• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

johnnysaint

So who will be our next PM this time next week?

Recommended Posts

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You fail to show us all your wife/girlfriend/daughter (>18) tits and we'll send you Rick Santorum or Sarah Palin over to be the PM of the Downunder! What time's the barbie and pass the vegimite, would ya mate!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You fail to show us all your wife/girlfriend/daughter (>18) tits and we'll send you Rick Santorum or Sarah Palin over to be the PM of the Downunder! What time's the barbie and pass the vegimite, would ya mate!

 

A. It's the interweb, find your own porn.

B. Rick and Sarah might get a senate seat here but religious right wing cronies whilst tolerated inevitably fail to thrive.

C. The barbie is at six, only vegie sausages on my grill. Vegemite Sanger for lunch. If you can behave? Your welcome to join us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

 

If it was up to the people, Rudd would be a shoo in. But it is the "faceless men" who will decide, not the people. God help us if any of your first four get up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

 

If it was up to the people, Rudd would be a shoo in. But it is the "faceless men" who will decide, not the people. God help us if any of your first four get up.

The faceless men being the members of the ALP caucas. Kevin has done a great job of playing the victim. Dumbest thing Julia did since her coup d'etat was letting kev stay on the front bench.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

 

If it was up to the people, Rudd would be a shoo in. But it is the "faceless men" who will decide, not the people. God help us if any of your first four get up.

The faceless men being the members of the ALP caucas. Kevin has done a great job of playing the victim. Dumbest thing Julia did since her coup d'etat was letting kev stay on the front bench.

 

I think getting in to bed with the greens & independents was the dumbest thing she did. Left us with a govt that can't govern.

 

That and all the lies & broken promises.

 

Call the election, let the people decide who governs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

 

If it was up to the people, Rudd would be a shoo in. But it is the "faceless men" who will decide, not the people. God help us if any of your first four get up.

The faceless men being the members of the ALP caucas. Kevin has done a great job of playing the victim. Dumbest thing Julia did since her coup d'etat was letting kev stay on the front bench.

 

I think getting in to bed with the greens & independents was the dumbest thing she did. Left us with a govt that can't govern.

 

That and all the lies & broken promises.

 

Call the election, let the people decide who governs.

 

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

 

Grow up dickhead. I meant what I wrote.

 

What did you mean with your childish comment? You're being weak as piss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

 

Grow up dickhead. I meant what I wrote.

 

What did you mean with your childish comment? You're being weak as piss.

 

Just responding with your own catch phrase. I meant what I wrote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

 

Grow up dickhead. I meant what I wrote.

 

What did you mean with your childish comment? You're being weak as piss.

 

Just responding with your own catch phrase. I meant what I wrote.

 

"Catch phrase"?? When did I accuse you of groping bar staff?

 

You seem to have created a stereotype in your mind of expats in Indo (we grope people) & Indonesians (they're there to be groped).

 

It's completely fucked up JBTW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoever it is (for your sakes), I hope he/she is not connected to the fukwits who signed off on this piece of shit idea. Really you guys, haven't you been watching wtf is happening to Greece and England lately? Do y'all truly wanna emulate those f'ng loser countries? .....

 

 

Australia, aiming for surplus, hikes taxes on rich

Associated PressBy ROD McGUIRK | Associated Press – Tue, Feb 14, 2012

 

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — Australian lawmakers on Wednesday narrowly approved tax hikes for the wealthy that will help the government meet its pledge to deliver a budget surplus next year.

 

The legislation will limit the availability of a 30 percent tax rebate on health insurance premiums to lower- and middle-income earners. Currently all taxpayers can claim the rebate. But from July 1, individuals earning more than 129,000 Australian dollars ($137,800) a year and couples with joint incomes exceeding AU$258,000 will no longer be eligible. They are expected to pay, respectively, around AU$500 and AU$1,000 extra a year on average.

 

The cap will cost wealthy earners a total of AU$2.4 billion over three years.

 

The bill scraped through the House of Representatives on Wednesday by 71 votes to 70. It is assured passage through the Senate early this year with the guaranteed support of the center-left Labor Party government senators and those from the minor Greens party.

 

Tony Abbott, leader of the conservative opposition coalition, accused the government this week of playing the "politics of the class war" by increasing the tax burden on the wealthy.

 

He warned that wealthy people would give up their private health insurance and add pressure on the public health system. Currently 45 percent of Australians hold private health insurance.

 

But Health Minister Tanya Plibersek said the current rebate system was not fair to poorer Australians.

 

"I don't want a situation where the people who sit (in parliament) ... have their private health insurance subsidized by the people who clean this chamber at night," Plibersek told the House of Representatives.

 

The government announced in November last year that it will deliver a narrow surplus of AU$1.5 billion in the next fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012, despite the European debt crisis slashing revenue by AU$20 billion over four years, mainly through lower company tax yields.

 

The new surplus target is AU$2 billion less than the government had forecast in May 2011 due to the country's deteriorating finances.

 

The health-insurance rebate cut is the latest of several tax increases.

 

In July 2011, the government introduced a temporary tax to help pay the multibillion-dollar damage bill left by record floods and storms. The levy — 0.5 percent on incomes between AU$50,000 and AU$100,000, and a 1 percent on taxable incomes above that — was expected to raise AU$1.8 billion.

 

From July 2012, the government will place a new 30 percent tax on big mining companies whose profits have boomed largely due to Chinese demand for iron ore and coal. The tax is expected to raise almost AU$9 billion in three years.

 

Revenue raised from a carbon tax, which will also be imposed on Australia's largest greenhouse gas-polluting companies beginning in July, will be paid back to low-income earners as compensation for higher prices, and spent on industry assistance to help businesses adapt to a lower-carbon economy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

 

Grow up dickhead. I meant what I wrote.

 

What did you mean with your childish comment? You're being weak as piss.

 

Just responding with your own catch phrase. I meant what I wrote.

 

"Catch phrase"?? When did I accuse you of groping bar staff?

 

You seem to have created a stereotype in your mind of expats in Indo (we grope people) & Indonesians (they're there to be groped).

 

It's completely fucked up JBTW.

Fill yer boots.

 

Your posts perpetuate the stereotypes. I was merely casting a lure.

 

Back to the Julie and Kevin show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that's not casting a lure. It's making cheap & nasty insults for the sake of it, quite pathetic really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the way kevvie made the announcement at 1.00 am, in new york,

 

to be followed by a statement

 

when he returns

 

on FRIDAY

 

you won't see the sun in cant berra for flying knives

 

until after then

 

 

.......... and which of the wanky independents will give up first ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that's not casting a lure. It's making cheap & nasty insults for the sake of it, quite pathetic really.

Boohoo you dopey shelia.

 

Do you mean pathetic and nasty like the shit you slung at me because you didn't want to accept that Wifebeater is used by some in Australia to describe a truckies singlet? Then yeah probably.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

 

Which one of those are pro personal defense/castle doctrine-ish/private gun ownership?.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

 

Which one of those are pro personal defense/castle doctrine-ish/private gun ownership?.....

Neither Rick. You'd hate all of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

 

Which one of those are pro personal defense/castle doctrine-ish/private gun ownership?.....

As Dreadom said - you would hate them all! Even our conservatives are only a bit to the right of your democrats :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Exactly. I broke all my Midnight Oil albums after that one. All they needed was Peter Garrett to come balls out and name/shame and incarcerate a couple of the shonky installers and we might still have the policy in place. And country with subsidized insulation so we use less fossil fuel. instead we got Peter and Kevin dropping the bundle. Sadly reminiscent of Gough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

 

Which one of those are pro personal defense/castle doctrine-ish/private gun ownership?.....

Neither Rick. You'd hate all of them.

 

 

Oh well, there's always 2264....... :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, I reckon it'll be Julia, though I would probably prefer Kevin.

 

Given how strongly the pro-Gillard politicians have been slamming Rudd in the media today (one after the other coming out to take a shot on Sky News), I reckon they are worried he might be able to convince a enough votes to his side. A confident faction doesn't take to the public to slam their opposing factions - they simply let the votes do the talking. A rattled one goes on the attack and that's what we're seeing.

 

I don't think the problem for Gillard has anything to do with siding with the Greens & Independents. She did that AFTER the election resulted in a minority government. She was somewhat on the nose before she made the deals, it's just that Abbott is/as moreso.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, I reckon it'll be Julia, though I would probably prefer Kevin.

 

Given how strongly the pro-Gillard politicians have been slamming Rudd in the media today (one after the other coming out to take a shot on Sky News), I reckon they are worried he might be able to convince a enough votes to his side. A confident faction doesn't take to the public to slam their opposing factions - they simply let the votes do the talking. A rattled one goes on the attack and that's what we're seeing.

 

I don't think the problem for Gillard has anything to do with siding with the Greens & Independents. She did that AFTER the election resulted in a minority government. She was somewhat on the nose before she made the deals, it's just that Abbott is/as moreso.

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Penny Wong? You're fucking joking. She thinks she's a father.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Penny Wong? You're fucking joking. She thinks she's a father.

SO? of all the people the ALP could forward she's the only one with a brain and any credability left

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Penny Wong? You're fucking joking. She thinks she's a father.

SO? of all the people the ALP could forward she's the only one with a brain and any credability left

You must be joking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Penny Wong? You're fucking joking. She thinks she's a father.

SO? of all the people the ALP could forward she's the only one with a brain and any credability left

You must be joking.

Nope - you want to expand on why you think that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

 

 

How many body guards does she have? And are they armed?...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

 

 

How many body guards does she have? And are they armed?...

 

 

What does that have to do with the price of tea? Or Kev and Julia for that matter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

 

 

How many body guards does she have? And are they armed?...

 

 

What does that have to do with the price of tea? Or Kev and Julia for that matter?

 

 

Twas just a hipocrisy test, mate, just like we do here. Anyways, did she pass it?....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

 

 

How many body guards does she have? And are they armed?...

 

 

What does that have to do with the price of tea? Or Kev and Julia for that matter?

 

 

Twas just a hipocrisy test, mate, just like we do here. Anyways, did she pass it?....

 

 

Still not sure what your point is? Do you speak 'strine mate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dreads...you been cooking the gold tops up at Nana Glen or something similar?...wtf is going on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dreads...you been cooking the gold tops up at Nana Glen or something similar?...wtf is going on?

No idea what you are talking about? Just understand ricks point about bodyguards? Was it about Whitney? Gun control? Or a possible lesbian PM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea what you are talking about?

 

probably correct....just wondering what got under your skin...gold tops would explain it...Nana glen is where Crowie lives...not far from you and where they are readily available....I know you do the vegan thing....just wondering why you turned into an entitled dick.

 

this conversation is everything you rag on the sepps about....makes no sense other than you are tripping. just saying. I'm confused....it's not like it wasn't clear that people like Peter garret were tremendously underequipped from the get go. why the surprise?

 

you voted for these cunts din't you? now it's wildman bobbie brown and his band of renowns...wtf?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you've joined the glorious people's labor party. Your duties - # 1 - defeat your rivals in your faction. # 2 defeat your factional rivals in the other factions. # 3 - get preselection for the senate or a safe seat. a very distant # 4 - defeat the coalition. # 5 (so far off in the distance as to be barely visible) - serve the people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you've joined the glorious people's labor party. Your duties - # 1 - defeat your rivals in your faction. # 2 defeat your factional rivals in the other factions. # 3 - get preselection for the senate or a safe seat. a very distant # 4 - defeat the coalition. # 5 (so far off in the distance as to be barely visible) - serve the people.

 

well said that man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you've joined the glorious people's labor party. Your duties - # 1 - defeat your rivals in your faction. # 2 defeat your factional rivals in the other factions. # 3 - get preselection for the senate or a safe seat. a very distant # 4 - defeat the coalition. # 5 (so far off in the distance as to be barely visible) - serve the people.

 

 

Wondering how this is any different to the Coalition (aside from who has to beat whom). Hell, they have factions known as the Liberal Party & National Party that actually run in the same electorates! Were they in power, we'd be playing this same game between Turnbull & Abbott.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we'd be playing this same game between Turnbull & Abbott.

 

yeah....it isn't good but it would have happened while the economy was in surplus. not so much now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you've joined the glorious people's labor party. Your duties - # 1 - defeat your rivals in your faction. # 2 defeat your factional rivals in the other factions. # 3 - get preselection for the senate or a safe seat. a very distant # 4 - defeat the coalition. # 5 (so far off in the distance as to be barely visible) - serve the people.

 

 

Wondering how this is any different to the Coalition.

 

 

There's no real difference of course but at least the conservatives don't pretend to be in any way representative of the majority of the electorate (other than the few 'wets'). Honest rogues if you like. I don't like any of them and the tragedy is that there's a few decent people in both groups who can't seem to get together. Oh wait, what about the Democrats ??? Oh that's right, they got 'Kernot-ed' and 'Lees-ed' and managed to stab themselves in the back which was a major achievement. And as for the Greens, well which faction is the best ? The social justice mob, the tree lickers, the animal lovers, or the gay mafia ? It's enough to make one an anarchist .... (or join the Popular Front for the Liberation of Judea, or even the Judean People's Liberation Front, or the .....)

 

Now Simon said that Kevin's naughty, and Julia didn't say that Kev's a good boy, so Kev said that Julia's naughty too, and Kev said that he was throwing his toy out of the sandpit and that he deserves all of Julia's toys, and all the kids have to decide whose friend they are now. And Tony's saying 'you little bewdy' .......

 

 

And I say 'give back your pocketmoney you little twerps'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

Not sure who you voted for last time?

 

I had a choice between Bronwyn Bishop, some patsy for the ALP ( who my old Neighbour Barry Unsworth had troublesupporting, a happy clappy for the Fred Nile party ( who actually had very good health care policies for the local hospital) and a green.

There wasn't a straight vote:

Tony

Bob

Julia

 

 

Kevin

 

So why the hell should a change to the leader of the party be they in power or oposition require a complete new election?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Julia Gillard says leadership debate is not an episode of Celebrity Big Brother.

 

 

 

-------------------- and the rest of the country thinks the opposite

 

 

 

BIG sister must go !

 

 

let's see if an independent or two get the jitters and force on her the election we have to have

 

 

 

P. S.

 

must be a bumper crop at Nana ------------------ all that rain and so on -------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

 

I think it's better than the alternative, where a politician elected to represent his constituents cannot do so due to it conflicting with the two main parties. Remember, no-one is forcing the parties in question to deal with the independents & small parties. They do so voluntarily because they want the power of government. The Labor Party is somewhat new to the game, but the Liberals have been passing the pet policies of the Nationals for over a decade at least.

 

Democracy is the worst form of government except for all the other ones ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Yeah Wilkie got his poker machine legislation??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Yeah Wilkie got his poker machine legislation??

 

Do the words "There will be no carbon tax" mean anything to you? Bob Brown?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Yeah Wilkie got his poker machine legislation??

 

Do the words "There will be no carbon tax" mean anything to you? Bob Brown?

You said one. There are more greens in parliament than just Bob Brown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Yeah Wilkie got his poker machine legislation??

 

Do the words "There will be no carbon tax" mean anything to you? Bob Brown?

You said one. There are more greens in parliament than just Bob Brown.

FFS. Evo's right. Gold tops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Julia or Kevin it will be interesting to see if either of them can hold the party together into the next election.

 

The libs must be lapping this up.

 

 

What the hell

 

 

Go the KATTER party......... can't get any worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now THAT will frighten the greenies out of the trees ----------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Julia or Kevin it will be interesting to see if either of them can hold the party together into the next election.

 

The libs must be lapping this up.

 

 

What the hell

 

 

Go the KATTER party......... can't get any worse.

:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

 

someone say puppets?

 

thechallenge.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

Bullshit. Typical splitting hairs crap from the left.

 

No no.. I said 'tax', not levy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

 

 

 

She lied. If she had been truthful at the election she wouldn't have got the numbers to form Govt. Labour are in power today on false pretenses as far as I'm concerned.

 

And they're a fucking shambles at present. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

 

 

 

She lied. If she had been truthful at the election she wouldn't have got the numbers to form Govt. Labour are in power today on false pretenses as far as I'm concerned.

 

And they're a fucking shambles at present. :P

How old are you? You act like you have never been lied to by a politician.

 

Boohoo fill yer boots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

 

Clearly you are a Labor cheerleader. The highest carbon tax in the world starts in Australia on July 1.

 

Good luck and good night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

 

 

 

 

you poke

 

 

 

you pay

 

 

 

 

why should other taxpayers pay for your kids through centrelink because you don't WANT to pay ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

has the Juliar camp already chosen her replacement ?

 

 

--- to keep kevvie out ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weird. Somewhere between 30 & 50% of the caucus support one or the other. Great way to govern, minimum of 30% of your SUPPORTERS don't think you're up for the job.

 

The greens don't care who gets up, they think they've got control anyway

 

Call an election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weird. Somewhere between 30 & 50% of the caucus support one or the other. Great way to govern, minimum of 30% of your SUPPORTERS don't think you're up for the job.

 

The greens don't care who gets up, they think they've got control anyway

 

Call an election.

 

 

FFS dry your eyes princess and accept the fact that a coalition of ALP, Greens and Independents beat a coalition of Liberal, national and independents.

 

 

Regardless of who the Prime Minister is on Monday, there is no mandate for an election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites