• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.
    • B.J. Porter

      Moderation Team Change   06/16/2017

      After fifteen years of volunteer moderation at SA, I will no longer be part of the moderation team. The decision to step aside is mine, and has been some time in the works but we did not wish to announce it in advance for a number of reasons. It's been fun, but I need my time back for other purposes now. The Underdawg admin account will not be monitored until further notice, as I will be relinquishing control of it along with my administrative privileges. Zapata will continue on as a moderator, and any concerns or issues can be directed to that account or to the Editor until further notice. Anyone interested in helping moderate the forums should reach out to Scot by sending a PM to the Editor account. Please note that I am not leaving the community, I am merely stepping aside from Admin responsibilities and privileges on the site.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

johnnysaint

So who will be our next PM this time next week?

155 posts in this topic

Julia?

 

Rudd?

 

Swan?

 

Crean?

 

Some other faceless fool?

 

Ah. The soap opera of Labour politics. Couldn't write this stuff for a movie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You fail to show us all your wife/girlfriend/daughter (>18) tits and we'll send you Rick Santorum or Sarah Palin over to be the PM of the Downunder! What time's the barbie and pass the vegimite, would ya mate!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You fail to show us all your wife/girlfriend/daughter (>18) tits and we'll send you Rick Santorum or Sarah Palin over to be the PM of the Downunder! What time's the barbie and pass the vegimite, would ya mate!

 

A. It's the interweb, find your own porn.

B. Rick and Sarah might get a senate seat here but religious right wing cronies whilst tolerated inevitably fail to thrive.

C. The barbie is at six, only vegie sausages on my grill. Vegemite Sanger for lunch. If you can behave? Your welcome to join us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

 

If it was up to the people, Rudd would be a shoo in. But it is the "faceless men" who will decide, not the people. God help us if any of your first four get up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

 

If it was up to the people, Rudd would be a shoo in. But it is the "faceless men" who will decide, not the people. God help us if any of your first four get up.

The faceless men being the members of the ALP caucas. Kevin has done a great job of playing the victim. Dumbest thing Julia did since her coup d'etat was letting kev stay on the front bench.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

 

If it was up to the people, Rudd would be a shoo in. But it is the "faceless men" who will decide, not the people. God help us if any of your first four get up.

The faceless men being the members of the ALP caucas. Kevin has done a great job of playing the victim. Dumbest thing Julia did since her coup d'etat was letting kev stay on the front bench.

 

I think getting in to bed with the greens & independents was the dumbest thing she did. Left us with a govt that can't govern.

 

That and all the lies & broken promises.

 

Call the election, let the people decide who governs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadership ballot, 10.00 Monday. A new PM? Let the feathers fly.

Can't see Kevin getting the numbers. Be great if there was a third option. But who? Creen, Wong, Garrett, Shorten? My pick would be Smith.

 

If it was up to the people, Rudd would be a shoo in. But it is the "faceless men" who will decide, not the people. God help us if any of your first four get up.

The faceless men being the members of the ALP caucas. Kevin has done a great job of playing the victim. Dumbest thing Julia did since her coup d'etat was letting kev stay on the front bench.

 

I think getting in to bed with the greens & independents was the dumbest thing she did. Left us with a govt that can't govern.

 

That and all the lies & broken promises.

 

Call the election, let the people decide who governs.

 

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

 

Grow up dickhead. I meant what I wrote.

 

What did you mean with your childish comment? You're being weak as piss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

 

Grow up dickhead. I meant what I wrote.

 

What did you mean with your childish comment? You're being weak as piss.

 

Just responding with your own catch phrase. I meant what I wrote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

 

Grow up dickhead. I meant what I wrote.

 

What did you mean with your childish comment? You're being weak as piss.

 

Just responding with your own catch phrase. I meant what I wrote.

 

"Catch phrase"?? When did I accuse you of groping bar staff?

 

You seem to have created a stereotype in your mind of expats in Indo (we grope people) & Indonesians (they're there to be groped).

 

It's completely fucked up JBTW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoever it is (for your sakes), I hope he/she is not connected to the fukwits who signed off on this piece of shit idea. Really you guys, haven't you been watching wtf is happening to Greece and England lately? Do y'all truly wanna emulate those f'ng loser countries? .....

 

 

Australia, aiming for surplus, hikes taxes on rich

Associated PressBy ROD McGUIRK | Associated Press – Tue, Feb 14, 2012

 

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — Australian lawmakers on Wednesday narrowly approved tax hikes for the wealthy that will help the government meet its pledge to deliver a budget surplus next year.

 

The legislation will limit the availability of a 30 percent tax rebate on health insurance premiums to lower- and middle-income earners. Currently all taxpayers can claim the rebate. But from July 1, individuals earning more than 129,000 Australian dollars ($137,800) a year and couples with joint incomes exceeding AU$258,000 will no longer be eligible. They are expected to pay, respectively, around AU$500 and AU$1,000 extra a year on average.

 

The cap will cost wealthy earners a total of AU$2.4 billion over three years.

 

The bill scraped through the House of Representatives on Wednesday by 71 votes to 70. It is assured passage through the Senate early this year with the guaranteed support of the center-left Labor Party government senators and those from the minor Greens party.

 

Tony Abbott, leader of the conservative opposition coalition, accused the government this week of playing the "politics of the class war" by increasing the tax burden on the wealthy.

 

He warned that wealthy people would give up their private health insurance and add pressure on the public health system. Currently 45 percent of Australians hold private health insurance.

 

But Health Minister Tanya Plibersek said the current rebate system was not fair to poorer Australians.

 

"I don't want a situation where the people who sit (in parliament) ... have their private health insurance subsidized by the people who clean this chamber at night," Plibersek told the House of Representatives.

 

The government announced in November last year that it will deliver a narrow surplus of AU$1.5 billion in the next fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012, despite the European debt crisis slashing revenue by AU$20 billion over four years, mainly through lower company tax yields.

 

The new surplus target is AU$2 billion less than the government had forecast in May 2011 due to the country's deteriorating finances.

 

The health-insurance rebate cut is the latest of several tax increases.

 

In July 2011, the government introduced a temporary tax to help pay the multibillion-dollar damage bill left by record floods and storms. The levy — 0.5 percent on incomes between AU$50,000 and AU$100,000, and a 1 percent on taxable incomes above that — was expected to raise AU$1.8 billion.

 

From July 2012, the government will place a new 30 percent tax on big mining companies whose profits have boomed largely due to Chinese demand for iron ore and coal. The tax is expected to raise almost AU$9 billion in three years.

 

Revenue raised from a carbon tax, which will also be imposed on Australia's largest greenhouse gas-polluting companies beginning in July, will be paid back to low-income earners as compensation for higher prices, and spent on industry assistance to help businesses adapt to a lower-carbon economy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually quite a lot of legislation has passed. What you mean is they are not governing the way you want it. Boohoo, fill yer boots and grope another bargirl/boy NTTIAWT.

 

Grow up dickhead. I meant what I wrote.

 

What did you mean with your childish comment? You're being weak as piss.

 

Just responding with your own catch phrase. I meant what I wrote.

 

"Catch phrase"?? When did I accuse you of groping bar staff?

 

You seem to have created a stereotype in your mind of expats in Indo (we grope people) & Indonesians (they're there to be groped).

 

It's completely fucked up JBTW.

Fill yer boots.

 

Your posts perpetuate the stereotypes. I was merely casting a lure.

 

Back to the Julie and Kevin show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that's not casting a lure. It's making cheap & nasty insults for the sake of it, quite pathetic really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the way kevvie made the announcement at 1.00 am, in new york,

 

to be followed by a statement

 

when he returns

 

on FRIDAY

 

you won't see the sun in cant berra for flying knives

 

until after then

 

 

.......... and which of the wanky independents will give up first ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that's not casting a lure. It's making cheap & nasty insults for the sake of it, quite pathetic really.

Boohoo you dopey shelia.

 

Do you mean pathetic and nasty like the shit you slung at me because you didn't want to accept that Wifebeater is used by some in Australia to describe a truckies singlet? Then yeah probably.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

 

Which one of those are pro personal defense/castle doctrine-ish/private gun ownership?.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

 

Which one of those are pro personal defense/castle doctrine-ish/private gun ownership?.....

Neither Rick. You'd hate all of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

 

Which one of those are pro personal defense/castle doctrine-ish/private gun ownership?.....

As Dreadom said - you would hate them all! Even our conservatives are only a bit to the right of your democrats :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Exactly. I broke all my Midnight Oil albums after that one. All they needed was Peter Garrett to come balls out and name/shame and incarcerate a couple of the shonky installers and we might still have the policy in place. And country with subsidized insulation so we use less fossil fuel. instead we got Peter and Kevin dropping the bundle. Sadly reminiscent of Gough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now, now girls

 

play fair

 

 

 

--------------- not like labour or the greens or the independents or the factional " leaders " or juliar or heavie kevvie

 

Which one of those are pro personal defense/castle doctrine-ish/private gun ownership?.....

Neither Rick. You'd hate all of them.

 

 

Oh well, there's always 2264....... :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, I reckon it'll be Julia, though I would probably prefer Kevin.

 

Given how strongly the pro-Gillard politicians have been slamming Rudd in the media today (one after the other coming out to take a shot on Sky News), I reckon they are worried he might be able to convince a enough votes to his side. A confident faction doesn't take to the public to slam their opposing factions - they simply let the votes do the talking. A rattled one goes on the attack and that's what we're seeing.

 

I don't think the problem for Gillard has anything to do with siding with the Greens & Independents. She did that AFTER the election resulted in a minority government. She was somewhat on the nose before she made the deals, it's just that Abbott is/as moreso.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, I reckon it'll be Julia, though I would probably prefer Kevin.

 

Given how strongly the pro-Gillard politicians have been slamming Rudd in the media today (one after the other coming out to take a shot on Sky News), I reckon they are worried he might be able to convince a enough votes to his side. A confident faction doesn't take to the public to slam their opposing factions - they simply let the votes do the talking. A rattled one goes on the attack and that's what we're seeing.

 

I don't think the problem for Gillard has anything to do with siding with the Greens & Independents. She did that AFTER the election resulted in a minority government. She was somewhat on the nose before she made the deals, it's just that Abbott is/as moreso.

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Penny Wong? You're fucking joking. She thinks she's a father.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Penny Wong? You're fucking joking. She thinks she's a father.

SO? of all the people the ALP could forward she's the only one with a brain and any credability left

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Penny Wong? You're fucking joking. She thinks she's a father.

SO? of all the people the ALP could forward she's the only one with a brain and any credability left

You must be joking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will still be Julia, Unfortunately. Not that I think Kevin would be any better. The ALP had some great ideas when they came into power, just have failed again and again to turn them into reality.

 

Don't think the ALP is alone in their soap opera dramas. The Libs had their go with Howard and Costello, and in a lesser degree Turnbull and Abbott

Reckon it will be Julia - just hoping that most of the faceless ALP remember what a complete and utter balls up Ruddy made when he was in the hot seat (which is why they got rid of him in the first place). The only other person that the ALP could put up that has any brains or credability is Penny Wong.

 

I would say that the ALP had some ideas when they came into power but when they turned them into reality they failed - home insulation scam anyone?

Penny Wong? You're fucking joking. She thinks she's a father.

SO? of all the people the ALP could forward she's the only one with a brain and any credability left

You must be joking.

Nope - you want to expand on why you think that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

 

 

How many body guards does she have? And are they armed?...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

 

 

How many body guards does she have? And are they armed?...

 

 

What does that have to do with the price of tea? Or Kev and Julia for that matter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

 

 

How many body guards does she have? And are they armed?...

 

 

What does that have to do with the price of tea? Or Kev and Julia for that matter?

 

 

Twas just a hipocrisy test, mate, just like we do here. Anyways, did she pass it?....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Ok all rug munching jokes aside, she is a very strong, credible and astute person.

 

 

How many body guards does she have? And are they armed?...

 

 

What does that have to do with the price of tea? Or Kev and Julia for that matter?

 

 

Twas just a hipocrisy test, mate, just like we do here. Anyways, did she pass it?....

 

 

Still not sure what your point is? Do you speak 'strine mate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dreads...you been cooking the gold tops up at Nana Glen or something similar?...wtf is going on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dreads...you been cooking the gold tops up at Nana Glen or something similar?...wtf is going on?

No idea what you are talking about? Just understand ricks point about bodyguards? Was it about Whitney? Gun control? Or a possible lesbian PM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea what you are talking about?

 

probably correct....just wondering what got under your skin...gold tops would explain it...Nana glen is where Crowie lives...not far from you and where they are readily available....I know you do the vegan thing....just wondering why you turned into an entitled dick.

 

this conversation is everything you rag on the sepps about....makes no sense other than you are tripping. just saying. I'm confused....it's not like it wasn't clear that people like Peter garret were tremendously underequipped from the get go. why the surprise?

 

you voted for these cunts din't you? now it's wildman bobbie brown and his band of renowns...wtf?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you've joined the glorious people's labor party. Your duties - # 1 - defeat your rivals in your faction. # 2 defeat your factional rivals in the other factions. # 3 - get preselection for the senate or a safe seat. a very distant # 4 - defeat the coalition. # 5 (so far off in the distance as to be barely visible) - serve the people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you've joined the glorious people's labor party. Your duties - # 1 - defeat your rivals in your faction. # 2 defeat your factional rivals in the other factions. # 3 - get preselection for the senate or a safe seat. a very distant # 4 - defeat the coalition. # 5 (so far off in the distance as to be barely visible) - serve the people.

 

well said that man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Penny Wong ? Fuck me !

 

There is good reason that woman is rarely let loose upon the public and it isn't because she's shy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you've joined the glorious people's labor party. Your duties - # 1 - defeat your rivals in your faction. # 2 defeat your factional rivals in the other factions. # 3 - get preselection for the senate or a safe seat. a very distant # 4 - defeat the coalition. # 5 (so far off in the distance as to be barely visible) - serve the people.

 

 

Wondering how this is any different to the Coalition (aside from who has to beat whom). Hell, they have factions known as the Liberal Party & National Party that actually run in the same electorates! Were they in power, we'd be playing this same game between Turnbull & Abbott.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we'd be playing this same game between Turnbull & Abbott.

 

yeah....it isn't good but it would have happened while the economy was in surplus. not so much now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you've joined the glorious people's labor party. Your duties - # 1 - defeat your rivals in your faction. # 2 defeat your factional rivals in the other factions. # 3 - get preselection for the senate or a safe seat. a very distant # 4 - defeat the coalition. # 5 (so far off in the distance as to be barely visible) - serve the people.

 

 

Wondering how this is any different to the Coalition.

 

 

There's no real difference of course but at least the conservatives don't pretend to be in any way representative of the majority of the electorate (other than the few 'wets'). Honest rogues if you like. I don't like any of them and the tragedy is that there's a few decent people in both groups who can't seem to get together. Oh wait, what about the Democrats ??? Oh that's right, they got 'Kernot-ed' and 'Lees-ed' and managed to stab themselves in the back which was a major achievement. And as for the Greens, well which faction is the best ? The social justice mob, the tree lickers, the animal lovers, or the gay mafia ? It's enough to make one an anarchist .... (or join the Popular Front for the Liberation of Judea, or even the Judean People's Liberation Front, or the .....)

 

Now Simon said that Kevin's naughty, and Julia didn't say that Kev's a good boy, so Kev said that Julia's naughty too, and Kev said that he was throwing his toy out of the sandpit and that he deserves all of Julia's toys, and all the kids have to decide whose friend they are now. And Tony's saying 'you little bewdy' .......

 

 

And I say 'give back your pocketmoney you little twerps'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

Not sure who you voted for last time?

 

I had a choice between Bronwyn Bishop, some patsy for the ALP ( who my old Neighbour Barry Unsworth had troublesupporting, a happy clappy for the Fred Nile party ( who actually had very good health care policies for the local hospital) and a green.

There wasn't a straight vote:

Tony

Bob

Julia

 

 

Kevin

 

So why the hell should a change to the leader of the party be they in power or oposition require a complete new election?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Julia Gillard says leadership debate is not an episode of Celebrity Big Brother.

 

 

 

-------------------- and the rest of the country thinks the opposite

 

 

 

BIG sister must go !

 

 

let's see if an independent or two get the jitters and force on her the election we have to have

 

 

 

P. S.

 

must be a bumper crop at Nana ------------------ all that rain and so on -------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

 

I think it's better than the alternative, where a politician elected to represent his constituents cannot do so due to it conflicting with the two main parties. Remember, no-one is forcing the parties in question to deal with the independents & small parties. They do so voluntarily because they want the power of government. The Labor Party is somewhat new to the game, but the Liberals have been passing the pet policies of the Nationals for over a decade at least.

 

Democracy is the worst form of government except for all the other ones ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Yeah Wilkie got his poker machine legislation??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Yeah Wilkie got his poker machine legislation??

 

Do the words "There will be no carbon tax" mean anything to you? Bob Brown?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Yeah Wilkie got his poker machine legislation??

 

Do the words "There will be no carbon tax" mean anything to you? Bob Brown?

You said one. There are more greens in parliament than just Bob Brown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Kevin was stabbed in the back because he was doing so poorly in the polls and by all accounts was an arsehole to work with.

 

There are faceless men in all forms of politics: local, state federal and party. Rudd was voted out after a secret ballot of all sitting members. Same thing happened to Turnbull. Only difference was Kevin was in power at the time.

 

As i have said your primary vote is for the local member, not the leader. Sometimes the best option for your local electorate is not a member of a major party, hence the recent success of the independents.

 

Nothing worse than living in a safe seat sometimes. It would be a lot better if there werent parties, or more concious (secret) ballots. I am not saying that what we have now is perfect, but I would much rather have the situation where policy decisions were discussed instead of just passed by an overwhelming majority.

 

Except that with a minority govt like we have now, one independent can have his own pet policy passed in legislation just because the minority govt want's to stay in power. You think that's good?

Yeah Wilkie got his poker machine legislation??

 

Do the words "There will be no carbon tax" mean anything to you? Bob Brown?

You said one. There are more greens in parliament than just Bob Brown.

FFS. Evo's right. Gold tops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Losing the arguement so you resort to cheap drug jibes like Evo. Well done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Losing the arguement so you resort to cheap drug jibes like Evo. Well done.

 

What fucking argument.

 

Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Julia or Kevin it will be interesting to see if either of them can hold the party together into the next election.

 

The libs must be lapping this up.

 

 

What the hell

 

 

Go the KATTER party......... can't get any worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now THAT will frighten the greenies out of the trees ----------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Julia or Kevin it will be interesting to see if either of them can hold the party together into the next election.

 

The libs must be lapping this up.

 

 

What the hell

 

 

Go the KATTER party......... can't get any worse.

:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the punters don't have a vote in it anyway. Once again the leadership of OUR country will be decided by a select few with back door deals.

 

Call the election.

 

A select few = 103 labor MPs and senators.

 

 

 

Most are puppets controlled by the "faceless men". That's why Rudd was stabbed in the back last time. He want's to get rid of them.

 

someone say puppets?

 

thechallenge.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

Bullshit. Typical splitting hairs crap from the left.

 

No no.. I said 'tax', not levy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

 

 

 

She lied. If she had been truthful at the election she wouldn't have got the numbers to form Govt. Labour are in power today on false pretenses as far as I'm concerned.

 

And they're a fucking shambles at present. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

 

 

 

She lied. If she had been truthful at the election she wouldn't have got the numbers to form Govt. Labour are in power today on false pretenses as far as I'm concerned.

 

And they're a fucking shambles at present. :P

How old are you? You act like you have never been lied to by a politician.

 

Boohoo fill yer boots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you remember Julia promising "No carbon tax"?

 

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

I don't particularly like Gillard myself, but let's not repeat the mindless Liberal talking points for them - Abbott is more than mindless for the lot of us laugh.gif

 

 

Clearly you are a Labor cheerleader. The highest carbon tax in the world starts in Australia on July 1.

 

Good luck and good night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, and as she hasn't brought in a tax, but an ETS with a transition period that acts like a tax, I'm curious what your point is. Having one's wages docked a certain percentage for alimony & child support acts like a tax too, but that doesn't make it a tax.

 

 

 

 

 

you poke

 

 

 

you pay

 

 

 

 

why should other taxpayers pay for your kids through centrelink because you don't WANT to pay ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the pendulum is swinging Rudd's way. Julia comes across flustered and not at all confident.

 

What chance of an election being called very soon?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"A liar will not be believed, even when he speaks the truth."

 

Aesop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

has the Juliar camp already chosen her replacement ?

 

 

--- to keep kevvie out ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weird. Somewhere between 30 & 50% of the caucus support one or the other. Great way to govern, minimum of 30% of your SUPPORTERS don't think you're up for the job.

 

The greens don't care who gets up, they think they've got control anyway

 

Call an election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weird. Somewhere between 30 & 50% of the caucus support one or the other. Great way to govern, minimum of 30% of your SUPPORTERS don't think you're up for the job.

 

The greens don't care who gets up, they think they've got control anyway

 

Call an election.

 

 

FFS dry your eyes princess and accept the fact that a coalition of ALP, Greens and Independents beat a coalition of Liberal, national and independents.

 

 

Regardless of who the Prime Minister is on Monday, there is no mandate for an election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kevin is your typical politician/psychopath. Charming, very convincing speaker, presents an engaging and apparently reasonable front. That's why the Australian public like him. Those who have had the misfortune to work with/for him have experienced a foul-tempered inconsiderate egomaniac who totally loses it when his plans don't work out. That's why they dumped him.

Julia is your typical party hack, will do anything to maintain power, including letting the Greens (basically totalitarian "we know best" ex-commies) have their way on lunatic carbon policy. University leftie who used to pretend to be lesbian for more credibility.

Abbott is another somewhat crazed type, of the religious rightwing persuasion.

 

Gawd help Australia, 'cos the pollies sure aren't going to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..........and Grumpy, don't keep biting when Dreads has a go. The man's a vego, obviously not to be taken seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

He already knocked that back remember. He wouldn't give the greens & independents everything they wanted - Julia said (lied) that she would give them what they wanted, just to stay in power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

He already knocked that back remember. He wouldn't give the greens & independents everything they wanted - Julia said (lied) that she would give them what they wanted, just to stay in power.

 

Yup.

 

With any luck, if that pans out, he'll go to a double dissolution and we can kick the dangerous idiots out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

He already knocked that back remember. He wouldn't give the greens & independents everything they wanted - Julia said (lied) that she would give them what they wanted, just to stay in power.

 

 

remember how he offered wilkie a billion dollars for hobart hospital?

remember how he said to windsor " I would sell my arse to be prime minister"

both said no, mainly based on how howard and abbott treated the independants when the libs were in power.

 

abbott is no better than kev or julia.

 

julia didnt lie, she just has core and non core independants!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..........and Grumpy, don't keep biting when Dreads has a go. The man's a vego, obviously not to be taken seriously.

 

:rolleyes:B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

He already knocked that back remember. He wouldn't give the greens & independents everything they wanted - Julia said (lied) that she would give them what they wanted, just to stay in power.

 

 

remember how he offered wilkie a billion dollars for hobart hospital?

remember how he said to windsor " I would sell my arse to be prime minister"

both said no, mainly based on how howard and abbott treated the independants when the libs were in power.

 

abbott is no better than kev or julia.

 

julia didnt lie, she just has core and non core independants!

You are no doubt a rabid labour supporter that would vote labour no matter how they fucked you.

 

"There will be NO CARBON TAX" - You obviously will deny that Gillard said that on national TV.

 

Abbot wouldn't bend over for the independents to get into power - Gillard did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

............ and look what they see !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I envy you Aussies. Got it done in only, what was it? About a month or so of haggling?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wham !

 

Bam !

 

 

Thank You

 

Maam !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the greens do have control! check the senate numbers!

 

will be funny watching Abbott when the senate blocks legislation put forward by a coalition government. (by the way, we already have a coalition government)

 

what are the odds of Abbott kowtowing to the greens? will he offer up his sphincter? bob might actually accept it!

He already knocked that back remember. He wouldn't give the greens & independents everything they wanted - Julia said (lied) that she would give them what they wanted, just to stay in power.

 

 

remember how he offered wilkie a billion dollars for hobart hospital?

remember how he said to windsor " I would sell my arse to be prime minister"

both said no, mainly based on how howard and abbott treated the independants when the libs were in power.

 

abbott is no better than kev or julia.

 

julia didnt lie, she just has core and non core independants!

You are no doubt a rabid labour supporter that would vote labour no matter how they fucked you.

 

"There will be NO CARBON TAX" - You obviously will deny that Gillard said that on national TV.

 

Abbot wouldn't bend over for the independents to get into power - Gillard did.

 

my god! she did say that! fancy a politician making a promise and not keeping it!

 

abbot did bend over. he, like i am sure you have been, was passed up for something better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

my god! she did say that! fancy a politician making a promise and not keeping it!

 

abbot did bend over. he, like i am sure you have been, was passed up for something better.

 

 

Bullshit. Abbot would not prostitue himself. Gillard did, purely to hold power. We all know that, except you won't accept what everyone else knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my god! she did say that! fancy a politician making a promise and not keeping it!

 

abbot did bend over. he, like i am sure you have been, was passed up for something better.

 

Keep the dream.

 

The funniest thing about this shitfight is that the Labor party is tearing itself a new fundamental orifice, but can't stop mentioning how the debate is all about keeping Abbott out of office.

 

Abbott must be hoe-ing into a monumental bag of popcorn at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

btw, the 'independents' have made it quite clear that they'll follow the Labor party like a nice herd of lemmings to electoral annihilation.

 

The LNP is not silly enough to believe they can negotiate with them any more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my god! she did say that! fancy a politician making a promise and not keeping it!

 

abbot did bend over. he, like i am sure you have been, was passed up for something better.

 

 

Bullshit. Abbot would not prostitue himself. Gillard did, purely to hold power. We all know that, except you won't accept what everyone else knows.

 

 

 

http://www.smh.com.au/national/the-day-abbott-bared-his-soul-20110827-1jfgv.html

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-election/wilkie-rejects-1b-sweetener-20100902-14rpi.html

 

abbot was as desperate as gillard, perhaps too desparate!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

73-29? in favour of Gillard.

 

Guarantees a Libs win next election.

Can't see Julia losing todays caucus vote. Unless there is a major change in the polls? I do not expect her to be the PM at the time of the next election. My money is on Smith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

73-29? in favour of Gillard.

 

Guarantees a Libs win next election.

Can't see Julia losing todays caucus vote. Unless there is a major change in the polls? I do not expect her to be the PM at the time of the next election. My money is on Smith.

Not official but seems it's 73-29.

 

Smith is likely. Somewhat bland, but remember, these guys chose Latham not so long ago, so it could be anybody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites