• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

michaelkeogh1970

What would make the perfect AC boat?

11 posts in this topic

I recently finished “Born to win” by John Bertrand and have just watched the videos of the 12s sailing off Fremantle and I got to thinking. In the book and on the video they talk about mammoth down speed tacking duels. 30 and 40 tacks up a single beat etc etc. I was a teenager when they raced in 86 – 87 and the AC got very little or no TV coverage, so excuse me if I am way off the mark. More recently, in the ACC boats I simply don’t recall any / many gloves off match racing duels (open to correction though).

 

 

 

In the last few years the FIA have changed the rules of F1 so much that they have forced the cars to be evenly matched – hence F1 is watchable again.

 

 

 

How could the AC be manipulated to make it really interesting for sailors to watch. Ok the big cats WILL be spectacular and I can’t wait to see them go, but lets face it, they won’t be doing 30 tacks up a beat! What would make the best boat / race course configuration to make the cup fun to watch?

 

 

 

I am thinking mono-hulls about 60 – 65 feet long (keep costs down – make them light like STP 65s on steroids).

 

Standard foils (+ maybe mast) again to keep costs way down and to level the playing field.

 

Most Importantly - Nationality rules.

 

Sail on a fairly short windward Leeward course with the start line half way up that is also a gate that must be sailed through both upwind and downwind.

 

 

 

IMHO this would give manufactured, but even full on match racing and if the costs are right the chance of a load of teams too. I recon 3 or 4 from USA, 3 or 4 from Europe, 2 from NZ, 2 from Australia, 2 or 3 from Asia (Korea, China, Japan) 1 or 2 from Russia. Am I delusional?!

 

 

 

P.S. Apologies if this has already been discussed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been discussed many times... almost ad nauseum, especially nationality rules for the hired guns.

 

But on number of tacks, both up and down:

 

The course boundaries in AC34 will mean that, by Grant Dalton's estimates, there will be between 40 and 60 tacks and gibes in each race, in far-overpowered and under-manned boats. If you add in the very likely possibility of moves to cover your trailing boat's attempts to break free, that number could (gasp for air) be even higher.

 

This will be far more intense than the 12's off Freo. The difference, and yes it does matter for how different, is that the higher intensity will also be for much shorter.

 

To me it's a little like Rugby 7's versus the traditional; or some better modern-game-evolution analogy.

 

I have 'grown' to appreciate the slowness of American Baseball, the rhythm and duration of the games, the ebb and flow. But very seldom take that many hours to actually watch one. If they began tied at the top of the ninth, I might.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently finished “Born to win” by John Bertrand and have just watched the videos of the 12s sailing off Fremantle and I got to thinking. In the book and on the video they talk about mammoth down speed tacking duels. 30 and 40 tacks up a single beat etc etc. I was a teenager when they raced in 86 – 87 and the AC got very little or no TV coverage, so excuse me if I am way off the mark. More recently, in the ACC boats I simply don’t recall any / many gloves off match racing duels (open to correction though).

 

 

 

In the last few years the FIA have changed the rules of F1 so much that they have forced the cars to be evenly matched – hence F1 is watchable again.

 

 

 

How could the AC be manipulated to make it really interesting for sailors to watch. Ok the big cats WILL be spectacular and I can’t wait to see them go, but lets face it, they won’t be doing 30 tacks up a beat! What would make the best boat / race course configuration to make the cup fun to watch?

 

 

 

I am thinking mono-hulls about 60 – 65 feet long (keep costs down – make them light like STP 65s on steroids).

 

Standard foils (+ maybe mast) again to keep costs way down and to level the playing field.

 

Most Importantly - Nationality rules.

 

Sail on a fairly short windward Leeward course with the start line half way up that is also a gate that must be sailed through both upwind and downwind.

 

 

 

IMHO this would give manufactured, but even full on match racing and if the costs are right the chance of a load of teams too. I recon 3 or 4 from USA, 3 or 4 from Europe, 2 from NZ, 2 from Australia, 2 or 3 from Asia (Korea, China, Japan) 1 or 2 from Russia. Am I delusional?!

 

 

 

P.S. Apologies if this has already been discussed.

 

 

I have the same book and its a good one . The points you pick up are valid and I think the STP 65 style is where it will end up at. The nationality thing is tough as even when there was one guys like Paul Cayard etc. were able to work around it . Lets just get through this cycle and see what shakes out. With the way the economy is going AC34 will be the biggest budget AC we will all see for a long time . If there is a AC 35 it will look quite a bit different than what we are seeing at present.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been discussed many times... almost ad nauseum, especially nationality rules for the hired guns.

 

But on number of tacks, both up and down:

 

The course boundaries in AC34 will mean that, by Grant Dalton's estimates, there will be between 40 and 60 tacks and gibes in each race, in far-overpowered and under-manned boats. If you add in the very likely possibility of moves to cover your trailing boat's attempts to break free, that number could (gasp for air) be even higher.

 

This will be far more intense than the 12's off Freo. The difference, and yes it does matter for how different, is that the higher intensity will also be for much shorter.

 

To me it's a little like Rugby 7's versus the traditional; or some better modern-game-evolution analogy.

 

I have 'grown' to appreciate the slowness of American Baseball, the rhythm and duration of the games, the ebb and flow. But very seldom take that many hours to actually watch one. If they began tied at the top of the ninth, I might.

 

Greenteamfan,

 

Take no notice of Spinray. He doesn't like it when people post anything negative about his precious AC34.

 

I agree that the AC72's will be spectacular on the water fleet racing but in a match racing enviroment? Nah.

 

There certainly won't be any of the classic tacking duels that we have seen in the past. The tacking angles of cat's is ugly and the speed of the tacks is slow. The AC45's tack at 4-5 knots, even in a blow compared to say an IACC class yacht that could tack on a dime and go into a tack at 9-10 knots and come out at the same speed.

 

Earlier in the ACWS we saw a couple of lee bow tacks but because the tacks were so slow the weather boat just sailed over the top. We saw also a couple of dial-downs which were abject failures. Since then the match racing might as well held on a single leg sprint course.

 

Stingray quotes Dalts 30 - 40 tacks and gybes in a race but when you translate that down to legs it is 4 tacks or gybes per leg for a 9 leg race. That is to be expected for the narrow courses they are going to set, so nothing spectacular there.

 

The IACC class boats, while magnificent boats and the ultimate match racer, have certainly seen their day. I agree that a mono in the 65 ft range, TP52 on steroids, would attract more challengers and therefore more interest.

 

I agree with Maxmini that AC35 will look nothing like AC34, even if, that's a big if, GGYC/Oracle manage to defend the Cup. I doubt that AC35 would be held in San Francisco. Pier 30/32 will be being built on for the Warriors stadium, Pier 27/29 will be the new cruise terminal and once the final AC34 economic figures are in and San Francisco find that the economic returns/tourist figures were nothing like those promised then I doubt that they would want to be host city again.

 

Larry/Russell have already admitted that the AC72 was an expensive mistake so we won't see those again. Thats a lot of design costs for a one off boat/event.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been discussed many times... almost ad nauseum, especially nationality rules for the hired guns.

 

But on number of tacks, both up and down:

 

The course boundaries in AC34 will mean that, by Grant Dalton's estimates, there will be between 40 and 60 tacks and gibes in each race, in far-overpowered and under-manned boats. If you add in the very likely possibility of moves to cover your trailing boat's attempts to break free, that number could (gasp for air) be even higher.

 

This will be far more intense than the 12's off Freo. The difference, and yes it does matter for how different, is that the higher intensity will also be for much shorter.

 

To me it's a little like Rugby 7's versus the traditional; or some better modern-game-evolution analogy.

 

I have 'grown' to appreciate the slowness of American Baseball, the rhythm and duration of the games, the ebb and flow. But very seldom take that many hours to actually watch one. If they began tied at the top of the ninth, I might.

 

Greenteamfan,

 

Take no notice of Spinray. He doesn't like it when people post anything negative about his precious AC34.

 

I agree that the AC72's will be spectacular on the water fleet racing but in a match racing enviroment? Nah.

 

There certainly won't be any of the classic tacking duels that we have seen in the past. The tacking angles of cat's is ugly and the speed of the tacks is slow. The AC45's tack at 4-5 knots, even in a blow compared to say an IACC class yacht that could tack on a dime and go into a tack at 9-10 knots and come out at the same speed.

 

Earlier in the ACWS we saw a couple of lee bow tacks but because the tacks were so slow the weather boat just sailed over the top. We saw also a couple of dial-downs which were abject failures. Since then the match racing might as well held on a single leg sprint course.

 

Stingray quotes Dalts 30 - 40 tacks and gybes in a race but when you translate that down to legs it is 4 tacks or gybes per leg for a 9 leg race. That is to be expected for the narrow courses they are going to set, so nothing spectacular there.

 

The IACC class boats, while magnificent boats and the ultimate match racer, have certainly seen their day. I agree that a mono in the 65 ft range, TP52 on steroids, would attract more challengers and therefore more interest.

 

I agree with Maxmini that AC35 will look nothing like AC34, even if, that's a big if, GGYC/Oracle manage to defend the Cup. I doubt that AC35 would be held in San Francisco. Pier 30/32 will be being built on for the Warriors stadium, Pier 27/29 will be the new cruise terminal and once the final AC34 economic figures are in and San Francisco find that the economic returns/tourist figures were nothing like those promised then I doubt that they would want to be host city again.

 

Larry/Russell have already admitted that the AC72 was an expensive mistake so we won't see those again. Thats a lot of design costs for a one off boat/event.

 

Very doubtful on several accounts - worth saving this post for later smile.gif.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^

 

What will be very doubtful?

 

That AC34 will be spectacular

 

That Oracle will defend the Cup

 

That AC34 will be the financial success that SF have been promised

 

That AC35 will remain in SF if Oracle defend the Cup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently finished "Born to win" by John Bertrand and have just watched the videos of the 12s sailing off Fremantle and I got to thinking. In the book and on the video they talk about mammoth down speed tacking duels. 30 and 40 tacks up a single beat etc etc. I was a teenager when they raced in 86 – 87 and the AC got very little or no TV coverage, so excuse me if I am way off the mark. More recently, in the ACC boats I simply don't recall any / many gloves off match racing duels (open to correction though).

 

 

 

In the last few years the FIA have changed the rules of F1 so much that they have forced the cars to be evenly matched – hence F1 is watchable again.

 

 

 

How could the AC be manipulated to make it really interesting for sailors to watch. Ok the big cats WILL be spectacular and I can't wait to see them go, but lets face it, they won't be doing 30 tacks up a beat! What would make the best boat / race course configuration to make the cup fun to watch?

 

 

 

I am thinking mono-hulls about 60 – 65 feet long (keep costs down – make them light like STP 65s on steroids).

 

Standard foils (+ maybe mast) again to keep costs way down and to level the playing field.

 

Most Importantly - Nationality rules.

 

Sail on a fairly short windward Leeward course with the start line half way up that is also a gate that must be sailed through both upwind and downwind.

 

 

 

IMHO this would give manufactured, but even full on match racing and if the costs are right the chance of a load of teams too. I recon 3 or 4 from USA, 3 or 4 from Europe, 2 from NZ, 2 from Australia, 2 or 3 from Asia (Korea, China, Japan) 1 or 2 from Russia. Am I delusional?! yes

 

 

 

P.S. Apologies if this has already been discussed.

 

 

 

AC is not about the sailors, it's about who has the deepest pockets and is being challenged to show how deep they really are. it is therefore never about keeping cost down. that's a illusion for people with shallow pockets

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently finished "Born to win" by John Bertrand and have just watched the videos of the 12s sailing off Fremantle and I got to thinking. In the book and on the video they talk about mammoth down speed tacking duels. 30 and 40 tacks up a single beat etc etc. I was a teenager when they raced in 86 – 87 and the AC got very little or no TV coverage, so excuse me if I am way off the mark. More recently, in the ACC boats I simply don't recall any / many gloves off match racing duels (open to correction though).

 

 

 

In the last few years the FIA have changed the rules of F1 so much that they have forced the cars to be evenly matched – hence F1 is watchable again.

 

 

 

How could the AC be manipulated to make it really interesting for sailors to watch. Ok the big cats WILL be spectacular and I can't wait to see them go, but lets face it, they won't be doing 30 tacks up a beat! What would make the best boat / race course configuration to make the cup fun to watch?

 

 

 

I am thinking mono-hulls about 60 – 65 feet long (keep costs down – make them light like STP 65s on steroids).

 

Standard foils (+ maybe mast) again to keep costs way down and to level the playing field.

 

Most Importantly - Nationality rules.

 

Sail on a fairly short windward Leeward course with the start line half way up that is also a gate that must be sailed through both upwind and downwind.

 

 

 

IMHO this would give manufactured, but even full on match racing and if the costs are right the chance of a load of teams too. I recon 3 or 4 from USA, 3 or 4 from Europe, 2 from NZ, 2 from Australia, 2 or 3 from Asia (Korea, China, Japan) 1 or 2 from Russia. Am I delusional?!

 

 

 

P.S. Apologies if this has already been discussed.

 

 

 

1/ Not only has this been widely discussed here - but what you see presented for AC34 is the result of the same discussion that took place long ago within OR. It ain't what it was but they at least hope it will be better (than the races you have apparently only read about!) in many respects. Why do you think the changes were promoted??

 

2/ Match racing is one on one racing within a set of rules, (not necessarily 12m having tacking duels). It's up to the sailors to develop winning tactics according to the type of boat they are match racing in. I for one would like to see this aspect given a bit more attention by the sailors in the AC45s and in the 72s to come. Maybe when the match racing really starts in earnest, some (those with slower boats?) will figure out how to fight dirty! smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe when the match racing really starts in earnest, some (those with slower boats?) will figure out how to fight dirty! smile.gif

Match racing is to a significant degree a game of control. Controlling the opposition is only possible if you can stay close. If, in fast boat, a small percentage difference in speeds results in large separations on the water, it will be that much harder for the slower boat to gain any degree of control over the faster boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe when the match racing really starts in earnest, some (those with slower boats?) will figure out how to fight dirty! smile.gif

Match racing is to a significant degree a game of control. Controlling the opposition is only possible if you can stay close. If, in fast boat, a small percentage difference in speeds results in large separations on the water, it will be that much harder for the slower boat to gain any degree of control over the faster boat.

 

Or to put it another way , it's hard to fight dirty if you can't catch up . Speed kills :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe when the match racing really starts in earnest, some (those with slower boats?) will figure out how to fight dirty! smile.gif

Match racing is to a significant degree a game of control. Controlling the opposition is only possible if you can stay close. If, in fast boat, a small percentage difference in speeds results in large separations on the water, it will be that much harder for the slower boat to gain any degree of control over the faster boat.

 

Or to put it another way , it's hard to fight dirty if you can't catch up . Speed kills :o

 

 

Catch up? Every second match you start with an advantage, right?

 

In a speed trial the slower boat loses obviously, but surely in a match you have at least at two possibilities to dominate by using superior tactics even if in a slower boat. Gain control of the other boat to maintain a winning position and/or get penalties against the other boat to negate their speed advantage. Not easy of course but in theory the rules should make this a possibility. Time will tell whether the penalties have been set at an appropriate level to make the game interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites