• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

GauchoGreg

"America's Cup Uncovered" Show

Recommended Posts

Well, FINALLY we have some information regarding broadcasting and online offerings from the organizers. Will these broadcasters also be airing the events?

 

 

</h3>

<h3>America's Cup Uncovered - Opening

Posted on 28 July 2011

 

A global first, the new weekly magazine program America’s Cup Uncovered is designed to connect viewers with the people, places and stories that are the backbone of the America’s Cup. Featuring behind-the-scenes sneak-peeks, athlete profiles and up-close action on and off the water, America’s Cup Uncovered will take an in-depth look at the 34th edition over the next two years, offering an exclusive window into one of the most prestigious events in sport.

 

With more than 90 weekly programs planned, the first episode will feature a variety of segments that will set the stage for future America’s Cup Uncovered episodes:

 

 

 

  • The show begins with a focus on the complete reinvention of the America’s Cup, as the sport drives towards the future.
  • Viewers will be introduced to the new home of the America’s Cup - San Francisco - and how the natural amphitheater of the San Francisco Bay is setting the stage for the Cup’s transformation.
  • Up close and personal with James Spithill (Australia) of ORACLE Racing, the youngest skipper to ever win the Cup, and what a typical “day at the office” entails, with eyes always set on defending his team’s win.
  • A preview of Cascais, the site of the inaugural America’s Cup World Series, which is the new professional circuit bringing the America’s Cup experience to port cities around the globe.
  • And finally, a visit to the past, with a visit to Auckland, New Zealand, where locals recall their Cup experience and how the oldest trophy in international sport helped rebuild and modernize their city’s waterfront.

Each episode is 30-minutes in duration, and available from 08:00 PDT / 11:00 EDT / 15:00 GMT on Saturdays, each week.

 

Each episode is available online for seven days, until the next episode is aired each Saturday, and from select international broadcasters, including:

 

Hong Kong - PCCW

UK - BSkyB

Spain - Mediaset

Portugal - TVI

LATAM - ESPN Sur

USA - ComCast Sports Network

South Africa - Supersport

New Zealand - TVNZ

 

http://www.americascup.com/en/Latest/Gallery/2011/7/Americas-Cup-Uncovered-preview/

 

By the way, that will be lame if you only get broadcast coverage if you are using ComCast, but at least we have the on-line offering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, FINALLY we have some information regarding broadcasting and online offerings from the organizers. Will these broadcasters also be airing the events?

 

 

</h3>

<h3>America's Cup Uncovered - Opening

Posted on 28 July 2011

 

A global first, the new weekly magazine program America's Cup Uncovered is designed to connect viewers with the people, places and stories that are the backbone of the America's Cup. Featuring behind-the-scenes sneak-peeks, athlete profiles and up-close action on and off the water, America's Cup Uncovered will take an in-depth look at the 34th edition over the next two years, offering an exclusive window into one of the most prestigious events in sport.

 

With more than 90 weekly programs planned, the first episode will feature a variety of segments that will set the stage for future America's Cup Uncovered episodes:

 

 

 

  • The show begins with a focus on the complete reinvention of the America's Cup, as the sport drives towards the future.
  • Viewers will be introduced to the new home of the America's Cup - San Francisco - and how the natural amphitheater of the San Francisco Bay is setting the stage for the Cup's transformation.
  • Up close and personal with James Spithill (Australia) of ORACLE Racing, the youngest skipper to ever win the Cup, and what a typical "day at the office" entails, with eyes always set on defending his team's win.
  • A preview of Cascais, the site of the inaugural America's Cup World Series, which is the new professional circuit bringing the America's Cup experience to port cities around the globe.
  • And finally, a visit to the past, with a visit to Auckland, New Zealand, where locals recall their Cup experience and how the oldest trophy in international sport helped rebuild and modernize their city's waterfront.

Each episode is 30-minutes in duration, and available from 08:00 PDT / 11:00 EDT / 15:00 GMT on Saturdays, each week.

 

Each episode is available online for seven days, until the next episode is aired each Saturday, and from select international broadcasters, including:

 

Hong Kong - PCCW

UK - BSkyB

Spain - Mediaset

Portugal - TVI

LATAM - ESPN Sur

USA - ComCast Sports Network

South Africa - Supersport

New Zealand - TVNZ

 

http://www.americasc...overed-preview/

 

By the way, that will be lame if you only get broadcast coverage if you are using ComCast, but at least we have the on-line offering.

 

 

I agree, great that they are making it available online (had to really - or be taunted as Flintstones)

But they are still using the same old script I see!

 

Good that they have got this far though - hope they can find broadcasters in further countries soon

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Each episode is available online for seven days"

 

Does someone want to be the official archivist for this one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great that they are making it available online

 

 

Not great. The absolute minimum they could do. Having their revenue stream dictate the time limit for the shows to be online is dopey, and flies directly in the face of the stated goal of getting the word out to the masses, and of the way modern media browsing occurs.

 

 

I imagine it'll be up to the Bittorrent community to sort it out, if anyone cares enough to bother.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see if that is really the case that the episode is only available for 7 days. It could be the same dopey type of misspeak as saying the boats will have closing speeds of up to 30knts. Obviously, the shows will be available at least 7 days. Why they would then pull them makes no sense, and actually makes less work for themselves, and would seem to take away potential revenue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see if that is really the case that the episode is only available for 7 days. It could be the same dopey type of misspeak as saying the boats will have closing speeds of up to 30knts. Obviously, the shows will be available at least 7 days. Why they would then pull them makes no sense, and actually makes less work for themselves, and would seem to take away potential revenue.

 

It's pretty routine for cable companies to require that they get pulled after a set period of time. The Daily Show is only available for 5 days or so for instance, because Comedy Central wants people to watch re-runs, I guess.

 

The bigger question is what ComCast Sports Network markets they will be in? CSN is a weird affiliate; first, it's actually a bunch of individual cable channels in 8 or 9 major US markets, and second, the national VS is also somehow part of the Network. And third, part of the Comcast/NBC merger means all of these networks are about to be renamed so mething with NBC in them to get the Comcast odor off and try to build more market share. All that being said, the CSN productions are generally really good (not that it will matter with all the content coming from ACEA), their regional promotion is pretty good, and Comcast reaches 22% of the TV market, which is a big-ass number. A number that has been falling since 2007, unfortunately for Comcast (now Xfinity).

 

The ability to reach 22% of the market in the US is great. The fact that ACEA might earn some revenue from it is great.

 

But it ain't what ElliCoutts promised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see if that is really the case that the episode is only available for 7 days. It could be the same dopey type of misspeak as saying the boats will have closing speeds of up to 30knts. Obviously, the shows will be available at least 7 days. Why they would then pull them makes no sense, and actually makes less work for themselves, and would seem to take away potential revenue.

 

It's pretty routine for cable companies to require that they get pulled after a set period of time. The Daily Show is only available for 5 days or so for instance, because Comedy Central wants people to watch re-runs, I guess.

 

The bigger question is what ComCast Sports Network markets they will be in? CSN is a weird affiliate; first, it's actually a bunch of individual cable channels in 8 or 9 major US markets, and second, the national VS is also somehow part of the Network. And third, part of the Comcast/NBC merger means all of these networks are about to be renamed so mething with NBC in them to get the Comcast odor off and try to build more market share. All that being said, the CSN productions are generally really good (not that it will matter with all the content coming from ACEA), their regional promotion is pretty good, and Comcast reaches 22% of the TV market, which is a big-ass number. A number that has been falling since 2007, unfortunately for Comcast (now Xfinity).

 

The ability to reach 22% of the market in the US is great. The fact that ACEA might earn some revenue from it is great.

 

But it ain't what ElliCoutts promised.

 

I wonder how long the contract is for. I have not been following that closely, but is CSN now a channel that is played outside of ComCast specific cable providers, as part of the NBC sports package? Like Versus, now under NBC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90 straight episodes ... it's going to get old.

 

 

But you won't be able to re-watch the episodes after 7 days. Woes me.

 

(even though, I will be surprised if they won't still be available)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I wonder how long the contract is for. I have not been following that closely, but is CSN now a channel that is played outside of ComCast specific cable providers, as part of the NBC sports package? Like Versus, now under NBC.

 

According to Comcast's site, if I had cable here in Berkley, MI I would not have CSN, though I would have VS. For me personally, it's not an issue - like many of my friends and family, I do my media consumption on the web with a laptop that's no longer fit for SA duty running a 50" LCD via HDMI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's pretty routine for cable companies to require that they get pulled after a set period of time. The Daily Show is only available for 5 days or so for instance, because Comedy Central wants people to watch re-runs, I guess.

 

 

Really, really? AFIK, TDS from Jan 1999 to the present is on the web at http://www.thedailyshow.com/videos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a market reach there if you add up all those regions and channels. But that is for just the segment shows, right?

 

The live, or delayed, race coverage could be different. Think they said they hope to live it on (at least) the final Sundays of ACWS events?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pretty routine for cable companies to require that they get pulled after a set period of time. The Daily Show is only available for 5 days or so for instance, because Comedy Central wants people to watch re-runs, I guess.

 

 

Really, really? AFIK, TDS from Jan 1999 to the present is on the web at http://www.thedailyshow.com/videos.

My bad. Confusing it with another show, I guess. Maybe simpsons. Damn you, short-term memory!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a market reach there if you add up all those regions and channels. But that is for just the segment shows, right?

 

The live, or delayed, race coverage could be different. Think they said they hope to live it on (at least) the final Sundays of ACWS events?

 

If the best they can do is one day of live coverage, these people should be laughed out of their jobs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a market reach there if you add up all those regions and channels. But that is for just the segment shows, right?

 

The live, or delayed, race coverage could be different. Think they said they hope to live it on (at least) the final Sundays of ACWS events?

 

If the best they can do is one day of live coverage, these people should be laughed out of their jobs.

Back in November in Dubai, RW suggested it will start off small then steadily progress. This ~is~ just #1, remember?

 

Am very, very happy that apparently (?) ALL the action will be web streamed, I suspect that even you will be gobsmacked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop Press:

 

A few minutes ago on the Tv news had a couple minutes over Cascais ACWS and it will be aired free on TVI (one of our national networks) "the official network of the event".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a market reach there if you add up all those regions and channels. But that is for just the segment shows, right?

 

The live, or delayed, race coverage could be different. Think they said they hope to live it on (at least) the final Sundays of ACWS events?

 

If the best they can do is one day of live coverage, these people should be laughed out of their jobs.

Back in November in Dubai, RW suggested it will start off small then steadily progress. This ~is~ just #1, remember?

 

Am very, very happy that apparently (?) ALL the action will be web streamed, I suspect that even you will be gobsmacked.

 

You want me to believe that with 50 or 100 production people working on this shit, and they can't plug a fucking computer into a board and send it to the web? Give me a break. Even Portugal can manage a megabit/second of upload speed. 1.2 million hits (not unique visitors, in case our resident bird brain is here) for our low-budget coverage of the Extremes. The AC45s would have twice that just on the name. That's hundreds of thousands of eyes that you think they will shit on because they can't get their act together, and hundreds of thousands of marketeers who would spread the word at this important but early date.

 

I refuse to believe that Ellison would surround himself with people that incompetent, though their silence on the matter does make me wonder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop Press:

 

A few minutes ago on the Tv news had a couple minutes over Cascais ACWS and it will be aired free on TVI (one of our national networks) "the official network of the event".

 

and we have to learn this from a guy watching the news.

 

thanks for your work Nulo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a market reach there if you add up all those regions and channels. But that is for just the segment shows, right?

 

The live, or delayed, race coverage could be different. Think they said they hope to live it on (at least) the final Sundays of ACWS events?

 

If the best they can do is one day of live coverage, these people should be laughed out of their jobs.

Back in November in Dubai, RW suggested it will start off small then steadily progress. This ~is~ just #1, remember?

 

Am very, very happy that apparently (?) ALL the action will be web streamed, I suspect that even you will be gobsmacked.

 

You want me to believe that with 50 or 100 production people working on this shit, and they can't plug a fucking computer into a board and send it to the web? Give me a break. Even Portugal can manage a megabit/second of upload speed. 1.2 million hits (not unique visitors, in case our resident bird brain is here) for our low-budget coverage of the Extremes. The AC45s would have twice that just on the name. That's hundreds of thousands of eyes that you think they will shit on because they can't get their act together, and hundreds of thousands of marketeers who would spread the word at this important but early date.

 

I refuse to believe that Ellison would surround himself with people that incompetent, though their silence on the matter does make me wonder.

What are you on about, besides trying to toot your own little OTWA/ESS horn?

 

They already announced that it will be live streamed via the web. Do you honestly predict it will be some unsteady camera guy, wondering the view finder around in some unsteady hand, from a Boston dock, with unsteady comms to some guy out on the course as the 5th man, breaking in to unsteady "umm, can you hear us now? okay.. now?" commentary from shore-side? With unsteady internet connection to boot, where people tweet "jeeezus, now what??" every time it drops out, right before they do too?

 

 

Clean, this thing is just so far over the top of that (commendable and fun OTWA and all, but still..) it's very much an amateur effort that just has no comparison at all to be made on any level. "Sending it to the web" may have been a big frikkin issue to OTWA with the dog twenty feer away peeing on the connection, the kid over there yanking the plug, whatever the fuck all your continuing problems were. But do you honestly think that that one facet of their production has not been thoroughly covered, and then some?

 

You did see the LIVE data feed picture I found, right? In case it has not yet dawned on your imagination: this shit coming up the big time.

 

I realize you don't want to be 'shown up' and realize you don't want to be 'left out' or just 'one face in a sea of 700 journos' etc, etc. And that's fine, good that you want to be one of THE guys, even if that is egocentric, and actually yes I would like that too, I think you are the best interviewer out there for some kinds of conversations, although maybe not in the SR (Shirley Realm) yet. But get a grip, buddy, the team assembled around this gig is most facking definitely professional, in just the production aspect there are over a hundred seasoned pro's involved by several accounts. Of course you are right to doubt that Larry "would surround himself with people that incompetent" - have you ever seen him low-ball anything in sailing?

 

It will obviously be on the internet, we may as well enjoy the production rather than try pretend we could have covered it better with tin cans and baling wire. It will be a very compelling journey they stream for us. The streaming is obviously not going to be the story.. Nice try, bud :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What are you on about, besides trying to toot your own little OTWA/ESS horn?

 

They already announced that it will be live streamed via the web. Do you honestly predict it will be some unsteady camera guy, wondering the view finder around in some unsteady hand, from a Boston dock, with unsteady comms to some guy out on the course as the 5th man, breaking in to unsteady "umm, can you hear us now? okay.. now?" commentary from shore-side? With unsteady internet connection to boot, where people tweet "jeeezus, now what??" every time it drops out, right before they do too?

 

 

Clean, this thing is just so far over the top of that (commendable and fun OTWA and all, but still..) it's very much an amateur effort that just has no comparison at all to be made on any level. "Sending it to the web" may have been a big frikkin issue to OTWA with the dog twenty feer away peeing on the connection, the kid over there yanking the plug, whatever the fuck all your continuing problems were. But do you honestly think that that one facet of their production has not been thoroughly covered, and then some?

 

You did see the LIVE data feed picture I found, right? In case it has not yet dawned on your imagination: this shit coming up the big time.

 

I realize you don't want to be 'shown up' and realize you don't want to be 'left out' or just 'one face in a sea of 700 journos' etc, etc. And that's fine, good that you want to be one of THE guys, even if that is egocentric, and actually yes I would like that too, I think you are the best interviewer out there for some kinds of conversations, although maybe not in the SR (Shirley Realm) yet. But get a grip, buddy, the team assembled around this gig is most facking definitely professional, in just the production aspect there are over a hundred seasoned pro's involved by several accounts. Of course you are right to doubt that Larry "would surround himself with people that incompetent" - have you ever seen him low-ball anything in sailing?

 

It will obviously be on the internet, we may as well enjoy the production rather than try pretend we could have covered it better with tin cans and baling wire. It will be a very compelling journey they stream for us. The streaming is obviously not going to be the story.. Nice try, bud

 

Now THAT was funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What are you on about, besides trying to toot your own little OTWA/ESS horn?

 

They already announced that it will be live streamed via the web. Do you honestly predict it will be some unsteady camera guy, wondering the view finder around in some unsteady hand, from a Boston dock, with unsteady comms to some guy out on the course as the 5th man, breaking in to unsteady "umm, can you hear us now? okay.. now?" commentary from shore-side? With unsteady internet connection to boot, where people tweet "jeeezus, now what??" every time it drops out, right before they do too?

 

 

Clean, this thing is just so far over the top of that (commendable and fun OTWA and all, but still..) it's very much an amateur effort that just has no comparison at all to be made on any level. "Sending it to the web" may have been a big frikkin issue to OTWA with the dog twenty feer away peeing on the connection, the kid over there yanking the plug, whatever the fuck all your continuing problems were. But do you honestly think that that one facet of their production has not been thoroughly covered, and then some?

 

You did see the LIVE data feed picture I found, right? In case it has not yet dawned on your imagination: this shit coming up the big time.

 

I realize you don't want to be 'shown up' and realize you don't want to be 'left out' or just 'one face in a sea of 700 journos' etc, etc. And that's fine, good that you want to be one of THE guys, even if that is egocentric, and actually yes I would like that too, I think you are the best interviewer out there for some kinds of conversations, although maybe not in the SR (Shirley Realm) yet. But get a grip, buddy, the team assembled around this gig is most facking definitely professional, in just the production aspect there are over a hundred seasoned pro's involved by several accounts. Of course you are right to doubt that Larry "would surround himself with people that incompetent" - have you ever seen him low-ball anything in sailing?

 

It will obviously be on the internet, we may as well enjoy the production rather than try pretend we could have covered it better with tin cans and baling wire. It will be a very compelling journey they stream for us. The streaming is obviously not going to be the story.. Nice try, bud :)

 

Stingray, you were the one that wrote something about 'for the Sunday only', which is what I said would be totally incompetent. I never claimed anything about the production would be, and considering the talent and $$$ involved, it is basically impossible for it to be anything less than 'gobsmacking.'

 

I will never be in the same technical league as the guys doing this thing, nor will OTWA be; the day I get offered 7-figure production budgets for sailing broadcasts is the day I cash out and go cruising - and it ain't gonna happen. Though frankly, I'd put JC up against any other english-language commentator on earth right now when it comes to doing exciting, energetic calling with essential first-hand knowledge of the discipline.

 

My point - and I encourage you to focus on this for a moment rather than get clouded up in the minutiae - is that while the production may be at ESPN level, the promotion and communication is closer to that of the kids on the corner with the lemonade stand. Ask yourself what's the goal with broadcasting the racing via internet? I assume the goals are (1) provide the core fans and kids - the die hard AC guys like you and me and the multihull locos and kids that have been engaged - with something to get excited with, and something to share with our networks of like-minded individuals, (2) begin the long and tedious process of building essential overall minute and user-minute view counts for sponsors and to give ammo to the guys negotiating the TV contracts, and (3) giving all the journalists at all the publications and news networks around the world something to report on in a way that they can do a good job of it, rather than relying on shitty press releases and 2 minute Youtube highlights.

 

Assuming this is the case, why would you not be promoting the live webcast a good 6 weeks before the event? Can you give me any good reason - aside from disorganization or incompetence - why this would be good practice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you on about, besides trying to toot your own little OTWA/ESS horn?

 

They already announced that it will be live streamed via the web. Do you honestly predict it will be some unsteady camera guy, wondering the view finder around in some unsteady hand, from a Boston dock, with unsteady comms to some guy out on the course as the 5th man, breaking in to unsteady "umm, can you hear us now? okay.. now?" commentary from shore-side? With unsteady internet connection to boot, where people tweet "jeeezus, now what??" every time it drops out, right before they do too?

 

 

Clean, this thing is just so far over the top of that (commendable and fun OTWA and all, but still..) it's very much an amateur effort that just has no comparison at all to be made on any level. "Sending it to the web" may have been a big frikkin issue to OTWA with the dog twenty feer away peeing on the connection, the kid over there yanking the plug, whatever the fuck all your continuing problems were. But do you honestly think that that one facet of their production has not been thoroughly covered, and then some?

 

You did see the LIVE data feed picture I found, right? In case it has not yet dawned on your imagination: this shit coming up the big time.

 

I realize you don't want to be 'shown up' and realize you don't want to be 'left out' or just 'one face in a sea of 700 journos' etc, etc. And that's fine, good that you want to be one of THE guys, even if that is egocentric, and actually yes I would like that too, I think you are the best interviewer out there for some kinds of conversations, although maybe not in the SR (Shirley Realm) yet. But get a grip, buddy, the team assembled around this gig is most facking definitely professional, in just the production aspect there are over a hundred seasoned pro's involved by several accounts. Of course you are right to doubt that Larry "would surround himself with people that incompetent" - have you ever seen him low-ball anything in sailing?

 

It will obviously be on the internet, we may as well enjoy the production rather than try pretend we could have covered it better with tin cans and baling wire. It will be a very compelling journey they stream for us. The streaming is obviously not going to be the story.. Nice try, bud :)

 

Stingray, you were the one that wrote something about 'for the Sunday only', which is what I said would be totally incompetent. I never claimed anything about the production would be, and considering the talent and $ involved, it is basically impossible for it to be anything less than 'gobsmacking.'

 

I will never be in the same technical league as the guys doing this thing, nor will OTWA be; the day I get offered 7-figure production budgets for sailing broadcasts is the day I cash out and go cruising - and it ain't gonna happen. Though frankly, I'd put JC up against any other english-language commentator on earth right now when it comes to doing exciting, energetic calling with essential first-hand knowledge of the discipline.

 

My point - and I encourage you to focus on this for a moment rather than get clouded up in the minutiae - is that while the production may be at ESPN level, the promotion and communication is closer to that of the kids on the corner with the lemonade stand. Ask yourself what's the goal with broadcasting the racing via internet? I assume the goals are (1) provide the core fans and kids - the die hard AC guys like you and me and the multihull locos and kids that have been engaged - with something to get excited with, and something to share with our networks of like-minded individuals, (2) begin the long and tedious process of building essential overall minute and user-minute view counts for sponsors and to give ammo to the guys negotiating the TV contracts, and (3) giving all the journalists at all the publications and news networks around the world something to report on in a way that they can do a good job of it, rather than relying on shitty press releases and 2 minute Youtube highlights.

 

Assuming this is the case, why would you not be promoting the live webcast a good 6 weeks before the event? Can you give me any good reason - aside from disorganization or incompetence - why this would be good practice?

Yes I did write 'for the final Sunday only' - remembering what RW suggested 8 months ago in Dubai, for actual TV broadcast as opposed to the wall to wall live streaming we could be about to be treated to, right from the get-go. Sundays is a good start IMO, it may not ever get past that for the ACWS, can't think of any sailing outside of LVC that has ever gotten all week long coverage before, live TV wise, you? Not sure even I would tune it in for that many hours.

 

But either way (TV or IP) if they ~do~ produce it all (!) then that is a ~major~ production effort. How many remote live mikes and cams per boat? how many mounted cams on chase boats? under-flying-helicopter cams? banks of computers to synchronize it all? directors? live data via selectable i-net feeds? professional commenters if you want that part turned on too? It means that the whole system will be All On All The Time, even if it is not live on your local Ch 8 CSN, which you say you would not watch anyway because IP is supposedly better than HD and surround sound.

 

Mostly agree with your 2nd-last paragraph, hard to argue w/you on that much as I'm in the mood to :) But people don't get excited 6 weeks ahead unless you are one of the few AC geeks here anyway, one week is plenty of heads-up for most potential viewers and we got that.

 

We need to see what they start out with before tossing rocks, pebbles probably anyway. 'Anarchy' and 'Rebel with a Cause' chest beating has its place but there just isn't much of a cause to stand on yet. 'Cheap' production is quite obviously not what this is going to be about, it is not the basis of any comparison. ACEA don't care how cheap an afternoon of OTWA can be had for, it is not even on the same radar gear. The really cool shit is in the interviews like you (most recently) got with GD and LD; the ragging on about being a better media-delivery guru with oh-so-sage advice somehow falls flat in the face of what's ahead on that front; it is a losing argument, a different league, may as well comment about the good and bad of it instead of try compete.

 

Your comment to GD that 'well ACEA haven't called OTWA yet to provide the coverage' made me cringe; by how seriously you said it, it was as if you actually did have that fantasy. Your relative strengths lie elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"A global first, the new weekly magazine program America's Cup Uncovered is designed to connect viewers with the people, places and stories that are the backbone of the America's Cup."

 

I could have sworn there was weekly TV coverage of events in Kiwiland and Fremantle. Furthermore, in the UK at least, that was on mainstream free-to-view channels, not a minority subscription broadcaster. Global first, my arse.

 

This is fine when there are events to report but how the hell they are going to fill 30 minutes when there is no sailing will be interesting to behold. Or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"A global first, the new weekly magazine program America's Cup Uncovered is designed to connect viewers with the people, places and stories that are the backbone of the America's Cup."

 

I could have sworn there was weekly TV coverage of events in Kiwiland and Fremantle. Furthermore, in the UK at least, that was on mainstream free-to-view channels, not a minority subscription broadcaster. Global first, my arse.

 

This is fine when there are events to report but how the hell they are going to fill 30 minutes when there is no sailing will be interesting to behold. Or not.

 

true --to be or not to be -that is the question

 

do you like shake-a-spear

 

BEHOLD A PALE HORSE --

 

[sorry

 

[ i shall explain for you pilgrims a pale horse or pale face as in pale face= pilgrim is without life-breath--]]

 

DEAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A limited time window now exists to throw rocks at what is about to take place, and the recent posting activity and criticism is bullshit even if their may be some relevant points, simply because;

 

1. This is the first event, and we have yet to see what they will produce, regardless of how may people or $ are involved. As a viewer, scale arguments don't mean shit, I'm not paying for this and will judge the end product on its own merits relative to others.

 

2. Expect they will do their best, yet strive to improve with subsequent events. If after the next event we don't see improvement, then we should reassess the situation, not before.

 

2. Nothing on this scale has ever been approached in the past, so a select few can criticize all they want BEFORE THE FACT, but it may be prudent to STFU and see what they come up with.

 

3. Some (without naming names) may be overly sensitive to the fact that the big boys have moved in on a turf they claim to have pioneered. Tough shit - ditch the attitude, sit back and enjoy the viewing.

 

OTWA is nice, and appreciated, but has clearly had it's ups and downs. It continues to improve, and so will these guys if you give them a sporting chance, regardless of the resources involved. I'm not interested in listening to the pity card, just viewing resuts.

 

PS - if their was any question as to why they don't grant SA interviews, it's been answered more than a few times on these threads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm confused are we going to get daily live coverage from Cascais or not, if Audi Med Cup can do it, then surely AC can ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my take on things but I get the impression that the RW/ACEA way of doing things is more in the Peter Huston, hang out in cocktail bars, networking, big picture, future resume, X billion potential viewers, scripted press 'oppurtunities' style, rather than the hands on, spontaneous interview, inform the fan(atics), walk the dock, 'IM style'.

 

One would hope that the organisation/s between them could (or will soon) cater to all the interested segments though. I believe ACEA, for example, was planning on an eventual staff of 200 based in SF, but last I heard they had under 50, so there are bound to be some pretty big gaps still from their side at least.

 

More importantly at the moment the actual sailing and setup side of things seems to be coming together very well under ACRM in Portugal and that bodes well for the coming events. Hopefully the PR/News/TV/Website aspects will catch up. And I suspect the whole production side of things is far more advanced already than some seem willing to believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you on about, besides trying to toot your own little OTWA/ESS horn?

 

They already announced that it will be live streamed via the web. Do you honestly predict it will be some unsteady camera guy, wondering the view finder around in some unsteady hand, from a Boston dock, with unsteady comms to some guy out on the course as the 5th man, breaking in to unsteady "umm, can you hear us now? okay.. now?" commentary from shore-side? With unsteady internet connection to boot, where people tweet "jeeezus, now what??" every time it drops out, right before they do too?

 

 

Clean, this thing is just so far over the top of that (commendable and fun OTWA and all, but still..) it's very much an amateur effort that just has no comparison at all to be made on any level. "Sending it to the web" may have been a big frikkin issue to OTWA with the dog twenty feer away peeing on the connection, the kid over there yanking the plug, whatever the fuck all your continuing problems were. But do you honestly think that that one facet of their production has not been thoroughly covered, and then some?

 

You did see the LIVE data feed picture I found, right? In case it has not yet dawned on your imagination: this shit coming up the big time.

 

I realize you don't want to be 'shown up' and realize you don't want to be 'left out' or just 'one face in a sea of 700 journos' etc, etc. And that's fine, good that you want to be one of THE guys, even if that is egocentric, and actually yes I would like that too, I think you are the best interviewer out there for some kinds of conversations, although maybe not in the SR (Shirley Realm) yet. But get a grip, buddy, the team assembled around this gig is most facking definitely professional, in just the production aspect there are over a hundred seasoned pro's involved by several accounts. Of course you are right to doubt that Larry "would surround himself with people that incompetent" - have you ever seen him low-ball anything in sailing?

 

It will obviously be on the internet, we may as well enjoy the production rather than try pretend we could have covered it better with tin cans and baling wire. It will be a very compelling journey they stream for us. The streaming is obviously not going to be the story.. Nice try, bud :)

 

Stingray, you were the one that wrote something about 'for the Sunday only', which is what I said would be totally incompetent. I never claimed anything about the production would be, and considering the talent and $$$ involved, it is basically impossible for it to be anything less than 'gobsmacking.'

 

I will never be in the same technical league as the guys doing this thing, nor will OTWA be; the day I get offered 7-figure production budgets for sailing broadcasts is the day I cash out and go cruising - and it ain't gonna happen. Though frankly, I'd put JC up against any other english-language commentator on earth right now when it comes to doing exciting, energetic calling with essential first-hand knowledge of the discipline.

 

My point - and I encourage you to focus on this for a moment rather than get clouded up in the minutiae - is that while the production may be at ESPN level, the promotion and communication is closer to that of the kids on the corner with the lemonade stand. Ask yourself what's the goal with broadcasting the racing via internet? I assume the goals are (1) provide the core fans and kids - the die hard AC guys like you and me and the multihull locos and kids that have been engaged - with something to get excited with, and something to share with our networks of like-minded individuals, (2) begin the long and tedious process of building essential overall minute and user-minute view counts for sponsors and to give ammo to the guys negotiating the TV contracts, and (3) giving all the journalists at all the publications and news networks around the world something to report on in a way that they can do a good job of it, rather than relying on shitty press releases and 2 minute Youtube highlights.

 

Assuming this is the case, why would you not be promoting the live webcast a good 6 weeks before the event? Can you give me any good reason - aside from disorganization or incompetence - why this would be good practice?

 

 

i have been asking myself that same questions for the last cuople of weeks....why the secrecy

the only reason i come up with is....a work-in-progress which equates to LAME at this stage of the game

with major contracts on the brink

for individual team sponsors and the rest

LAME LAME LAME

i just can't believe there are people out there still defending them

 

the website LAME

the PR LAME

we are trying to stay involved but everyday they disssppoint somehow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm confused are we going to get daily live coverage from Cascais or not, if Audi Med Cup can do it, then surely AC can ?

 

dude you just stole my line

and RC44

and all sorts of other events

 

how do you want Venezia & China to get sponsors and keep to the financial comitments if you don't have a broadcasting plan?

its a fucking oxymoron

and yes 6 weeks if not 6 months would be great

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A limited time window now exists to throw rocks at what is about to take place, and the recent posting activity and criticism is bullshit even if their may be some relevant points, simply because;

 

1. This is the first event, yada yada

2. Expect they will do their best, yadayada

2. Nothing on this scale has ever been approached in the past, yada yada

 

LMAO, sorry, but that is so funny ... on what planet do you live ?

simple reality : the whole question of how good, nice, spectacular etc... this event (the first AC45 event by the way, nothing more, nothing less) can be mediatised comes down to the simple question how mucho yankee dineiros they are willing to throw into it without knowing if ever they will get a real return.

Argue at will on that one SWS and all the other evangelists and (let's hope not, for your own sake) maybe soon to be apologists, but the technology is not the issue, the scale is not the issue, the event itself is not the issue, it's just the question of pooring an unhealthy amount of cash into a black hole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"A global first, the new weekly magazine program America's Cup Uncovered is designed to connect viewers with the people, places and stories that are the backbone of the America's Cup."

 

I could have sworn there was weekly TV coverage of events in Kiwiland and Fremantle. Furthermore, in the UK at least, that was on mainstream free-to-view channels, not a minority subscription broadcaster. Global first, my arse.

 

This is fine when there are events to report but how the hell they are going to fill 30 minutes when there is no sailing will be interesting to behold. Or not.

 

ESPN had a weekly re-cap show back in '86 when the LV series started in Freo. Before the first races they had a background program, reviewing what had happened from '83 forward, who the teams and boats were, the venue, etc.

 

From then-on the shows were reports of the races that had happened during the week, highlights of starts, crossings, mark roundings, finishes, and then the standings up to that point. The first live races were the defender and challenger finals.

 

Things scaled back some after that but I do think there were reports during the '92-'00 period.

 

I have all of the '87 programs on tape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But either way (TV or IP) if they ~do~ produce it all (!) then that is a ~major~ production effort. How many remote live mikes and cams per boat? how many mounted cams on chase boats? under-flying-helicopter cams? banks of computers to synchronize it all? directors? live data via selectable i-net feeds? professional commenters if you want that part turned on too? It means that the whole system will be All On All The Time, even if it is not live on your local Ch 8 CSN, which you say you would not watch anyway because IP is supposedly better than HD and surround sound.

I don't HAVE cable. I have a computer and a lovely TV. That's all. Keep in mind - IF they are producing any TV at all, they have the ability to send it to the web. There is literally zero extra effort other than clicking on "publish stream" or whatever their software uses.

 

 

people don't get excited 6 weeks ahead unless you are one of the few AC geeks here anyway, one week is plenty of heads-up for most potential viewers and we got that.

It's more about planning, which is why, say, the NBA Finals advertises heavily more than a month than they begin. I somehow don't think they are wrong.

 

We need to see what they start out with before tossing rocks, pebbles probably anyway. 'Anarchy' and 'Rebel with a Cause' chest beating has its place but there just isn't much of a cause to stand on yet.

 

There is plenty of cause to complain right now, and you know it very well. On a scale of 1-10:

 

Website: 2

Pre-event Comms: 1

Photos from Cascais: 6

Videos: 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone loves a critic!

 

ratatouille-critic1.jpg

 

Jesus wept, if only the world could tap into all the incisive, intellectual, perceptive, astute, persuasive, diplomatic, technically savy, talent available here!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone loves a critic!

 

 

 

Jesus wept, if only the world could tap into all the incisive, intellectual, perceptive, astute, persuasive, diplomatic, technically savy, talent available here!

 

Oh, stop it. This site was founded on criticizing the things that the existing publications were too spineless to deal with, and we remain one of the only ones to speak regardless of how it'll effect our ability to get media credentials and press junkets, and we've got a pretty good track record of calling it early, and calling it right. If we were usually wrong, guys like Luca and Moose and Dalts wouldn't take my calls or trust me enough to be recorded for an hour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

What was all that about? It leaves you waiting.

 

Just how many times is the lasting impression of anything to do with AC 34 going to be a shot of a FAIL? ACEA has sold it's soul to the mighty dollar .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note the 480p max setting. That's a contract limitation for broadcasters.

I was wondering too that it is not available in HD. The broadcasterm must have some incentive, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clean, can't you get inside info from Genny?

 

She doesn't know anything. If you have specific questions, post 'em.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two Thumbs Up! Thoroughly enjoyed it, that is an excellent production all around.

 

Disagree. Fundamentally weak production. Voiceover from a kiddy show, uncreative shot selection, weak soundtrack, and once again, producers showing that they can't get character development going despite having some excellent characters. If they only put half the resources into their shot selection and script that they did into the opening animation...Most interesting part of it was the kiwi with the headphones, and they somehow managed to make Jimmy seem boring. Oh, and I thought his nickname was "Pit Bull" for its sonic resemblance to his last name and his tenacity. Not "Bulldog." <facepalm>.

 

I'm glad they're trying, and hope they get better - this accomplishes very little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Long, long interview with RC in Germany's leading news magazine "Der Spiegel".

 

part 1: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/0,1518,776198,00.html

G-Tran: http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&hl=de&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/0,1518,776198,00.html&usg=ALkJrhjjDN03_9zGbZ5_WUL5cazLSEHX2w

 

part 2: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/0,1518,776198-2,00.html

G-Tran: http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&hl=de&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/0,1518,776198-2,00.html&usg=ALkJrhiqa-r5atXfEKrCZfkROjzOmhKaIw

 

Like always, German to English translation is only something for the die-hards, but I was told that the interview is very good (haven't read it myself yet).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Enjoyed it too. Glad it's available online anyway. I noticed they fudged the COR aspect, not that it matters to the general public.

Like Clean though, I thought some of the 'sound bites' were poorly chosen, PC sounded half asleep for example. Hope they have more to work with as they catch up to the action and have more time to assemble stories, biographies etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Enjoyed it too. Glad it's available online anyway. I noticed they fudged the COR aspect, not that it matters to the general public.

Like Clean though, I thought some of the 'sound bites' were poorly chosen, PC sounded half asleep for example. Hope they have more to work with as they catch up to the action and have more time to assemble stories, biographies etc

 

I hate to say it, and I mean no offense by it at all, but it just 'feels' like it was produced and directed by Brits. No sense of drama, no real 'extremeness', no character development, no humor at all, and ultimately, plain vanilla flavor for a subject that is all red hot chili peppers.

 

I'm guessing Sunset + Vine put in a VERY low bid, and you get what you pay for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2ct...

 

First I was reminded of the ACM productions form the days of yore, then I wondered where the magazine would want to lead the viewer. In the middle it sounded like educational TV, before it became slightly better.

 

As a disclaimer I must add that we maybe aren't the target group, but people who have no background knowledge and need the look back to understand what this is all about.

 

All in all, I perceived it as an o.k. production technically, the content was o.k. also; a story line, the "feel" and the ability to absorb the viewer were certainly not there. Room for improvement once they have competition footage.

 

EDIT: Yes, its cool that it is available online and even on YouTube (for people with the the narrowest broadband around).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So when Larry Ellison won the Cup in 2010 he had to get a new CoR before the action could begin. Artemis Racing from Sweden. Yeah right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For an introductory first program, it was good. Set-up some historical background and laid a foundation to build on. That is the important issue to focus on, they need to build it up from here.

 

Remember, we have studied the AC over the last four years like few others. Not many out there have that amount of knowledge.

 

As the program progresses we will then have a better line to critique how they are progressing with the series.

 

A good first effort.

 

Thanks for the first heads-up Renn. :D

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For an introductory first program, it was good. Set-up some historical background and laid a foundation to build on. That is the important issue to focus on, they need to build it up from here.

 

Remember, we have studied the AC over the last four years like few others. Not many out there have that amount of knowledge.

 

As the program progresses we will then have a better line to critique how they are progressing with the series.

 

A good first effort.

 

Thanks for the first heads-up Renn. :D

 

 

 

 

 

 

My sentiments, exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Enjoyed it too. Glad it's available online anyway. I noticed they fudged the COR aspect, not that it matters to the general public.

Like Clean though, I thought some of the 'sound bites' were poorly chosen, PC sounded half asleep for example. Hope they have more to work with as they catch up to the action and have more time to assemble stories, biographies etc

 

I hate to say it, and I mean no offense by it at all, but it just 'feels' like it was produced and directed by Brits. No sense of drama, no real 'extremeness', no character development, no humor at all, and ultimately, plain vanilla flavor for a subject that is all red hot chili peppers.

 

I'm guessing Sunset + Vine put in a VERY low bid, and you get what you pay for.

 

Produced and directed by Brits? Not surprising coz as you know, the core team at S&V is Brit, albeit with a bit of Hollywood savvy.

 

I thought the pace and editing was pretty decent. They certainly had lots of good action to work with. They condensed a lot into a 30-minute intro for the general public. My big quibble is with the voiceover guy. Jasus! Incredibly weak. Just so obvious he was reading off a script, complete with kindergarten-like emphasis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the criticisms above, do a Take 2. There is some very, very good production quality if you pay close attention.

 

Most of it is so fast moving, 3 to 5 seconds max duration, that it's easy to forget just how good each one is. Seriously, that thing is impressive.

 

Excellent start, looks great even on a phone.

 

Edit, will agree the voice might be better but I got used to him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent opening.

 

Good background, cool with America and SF background and on screen handoff from America to AC45.

 

Lots of fast sailing.

 

THE CAPSIZE! THE CAPSIZE! "Dangerously fast!" says background news voice.

 

Nice history. Good highlights. Australian nationalism in winning.

 

US retaking the Cup! Defend the trophy!!

 

Fisher! Nice cameo. Good intro of the competitors.

 

Did I say CAPSIZE! Danger Will Robinson!

 

Bruno! So French you know.

 

San Francisco. Nice city shots and pix of the future for SF and the race in SF.

 

Nice move into Cascais change the narrator to Brit(?) when Cascais/Europe comes up.

 

Nice use of Spithill as human involvement and the physical fitness aspect…blood sweat and tears. Nice personal history and tie to cup. Kind of same we see with training camp promos for NFL. The work behind the game. The team aspect.

 

The heads up display that pops up on the screen hinting at future broadcast.

 

Nice tip of the hat to Team New Zealand and Blake and red sox. Very nice touch. and explains the original background on Team New Zealand. What a difference Cup made to Auckland and New Zealand aimed no doubt at SF and potential city sponsors.

 

Good promotion for Emirates. Nice fair play touch for AC34 considering. Beating Spithill and Ozzies…grrr. Good humor.

 

And leave us at Cascais with a preview of coming attractions.

 

Excellent first of 90 intro videos for AC34.

 

Just crazy bassackwards that it won't be in an online library that people can use to get up to speed as more and more people check out the AC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good effort at a recap there, Eagles, nobody else has tried so far. Again, if you watch closely there's a ~lot~ in it.

 

Figured the SF advertising parts would stiffen your bone :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who thought, "I'm not buying that Jimmy Spithill drives a Toyota Camry"? I know it's completely irrelevant, but I mean ... I just didn't see that one coming.

 

Anyways, I just had some non-sailing friends watch it. They didn't pay attention to any of the narrative after a while because it was boring. They liked the cool sailing footage, as did I, but my friend Matt said he'd prefer to be able to access the action in short videos. He was like, "This is like the time you made me watch that show on CNN, except the CNN one was way better because they had that one hot chick on it who was really interesting."

 

I like the concept, but this just wasn't exciting to me at all. It's missing something, or maybe it has too much something.

 

Edit: I thought the Kiwi talking shit about beating an Ozzie was fucking hilarious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good effort at a recap there, Eagles, nobody else has tried so far. Again, if you watch closely there's a ~lot~ in it.

 

It was very well done especially when you look at it as chapter 1 of 90 chapter book. The preface.

 

Opinions here seem a bit pre-determined, they didn't need to actually watch it (if they even watched it). I think pros would give it two thumbs up.

 

Figured the SF advertising pats would stiffen your bone

 

Calm yourself monkey boy. You and Clean's scatological obssesions remind me that the web is 50% porno driven. Clean sees pole dancing monkey women in boat graphics. You get hot on advertising copy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Showed it to some pub friends and what gets their attention is the water action and the boats.

 

If it was being viewed on TV then maybe the syrupy personality parts would have seeped down deeper.

 

Those special effects water wise are actually excellent, the drips on the lens and such when surfacing and shaking off the Cup and on when on board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good effort at a recap there, Eagles, nobody else has tried so far. Again, if you watch closely there's a ~lot~ in it.

 

It was very well done especially when you look at it as chapter 1 of 90 chapter book. The preface.

 

Opinions here seem a bit pre-determined, they didn't need to actually watch it (if they even watched it). I think pros would give it two thumbs up.

 

Figured the SF advertising pats would stiffen your bone

 

Calm yourself monkey boy. You and Clean's scatological obssesions remind me that the web is 50% porno driven. Clean sees pole dancing monkey women in boat graphics. You get hot on advertising copy.

 

Fuck you. I was first to post the Goddess Artemis with her leg wrapped around the pole!

 

Pole Dancer (PD) from here on, SAAC lore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good effort at a recap there, Eagles, nobody else has tried so far. Again, if you watch closely there's a ~lot~ in it.

 

It was very well done especially when you look at it as chapter 1 of 90 chapter book. The preface.

 

Opinions here seem a bit pre-determined, they didn't need to actually watch it (if they even watched it). I think pros would give it two thumbs up.

 

Figured the SF advertising pats would stiffen your bone

 

Calm yourself monkey boy. You and Clean's scatological obssesions remind me that the web is 50% porno driven. Clean sees pole dancing monkey women in boat graphics. You get hot on advertising copy.

 

I was first to post the Goddess Artemis with her leg wrapped around the pole!

 

 

Not something I'd advertise, certainly Clean has taken up the torch on it. I suppose frequent viewing of pole dancing makes the association.

 

Sometimes a legendary goddess with her bow is just a legendary goddess with her bow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pole Dancer (PD) from here on, SAAC lore.

Torbin Tornquist

Billionaire sailor

Challenger or Record

Prefers the other kind.

 

Pole dancing is art

that sometime misses.

Pay more more money

to enjoy the right one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good effort at a recap there, Eagles, nobody else has tried so far. Again, if you watch closely there's a ~lot~ in it.

 

It was very well done especially when you look at it as chapter 1 of 90 chapter book. The preface.

 

Opinions here seem a bit pre-determined, they didn't need to actually watch it (if they even watched it). I think pros would give it two thumbs up.

 

Figured the SF advertising pats would stiffen your bone

 

Calm yourself monkey boy. You and Clean's scatological obssesions remind me that the web is 50% porno driven. Clean sees pole dancing monkey women in boat graphics. You get hot on advertising copy.

 

Fuck you. I was first to post the Goddess Artemis with her leg wrapped around the pole!

Pole Dancer (PD) from here on, SAAC lore.

 

 

Temper temper, what a childish comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who thought, "I'm not buying that Jimmy Spithill drives a Toyota Camry"? I know it's completely irrelevant, but I mean ... I just didn't see that one coming.

 

Anyways, I just had some non-sailing friends watch it. They didn't pay attention to any of the narrative after a while because it was boring. They liked the cool sailing footage, as did I, but my friend Matt said he'd prefer to be able to access the action in short videos. He was like, "This is like the time you made me watch that show on CNN, except the CNN one was way better because they had that one hot chick on it who was really interesting."

 

I like the concept, but this just wasn't exciting to me at all. It's missing something, or maybe it has too much something.

 

Edit: I thought the Kiwi talking shit about beating an Ozzie was fucking hilarious.

I have a couple of not sailing guinea pigs around I can test on the things ACEA does. Usually they are excited by the boats and any OTW action. Some of them think the AC will be competed for in the current boats (AC45), this is the impression the PR makes currently. So, something is going wrong here, or is it a deliberate mis-information/omission to promote the AC45?

 

Anyay, here is the assessment of the video by my favorite guinea pig:

- Beautiful pictures, especially the dramatic intro.

- Too many "heads" and spoken parts without action.

- The attention abated after half of the program, during the long section with JS.

- Info about the boats was missed, like measures and technical data, incl. graphics.

- Same for the race format, no mention, no graphics, leaves the viewer wondering about what to expect at the events.

- No info about why there are two boat classes.

- The national aspect (e.g. China vs. Sweden, USA vs. NZ) is not emphasized enough and would increase the attention and identification of the general public.

- More historical footage to underline the importance of the event/Cup competition is needed.

=> The first of many programs, so there is still a lot of potential. All in all a very well made format, professionally presented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes in and I gave up

 

"Larry Ellisons Oracle Racing are the current holders" (of the cup)

 

FAIL. If they can't get the basics right then I don't hold any hope for the rest of it so I won't bother. They got one chance and they blew it within 2 minutes.

 

No sign of it anywhere on the TVNZ site or being broadcast in the near future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who thought, "I'm not buying that Jimmy Spithill drives a Toyota Camry"? I know it's completely irrelevant, but I mean ... I just didn't see that one coming.

 

Anyways, I just had some non-sailing friends watch it. They didn't pay attention to any of the narrative after a while because it was boring. They liked the cool sailing footage, as did I, but my friend Matt said he'd prefer to be able to access the action in short videos. He was like, "This is like the time you made me watch that show on CNN, except the CNN one was way better because they had that one hot chick on it who was really interesting."

 

I like the concept, but this just wasn't exciting to me at all. It's missing something, or maybe it has too much something.

 

Edit: I thought the Kiwi talking shit about beating an Ozzie was fucking hilarious.

I have a couple of not sailing guinea pigs around I can test on the things ACEA does. Usually they are excited by the boats and any OTW action. Some of them think the AC will be competed for in the current boats (AC45), this is the impression the PR makes currently. So, something is going wrong here, or is it a deliberate mis-information/omission to promote the AC45?

 

Anyay, here is the assessment of the video by my favorite guinea pig:

- Beautiful pictures, especially the dramatic intro.

- Too many "heads" and spoken parts without action.

- The attention abated after half of the program, during the long section with JS.

- Info about the boats was missed, like measures and technical data, incl. graphics.

- Same for the race format, no mention, no graphics, leaves the viewer wondering about what to expect at the events.

- No info about why there are two boat classes.

- The national aspect (e.g. China vs. Sweden, USA vs. NZ) is not emphasized enough and would increase the attention and identification of the general public.

- More historical footage to underline the importance of the event/Cup competition is needed.

=> The first of many programs, so there is still a lot of potential. All in all a very well made format, professionally presented.

 

 

They know they have 89 more episodes to produce and can't repeat themselves too often, so they gave to keep some of their powder dry!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Produced and directed by Brits? Not surprising coz as you know, the core team at S&V is Brit, albeit with a bit of Hollywood savvy.

 

I thought the pace and editing was pretty decent. They certainly had lots of good action to work with. They condensed a lot into a 30-minute intro for the general public. My big quibble is with the voiceover guy. Jasus! Incredibly weak. Just so obvious he was reading off a script, complete with kindergarten-like emphasis.

 

I really enjoyed it. I'm quite new to the America's Cup and it's such a complicated setup for a beginner to understand but I think they managed to get the basics across very well. They have another 89 shows to go into more details remember.

 

 

I agree about the voice guy. Not keen on him. I prefer the voiceover guy that's used over the Cascais section in the middle, it seems less forced, but maybe that's because I'm a Brit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They know they have 89 more episodes to produce and can't repeat themselves too often, so they gave to keep some of their powder dry!

I think that was clear from both of my posts re. this subject. If not, yes, I agree (and the guinea pig too).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck you. I was first to post the Goddess Artemis with her leg wrapped around the pole!

Pole Dancer (PD) from here on, SAAC lore.

 

 

Temper temper, what a childish comment.

oops, forgot the smiley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like some photograph of the Russian revolution where there's a gap at Lenin's side where Trotsky has been air-brushed out of history. ML as CoR - gone. RC's sojourn at Alinghi - gone.

 

Those "I am an athlete and my body is a templet" shots of JS in the gym were slightly undermined by the footage of his stuffing a burger into his mouth, shown twice. Though to be fair, the mini-autobio by JS was the most interesting part for me. Anybody else spot that the same reaction shot of a press conference crowd laughing was used twice? Maybe they only laughed the once.

 

And does the editor receive an electric shock to the genitalia if he holds a shot for more than three seconds?

 

Ghastly. I feel stupider just through watching it. Maybe it will improve when there is some racing to show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like some photograph of the Russian revolution where there's a gap at Lenin's side where Trotsky has been air-brushed out of history. ML as CoR - gone. RC's sojourn at Alinghi - gone.

 

But what's to say they won't mention all that later down the line? It's just not important enough to dwell on in the first episode.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like some photograph of the Russian revolution where there's a gap at Lenin's side where Trotsky has been air-brushed out of history. ML as CoR - gone. RC's sojourn at Alinghi - gone.

 

But what's to say they won't mention all that later down the line? It's just not important enough to dwell on in the first episode.

 

 

As someone who has, for several years now, been observing the propaganda machine that is the team previously known as BMWO, I seriously doubt it. Furthermore the way Artemis was presented as becoming CoR came close to a downright lie, quite apart from the fact that, for the DoGmatically inclined, they are not the challenger and TO is not the defender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Not something I'd advertise, certainly Clean has taken up the torch on it. I suppose frequent viewing of pole dancing makes the association.

 

Sometimes a legendary goddess with her bow is just a legendary goddess with her bow.

 

Perception is reality, and judging from my friends' reaction to the Artemis look, the Facebook Generation are frequent viewers of pole dancing. It is high on my list of things to ask Tornquvist when I get him on camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So when Larry Ellison won the Cup in 2010 he had to get a new CoR before the action could begin. Artemis Racing from Sweden. Yeah right.

 

We have a lot of historians of the cup here.

Did we have ever had before 2 poodles in the same cup ? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites