• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  
sarah0809

Artemis?

Recommended Posts

At least one of the teams were more than half-way to full funding (build 72' and race in the LV) late January and signing up sailors a couple of weeks ago. With 3 months to go to entry fee deadline and another few months for build start deadline it is too early to write off this team (and a few others I suspect). I can't reveal which team I am talking about but it ain't China, the other French or the Finn team. The pessimists around here will have become quite by 2013 when we'll see - yes we will actually be able to see it wherever we are - the greatest sail boat race ever I predict. Just my 2 cents /vf

I have hope to see Energy, Korea, and perhaps Green Comm on AC72.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least one of the teams were more than half-way to full funding (build 72' and race in the LV) late January and signing up sailors a couple of weeks ago. With 3 months to go to entry fee deadline and another few months for build start deadline it is too early to write off this team (and a few others I suspect). I can't reveal which team I am talking about but it ain't China, the other French or the Finn team. The pessimists around here will have become quite by 2013 when we'll see - yes we will actually be able to see it wherever we are - the greatest sail boat race ever I predict. Just my 2 cents /vf

 

 

The pessimists will move on to the next thing. They never stop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least one of the teams were more than half-way to full funding (build 72' and race in the LV) late January and signing up sailors a couple of weeks ago. With 3 months to go to entry fee deadline and another few months for build start deadline it is too early to write off this team (and a few others I suspect). I can't reveal which team I am talking about but it ain't China, the other French or the Finn team. The pessimists around here will have become quite by 2013 when we'll see - yes we will actually be able to see it wherever we are - the greatest sail boat race ever I predict. Just my 2 cents /vf

I have hope to see Energy, Korea, and perhaps Green Comm on AC72.

 

Those are the three I would believe have the best shot. Gotta give China credit for actually keeping a presence on AC.com. Aleph, on the other hand, has vanished from the face of the earth (well, I guess Aleph competed in the last RC44 event, but that is hardly AC news).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least one of the teams were more than half-way to full funding (build 72' and race in the LV) late January and signing up sailors a couple of weeks ago. With 3 months to go to entry fee deadline and another few months for build start deadline it is too early to write off this team (and a few others I suspect). I can't reveal which team I am talking about but it ain't China, the other French or the Finn team. The pessimists around here will have become quite by 2013 when we'll see - yes we will actually be able to see it wherever we are - the greatest sail boat race ever I predict. Just my 2 cents /vf

I have hope to see Energy, Korea, and perhaps Green Comm on AC72.

 

Those are the three I would believe have the best shot. Gotta give China credit for actually keeping a presence on AC.com. Aleph, on the other hand, has vanished from the face of the earth (well, I guess Aleph competed in the last RC44 event, but that is hardly AC news).

Agreed - Loick with his extensive experience on large cats could have a formidable presence. It was apparent in AC33 when he took over helming from EB who was snake waking all over the place.

 

Would love to see the new guys on TK keep the momentum from Draper going - but that's likely a tall order. Not sure if any of the Chaebols are interested sponsors, but that could easily be a game changer for TK as they have deep pockets and budgets for these types of events.

 

GC seems to have made some progress with sponsorships lately, and they have a recent piece on the team website about a local planning company that will set-up and manage the SF team base, etc. so it sounds like their is activity behind the scenes taking place.

 

I hate to disparage all the AC34 anti-fans that pounced on the comment about only 3 challengers, but RC did make a comment that a 4th challenger is a possibility, which could yield 9 AC72's out on the SF Bay, possibly 10 if two of the three above go into a build.

 

For the AC34 anti-fans waiting on the sidelines to jump for joy in celebration should 9 or 10 72's not be built or show up on the SF Bay, please remove your hat and pinch a loaf in it. You know who you are smile.gif.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ One of the fun things to come out of Tuesday's event was how big and in-yer-face OR's 'Defense trials' two-boat competition is going to be. Other two-boat teams may run them both too, when not in actual LV races.

 

There are plenty of suggestions that GCR is the most advanced among the remaining possibilities so far. They have flat out said that the Lombardy deal guaranteed their entry to the LV. We can reasonably doubt them until we see proof of the build but that may be a long wait, depending their build plan timeline. Otoh, If they really do have €54M in cash and services to depend on then it even seems possible they might build two boats given how that's a pretty darn serious budget number; in which case the evidence might come sooner rather than later.

 

My guess by process of elimination is that vadfan is referring to either ET or TK. And since ET already has sailors, and since TK is rebuilding with Outteridge, then it's TK that is closest to making it next after GCR.

 

ET seems to have commitments enough to build a boat but not yet enough to fund a decent campaign around it. They would be my third-in-line addition at this stage but it's got t be dang hard for even the team principals to know how and when prospective decisions may come down.

 

China? Barot and Dabbadie are apparently still in China but will they have even one decent sailor to send to Naples?

 

And if Pennec and the Gitana boys are busy with x40s and MOD70s then will Aleph?

 

Hopefully they either put up or shut up soon, at least ACWS wise, because those two look pretty fragile right now - without any evidence whatsoever to the contrary that we can point to.

 

For the event itself, seems to me that China having a presence in the LV would be pretty big; so for that sake, I guess I hope TC somehow ultimately make it too - with a solid enough campaign that the Chinese can be proud enough to follow it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact Energy has not thrown in the towel, to me, would seem to indicate they still feel they have a good shot at making it. In many ways, they sound a lot like ETNZ early last year.

 

Without all the bitching about the event and constantly playing the pity card that they're broke.

 

Gotta love Loick's attitude and his interviews, and would love to see him funded for at least one 72 if not two.

 

^Ditto!

 

the way you guys completely

 

and repeatedly

 

fail to allow for the subtle but important differences

 

in inter-cultural communication

 

would be a joke

 

if it wasn't a tragedy

 

remember you invented the cool-aid

and you drank it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact Energy has not thrown in the towel, to me, would seem to indicate they still feel they have a good shot at making it. In many ways, they sound a lot like ETNZ early last year.

 

Without all the bitching about the event and constantly playing the pity card that they're broke.

 

Gotta love Loick's attitude and his interviews, and would love to see him funded for at least one 72 if not two.

 

^Ditto!

 

the way you guys completely

 

and repeatedly

 

fail to allow for the subtle but important differences

 

in inter-cultural communication

 

would be a joke

 

if it wasn't a tragedy

 

Borrowing TK's lecturing podium ?

 

Do teach us wink.gif

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to love the OR fanboys.

 

So, GD, IM, PC and others say there will be 3 challengers, although IM was later told by his masters to talk it up. I am sure they all acknowledge there is a small chance of other teams doing something, but the collective wisdom is that 3 is the most likely number. However, the OR fanboys would rather go for wild speculation, smoke signals and rumour over what those 3 say.

 

Then let's look at the figure of 3 challengers. Let's even pretend it will be 4 or even 5. I was so roundly attacked just before entries closed when I said I doubted there would be even 6 challengers. Back then, 6 would have been considered a real diappointment, a failure. We will not have 6. I personally am more optimistic than most and say there will be 4 teams competing for the LVC. This will be the worst turn out for the LVC ever. Irrespective of how greart a spectacle the event turns out to be, the choices made by Oracle/GGYC and the actions of AC Alphabet has killed competition. They have done it by making this by far the most expensive it has ever been to be competitive in the Cup. More than ever before, this MC Cup is about who has the most money.

 

And the funniest thing of all the OP fanboys comments........one man is to blame for all of this by talking negatively! It's OK, everybody. GGYC, Oracle, AC Alphabet have done everything right and if it wasn't for GD constantly going on and on, there would have been lots more teams raising record amounts of money to be able to compete! It's all GD's fault! It doesn't ahve anything to do with it being the most expensive Cup ever and it taking place during one of the toughest economic times in modern history. It has nothing to do with the (allegedly) poor performance of ACEA, their inability to put together a timely calander of events, sign media/TV deals, secure any other major sponsor beyond LV and the fact that it is clear to anybody looking from the outside that ACEA is run by somebody who doesn't have a clue about the sport. NO! It's all Grant Dalton's fault. :lol:

 

Time to wake up and smell the coffee!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me again how having another Areva would improve the LV, let alone the Match for the Cup.

 

Waiting....

 

 

How many Areva 's were in there when you confidently predicted 15.. minimum 10 teams.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to love the OR fanboys.

 

So, GD, IM, PC and others say there will be 3 challengers, although IM was later told by his masters to talk it up. I am sure they all acknowledge there is a small chance of other teams doing something, but the collective wisdom is that 3 is the most likely number. However, the OR fanboys would rather go for wild speculation, smoke signals and rumour over what those 3 say.

 

Then let's look at the figure of 3 challengers. Let's even pretend it will be 4 or even 5. I was so roundly attacked just before entries closed when I said I doubted there would be even 6 challengers. Back then, 6 would have been considered a real diappointment, a failure. We will not have 6. I personally am more optimistic than most and say there will be 4 teams competing for the LVC. This will be the worst turn out for the LVC ever. Irrespective of how greart a spectacle the event turns out to be, the choices made by Oracle/GGYC and the actions of AC Alphabet has killed competition. They have done it by making this by far the most expensive it has ever been to be competitive in the Cup. More than ever before, this MC Cup is about who has the most money.

 

And the funniest thing of all the OP fanboys comments........one man is to blame for all of this by talking negatively! It's OK, everybody. GGYC, Oracle, AC Alphabet have done everything right and if it wasn't for GD constantly going on and on, there would have been lots more teams raising record amounts of money to be able to compete! It's all GD's fault! It doesn't ahve anything to do with it being the most expensive Cup ever and it taking place during one of the toughest economic times in modern history. It has nothing to do with the (allegedly) poor performance of ACEA, their inability to put together a timely calander of events, sign media/TV deals, secure any other major sponsor beyond LV and the fact that it is clear to anybody looking from the outside that ACEA is run by somebody who doesn't have a clue about the sport. NO! It's all Grant Dalton's fault. :lol:

 

Time to wake up and smell the coffee!

You bring up several valid points - management, the economy, difficulty in raising sponsor money, etc.

 

First, I don't think anyone dumped all this on Dalton shoulders as you opine. Has he consistently undermined the event ? No question, starting with "not entering", and the list goes on, and on. Is he helping the event or other challengers by such actions ? I don't think so, and I also don't think he cares as he continues to grind his ax about having to compete against billionaires and complain that he's broke. The AC has always been an expensive endeavor, maybe he's out of his league and needs to reconsider what he undertakes.

 

Second, if I recall correctly, you took a pretty direct shot at Dalton not that long ago, so your hands aren't exactly clean, or did you forget already ?

 

Third, I don't think anyone has said this has been executed perfectly, as has been the subject of several posts. Because some (like me) choose not to throw gasoline on an already burning fire in a cess pool does not mean I think things have been perfect. Needless to say this whole event is a major undertaking and if anything, I've said give them time to improve things before passing fianl judgment, which has been passed by many since they announced the AC would be raced in cats. I trust they will improve. How much, and in what areas I don't know.

 

Fourth, In terms of the number of challengers, some predicted more, but as soon as a few people mentioned 3, a small crowd pounced on the number as if it is the final number. Could it be ? Possibly, but challengers also have another 3 months to secure funding. I choose to hold out hope that one possibly two more will enter the challenger series making it four or possibly five. Certainly the talent is there to make this a competitive event.

 

Fifth, the intent is to lay a foundation for a new cup format. Maybe it will take two iterations and a little economic help to pull this together, but it's good to know the resources and commitment are in place to bootstrap the first attempt to overhaul the event.

 

Lastly, and this point has been largely overlooked, this is likely to be the most level playing field the AC has seen in several decades, which the challengers have openly acknowledged, at least the honest ones that aren't preoccupied with bitching.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to wake up and smell the coffee!

 

The coffee has already been consumed, Simon. We are now in the damage limitation phase. The party line now is that there may only be 3/4 challengers but they are perfectly formed. What is sad is to see IM obediently trotting out this position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me again how having another Areva would improve the LV, let alone the Match for the Cup.

 

Damn, when you told us that those predicting only 8 challengers were wrong by "an order of magnitude", and that we'd look very foolish, we all assumed you believed there would be more. Now I realise you meant all along there would be an order of magnitude fewer.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be safe to say, knowing how Bruno Peyron works, that if they had thrown in the towel on AC34, that they would announce it and officially reformulate their effort as interim competition in the ACWS with hard plans for AC35. The fact Energy has not thrown in the towel, to me, would seem to indicate they still feel they have a good shot at making it. In many ways, they sound a lot like ETNZ early last year.

 

But in a recent interview he indicated for the first time that he may now be positioning for AC35. That's a significant change of tune. I still hope he makes it for AC34 but potential French finance industry backers are taking a hell of a haircut on Greek sovereign debt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The pessimists will move on to the next thing. They never stop.

 

We are blessed to have so much material to work with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to wake up and smell the coffee!

 

The coffee has already been consumed, Simon. We are now in the damage limitation phase. The party line now is that there may only be 3/4 challengers but they are perfectly formed.

And how is this different from the level of competition in AC32, and how many times has this already been mentioned ?

 

This is likely to be the case in any challenger series, but you can continue ignoring it if you choose to.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to love the OR fanboys.

 

So, GD, IM, PC and others say there will be 3 challengers, although IM was later told by his masters to talk it up. I am sure they all acknowledge there is a small chance of other teams doing something, but the collective wisdom is that 3 is the most likely number. However, the OR fanboys would rather go for wild speculation, smoke signals and rumour over what those 3 say.

 

Then let's look at the figure of 3 challengers. Let's even pretend it will be 4 or even 5. I was so roundly attacked just before entries closed when I said I doubted there would be even 6 challengers. Back then, 6 would have been considered a real diappointment, a failure. We will not have 6. I personally am more optimistic than most and say there will be 4 teams competing for the LVC. This will be the worst turn out for the LVC ever. Irrespective of how greart a spectacle the event turns out to be, the choices made by Oracle/GGYC and the actions of AC Alphabet has killed competition. They have done it by making this by far the most expensive it has ever been to be competitive in the Cup. More than ever before, this MC Cup is about who has the most money.

 

And the funniest thing of all the OP fanboys comments........one man is to blame for all of this by talking negatively! It's OK, everybody. GGYC, Oracle, AC Alphabet have done everything right and if it wasn't for GD constantly going on and on, there would have been lots more teams raising record amounts of money to be able to compete! It's all GD's fault! It doesn't ahve anything to do with it being the most expensive Cup ever and it taking place during one of the toughest economic times in modern history. It has nothing to do with the (allegedly) poor performance of ACEA, their inability to put together a timely calander of events, sign media/TV deals, secure any other major sponsor beyond LV and the fact that it is clear to anybody looking from the outside that ACEA is run by somebody who doesn't have a clue about the sport. NO! It's all Grant Dalton's fault. :lol:

 

Time to wake up and smell the coffee!

You bring up several valid points - management, the economy, difficulty in raising sponsor money, etc.

 

First, I don't think anyone dumped all this on Dalton shoulders as you opine. Has he consistently undermined the event ? No question, starting with "not entering", and the list goes on, and on. Is he helping the event or other challengers by such actions ? I don't think so, and I also don't think he cares as he continues to grind his ax about having to compete against billionaires and complain that he's broke. The AC has always been an expensive endeavor, maybe he's out of his league and needs to reconsider what he undertakes.

 

Second, if I recall correctly, you took a pretty direct shot at Dalton not that long ago, so your hands aren't exactly clean, or did you forget already ?

 

Third, I don't think anyone has said this has been executed perfectly, as has been the subject of several posts. Because some (like me) choose not to throw gasoline on an already burning fire in a cess pool does not mean I think things have been perfect. Needless to say this whole event is a major undertaking and if anything, I've said give them time to improve things before passing fianl judgment, which has been passed by many since they announced the AC would be raced in cats. I trust they will improve. How much, and in what areas I don't know.

 

Fourth, In terms of the number of challengers, some predicted more, but as soon as a few people mentioned 3, a small crowd pounced on the number as if it is the final number. Could it be ? Possibly, but challengers also have another 3 months to secure funding. I choose to hold out hope that one possibly two more will enter the challenger series making it four or possibly five. Certainly the talent is there to make this a competitive event.

 

Fifth, the intent is to lay a foundation for a new cup format. Maybe it will take two iterations and a little economic help to pull this together, but it's good to know the resources and commitment are in place to bootstrap the first attempt to overhaul the event.

 

Lastly, and this point has been largely overlooked, this is likely to be the most level playing field the AC has seen in several decades, which the challengers have openly acknowledged, at least the honest ones that aren't preoccupied with bitching.

 

+1 to Simon's post, it shows that he is capable of a balanced view, to criticize what he does not like and to compliment what he likes, without regard to the person. It indeed is possible to disagree with someone one day because of one thing and agree with him the other about another thing - go figure. Again, the world, and the AC for that matter, is not either-or, it is as-well-as.

 

What harm actually did the “not entering” of ETNZ do? It generated a bit of additional interest in the AC at a very early stage and more posts/clicks on SAAC. At a stage when we did not even know where the first ACWS event will take place -talking about doing damage…

 

It’s very friendly to give ACEA et al. the benefit of doubt for the 100th time now, but actually why? They were the ones that spouted about the best, the biggest, the awesomest, the revolutionariest blah blah blah. Why not measure them against their promises, especially since many (also GD?) said already early on that they do over-promise? Looks like the early critics were not too wrong…

 

So, 3 challengers secured, others maybe in the pipeline. Not comparable to AC32 and AC33-MKI. Better than AC33-MKII, tho.

It will be nice to watch the sailing no matter what GD says and no matter how many challengers will turn up. But, if there are only few, the on-shore presentation may be a bit meager, because that was something the “fleet-fillers” were needed for in previous ACs. Not to mention to draw fans (the oh so badly needed public) from their home country into interest for the AC - TV viewers, consumers (!) all of them. Again: The number of challengers does not necessarily influence the quality of racing, but it certainly influences the financial viability of the event, especially on a global scale.

 

The most level playing field it is this time, I agree, and from a sporting perspective I will not revise my initial statement that the protocol is breathtakingly fair - especially in comparison to the AC33-MKI sorry effort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Soiler has this stupid idea in his poor excuse for a brain that because TNZ did not ship their AC45 to Cascais using ACRM supplied shipping that it undermined the AC.

 

Solier must have missed the memo because ACRM did not ship the AC45's from Auckland to Cascais but Valencia as a staging port as there were no ACWS venues at that stage. The shipping that ACRM organised was on a commercial container ship and at the teams cost. There was no obligation on the part of the teams to use this shipping.

 

Only 2 of the 4 teams that were in Auckland shipped to Valencia, Artemis and CT. Oracle shipped to San Francis and TNZ had another 6 weeks sailing the AC45 in Auckland before shipping to Cascais via their shipping partner/sponsor Maersk.

 

34th America’s Cup Regatta Notice 2011/12

 

From: Iain Murray, Regatta Director

To: Competitors for the 34th America's Cup

Date: 20 March 2011

 

Subject: ACRM Managed Shipping from New Zealand to first ACWS

Venue

 

ACRM can offer Competitors the following terms for shipping containers from

New Zealand to Valencia, in preparation for moving them to the first AC World

Series event.

 

Until the location of the first event is announced, we cannot finalize the onshipment

from Valencia but have allowed enough time to manage this no

matter where the first event is located. The cost of this on-shipping isn't

included in the cost shown below but will be communicated once we have the

destination. There is no additional management fee for this service and fees

are to be paid directly to the European agent and not to ACRM. Fees are due

after landing in Valencia.

 

There is no obligation to take up this offer and teams are free to ship when

ever and with whomever they wish.

 

Route: Auckland - Valencia

 

Last delivery date to the docks in Auckland: 12 May 2011

 

ETA Valencia: 18 June 2011

 

Cost per 40 foot High Cube: £3050.00

 

European Agent: PSP Logistics Limited, UK. Contact Frank Dixie -

Frank.Dixie@PSP-Logistics.com

 

NZ Agent: Gateway Cargo, Auckland. Contact Stephen Kirkham -

Stephen.Kirkham@GatewayCargo.co.nz

 

If you wish to take up this offer, we will need you to confirm this plus the

number of units to be transported to the agents and to Stuart Gentry, ACRM

Shipping and Logistics Manager by 4 April 2011 at the latest.

Stuart can be contacted on Stuart.Gentry@AmericasCup.com and PSP and

Gateway Cargo can be contacted on the e-mail addresses above. Stuart will

be coordinating the shipment for ACRM.

 

If you have any questions, please let Stuart know.

 

Iain Murray

Regatta Director

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+1 to Simon's post, it shows that he is capable of a balanced view, to criticize what he does not like and to compliment what he likes, without regard to the person. It indeed is possible to disagree with someone one day because of one thing and agree with him the other about another thing - go figure. Again, the world, and the AC for that matter, is not either-or, it is as-well-as.

 

Absolutely. Critical assessment of what is and is not working in AC34 gives us something to discuss. Haters versus fanboys gets old awfully quickly. I think it's unfortunate that kiwi_jon, who clearly has a lot of knowledge, has allowed himself to be goaded into ad hominem attacks.

 

It will be nice to watch the sailing no matter what GD says and no matter how many challengers will turn up. But, if there are only few, the on-shore presentation may be a bit meager, because that was something the "fleet-fillers" were needed for in previous ACs. Not to mention to draw fans (the oh so badly needed public) from their home country into interest for the AC - TV viewers, consumers (!) all of them. Again: The number of challengers does not necessarily influence the quality of racing, but it certainly influences the financial viability of the event, especially on a global scale.

 

That's one reason why the number of challengers matters like hell. The exit stage left of Team Origin virtually guaranteed that there will be minimal mainstream media coverage in Britain. If there is no French team, the same will be true in France. And so on. Just possibly, the co-existence of the ACWS during the LVC may mitigate this. We could hope. This clearly matters to teams hoping to develop sponsorships in the AC35 cycle. They need to demonstrate media coverage in the regions of interest to potential sponsors.

 

The second reason the number of LVC entries matters is the oft-repeated point that it is rare - very rare - to win on the first challenge. Therefore teams need to develop. Having 3 strong challengers in AC34 does not bode well for AC35.

 

The third reason the number of challengers matters lies in the economic benefit to the venue and we can see this point has not escaped the supervisors of SF.

 

The most level playing field it is this time, I agree, and from a sporting perspective I will not revise my initial statement that the protocol is breathtakingly fair - especially in comparison to the AC33-MKI sorry effort.

 

That is indeed a positive that OR can be proud of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+1 to Simon's post, it shows that he is capable of a balanced view, to criticize what he does not like and to compliment what he likes, without regard to the person. It indeed is possible to disagree with someone one day because of one thing and agree with him the other about another thing - go figure. Again, the world, and the AC for that matter, is not either-or, it is as-well-as.

 

Absolutely. Critical assessment of what is and is not working in AC34 gives us something to discuss. Haters versus fanboys gets old awfully quickly. I think it's unfortunate that kiwi_jon, who clearly has a lot of knowledge, has allowed himself to be goaded into ad hominem attacks.

 

It will be nice to watch the sailing no matter what GD says and no matter how many challengers will turn up. But, if there are only few, the on-shore presentation may be a bit meager, because that was something the "fleet-fillers" were needed for in previous ACs. Not to mention to draw fans (the oh so badly needed public) from their home country into interest for the AC - TV viewers, consumers (!) all of them. Again: The number of challengers does not necessarily influence the quality of racing, but it certainly influences the financial viability of the event, especially on a global scale.

 

That's one reason why the number of challengers matters like hell. The exit stage left of Team Origin virtually guaranteed that there will be minimal mainstream media coverage in Britain. If there is no French team, the same will be true in France. And so on. Just possibly, the co-existence of the ACWS during the LVC may mitigate this. We could hope. This clearly matters to teams hoping to develop sponsorships in the AC35 cycle. They need to demonstrate media coverage in the regions of interest to potential sponsors.

 

The second reason the number of LVC entries matters is the oft-repeated point that it is rare - very rare - to win on the first challenge. Therefore teams need to develop. Having 3 strong challengers in AC34 does not bode well for AC35.

 

The third reason the number of challengers matters lies in the economic benefit to the venue and we can see this point has not escaped the supervisors of SF.

 

The most level playing field it is this time, I agree, and from a sporting perspective I will not revise my initial statement that the protocol is breathtakingly fair - especially in comparison to the AC33-MKI sorry effort.

 

That is indeed a positive that OR can be proud of.

 

All excellent points. From very early on, I have said 6 challengers is what is desired, and I believe that should include at least one French and one Asian team. If we end up with 4 or 5 challengers, it will still be great, but obviously not what we would hope for. Three challengers would absolutely be a dissappointment for local impact, international interest, and simple quantity of racing, although the quality of racing will not be impacted I the least. Having a concurrent ACWS with the teams not participating during the LV or even the AC would certainly help, particularly in France and England.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Soiler has this stupid idea that GD's constant bitching about money when he's government funded, complaining about wings and cranes, boycotting the AC website, and shooting his mouth off in SD undermined the AC.

 

 

Porta Potty, apparently you missed the memo about the gag order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Sailing-With-Simpleton is still flagging IHC classes. That village will be sending out a posse any time soon to look for him: thought he'd be hiding out in the Badlands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second, if I recall correctly, you took a pretty direct shot at Dalton not that long ago, so your hands aren't exactly clean, or did you forget already ?

I did have a pop at GD, because I do not like his management style and do not believe that ETNZ can win with him running the show. I also said he should keep his head down and stop being an "outsider" because it is hurting his team. At no time have I ever suggested that GD is having a negative effect on the event because I do not believe his posturing has any effect on it at all. That sort of stupidity I leave to you. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second, if I recall correctly, you took a pretty direct shot at Dalton not that long ago, so your hands aren't exactly clean, or did you forget already ?

I did have a pop at GD, because I do not like his management style and do not believe that ETNZ can win with him running the show. I also said he should keep his head down and stop being an "outsider" because it is hurting his team. At no time have I ever suggested that GD is having a negative effect on the event because I do not believe his posturing has any effect on it at all. That sort of stupidity I leave to you. :P

 

Thanks for the credit, but I believe it's in ACEA's hands smile.gif.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second, if I recall correctly, you took a pretty direct shot at Dalton not that long ago, so your hands aren't exactly clean, or did you forget already ?

I did have a pop at GD, because I do not like his management style and do not believe that ETNZ can win with him running the show. I also said he should keep his head down and stop being an "outsider" because it is hurting his team. At no time have I ever suggested that GD is having a negative effect on the event because I do not believe his posturing has any effect on it at all. That sort of stupidity I leave to you. :P

 

Thanks for the credit, but I believe it's in ACEA's hands smile.gif.

I don't think so. A quick search shows many posts by you on the subject. This is just one example is just the latest in a long history you have at trying to blame GD.

 

Dalton has been undermining the event ever since he "didn't enter", didn't want to use the website, didn't like the idea of having to use cranes, didn't want ACEA to ship his shit to Cascais, wouldn't buy a second AC 45 in a million years (yet that's the first thing LR did), shot his mouth off in SD, etc. etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second, if I recall correctly, you took a pretty direct shot at Dalton not that long ago, so your hands aren't exactly clean, or did you forget already ?

I did have a pop at GD, because I do not like his management style and do not believe that ETNZ can win with him running the show. I also said he should keep his head down and stop being an "outsider" because it is hurting his team. At no time have I ever suggested that GD is having a negative effect on the event because I do not believe his posturing has any effect on it at all. That sort of stupidity I leave to you. :P

 

Thanks for the credit, but I believe it's in ACEA's hands smile.gif.

I don't think so. A quick search shows many posts by you on the subject. This is just one example is just the latest in a long history you have at trying to blame GD.

 

Dalton has been undermining the event ever since he "didn't enter", didn't want to use the website, didn't like the idea of having to use cranes, didn't want ACEA to ship his shit to Cascais, wouldn't buy a second AC 45 in a million years (yet that's the first thing LR did), shot his mouth off in SD, etc. etc.

Yes, and I stand by my comments which are based on GD's actions and his direct remarks. GD is sure as hell not supporting the ACWS concept and everything it involves, which is the point of my posts. If you take the time to read them you might see this.

 

Closer to the point, I don't recall ever stating or even inferring that his ongoing efforts to undermine the event have reduced the number of ACWS participants or AC entrants. This is the conclusion you're trying draw, which is incorrect. As I stated, macro-economic conditions are probably the biggest factor in the number of challengers with this event.

 

Regardless, keep searching to prove your claim that I stated his efforts have limited the number of challengers, and let me know as soon as you find some conclusive material in my posts that support your position. Good luck.

 

And BTW, I don't consider GD a macro-economic factor smile.gif.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Expect WingTri action very soon...

 

I heard it (72 wing) was due to go in this week but they dropped it ....... since the skin is a carbon -nomex sandwich

there is a bit more involved in the repair ......... maybe early next week

 

any of you guys living near Sagunto to get some pics??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder how teams with clear wings will deal with the ugly yellow wing extensions. Ostensibly painting them black?

 

...... clear coat should work

 

 

biggrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems Artemis have stepped the wing on their ORMA60 trimaran. Heading to Sagunto to "spy"...

 

Good man...

 

(Sure hope he doesn't get flicked - imagine if we had to rely solely on SA for news!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

two element wing at the top and three element wing below that top section, parabolic trailing edge (for pressure distribution gains, and maybe even a little 'smoother' twist profile when they twist it.) Cant really tell from this angle about the lines holding it up - pretty!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dang - AC72 Wing porn!!!

 

edit: that thing looks downright scary, bet they trial in in very light air to start...

 

Looks great - actually smaller re the people than I had imagined. Piece of cakewink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dang - AC72 Wing porn!!!K

 

edit: that thing looks downright scary, bet they trial in in very light air to start...

 

Looks great - actually smaller re the people than I had imagined. Piece of cakewink.gif

 

It does look quite a bit smaller than expected . Perhaps it is not full scale ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dang - AC72 Wing porn!!!K

 

edit: that thing looks downright scary, bet they trial in in very light air to start...

 

Looks great - actually smaller re the people than I had imagined. Piece of cakewink.gif

 

It does look quite a bit smaller than expected . Perhaps it is not full scale ?

Am on a phone with liitle time to look at it, yes - could it be a %- scale wing? Those amas are about 70'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have photoshop at work, and it'll be hard til we get a better angle, but I just did a crappy size compare by pasting them into Word and making the wings the same height as a side-one one of DZ.

 

Looked to me like the DZ boat was comparatively much smaller, i.e. that it had a greater height compared to DZ's LOA than the Artemis wing does to the LOA of even the ORMA 60. That said:

 

a) I doubt anyone would find that very surprising and

B) I'm sure people can do a better picture comparison to the one I just did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, DLR of about 15 :blink:

 

It appears to be full size to my unreliable eyeometer, but I know there are some who love doing tricks with scales and so on who will prove it one way or the other.

 

One question though: should that photo have been posted here?

 

That doesn't seem to give Pierre much of a scoop for his work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, DLR of about 15 :blink:

 

It appears to be full size to my unreliable eyeometer, but I know there are some who love doing tricks with scales and so on who will prove it one way or the other.

 

One question though: should that photo have been posted here?

 

That doesn't seem to give Pierre much of a scoop for his work.

 

 

It made it to the FP with photo credits to Pierre

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ac72-ac45-comparison-specs-04.pngconcept-ac45-ac72-ggyc-0001-2.jpg

US17 maxed out at 68m/223ft

* add couple of meters for the wing extensions to the 45

Interesting.

With a ratio L/mast of 1,8 the boat will one of the most extreme ever seen. I bet they will have to move a bit forward the curved or T foils if they don't want to pitchpole.

Interestingly, the faster the boat vs the wind, the safer to pitchpole, but if they slow downwind for a penalty, Oouch....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, DLR of about 15 :blink:

 

It appears to be full size to my unreliable eyeometer, but I know there are some who love doing tricks with scales and so on who will prove it one way or the other.

 

One question though: should that photo have been posted here?

 

That doesn't seem to give Pierre much of a scoop for his work.

 

 

It made it to the FP with photo credits to Pierre

 

Oh well then....so they probably got permission. Or does this not even apply to a 'news outlet'?? What applies to posting photos here - anyone know?

 

I had assumed that a simple 'copyright', as in this case, meant - use with specific permission only.

 

Whereas for example the AC photos are usually "copyright - can be used for editorial purposes, 'With Author Attribution'." That's a much more user friendly mode!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AC72 Wing.

 

Really???? Proportions are looking right on a 60ft (about 1.7-1.8 times the boat lenght) so it is very unlikely to be an AC72 wing... may be a scaled down version done as a "proof of concept".

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AC72 Wing.

 

Really???? Proportions are looking right on a 60ft (about 1.7-1.8 times the boat lenght) so it is very unlikely to be an AC72 wing... may be a scaled down version done as a "proof of concept".

 

 

That's the open question - but it's not a 60' any more!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, DLR of about 15 :blink:

 

It appears to be full size to my unreliable eyeometer, but I know there are some who love doing tricks with scales and so on who will prove it one way or the other.

 

One question though: should that photo have been posted here?

 

That doesn't seem to give Pierre much of a scoop for his work.

 

 

It made it to the FP with photo credits to Pierre

 

Oh well then....so they probably got permission. Or does this not even apply to a 'news outlet'?? What applies to posting photos here - anyone know?

 

I had assumed that a simple 'copyright' as in this case meant - use with specific permission only.

 

Whereas for example the AC photos are usually "copyright - can be used for editorial purposes, 'With Author Attribution'."

 

Pierre himself has twitted this photo.

© in the pic and in my post... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, DLR of about 15 :blink:

 

It appears to be full size to my unreliable eyeometer, but I know there are some who love doing tricks with scales and so on who will prove it one way or the other.

 

One question though: should that photo have been posted here?

 

That doesn't seem to give Pierre much of a scoop for his work.

 

 

It made it to the FP with photo credits to Pierre

 

Oh well then....so they probably got permission. Or does this not even apply to a 'news outlet'?? What applies to posting photos here - anyone know?

 

I had assumed that a simple 'copyright' as in this case meant - use with specific permission only.

 

Whereas for example the AC photos are usually "copyright - can be used for editorial purposes, 'With Author Attribution'."

 

Pierre himself has twitted this photo.

© in the pic and in my post... ;)

 

Yeah I've seen the copyright in the photo - kind of hard to miss. The Author can post work wherever he/she chooses but that doesn't negate the copyright does it. Author wouldn't have gone to the trouble of superimposing the copyright label for no reason one would have thought.

 

Just trying to clarify. Seems pertinent if there is any quibbling going on between sailing news websites. Or does Anarchy rule?

 

Notice they credited the photo on the FP, but did not link to his site, as it seems is usually done (nor to the thread).

 

 

 

Anyway, how tall do you reckon that wing is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Pierre twitted the pic before publish the article in vsail.info)

I think it's a standart AC72.

The amas of tri are 74'.

 

Another pic posted in a spanish forum

 

13032012ca.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

new at ac.com

 

 

New wing makes appearance with teams getting ready to race

Posted on 13 March 2012

 

This is an exciting time in the America's Cup cycle. Personally, I love this period leading into the first event of the year. Everybody is eager to get going, all the dreams for the season are still there to be realised and everyone is a winner - or at least a potential winner still - going into race one.

...

 

---

edit, and at SailWorld,

Artemis Racing test new wingsail on Orma 60 in Valencia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I know this has been discussed at other times, but we now have a live example...

 

Surrogate Yacht means any catamaran yacht that is greater than 10 meters LOA,

except that an AC45 Yacht whose "platform" (external shape of the hulls, and the

crossbeams) comply with the AC45 Class Rule shall not be a Surrogate Yacht. For

the avoidance of doubt, daggerboard cases may be modified, and for the purposes of

this definition any such modification is not deemed to change the external shape of

the hull.

 

They can modify the wing, daggerboard, rudders, rigging and running gear as long as they don't change the shape of the hulls or alter the crossbeams. However they are then no longer a class AC45 and cannot race in the ACWS.

 

Oracle have 4 AC45's. The 2 originals they will keep as class boats and the other 2 they will use as test platforms.

 

By the letter of the law, they are fine, as this platform is a tri. But IF, as is speculated, this IS a 72 destined wing...

How can that be right? Pick up a fully pre-developed/tested rig and plonk it on your 72 platform?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny, this "Poodle" looks like they might actually want to beat Oracle. :D

 

Paul was taken aback when I wished him enough luck to come in 2nd

 

1127.jpg

 

 

I have no doubt he's in it to win it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules are words.

You can play into the rules.

I love to respect the rules.

I hate the cheaters but I love who think about the loopholes of playfield..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could we see a protest, or a 'clarification' question asked?

 

'Catamaran' may be in the words (screwup?) but there's a variety of wing parts build restrictions too, right? Can they really develop the heck out of this wing? And, what if it breaks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could we see a protest, or a 'clarification' question asked?

 

'Catamaran' may be in the words (screwup?) but there's a variety of wing parts build restrictions too, right? Can they really develop the heck out of this wing? And, what if it breaks?

There is a limit of 6 wing spar sections. I think it's sure those are their first two of six.

But there is no date limit for wings, only for launching the AC72s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(hh) Wing Spar means the mast, or spar, that carries most of the compression loads due to

sail (including wing) and rigging load, and which is substantially transferred to the boat via

the mast base.

 

29.6. Wing Spar Limits

 

Each Competitor may build, acquire or otherwise obtain a maximum of six Wing Spar

sections, provided:

 

(a) any Wing Spar section less than 12m in length that is part of a wing whose length

from mast base to wing top is less than 22m, is not counted in this limit;

 

(b ) a Wing Spar section is included in this limit when the Competitor or its representative

takes delivery of the section; and

 

(c ) a Wing Spar section shall be deemed to be new if more than 50% of its mass is

replaced.

 

(d) A wing spar extension for a AC45 Yacht acquired by a competitor from ACRM and

used solely on an AC45 Yacht shall not for the purposes of Article 29.6 constitute a

wing spar section.

 

http://noticeboard.a...dments-1-11.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Thanks. Should we assume that everything attached to the wing spar is unlimited in new parts and controls and flap configurations and such - within the DR of course?

 

The 'plan forms' in the DR being so restricted, this wing does give us a fairly tight view of the overall outline, but that may be all we can take.

 

Looking forward to the AR coverage of it tomorrow, alluded to by Peter Rusch's article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Thanks. Should we assume that everything attached to the wing spar is unlimited in new parts and controls and flap configurations and such - within the DR of course?

 

The 'plan forms' in the DR being so restricted, this wing does give us a fairly tight view of the overall outline, but that may be all we can take.

 

Looking forward to the AR coverage of it tomorrow, alluded to by Peter Rusch's article.

I think so. The 6 wing spar sections is the only number restriction about wing construction.

 

 

Using a 74' tri for testing wings Artemis has unlimited time for testing wings... but the others have only 30 days in 2012.

We can expect to see a lot of changes in the Artemis wing for testing those weeks...

 

I think it's possible we will see another Team with a big tri... or a request of clarification! :)

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 70' tris seem a good platform for unlimited wing testing.

 

The ORMA 74 is heavier than an AC72. Less boat speed, less apparent wind. Not ideal conditions for testing AC72 wings.

 

But there are a few old ORMA60 that could be modified...

 

Is Oracle rebuilding an old tri?

 

Is Oracle building an (AC)72 tri to test their wings?

 

We will see the trimaran Vodafone in Auckland become a 70'?

 

We will see the MOD70 of Guichard used as a platform to test the wings of Energy (if they get money)?

 

There is a MOD70 without sponsors (ex-Veolia)...

 

Crazy scenarios?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're the exact scenarios I was imagining when I saw this 'non-catamaran' surrogate.

Does the centre hull of a custom built 70' tri of the dimensions of an AC72 even have to go in the water?

 

AC has always been about the billionaires - fairy thinking usage, and testing limitations just makes them spend their money in other ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crazy scenarios?

 

 

I think so, for two reasons. #1 Wind tunnel testing is both more private and more precise and controllable, and #2 its very late in the process for someone to try to modify an existing tri - its not just a case of simply dropping in a wing.

 

My sense of the benefit here is not aero work on the wing, but crew experience and development with controlling such a large wing, but I would expect all the teams to have cockpit 'simulators' where they can develop, test and train on the sail control hardware - which again is more private, and more easily modified & developed but admittedly not as 'real' as actually being on a boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"#2 its very late in the process for someone to try to modify an existing tri - its not just a case of simply dropping in a wing."

 

 

Estar wasn't that Ernesto's logic before Oracle threw a wing on Dogzilla?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Thanks. Should we assume that everything attached to the wing spar is unlimited in new parts and controls and flap configurations and such - within the DR of course?

 

The 'plan forms' in the DR being so restricted, this wing does give us a fairly tight view of the overall outline, but that may be all we can take.

 

Looking forward to the AR coverage of it tomorrow, alluded to by Peter Rusch's article.

I think so. The 6 wing spar sections is the only number restriction about wing construction.

 

 

Using a 74' tri for testing wings Artemis has unlimited time for testing wings... but the others have only 30 days in 2012.

We can expect to see a lot of changes in the Artemis wing for testing those weeks...

I think it's possible we will see another Team with a big tri... or a request of clarification! :)

 

 

 

 

Artemis obviously had a great idea with this. Actually pretty surprised Oracle has not jumped on this idea already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Artemis Racing base in Sagunto, is in the Vulkan Shipyard facilities, inside the "Puerto de Sagunto", 12 NM of Valencia PAC

 

These are pics of the tri ORMA60, taken today at noon

post-40889-003900900 1331738925_thumb.jpg

post-40889-006033100 1331738957_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Training activity weeks ago in Sagunto waters of Artemis Racing AC45.

Hope to catch some pics of the "AC72 winged" Orma60 in the coming days ...

post-40889-004072600 1331739027_thumb.jpg

post-40889-081103100 1331739042_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"#2 its very late in the process for someone to try to modify an existing tri - its not just a case of simply dropping in a wing."

 

 

Estar wasn't that Ernesto's logic before Oracle threw a wing on Dogzilla?

 

About three months before AC33 BMWO installed an engine and modified the tri for a wing down in SD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Thanks. Should we assume that everything attached to the wing spar is unlimited in new parts and controls and flap configurations and such - within the DR of course?

 

The 'plan forms' in the DR being so restricted, this wing does give us a fairly tight view of the overall outline, but that may be all we can take.

 

Looking forward to the AR coverage of it tomorrow, alluded to by Peter Rusch's article.

I think so. The 6 wing spar sections is the only number restriction about wing construction.

 

 

Using a 74' tri for testing wings Artemis has unlimited time for testing wings... but the others have only 30 days in 2012.

We can expect to see a lot of changes in the Artemis wing for testing those weeks...

I think it's possible we will see another Team with a big tri... or a request of clarification! :)

 

 

 

 

Artemis obviously had a great idea with this. Actually pretty surprised Oracle has not jumped on this idea already.

 

This project has been common knowledge for months so it's not like they suddenly sprung it on anybody. If oracle thought it was the way to go or did not already have a better program in place they would have already had one or two in the water by now .There is always a method to Larry's madness :)

Share this post


Link to post