• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

pidry

Jib halyard sheave: height on the mast-> Any wisdom

9 posts in this topic

Dear SA community and maybe biggest knowledge base in the sailing world!

 

The framework:

I have a dinghy, which I sometimes use for racing, and sometimes I get these ideas: Why is this or that done as it is done? And why not differently? So now I have this jib, which has halyard, which has a sheave on the mast. In my boat, this sheave is about 25 cm below the forestay/shrouds attachment point. Rig tension is applied via the jjib luff wire.

 

The question:

Why is the jib halyard sheave lower than the forestay? Why not at the same height? Why not lower?

 

Obviously the minimum height is such that I can still hoist & tension the jib ... as it is now, I have about 15 cm space between the head and the mast, so plenty of room for (at least theoretical) experimentation.

 

Now, please give me some thoughts & ideas!

 

Thanks. Have fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

basically its all about mast bend behaviour...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And rake, and all sorts of stuff. Basically, changing the halyard height on a jib where the jib luff tensions the rig will significantly change how the boat handles and how controls affect performance. Changing the height of any halyard will make a lot of differences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you have a working forestay (ie the jib luff wire becones the forestay when you tension the jib halyard) it doesn't matter where the forestay attachment is - it's slack when you're sailing.

 

As for the displacement between the jib halyard and the shrouds, as JimC says it's about mast bend. And likely constrained by class rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your jib is also probably cut to the existing halyard exit height, change this and the leach length will be too long, also the haliard exit should be at east about 100 mm above the head of the jib or else the leach at the head of the jib will be too close to the mast and destroy he slot effect at the top of the sail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so lots of things change when moving the halyard attachment point (hoist height). But rake will stay more or less the same as long as I don't change the shrouds. So it will be mostly about bend.

 

But the question is: What is desirable? Putting the halyard sheave low, to get more bend? Or put it high to get less bend (e.g. only bend from the spreaders)?

I assume that one of these is good, so it should be either as low as possible (-> limited by the jib luff length) or as high as possible (limited by the forestay height). As it is now, it is right in the middle ....

 

Class rules don't restrict it in my case!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear here:

 

If I understand you correctly, you don't give a hoot what the class rules say, you just want to make the rigging work.

 

If that is the case, you have truly opened Pandora's Box and you might end up being an expert in the end haha!

 

The mast bend induced by the shrouds and spreader is affected not only by the offset of the halyard and shroud attachment, but also by spreader length, sweepback, and chainplate location, and rake. As you rake the mast, assuming you have provision to change shroud length (like a 505) then with non-swinging spreaders, the rake induces bend.

 

How much bend? It depends on what you are trying to do and why, and what other controls are at play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And on top of it all, what's desirable also has to take into account how the sails are cut. Changing the bend shape, rake, etc. will all result in changes to sail shape, and the best sail shape will be (should be) what the sails were cut to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

so far, thanks for your replies. So what I have learned is what I have to take into account when moving the jib halyard heigt. Class rules do not mention anything about the jib halyard, which is why I started this thread. Moreover, new sails will soon be necessary anyway, which makes all kind of things possible.

So, let's move a step forward and have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of having the halyard high or low or somewhere in between.

 

Any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites