• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

thetruth

Luna Rossa 72

Recommended Posts

'September boat' makes little sense to me since OR has to train through the same months as the Challengers, and since they ~have to be ~ prepared to race under even higher wind limits (actually quite a lot higher, too) and since we have not seen OR shying away from heavy conditions even in the very early days of Boat2.

 

I see no indication through either statements or actions that OR has had any plan whatsoever except to be able to race at the very high end. Read that Nevius line again, about how the Italians are pissed off because OR is apparently 'brushing off' LR's press for lighter limits. How much more bluntly could that point be made?

 

The OR-is-pushing-for-lighter completely unsubstantiated speculation just doesnt stack up, it is apparently just the product of too-fervent imaginations.

 

IF anyone, GD or whoever, has a big problem with lower limits the that problem for them quite obviously starts with PB. No other team has proposed it.

 

I've said all along that teams will press for their own interests, imaginary 'cozy relationships' or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  •  

     

     

    Despite the AC Panel set in place to look at the Artemis crash in-depth saying that the teams should, "...suspend all sailing in AC72 and AC45 catamarans until the middle of next week," It looks as if Luna Rossa hit the water today. Shiny!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paging the intrepid MM to the red phone!!!

Mmh ... I suspect the Spring hormones kicked in, and he's off chasing skirts ..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Luna Rossa don't follow the oracle example and strip the silver off the wing and make it clear ( at least for this training period), then all their talk and bluster about making the boats safer is just that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ You'd think that for safety reasons you'd only need to make the bottom 20' or so clear to be able to see through down to the structure, the way the wing might collapse under almost scenario. LR may be close to there already.

 

In the photo above with the GG in the background it's good to see a beefy LR boat in the foreground but absent ACRM-mandated help then I hope there was faster support too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'September boat' makes little sense to me since OR has to train through the same months as the Challengers, and since they ~have to be ~ prepared to race under even higher wind limits (actually quite a lot higher, too) and since we have not seen OR shying away from heavy conditions even in the very early days of Boat2.

 

I see no indication through either statements or actions that OR has had any plan whatsoever except to be able to race at the very high end. Read that Nevius line again, about how the Italians are pissed off because OR is apparently 'brushing off' LR's press for lighter limits. How much more bluntly could that point be made?

 

The OR-is-pushing-for-lighter completely unsubstantiated speculation just doesnt stack up, it is apparently just the product of too-fervent imaginations.

 

IF anyone, GD or whoever, has a big problem with lower limits the that problem for them quite obviously starts with PB. No other team has proposed it.

 

I've said all along that teams will press for their own interests, imaginary 'cozy relationships' or not.

 

I agree, if ETNZ think they have an advantage in heavier wind they won't care where the call for lighter winds come from they will be against it, as they should be.

From this point forward it's in it to win it for every team and that includes LR and even Artemis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

^ The request has come from LR. There aren't any other advocates for lowering the wind limit thus far. Your point is?

 

Why wouldn't you produce a boat for September if winning a regatta in September was your goal?

.

 

Great question but it should be directed at GD as he was the one that first threw a hissy fit and coined the term " September boat ".

 

I missed the "hissy fit" completely. Wasn't it only a statement that the boat is designed for the AC rather than the expected LVC conditions? Can't remember...

 

One man's trash is another's treasure.

 

One man's statement of fact is another's hissy fit :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With this press conference we are listening to half a conversation, in a foreign language and we are not even sure which of the other three teams it's even aimed at (or a combo of teams). Prefer this to silence, but it's all a bit mysterious...


Only thing I'll add is it's all very well the competitors fancying zooming about in 33 knots but the people charged with the rescuing responsibility (divers etc) should also have a say - they have to be out there and function in what will be pretty extreme conditions too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

'September boat' makes little sense to me since OR has to train through the same months as the Challengers, and since they ~have to be ~ prepared to race under even higher wind limits (actually quite a lot higher, too) and since we have not seen OR shying away from heavy conditions even in the very early days of Boat2.

 

I see no indication through either statements or actions that OR has had any plan whatsoever except to be able to race at the very high end. Read that Nevius line again, about how the Italians are pissed off because OR is apparently 'brushing off' LR's press for lighter limits. How much more bluntly could that point be made?

 

The OR-is-pushing-for-lighter completely unsubstantiated speculation just doesnt stack up, it is apparently just the product of too-fervent imaginations.

 

IF anyone, GD or whoever, has a big problem with lower limits the that problem for them quite obviously starts with PB. No other team has proposed it.

 

I've said all along that teams will press for their own interests, imaginary 'cozy relationships' or not.

 

I agree, if ETNZ think they have an advantage in heavier wind they won't care where the call for lighter winds come from they will be against it, as they should be.

From this point forward it's in it to win it for every team and that includes LR and even Artemis.

 

Gotta disagree with you Stinger as it is only compulsory to sail in heavy weather during the cup itself, where the weather is expected to be lighter.

On all days leading up to the cup, they can sit out the weather on the docks.

 

This isn't a criticism btw, its simply acknowledging an advantage they have as defender. One which they would have been silly not to exploit.

Certainly if you look at their boats, they are both built with significantly less hull volume which indicates either:

 

1. They have built a boat for lighter airs than ETNZ (aka September boat), or

2. They feel that they need less volume than ETNZ does for the same conditions.

 

Irrespective of which, ETNZ have a boat that should be more resilient in heavy weather, but they look to have paid a price in terms of weight and wetted surface area.

Therefore, for ETNZ to accept a lowering of the wind range in the AC itself makes ZERO sense to me and makes limited sense to accept a reduction in the LVC.

 

Certainly, reducing the limits to 20 knots is nucking futs.

I don't know if Bertelli is simply posturing for other concessions or what.

But if he is genuinely not comfortable racing his boat in more than 20 knots, he needs to keep good his promise and withdraw from the cup.

 

Seems to me though, that little will change and that the same three challengers will line up under much the same protocol come July.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Largely agreed, and GD has already said that he thinks OR's finer bows will be one of the factors making OR faster upwind for drag reasons.

 

But again: whether anyone 'expects' September to be light, very heavy, or mostly in-between, you can safely bet your last dollar that OR is willing, designed and prepared to race at the heavy end no matter what GD might imagine. OR will train in that, and in stronger than CSS conditions, to prepare for it.

 

As several posters have suggested, it's not necessarily even the case the lighter is safer. Foils, and their positive-lift action in bearaways, might be best when under full power if and when you have the high-end ones installed.

 

20 knots for a top end would greatly change all the parameters at far too late a stage in the game. Would be extremely surprised to see any besides LR propose it, let alone vote for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'September boat' makes little sense to me since OR has to train through the same months as the Challengers, and since they ~have to be ~ prepared to race under even higher wind limits (actually quite a lot higher, too) and since we have not seen OR shying away from heavy conditions even in the very early days of Boat2.

I see no indication through either statements or actions that OR has had any plan whatsoever except to be able to race at the very high end. Read that Nevius line again, about how the Italians are pissed off because OR is apparently 'brushing off' LR's press for lighter limits. How much more bluntly could that point be made?

The OR-is-pushing-for-lighter completely unsubstantiated speculation just just doesnt stack up, it is apparently just the product of too-fervent imaginations.

IF anyone, GD or whoever, has a big problem with lower limits the that problem for them quite obviously starts with PB. No other team has proposed it.

I've said all along that teams will press for their own interests, imaginary 'cozy relationships' or not.

I agree, I think it is more about GD's gamesmanship and trying to needle RC / Oracle off the water in any way possible.

TNZ has learned from the best (especially Dennis Conner) that winning on the water is just part of the contest the battle is waged on every front on and off the water. Mind games are a key tool.

At one stage (probably when DC insisted core samples were drilled in our new boat KZ7) Dennis would have been one of the most despised men in NZ, now he is a hugely popular figure...

I think NZ public grew to appreciate the history, high stakes & intrigue of the cup and even to appreciate the mind games.

 

Nothing puts a smile on GD's face quicker than getting a rise out of Russell.

 

LE & RC want high wind ranges for broadcaster certainty, they would be crazy to have a boat not capable of sailing in that wind range.

If I understand correctly, light winds in Sept are anything but guaranteed. There's no reason ETNZ couldn't mode boat 1 for higher wind and make b2 a September boat also. Assuming (but not certain) that you can change your boat during a series, they could sail b1 right up to the LVC final (also assuming they make the final) and preserve b2 for LV final & AC if successful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Bingo.

 

Hence RC's comments on stage w GD recently in Auckland when he chastised GD's 'September Boat' comments. RC asked him exactly when he'd become such an expert about OR2's capabilities now, let alone in the boat's future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Largely agreed, and GD has already said that he thinks OR's finer bows will be one of the factors making OR faster upwind for drag reasons.

 

But again: whether anyone 'expects' September to be light, very heavy, or mostly in-between, you can safely bet your last dollar that OR is willing, designed and prepared to race at the heavy end no matter what GD might imagine. OR will train in that, and in stronger than CSS conditions, to prepare for it.

 

As several posters have suggested, it's not necessarily even the case the lighter is safer. Foils, and their positive-lift action in bearaways, might be best when under full power if and when you have the high-end ones installed.

 

20 knots for a top end would greatly change all the parameters at far too late a stage in the game. Would be extremely surprised to see any besides LR propose it, let alone vote for it.

 

Okie, so now we are on the same page as I don't believe OR have "bet the farm" on light conditions.

For me the term "September boat" is about having a boat moded more towards light winds which is what OR has done.

 

FWIW I don't think having finer bows will win this cup for OR. The cup will be won on foil design, manoeuvrability and wing design IMHO.

At this stage it is reasonable to believe that ETNZ leads the foil design race, but there really isn't enough to suggest anything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the shit just hit the fan!

 

AC34, here we come.

 

edit, Si, what happened to your post, was responding to that; good line by Bundock

Can you paraphrase the mysterious post you responded too. I be intrigued.

 

WetHog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW I don't think having finer bows will win this cup for OR. The cup will be won on foil design, manoeuvrability and wing design IMHO.

 

Agreed. Finer bows may very well help upwind as GD says; but his contention that they will hurt OR in 'downwind' has yet to be proven and other factors will matter more anyway.

 

What a bunch of knuckleheads, I can't wait for the start gun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And in flaunting the 'no-sail' directive, it appears the review committee have taken a similar level of stature and powers to the UN...

 

What will happen, will happen.

Bring on the 72's!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why do you keep posting links to your own site, that contain material already pointed to long ago at the source sites?

 

Bonus points for the answer to this: How many sites and twitter accounts and SAAC names do you use, and for what reasons are there so many?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

L’AC72 Luna Rossa è uscita questa mattina per un primo allenamento nella baia di San Francisco. Le condizioni di vento leggero (3 nodi), in progressivo aumento fino a 12 nodi, hanno consentito all’equipaggio di effettuare un significativo numero di manovre.

 

This morning the Luna Rossa AC72 sailed for the first time in the bay of San Francisco. The light winds (3 knots), that increased up to 12, allowed the crew to carry out an extensive number of maneuvers.

post-33465-0-39594900-1368919893_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^

Pretty sure they do. That's why there aren't too many shots of their rudders and Ts on the hard.

 

Related lifting question...

Do OR fit the bow brace before lifting out of the water? Or is it only when the rig is being removed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They did look shiny though, got some video on my phone but have no idea how to post it. As soon as the wind picked up they headed home, which is a shame because it has turned out to be a warm ,mellow day on SF Bay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

'September boat' makes little sense to me since OR has to train through the same months as the Challengers, and since they ~have to be ~ prepared to race under even higher wind limits (actually quite a lot higher, too) and since we have not seen OR shying away from heavy conditions even in the very early days of Boat2.

I see no indication through either statements or actions that OR has had any plan whatsoever except to be able to race at the very high end. Read that Nevius line again, about how the Italians are pissed off because OR is apparently 'brushing off' LR's press for lighter limits. How much more bluntly could that point be made?

The OR-is-pushing-for-lighter completely unsubstantiated speculation just just doesnt stack up, it is apparently just the product of too-fervent imaginations.

IF anyone, GD or whoever, has a big problem with lower limits the that problem for them quite obviously starts with PB. No other team has proposed it.

I've said all along that teams will press for their own interests, imaginary 'cozy relationships' or not.

I agree, I think it is more about GD's gamesmanship and trying to needle RC / Oracle off the water in any way possible.

TNZ has learned from the best (especially Dennis Conner) that winning on the water is just part of the contest the battle is waged on every front on and off the water. Mind games are a key tool.

At one stage (probably when DC insisted core samples were drilled in our new boat KZ7) Dennis would have been one of the most despised men in NZ, now he is a hugely popular figure...

I think NZ public grew to appreciate the history, high stakes & intrigue of the cup and even to appreciate the mind games.

 

Nothing puts a smile on GD's face quicker than getting a rise out of Russell.

 

LE & RC want high wind ranges for broadcaster certainty, they would be crazy to have a boat not capable of sailing in that wind range.

If I understand correctly, light winds in Sept are anything but guaranteed. There's no reason ETNZ couldn't mode boat 1 for higher wind and make b2 a September boat also. Assuming (but not certain) that you can change your boat during a series, they could sail b1 right up to the LVC final (also assuming they make the final) and preserve b2 for LV final & AC if successful.

You may find that boat 1 has been re-moded for September.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why do you keep posting links to your own site, that contain material already pointed to long ago at the source sites?

 

Bonus points for the answer to this: How many sites and twitter accounts and SAAC names do you use, and for what reasons are there so many?

First answer post when i get them second I cant get into my Winged account as explained in my first icup post third answer isailmedia group has several let me see if I can list them all for you now

Twitter

1. @isailmedia

2. @acws45

3. @icupusa

 

Tumblr.

4 http://acworldseries.tumblr.com/

 

As i sad i couldnt retrive my winged account only active one I use on SA . after waiting for a reset i opened new account because I could not reset .

 

How many points

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's been a lot of talk about "September" sailing being significantly lighter than July/August. Anybody have actual historical data for the course area? All I could find was from the airport, but I suspect conditions may be different there. At the airport, for what it's worth, there seems to be only a couple mph difference in average velocity from August to September. From http://weatherspark.com/averages/31587/San-Francisco-California-United-States

post-1017-0-51601400-1368924895_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^ Okay - First time for me. Great Carlo B photos and yes, a nice presentation of them.

Thank you , its been a on going project been little busy cleaning from sandy The fact is its easier to share photos with a link and alot easier on SA servers .on the medium questions Im trying develop a app for our imedia page prototype seen here http://www.icupusa.com/#!imedia/ct74

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

^^ Okay - First time for me. Great Carlo B photos and yes, a nice presentation of them.

Thank you , its been a on going project been little busy cleaning from sandy The fact is its easier to share photos with a link and alot easier on SA servers .on the medium questions Im trying develop a app for our imedia page prototype seen here http://www.icupusa.com/#!imedia/ct74

Nice...

But please don't forget to send them to spinbot, so that he can post them on his forum....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's been a lot of talk about "September" sailing being significantly lighter than July/August. Anybody have actual historical data for the course area? All I could find was from the airport, but I suspect conditions may be different there. At the airport, for what it's worth, there seems to be only a couple mph difference in average velocity from August to September. From http://weatherspark.com/averages/31587/San-Francisco-California-United-States

I am sure that our bay specialist the SWallower wil provide us with more specific data

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea of lowering wind limits is naive, unfair and exactly the sort of non-decision I would expect the non-independent review sham to come up with. I don't know why PB is bringing it up. Both boats that have gone over went over well, well inside the wind limits. The only boat that we know that has sailed up to the wind limit - ETNZ - seemed to have quite a good time. This is because they have quite a safe boat. A1 and OR1 were not good boats.

 

So what can the review say - we are going to halve the wind limit so the rickety boats some competitors have made will be safe? Because over 15 knots, two boats have proved that they are not. It looks like OR2 has joined LR and ETNZ in producing a good boat. Hopefully AR2 will be as well.

 

It's not about wind limits - it's about having a good enough boat for the job. Lots of people on this site knocked the ENTZ approach, saying it was all muscle and no sophistication. Their design is so far the only one that has stood up.

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You may find that boat 1 has been re-moded for September.

 

You may find B1 re-moded for LVC !

 

I find it terribly doubtful that they would re-mode boat 1 for September when B2 is far closer to a September boat than B1.

So yeah, I agree with Kiwing. If they remode boat 1, it will likely be for LVC.

 

But doG (and ETNZ) only know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I don't get it :unsure:

 

Demands better safety support: helicopters divers etc.

Then goes out foiling during the requested stand down period.

 

 

On the one hand, under 12kt foiling with only jib up is pretty impressive.

Shows confidence that the ETNZ design isn't going to implode on first contact with The Bay (dun dun dah!).

Arguably insensitive & in conflict with request for better safety measures but also if they felt ready & confident in their boat they shouldn't miss out on competitive advantage of getting there before ETNZ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I don't get it :unsure:

 

Demands better safety support: helicopters divers etc.

Then goes out foiling during the requested stand down period.

 

 

On the one hand, under 12kt foiling with only jib up is pretty impressive.

Shows confidence that the ETNZ design isn't going to implode on first contact with The Bay (dun dun dah!).

Arguably insensitive & in conflict with request for better safety measures but also if they felt ready & confident in their boat they shouldn't miss out on competitive advantage of getting there before ETNZ.

 

Off his meds it would seem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luna Rossa foiling on the San Francisco Bay

  • © Luna Rossa/Carlo Borlenghi

    LunaRossaSF13cb_05714.jpg

 

More pics here ..

 

http://luna-rossa-challenge-2013.americascup.com/en/latest/2645/luna-rossa-foiling-on-the-san-francisco-bay

 

Was out on the water this morning in the same area - saw them tooling around back and forth east of Alcatraz ~ 9:30 in glass like conditions. Later saw them head for the gate and eventually the city front in search of pressure. As of ~ 11:00 they were on the city front and not foiling in 8 knots of wind, as we sailed right by them about three times.

 

Good to see them on the water.

 

Where again are all those posters that were preciously screaming about how unfair wind limits are?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

You may find that boat 1 has been re-moded for September.

 

You may find B1 re-moded for LVC !

 

I find it terribly doubtful that they would re-mode boat 1 for September when B2 is far closer to a September boat than B1.

So yeah, I agree with Kiwing. If they remode boat 1, it will likely be for LVC.

 

But doG (and ETNZ) only know

Maybe, but given boat 1 may not be here before the start of LVC, it would appear unlikely that would be the case, particularly when they have to then put the boat together when it arrives. I would have thought they may take a bit of a calculated risk in modifying boat 1 to be the next generation boat and use NZA as the fall back position if it didn't work which is what they did back in 95 with 32 & 38.

 

Without doubt ETNZ are the benchmark when it comes to sailing in big breeze. By their own admission they need to improve down the wind range more so than anywhere else.

 

There is no way boat 1 will be sailing in 6 weeks time. NZA will be the boat they take into the start of the LVC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

You may find that boat 1 has been re-moded for September.

 

You may find B1 re-moded for LVC !

 

I find it terribly doubtful that they would re-mode boat 1 for September when B2 is far closer to a September boat than B1.

So yeah, I agree with Kiwing. If they remode boat 1, it will likely be for LVC.

 

But doG (and ETNZ) only know

Maybe, but given boat 1 may not be here before the start of LVC, it would appear unlikely that would be the case, particularly when they have to then put the boat together when it arrives. I would have thought they may take a bit of a calculated risk in modifying boat 1 to be the next generation boat and use NZA as the fall back position if it didn't work which is what they did back in 95 with 32 & 38.

 

Without doubt ETNZ are the benchmark when it comes to sailing in big breeze. By their own admission they need to improve down the wind range more so than anywhere else.

 

There is no way boat 1 will be sailing in 6 weeks time. NZA will be the boat they take into the start of the LVC.

 

But could it be sailing in 11 weeks when the LVC actually starts to matter? I'm not saying this is the case, just offering a possible scenario

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't the Italians go sailing? The conditions were perfect for their first sail in SF.

 

The review committee has no teeth. It just has an advisory role. This is going to be a bit of mess: the teams will use the review committee to bolster their case when it suits them - and completely ignore it when it doesn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

You may find that boat 1 has been re-moded for September.

 

You may find B1 re-moded for LVC !

 

I find it terribly doubtful that they would re-mode boat 1 for September when B2 is far closer to a September boat than B1.

So yeah, I agree with Kiwing. If they remode boat 1, it will likely be for LVC.

 

But doG (and ETNZ) only know

Maybe, but given boat 1 may not be here before the start of LVC, it would appear unlikely that would be the case, particularly when they have to then put the boat together when it arrives. I would have thought they may take a bit of a calculated risk in modifying boat 1 to be the next generation boat and use NZA as the fall back position if it didn't work which is what they did back in 95 with 32 & 38.

 

Without doubt ETNZ are the benchmark when it comes to sailing in big breeze. By their own admission they need to improve down the wind range more so than anywhere else.

 

There is no way boat 1 will be sailing in 6 weeks time. NZA will be the boat they take into the start of the LVC.

 

But could it be sailing in 11 weeks when the LVC actually starts to matter? I'm not saying this is the case, just offering a possible scenario

I have no doubt the boat will be sailing in 11 weeks. The only place ETNZ have to prove their credentials is in the lower wind ranges where practically everyone else has been training, including OR.

 

My understanding is boat 1 has undergone significant surgery to become a medium air upwind boat. If it was an LVC boat, I'm not sure the changes to the boat would be as significant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't the Italians go sailing? The conditions were perfect for their first sail in SF.

 

The review committee has no teeth. It just has an advisory role. This is going to be a bit of mess: the teams will use the review committee to bolster their case when it suits them - and completely ignore it when it doesn't.

 

They certainly seemed to think so today - no hesitation to hit the water.

 

How about those 20 knot wind limits ?

 

They must be in collusion with TNZ :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no doubt the boat will be sailing in 11 weeks. The only place ETNZ have to prove their credentials is in the lower wind ranges where practically everyone else has been training, including OR.

 

My understanding is boat 1 has undergone significant surgery to become a medium air upwind boat. If it was an LVC boat, I'm not sure the changes to the boat would be as significant.

 

Hmmm, I just find it odd that they would make mods to boat 1 to make it their light wind boat when it is the boat that is currently moded most towards heavier conditions.

Why not re-mode boat 2 which would need fewer mods???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's been a lot of talk about "September" sailing being significantly lighter than July/August. Anybody have actual historical data for the course area? All I could find was from the airport, but I suspect conditions may be different there. At the airport, for what it's worth, there seems to be only a couple mph difference in average velocity from August to September. From http://weatherspark.com/averages/31587/San-Francisco-California-United-States

 

 

I dunno on OCT.5th I could barely open the West door on the upper level (west end) of GGYC to step out

 

I could not believe the lack of white caps (Incoming Flood & Wind)

 

this is one of the vid's I shot

 

Friend of mine came in from Media Boat SOAKING - SHIVERING w Blue Lips :o Fack That !!!!!! I suggested he go get checked out (He's on here)

 

Anyway check out the Vid from OCT - 5 - 2012 AC-45s / FRISCO :)

 

and figure the wind speed from the speed of the boats (the Vid does the Wind No Justice)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NOT to hex LR but going out on times like these are the times you likely shall regret

 

Oh ya Yer Up to It an ALL

 

But Just like when your Mom said "I don't think you should do that Today"

 

Sure as Shit "THAT" is when you twist your ankle (or Whatever)

 

Jus sayin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have no doubt the boat will be sailing in 11 weeks. The only place ETNZ have to prove their credentials is in the lower wind ranges where practically everyone else has been training, including OR.

 

My understanding is boat 1 has undergone significant surgery to become a medium air upwind boat. If it was an LVC boat, I'm not sure the changes to the boat would be as significant.

 

Hmmm, I just find it odd that they would make mods to boat 1 to make it their light wind boat when it is the boat that is currently moded most towards heavier conditions.

Why not re-mode boat 2 which would need fewer mods???

 

Surely a re-mode of b2 would cost them sailing time and if the re-mode was unsuccessful they would have two slow boats ..

 

To me it is more logical to rebuild b1 .. it is done by Cooksons so it can be quite extensive and will amount to b3 .. In the meantime they have a fast boat for the LV series and can keep their options open about which boat they will use in the AC .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I have no doubt the boat will be sailing in 11 weeks. The only place ETNZ have to prove their credentials is in the lower wind ranges where practically everyone else has been training, including OR.

 

My understanding is boat 1 has undergone significant surgery to become a medium air upwind boat. If it was an LVC boat, I'm not sure the changes to the boat would be as significant.

 

Hmmm, I just find it odd that they would make mods to boat 1 to make it their light wind boat when it is the boat that is currently moded most towards heavier conditions.

Why not re-mode boat 2 which would need fewer mods???

 

Surely a re-mode of b2 would cost them sailing time and if the re-mode was unsuccessful they would have two slow boats ..

 

To me it is more logical to rebuild b1 .. it is done by Cooksons so it can be quite extensive and will amount to b3 .. In the meantime they have a fast boat for the LV series and can keep their options open about which boat they will use in the AC .

 

Whilst I am dubious, I hope you're right Terry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no doubt the boat will be sailing in 11 weeks. The only place ETNZ have to prove their credentials is in the lower wind ranges where practically everyone else has been training, including OR.

 

My understanding is boat 1 has undergone significant surgery to become a medium air upwind boat. If it was an LVC boat, I'm not sure the changes to the boat would be as significant.

 

:)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luna Rossa is launching and recovering without rudders.

Does TNZ do the same?

 

DSC_0032_zpse3e489f2.jpg

 

 

 

DSC_0079_zps508fe6b6.jpg

 

 

I wonder if they'll pimp their dolly into a high lift like OTUSA so they can leave the rudders in?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest in the Prada line..

6497a5_70cbe677c640e562071e4dc428a97784.

© Luna Rossa by Carlo Borlinghi - all rights reserved

 

Silver armour on a silver steed - very retro

 

AACA2002ArmorHorse1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the fact that LR went out sailing yesterday tells me two things.

 

A ) The review committee is no more than a show.

B ) The teams know what caused the accident and are comfortable (at least LR) with sailing their boats on SF bay.

 

IMHO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That Luna Rossa is one magical boat.

Here she is foiling in SF Bay with all her aero fairings.

 

LunaRossaSF13cb_057141_zps6d4fa3d4.jpg

 

And here she is during recovery without all her aero fairings.

DSC_00102_zpsedea9b88.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Removable fariings so they can attach the haul out straps.

 

I think its for rudder access.

My pictures of the lifting harness don't show anything connected to the rear beam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a LOUD bang when they first took up the tension on the lifting harness. One of those O'shit moments.

They sent a crew up to take a look then lowered the harness and regrouped.

It must not have been anything serious because they hooked up again and recovered LR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the fact that LR went out sailing yesterday tells me two things.A ) The review committee is no more than a show.B ) The teams know what caused the accident and are comfortable (at least LR) with sailing their boats on SF bay.IMHO

 

In some ways I agree with LR's actions.

 

1) If you really want to honour the memory of a sailor, isn't the best way to go sailing?

 

2) I'm not sure if LR believe they can beat ETNZ (unless they have some advantages in foil technology).

If this is the case then Artemis is their main competitive focus. It's more fun being LVC runner up in history books than nowhere. All that the delay is doing for them is rewarding their main competitor for their ineptitude and giving them a catch up chance.

 

3) It's a great way to send a message to the review committee that these boats work fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like they are off and running strong which is great to see.LR is obviously on a mission and every day they are on the water that their number one challenge, Emirates, isn't is a benefit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a LOUD bang when they first took up the tension on the lifting harness. One of those O'shit moments.

They sent a crew up to take a look then lowered the harness and regrouped.

It must not have been anything serious because they hooked up again and recovered LR.

 

 

Hope they didn't shag their main beam like AR did when first hitting the bay :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So the fact that LR went out sailing yesterday tells me two things.A ) The review committee is no more than a show.B ) The teams know what caused the accident and are comfortable (at least LR) with sailing their boats on SF bay.IMHO

 

In some ways I agree with LR's actions.

 

1) If you really want to honour the memory of a sailor, isn't the best way to go sailing?

 

2) I'm not sure if LR believe they can beat ETNZ (unless they have some advantages in foil technology).

If this is the case then Artemis is their main competitive focus. It's more fun being LVC runner up in history books than nowhere. All that the delay is doing for them is rewarding their main competitor for their ineptitude and giving them a catch up chance.

 

3) It's a great way to send a message to the review committee that these boats work fine.

 

If you believe what Jimmy said about OR having never observed LR beating ETNZ in a matchup, then their chances of beating ETNZ are pretty low.

That said, presumably LR will add some "bits" to their boat before the LVC starts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So the fact that LR went out sailing yesterday tells me two things.A ) The review committee is no more than a show.B ) The teams know what caused the accident and are comfortable (at least LR) with sailing their boats on SF bay.IMHO

 

In some ways I agree with LR's actions.

 

1) If you really want to honour the memory of a sailor, isn't the best way to go sailing?

 

2) I'm not sure if LR believe they can beat ETNZ (unless they have some advantages in foil technology).

If this is the case then Artemis is their main competitive focus. It's more fun being LVC runner up in history books than nowhere. All that the delay is doing for them is rewarding their main competitor for their ineptitude and giving them a catch up chance.

 

3) It's a great way to send a message to the review committee that these boats work fine.

 

 

LR would not be out there as early as possible if they didn't think they had a shot at their real challenge ET.

 

Everyone including the review committee knew the boats work fine in a max of 12 kts and flat water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^

Pretty sure they do. That's why there aren't too many shots of their rudders and Ts on the hard.

 

Related lifting question...

Do OR fit the bow brace before lifting out of the water? Or is it only when the rig is being removed?

The brace is to hold the prodder up wo headstay...so its fitted when no headstay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't the Italians go sailing? The conditions were perfect for their first sail in SF.

 

The review committee has no teeth. It just has an advisory role. This is going to be a bit of mess: the teams will use the review committee to bolster their case when it suits them - and completely ignore it when it doesn't.

The USCG reads recommendations and issues marine event permits

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

^

Pretty sure they do. That's why there aren't too many shots of their rudders and Ts on the hard.

 

Related lifting question...

Do OR fit the bow brace before lifting out of the water? Or is it only when the rig is being removed?

The brace is to hold the prodder up wo headstay...so its fitted when no headstay

Tnx. Just had me wondering about the lack of a similar thing on the ETNZ and LR boats.

Artemis had the upside down one, so obviously the kiwi design has inherent static strength built in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

^

Pretty sure they do. That's why there aren't too many shots of their rudders and Ts on the hard.

 

Related lifting question...

Do OR fit the bow brace before lifting out of the water? Or is it only when the rig is being removed?

The brace is to hold the prodder up wo headstay...so its fitted when no headstay

Tnx. Just had me wondering about the lack of a similar thing on the ETNZ and LR boats.

Artemis had the upside down one, so obviously the kiwi design has inherent static strength built in.

 

 

LR has 2 of these mounted for each haul out...

921054_495408073846705_743304714_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't had much of an opinion of LR aside from a) me likey shiny, B) root for them when in Naples but I find it pretty bizarre and obnoxious that the syndicate head first makes public comments talking about how the event isn't safe, and rides the accident with AR to get his voice heard, and then goes out sailing right after the official group concerned with the accident says don't sail for a few he takes the boat out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites