• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.
    • B.J. Porter

      Moderation Team Change   06/16/2017

      After fifteen years of volunteer moderation at SA, I will no longer be part of the moderation team. The decision to step aside is mine, and has been some time in the works but we did not wish to announce it in advance for a number of reasons. It's been fun, but I need my time back for other purposes now. The Underdawg admin account will not be monitored until further notice, as I will be relinquishing control of it along with my administrative privileges. Zapata will continue on as a moderator, and any concerns or issues can be directed to that account or to the Editor until further notice. Anyone interested in helping moderate the forums should reach out to Scot by sending a PM to the Editor account. Please note that I am not leaving the community, I am merely stepping aside from Admin responsibilities and privileges on the site.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Rolfe'd

Laser with an I14 rig

66 posts in this topic

This was shot this past weekend in Miami, notice that it's planing upwind in 5 knots.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very cool!, now it needs a Hansen main!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the hansen main would slow it down...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would only approach sailing that thing with my rosary beads firmly stuffed in my lifejacket pocket...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was hoping that there was considerable CF reinforcement done to handle the loads.

 

On the general idea: Having half (just for a number) the righting moment one "should" have for the rig will be interesting to see how it works. We had posts about lake racing somewhere off in Eastern Europe (Hungary I think) where they were racing Melges 24 singlehanded and so forth. They did okay though it sounds way off.

 

Of course, that's a light-air strategy, not something for suitable-all-around.

 

Let us know how this goes!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would only sail that after alot of very hard praying :L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a One Design 14 GP rig. Can see the old hardware. Main logo would also suggest this. Very cool. Who's boat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dude, but the 'Contender' has been around for decades.

 

Not with a massive spinnaker ;)

 

That is a One Design 14 GP rig. Can see the old hardware. Main logo would also suggest this. Very cool. Who's boat?

 

It's Luke/Eric Lawrence's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sick boat. I imagine with the CE moved that far aft there would be some serious weather helm. Even in 5 knots of breeze with a very flat boat you can see him driving down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother and i have sailed it in 15-18 knots wothout the kite and it was slightly hard to bear away and make it yet The helm isn't that bad through the wind increas

-it's a big rig of a 1995 US 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are your weights, if you could share the information? Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it so wrong to think that it didn't look terrible? I mean, the hull shape with a bit of modification (moving CE/CLR around a bit, nicer rails for trapping, etc) seems like it doesn't mind the power, and the rig with a bit of modernization could be real neat.

 

Nice job guys, definitely want to see this progress.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see the Laser construction holding up to more load.

 

Hell, it can't eve hold up to the load of the normal rig.

Granted they may have made some improvements in construction since my day, but I was able to twist the boat on its longitudinal axis just by hiking my 190-pound ass with the stock rig. The mast step/tube/whatever is not exactly enshrined in the engineering hall of fame...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Laser without a rig weighs what, like 140 pounds or so? That's only forty pounds less than the OD-14 would've been. Seems like just the right amount of power. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that IS a Franken rig, but your camerawork is great!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that IS a Franken rig, but your camerawork is great!

 

Thanks, I was kicking myself for how shaky it was in some spots, I'm going to make a stabilized mini-boom eventually for stuff like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that IS a Franken rig, but your camerawork is great!

 

I like the underwater shots. That can't be easy with more than just a knot or two of speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cool. Love franken-boats!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody know the song thats playing?

 

It's in the video description - Finally Moving by Pretty Lights

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

waste of a perfectly good I14 rig. Can they send in a video of it imploding in 30kts of breeze? My money would go on the bow snapping off around the mast base due to the extra compression from the mast and bow lift from the spinnaker pole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesomeness! Where does the chute go when it's down; is there a retrieval line or do you just haul on the sheet? I want to see a douse in breeze video :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, not bad

i too had the idea

i guess everybody who is used to trapez-boats thought about it (in one way or another), while hicking there hairy asses out of the ultimate 4ksb.

the most striking thing too me:

people actually do have too much time.

moneywise? i wouldn't spend a pound, but if the stuff is lying around? why not...

but the time!!!!

in my young days i converted a contender with a assym. i used an opti boom with its fork around the mast and one set of stays from midway to the bow. i used an old symm kite (can't remeber which boat is was from ) and it was ok. never had it up in shit loads of wind but still it was cool.

no, i don't have any pictures (imagin that), but i've seen some other pics with kited contenders.

anyway, keep up the frankenstein thing. in all classes.

please do

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it, can't wait to see more. This would fill the lIght air hole until the real fun, kiting and mothing, can begin!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you notify your local PHRF committee about the modifications? Hope so...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the hansen main would slow it down...

 

Why would that be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw it done with a 470 mast on a Laser, nicknamed a "LaTender". Good stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*Shameless bump to get this out from under all the occupy BS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know about what the sail area is, and the crew weights?

 

If it were a current I14 mainsail I'd suppose about 12.5 m2 as a rough guess, but apparently it's a One Design GP.

 

The reason is, it could help show how far sailing-area-for-righing-moment can be pushed for a light-air play boat. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know about what the sail area is, and the crew weights?

 

If it were a current I14 mainsail I'd suppose about 12.5 m2 as a rough guess, but apparently it's a One Design GP.

 

The reason is, it could help show how far sailing-area-for-righing-moment can be pushed for a light-air play boat. Thanks!

 

Crew weight is probably about 175, not sure about sail area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How 'bout a set of wings from a Hobie FX1?

 

That or racks to get the crew out further would be overkill on top of overkill, but sick nonetheless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that rather than overkill, it would be better matching righting moment to sail area. Of course the rig ordinarily has a jib as well, but it would have two on trapeze, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great project. Major boo-yaa's to ya's.

 

Can you right it?

 

Yeah, he flipped once during that session and it didn't seem to be much of a problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

laser 2?

 

Yup. Seems pretty obvious really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it a contender with a kite? :lol:

 

 

?????? What an idiot?

 

Why idiot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started on a very similar project 20 years ago with a Laser hull I bought for 10 bucks and a free 505 rig. The hull had the mast step ripped out so an easy matter to cut a hole big enough to slip in some reinforcing bulkheads to handle the mast compression loads. Ended up in a landfill though when I started building my first boat. Hadn't planned on a chute though... nice work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it a contender with a kite? :lol:

 

 

?????? What an idiot?

 

No, a Contender main is a lot smaller :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dude, but the 'Contender' has been around for decades.

 

Not with a massive spinnaker ;)

 

That is a One Design 14 GP rig. Can see the old hardware. Main logo would also suggest this. Very cool. Who's boat?

 

It's Luke/Eric Lawrence's

 

yeah, i've gota say for the first part the video i was also thinking ho hum...contender. but then saw the kite...hmmmmm...getting that up and down must be entertaining ! :lol:

 

well done

 

cheers,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My First Laser (like a 1978 vintage) Came Used with a Spinaker.... Was questionable at the time. Now i Get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome and beautiful video. What a fun project. props to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody know the song thats playing?

 

Pretty sure its "Finally Moving" by "Pretty Lights"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interested to see this. Am currently looking at adding bowsprit, asymmetrical kite and trapeze to a "Leader" dinghy.

 

The Leader class was designed and built by Paul Kulmar in Sydney Australia, in the early 1980's.

It's 13' long, fine skiff nose on hull similar to Laser on the bottom, but with open, free draining deck on top.

The foam-core hulls are similar in design and construction to the Aero9 style NS14/MG14; just shorter and narrower.

It has 2 mast steps and 2 sets of rear stay hounds, so you can move the mast forward and sail 1-up cat rigged, or move aft for 2-up sloop rigged.

It has Yachting Vic yardstick of 117, slower than a Laser Radial (116).

With trapeze + asymmetric, this may drop to 108; similar to a Contender (107.5)

 

I only weigh 62kg, so am looking at a 10sq.m spinnaker. Expect to sail it 1-up mostly, but love the option of moving the mast, adding jib and going 2-up.

Am not worried about class rules; the Leader class is pretty much extinct these days anyway.

I'm seeing this as a cost effective way of getting a trap+kite style sports skiff. Expecting total cost around AUS$2000, compared to $6000 for 2nd hand MG with bowsprit (which would be too powerful for me to sail 1-up anyway), or $7500+ for 2nd hand RS100, or more for other things like RS Vareo, Musto Skiff.

 

A comment above about the hull breaking with the nose lifting up. The Leader has a big vertical support, between the hull bottom and deck under the 2 mast steps. I imagine that this offers longitudanal strength, but also limits placement and length of retracting bowsprit.

 

Questions:

- the frankenlaser has fixed bowsprit on the deck. Any problems with doing it that way?

- did you have to increase the rudder blade size?

- fun winter construction project, awesome next season toy, or what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was just a matter of time. Wonder what took so long?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesomeness! Where does the chute go when it's down; is there a retrieval line or do you just haul on the sheet? I want to see a douse in breeze video :-)

 

haa me to, you just grab the sheet and stuff like crazzy, works pretty well if your not in a puff.

 

It was just a matter of time. Wonder what took so long?

 

thats what i said, so i did it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very cool!, now it needs a Hansen main!

 

Agreed, i think any up to date main will make worlds of difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interested to see this. Am currently looking at adding bowsprit, asymmetrical kite and trapeze to a "Leader" dinghy.

 

The Leader class was designed and built by Paul Kulmar in Sydney Australia, in the early 1980's.

It's 13' long, fine skiff nose on hull similar to Laser on the bottom, but with open, free draining deck on top.

The foam-core hulls are similar in design and construction to the Aero9 style NS14/MG14; just shorter and narrower.

It has 2 mast steps and 2 sets of rear stay hounds, so you can move the mast forward and sail 1-up cat rigged, or move aft for 2-up sloop rigged.

It has Yachting Vic yardstick of 117, slower than a Laser Radial (116).

With trapeze + asymmetric, this may drop to 108; similar to a Contender (107.5)

 

I only weigh 62kg, so am looking at a 10sq.m spinnaker. Expect to sail it 1-up mostly, but love the option of moving the mast, adding jib and going 2-up.

Am not worried about class rules; the Leader class is pretty much extinct these days anyway.

I'm seeing this as a cost effective way of getting a trap+kite style sports skiff. Expecting total cost around AUS$2000, compared to $6000 for 2nd hand MG with bowsprit (which would be too powerful for me to sail 1-up anyway), or $7500+ for 2nd hand RS100, or more for other things like RS Vareo, Musto Skiff.

 

A comment above about the hull breaking with the nose lifting up. The Leader has a big vertical support, between the hull bottom and deck under the 2 mast steps. I imagine that this offers longitudanal strength, but also limits placement and length of retracting bowsprit.

 

Questions:

- the frankenlaser has fixed bowsprit on the deck. Any problems with doing it that way?

- did you have to increase the rudder blade size?

- fun winter construction project, awesome next season toy, or what?

 

sounds versatile

the fixed bowsprit inst a problem as long as you remember its there when racing other boats.....

the rudder is stock and refuses to bear away unless your on the wire but I sail out of Coral Reef Yacht club in Miami as much as i can, getting ready for the Miami to key largo race in mid April.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know about what the sail area is, and the crew weights?

 

If it were a current I14 mainsail I'd suppose about 12.5 m2 as a rough guess, but apparently it's a One Design GP.

 

The reason is, it could help show how far sailing-area-for-righing-moment can be pushed for a light-air play boat. Thanks!

 

all the rigging is from a 1995 14 GP boat, not quite sure what the numbers are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interested to see this. Am currently looking at adding bowsprit, asymmetrical kite and trapeze to a "Leader" dinghy.

 

The Leader class was designed and built by Paul Kulmar in Sydney Australia, in the early 1980's.

It's 13' long, fine skiff nose on hull similar to Laser on the bottom, but with open, free draining deck on top.

The foam-core hulls are similar in design and construction to the Aero9 style NS14/MG14; just shorter and narrower.

It has 2 mast steps and 2 sets of rear stay hounds, so you can move the mast forward and sail 1-up cat rigged, or move aft for 2-up sloop rigged.

It has Yachting Vic yardstick of 117, slower than a Laser Radial (116).

With trapeze + asymmetric, this may drop to 108; similar to a Contender (107.5)

 

I only weigh 62kg, so am looking at a 10sq.m spinnaker. Expect to sail it 1-up mostly, but love the option of moving the mast, adding jib and going 2-up.

Am not worried about class rules; the Leader class is pretty much extinct these days anyway.

I'm seeing this as a cost effective way of getting a trap+kite style sports skiff. Expecting total cost around AUS$2000, compared to $6000 for 2nd hand MG with bowsprit (which would be too powerful for me to sail 1-up anyway), or $7500+ for 2nd hand RS100, or more for other things like RS Vareo, Musto Skiff.

 

A comment above about the hull breaking with the nose lifting up. The Leader has a big vertical support, between the hull bottom and deck under the 2 mast steps. I imagine that this offers longitudanal strength, but also limits placement and length of retracting bowsprit.

Had similar idea with a Leader, but got back to Northies and will do NS/MG.

 

Questions:

- the frankenlaser has fixed bowsprit on the deck. Any problems with doing it that way?

- did you have to increase the rudder blade size?

- fun winter construction project, awesome next season toy, or what?

ask RohanOz for some pics on an Aero 6 to MG conversion.

I wouldn't compare the Leader with a 9, perhaps a 4, although Paul could have been 15 years ahead of Michael Nash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites