• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

kwelch

ActiSense NGW-1 Issues

14 posts in this topic

Has anyone out there experienced issues with the ActiSense NGW-1-ISO (The RS-232 version). I am trying to put high-speed 10Hz GPS data 115200,8N and it will only work up to 4800 baud, yet the manual states that is will run to at least 115200.

In talking with the distributor they say that 4800 is all it will do, but this doesn't seem right as the USB version works great and easily handles high speed data. Anyone out there have any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone out there experienced issues with the ActiSense NGW-1-ISO (The RS-232 version). I am trying to put high-speed 10Hz GPS data 115200,8N and it will only work up to 4800 baud, yet the manual states that is will run to at least 115200.

In talking with the distributor they say that 4800 is all it will do, but this doesn't seem right as the USB version works great and easily handles high speed data. Anyone out there have any ideas?

 

I can alter the speed with the program from actisense (nmeareader).

The manual you refer to is that the gps or the actisense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So here is the scoop -- the Actisense will work at faster baud rates if you use the software programming tool to step up the baud rate (something they don't clearly explain) -- however, for some odd reason which they claim is to maintain compatibility with the N2K standard it will only output the position at 1 Hz -- yes you read that right, 1 freeking Hz.

 

Now the USB version of their same interface unit will operate much faster, so why 1 Hz is beyond me -- perhaps someone out there can enlighten me, or even better suggest a solution to get 10 Hz GPS data onto an N2K bus...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So here is the scoop -- the Actisense will work at faster baud rates if you use the software programming tool to step up the baud rate (something they don't clearly explain) -- however, for some odd reason which they claim is to maintain compatibility with the N2K standard it will only output the position at 1 Hz -- yes you read that right, 1 freeking Hz.

 

Now the USB version of their same interface unit will operate much faster, so why 1 Hz is beyond me -- perhaps someone out there can enlighten me, or even better suggest a solution to get 10 Hz GPS data onto an N2K bus...

 

How about the ais firmware fore the NGW iso?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't looked at this, but I finally heard back from Actisense in that they have a "firmware" issue with the RS-232 version which doesn't let it operate faster than 1 Hz -- bummer! The USB version however works very well and is directly supported by Expedition...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck. I just ordered an NGW last week. After several emails and a phone call with one of their engineers to clarify how the NGW worked, I came away with the very clear understanding that data could be put onto the 2000 bus faster than 1hz, provided that was allowed for in the NMEA 2000 specification, which it is for basically all channels. Not going to be very impressed if that turns out to be bullshit.

 

Do you know if this firmware issue applies to the NMEA version only or does it also apply to the ISO version with the RS232 interface? Is it something that they are working on fixing? I want to make an Arduino spit data onto the 2000 bus. 1hz is fine for now but eventually I want to drive a Simrad autopilot with heading and rate of turn data and that needs to be 10hz. Maybe a Raspberry Pi and the USB version is the way to go instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck. I just ordered an NGW last week. After several emails and a phone call with one of their engineers to clarify how the NGW worked, I came away with the very clear understanding that data could be put onto the 2000 bus faster than 1hz, provided that was allowed for in the NMEA 2000 specification, which it is for basically all channels. Not going to be very impressed if that turns out to be bullshit.

 

Do you know if this firmware issue applies to the NMEA version only or does it also apply to the ISO version with the RS232 interface? Is it something that they are working on fixing? I want to make an Arduino spit data onto the 2000 bus. 1hz is fine for now but eventually I want to drive a Simrad autopilot with heading and rate of turn data and that needs to be 10hz. Maybe a Raspberry Pi and the USB version is the way to go instead.

 

The USB version works as advertised (I use this with Expedition), but not the NMEA version. I am not sure about the ISO version...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck. I just ordered an NGW last week. After several emails and a phone call with one of their engineers to clarify how the NGW worked, I came away with the very clear understanding that data could be put onto the 2000 bus faster than 1hz, provided that was allowed for in the NMEA 2000 specification, which it is for basically all channels. Not going to be very impressed if that turns out to be bullshit.

 

Do you know if this firmware issue applies to the NMEA version only or does it also apply to the ISO version with the RS232 interface? Is it something that they are working on fixing? I want to make an Arduino spit data onto the 2000 bus. 1hz is fine for now but eventually I want to drive a Simrad autopilot with heading and rate of turn data and that needs to be 10hz. Maybe a Raspberry Pi and the USB version is the way to go instead.

Or get a board with a CAN bus, like the Craneboard, and then maybe you can output NMEA-2000 directly without a converter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

xyzzy, either you are an electrical engineering wiz and don't see any major challenges with your suggestion or you haven't researched the problem enough to grasp the magnitude of it. I definitely will not be going that route.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a closed and expensive specification that, particularly in comparison to 0183, is a good deal more complicated and harder to reverse engineer. What I gather from the people that have tried is that listening is fairly ok but getting something talking with stability and reliability is a big challenge, due to among other things these rapid update packets that are part of the spec but so far not very well reversed engineered.

 

Bottom line for me is that other people have made interface hardware and supporting software in a range of operating systems at a price I find acceptable that ought to do what I need, so I would rather work on other areas where this is not the case. Or maybe even just go sailing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck. I just ordered an NGW last week. After several emails and a phone call with one of their engineers to clarify how the NGW worked, I came away with the very clear understanding that data could be put onto the 2000 bus faster than 1hz, provided that was allowed for in the NMEA 2000 specification, which it is for basically all channels. Not going to be very impressed if that turns out to be bullshit.

 

Do you know if this firmware issue applies to the NMEA version only or does it also apply to the ISO version with the RS232 interface? Is it something that they are working on fixing? I want to make an Arduino spit data onto the 2000 bus. 1hz is fine for now but eventually I want to drive a Simrad autopilot with heading and rate of turn data and that needs to be 10hz. Maybe a Raspberry Pi and the USB version is the way to go instead.

 

The USB version works as advertised (I use this with Expedition), but not the NMEA version. I am not sure about the ISO version...

 

I would like to use an Actisense for converting NMEA 2000 PGNs into NMEA0183 sentenses (RS 232 or USB)

But I need the NMEA0183 sentenses more often than by 1 Hz.

If possible as fast/often than the NMEA2000 bus is sending all these informations (not only GPS but also wind datas and STW)

 

NMEA0183 sentenses are needed for own calculations and calibrations not for driving any NMEA0183 unit.

 

Ist this possible with a NGW-1-USB?

Is it meanwhile possible with the NGW-1-ISO (RS232)?

Any other suggestions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gadget, thanks for your answere.

 

These devices are not good for me, because I need much more informations than position and SOG only.

I need also wind datas and STW.

 

For doing own calculations (and own displays) I would prefer to get these datas more often than every second or less (like it comes on NMEA0183 standard bus)

The aim was to find a device which reads NMEA2k and transforms to something I can handle like NMEA0183. (Just listening is needed, not writing back to N2k bus)

 

Actisense would be perfect and easy to install (I am sailing chartered boats on several regattas) and I wanted to avoid to build an own NMEA2k-Converter with a µC.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites