• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

oioi

1.5 tonnes of rice

28 posts in this topic

there was a snippet in seahorse this month, that camper were alledgedly taking 1.5tonnes of rice on board for each leg (this is allowed as it is food) and using it as additional ballast. Anybody got a back up to that story? Also any other good gossip like that from the race?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was true, then surely must be some sort of Rule 69 transgression against the spirit or intention of the race rules. And if Camper was 'at it' as alledged, then likely the others as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In a race when the the crew cut tooth brushes down to save weight I find it a bit hard to believe that they would load 1.5 tonne of anything onto the boat. And could you imagine the rice after a few days of sloshing around in the wet! It would take some serious packaging to stop it breaking.

This is a big load of crazy shit for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a metric fuckload of rice. Doesn't sound right to me. If you were going to play that game I think you'd pick something else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a metric fuckload of rice. Doesn't sound right to me. If you were going to play that game I think you'd pick something else.

 

 

A metric shitload of Rum/beer would be more legit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had this vague idea that somewhere in the NOR/VO70 rule/SIs was a weight limit on stores?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had this vague idea that somewhere in the NOR/VO70 rule/SIs was a weight limit on stores?

 

Can't find any such rule. About the only reference is that food must be removed for the basic measuring. There is a prohibition on moving liquids about to change the trim of the boat, rice of course isn't a liquid.

Booze would clearly breach that rule. :( Pedantically even stacking a food box containing cooking oil would breach them.

 

I could imagine that if your weather forecast was such that carrying additional ballast in the early stages of the race was an advantage taking a gratuitous amount of food would work. But once the wind dropped one would assume that the crew would need to heave it overboard. However rather than just rice, I would imagine taking actual, ready to eat, nice, food would be appreciated by the crew. The rules do seem to have a potential hole here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In a race when the the crew cut tooth brushes down to save weight I find it a bit hard to believe that they would load 1.5 tonne of anything onto the boat. And could you imagine the rice after a few days of sloshing around in the wet! It would take some serious packaging to stop it breaking.

This is a big load of crazy shit for sure.

 

Vaccume packed into bricks, it would be very easy to move around.

 

Considering all the images from the boats, i think it would have been spotted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must have never watched Hornblower to consider that stunt!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds impropable ... but on the other hand, you load 1.5 tonnes of rice (or whatever mass you want) and get ... let me see ... mother uses 3 cups of water for each cup of rice ... but rice is much lighter ... so ... 6-8 tonnes ( = 6000 - 8000 kg!!!) to trim your boat. Seems legit :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a metric fuckload of rice. Doesn't sound right to me. If you were going to play that game I think you'd pick something else.

 

 

A metric shitload of Rum/beer would be more legit!

 

Ummmm, if it was 1.5 tonnes of Steinlager it could be creditable, and explain the variable performance.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Seahorse article was a bit bitchy in tone. It also mentioned persistently sick crew. I got the impression it was a bit of a whinge from the Spanish 9rightly or wrongly).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.5 tons of rice? Christ, how many gallons of soy sauce did they bring along?

 

Kind of a lame move if they really did it.... Within the letter of the rule but not within the spirit of it.... Wonder if the boat was designed with the rice ballast system in mind from the get-go? Anybody know if the other teams were pushing it that far?

 

Serge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.5 tons of rice? Christ, how many gallons of soy sauce did they bring along?

 

Kind of a lame move if they really did it.... Within the letter of the rule but not within the spirit of it.... Wonder if the boat was designed with the rice ballast system in mind from the get-go? Anybody know if the other teams were pushing it that far?

 

Serge

 

Good for them if it was, I think it's a pretty big trade-off. All the videos I've seen making moving the stack in those cramped confines a major chore, no imagine that olong with the sails and all the personal gear you are also tossing around 150 20lb sacks fo rice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must have never watched Hornblower to consider that stunt!

 

That was my first thought as well. Would serve 'em right to have their decks explode!

 

For those who have not read HH about a hundred times:

 

Hornblower and the Cargo of Rice

In The Cargo of Rice, aboard the Indefatigable, the newly situated Midshipman Hornblower is put in command of the French ship Marie Galante, carrying a cargo of rice from New Orleans, by order of Captain Pellew after it is taken as a prize. It is Hornblower's first time in command of a ship since joining the Royal Navy. He is instructed to take the captured French ship and her crew to a British port where he is to receive his next orders. Sailing is relatively smooth for Hornblower and his four seamen, until one of the crew (Matthews) informs him that the ship is taking on water from somewhere. Hornblower recalls that the Marie Galante was struck below the hull's waterline by a cannonball from the Indefatigable before her capture. They check for moisture but find none until it is pointed out that the dried rice will absorb all of it. They hastily attempt to patch the hole with a sail, but by then the rice has expanded so much that the ship is breaking apart. A massive attempt to jettison the rice comes too late and Hornblower commands all hands to abandon ship. Hornblower's crew and the French prisoners are left at sea in an open boat.

 

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Midshipman_Hornblower#Hornblower_and_the_Cargo_of_Rice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't actually rice, it was organic quinoa, and it was stored in anti-expansion hesian sacks coated in a water-resistant polymer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't actually rice, it was organic quinoa, and it was stored in anti-expansion hesian sacks coated in a water-resistant polymer.

 

 

so your confirming it, was the seahorse article right and they stopped using it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no, they got sick of unclogging the shitter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A little checking around confirms that approximately 700 kg of rice in a cubic meter. So for 1.5 metric ton would require a bit less than 2 cubic meters of volume. It is plausible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That might explain the root cause of some bulkhead trouble in the Southern Ocean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That might explain the root cause of some bulkhead trouble in the Southern Ocean

 

The bulkheads were a kind of composite rice-paper (also edible, so they counted as food as well).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would not a ton and a half of chocolate be much smaller in vol? And you have a much better chance of the crew eating their way through it if it goes light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was rice because rice is cheap, and easily packed. They got busted somewhere when shore crew dumped a whole lot in some marina bins - VOR not happy, starving millions, bad image etc. not strictly against rules, questionable whether within the spirit, whatever that means.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't got a Seahorse sub anymore, anyone want to give a outline story?

 

Straight cheating or clever use of the rules?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

 

'Spanish designer Marcelino Botin also designed two boats-his Camper design being the only boat to beat a Juan K design in the latest race...despite the negative comments from Grant Dalton about the latest Botin design. But is Dalton aware that Camper at times had been using up to 1.5tonnes of extra ballast in the form of massive rice bags (allowed, since rice is food) up until the last stages? Curiously, once the extra weight was ditched in Lorient Camper appeared to improve, winner her first leg and grabbing second overall in the Galway in port race'

 

It goes on to say 'also is less known that two of the Camper crew were constantly battling seasickness. They passed up the chance for Spanish sailor Chuny Bermudez to drive the inshore races - though he was good enough for Torben Grael during the Brazil campaign. Perhaps these stories are for another time'

 

The piece is written by a very bitter Carlos Pich on how he sees Volvo turning their back on Spain with no Spanish designer, or boat builder involved in the new one design concept.

 

He ends the piece with 'the feeling here is that the Volvo Race Organisation with its very strong Anglo Saxon and American influence have treated their Spanish clients and supporters poorly, there are many examples cited by Spanish sailors, one of which is Telefonica didn't receive one of the awards handed out for the last event in any o father seamanship, media crew or shore crew categories, that alone is enough to make us suspicious'

 

The last paragraph is included to give a flavour of the whole piece, however it's the first one above, that is pertinent to Mad's post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

 

'Spanish designer Marcelino Botin also designed two boats-his Camper design being the only boat to beat a Juan K design in the latest race...despite the negative comments from Grant Dalton about the latest Botin design. But is Dalton aware that Camper at times had been using up to 1.5tonnes of extra ballast in the form of massive rice bags (allowed, since rice is food) up until the last stages? Curiously, once the extra weight was ditched in Lorient Camper appeared to improve, winner her first leg and grabbing second overall in the Galway in port race'

 

It goes on to say 'also is less known that two of the Camper crew were constantly battling seasickness. They passed up the chance for Spanish sailor Chuny Bermudez to drive the inshore races - though he was good enough for Torben Grael during the Brazil campaign. Perhaps these stories are for another time'

 

The piece is written by a very bitter Carlos Pich on how he sees Volvo turning their back on Spain with no Spanish designer, or boat builder involved in the new one design concept.

 

He ends the piece with 'the feeling here is that the Volvo Race Organisation with its very strong Anglo Saxon and American influence have treated their Spanish clients and supporters poorly, there are many examples cited by Spanish sailors, one of which is Telefonica didn't receive one of the awards handed out for the last event in any o father seamanship, media crew or shore crew categories, that alone is enough to make us suspicious'

 

The last paragraph is included to give a flavour of the whole piece, however it's the first one above, that is pertinent to Mad's post.

 

Thanks, is this a case of sour grapes? Have Camper admitted or denied this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites