat and protype vessel , we must start at the lake area first to check design in light waterways . Now the boat is ready to move in sea direction

Yes it is sail trimaran , but as it is fammily friendly design too , we must to take care about safety as well . I think that it is important to know , how fast is possible to back in case to unexpected events

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to go back ,,,, in a hurry.... and you take the sails down and use the motor,, you are indeed a fool .... sorry my friend ...

our boats sail very safe with 3 times the speed than the motor can push them in the best of conditions...

 

If yours doesnt, than something is seriously wrong

 

your last sentence sounds exaclty like the fuzzy warm secure feeling non sailors get when they sign the dotted line for a McGregor.

 

I think you have a beautiful boat there, with lots of potential, I like a lot of details, and some not so much, but your comments are really turning me off ...

 

thor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to go back ,,,, in a hurry.... and you take the sails down and use the motor,, you are indeed a fool .... sorry my friend ...

our boats sail very safe with 3 times the speed than the motor can push them in the best of conditions...

 

If yours doesnt, than something is seriously wrong

 

your last sentence sounds exaclty like the fuzzy warm secure feeling non sailors get when they sign the dotted line for a McGregor.

 

I think you have a beautiful boat there, with lots of potential, I like a lot of details, and some not so much, but your comments are really turning me off ...

 

thor

 

in case of unexpected events , means for me that is not possible to use sails ( sometimes shit happens ). Building our botas we are thinking always about safety. Maybe it is a foolish idea , but I believe that our boats are more friendly as a result

Kris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your desire to start in light conditions and work up to the stronger conditions.

I realise that it is not designed as a full race boat but a good boat works in well in all conditions.

Look forward to some sailing vids in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites