• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

dacapo

Cheoy Lee 48...thoughts??

49 posts in this topic

a good friend of mine is interested in the 1980 Cheoy Lee on ebay and was looking for some feedback wether or not to place a bid (he currently owns a Catalina 36 and wants to move up to a live aboard/winter in the Fla. Keys type thing...any thoughts on this particular boat?? Mr. Perry, thoughts on your design?? Anyone know this boat in Kemah Tx. ?

 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Sailbot-48-Cheoy-Lee-Excellent-Price-to-Sell-Fast-/251171278873?pt=Sailboats&hash=item3a7af99019#ht_168883wt_1196

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's SICK!

 

Interesting description in Bob's book. Note the unusual layout with 2 companion ways. Wouldn't bother me one bit, though.

 

Looks like a steal to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what happened to the bow chocks? They seem to have gone MIA, the stern ones are there. Leading dock lines right over the toe rail will shorten the life of varnish. At least this looks to have a keel stepped mast, and someone has sensibly gotten rid of the teak decks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.cruisersf...ebay-88657.html

 

This is from June on this one or another Cheoy lee 48.

 

I thought that in general the Cheoy Lee boats were showing a lot more problems than most Asian boats of that period.

 

Great looking boats but the stories I have heard are to avoid. Beautiful boat but if it is the same 48 from Texas your friend might want to call this guy first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys....my buddy won;t be happy but as they say...if it's too good to be true, it usually isn;t true...he'll keep looking. (ps....he IS in the market for a boat in the 42-48 ft. length. Price is an issue...he doesn;t want to go over $80,000) if anyone knows of a boat that is for sale....hit me up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice find (but scary), Kent.

 

This place never ceases to amaze. If I ever 'place a contract' on my own personal Rebecca (or would that be, if I ever 'go Rebecca'?) I'll surely come here first for feedback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice find (but scary), Kent.

 

This place never ceases to amaze. If I ever 'place a contract' on my own personal Rebecca (or would that be, if I ever 'do Rebecca'?) I'll surely come here first for feedback abuse.

 

Fixed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought they were a neat boat till I saw one hauled out in Port Townsend about 10 years ago.

 

Besides the build quality being way less then extraordinary, I couldn't believe the width and shape of the keel, I still shake my head when I think about that keel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheoy Lee had some really great looking boats and a great advertising campaign...not to mention the boats just looked so damn good at the boat shows. I have heard some stories about just about anything used to fill voids and cores. But doesn't that boat just look fantastic? Someone has gone to a lot of trouble to make the boat look like it is almost brand new.

 

The problem is that they are greedy. If they admited to some problems and priced it at $55k the boat would have already sold.

 

Scrap lead is at aprox $ .45 per pound. That is how I am evaluating boats today. I have been wondering when that boat on the truck thread with 7000lbs of ballest supposedly sitting very close to the mexican border is going to dissapear. Even as a salvage this boat worries me - You buy it to part out and find out that they used iron vice lead!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

didn't they use iron scrap and concrete ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it...I really like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No two Cheoy Lees were built the same. That's part of the problem. I'd run...

 

Based on a short tour of the Cheoy Lee yard in 1970, I'd say that a "production run" was a little like having a subdivision of houses all built to the same plan by different building crews. The same, but not the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It says "hull material...fiberglass"...is that an error?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It says "hull material...fiberglass"...is that an error?

 

A lot of the early Cheoy Lee boats were glass hulls with wooden decking and/or houses. What could possibly go wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It may simply be a rumor but I've heard; if some Taiwanese builders ran out of woven roving they would substitute burlap? Dealing with these guys over the years I can almost believe it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheoy Lee is Hong Kong...I believe that the boat in question was made in Hong Kong. But this is a good example of how it only takes a cheaply made boat that was expected to be much better built to tar others.

 

The Taiwanese boats that I have been on have been from some of the very best to laughable. But for the most part the higher end stuff is just fantastic for cruisers. There are a few that really are horrible but that is why Bob Perry has his $500 consulting service for serious buyers. http://www.perryboat.com/page/consult

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joli:

Those are old rumors and I spent a lot of time in Taiwan yards and never saw burlap being used. Most Taiwan hulls were massivley laid up with mat and roving. If there was one consistant problem with most of the Taiwan yards it was that "when in doubt add more laminate". I think the longevity and resale of almost all of my Taiwan boats proves that there were many good builders there, some better than others.

 

The Cheoy Lee pictured is not mine. It's a Brewer design. The OP's Yachtworld link is my 48. Mine were good designs built to CL's standards whih at the timne were not very high. The ballast was cast iron as far as I know. CL was an unusual yard in that the sons of the founder ran they yard and at least one was a college educated NA. His name was But Yang Lo, good old But Yang. They did all their own engineering. I did no structural drawings for them at all. In the end I thought it was becoming a problem as I noticed some changes to the designs, for instance they built the CL 35 with a deck stepped mast and I cleary designed a keel stepped mast, An angry exchange of letters followed. I could see problem on the horizon so I chose not to do anymore boats with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a Pedrick designed 41' next to us on one of our haul outs. Looked great on a paper and in ad copy,up close was an entirely different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joli:

Those are old rumors and I spent a lot of time in Taiwan yards and never saw burlap being used. Most Taiwan hulls were massivley laid up with mat and roving. If there was one consistant problem with most of the Taiwan yards it was that "when in doubt add more laminate". I think the longevity and resale of almost all of my Taiwan boats proves that there were many good builders there, some better than others.

 

The Cheoy Lee pictured is not mine. It's a Brewer design. The OP's Yachtworld link is my 48. Mine were good designs built to CL's standards whih at the timne were not very high. The ballast was cast iron as far as I know. CL was an unusual yard in that the sons of the founder ran they yard and at least one was a college educated NA. His name was But Yang Lo, good old But Yang. They did all their own engineering. I did no structural drawings for them at all. In the end I thought it was becoming a problem as I noticed some changes to the designs, for instance they built the CL 35 with a deck stepped mast and I cleary designed a keel stepped mast, An angry exchange of letters followed. I could see problem on the horizon so I chose not to do anymore boats with them.

 

I had the pleasure of meeting BL at the FLIBS show a few years ago. I was doing the 3d modelling for one of Cheoy Lee's designers based here in the States who had been referring to him in our conversations as 'Butt Yank' which I thought was just a rude uncomplimentary derisive nickname. That had bothered me somewhat, but I was appalled when the designer introduced me and then actually called him Butt Yank to his face. The look on my face didn't go unnoticed and it wasn't until later that was told that But Yang was indeed the name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The very first boat brochures I ever sent for were Cheoy Lees. The dealer lived on Mercer Island where I lived. I sent him a letter, "Please send me all your brochures." He called me on the phone. " I'm just a kid." We had a chat. He sent me all his brochures. So I have a soft spot for the CL boats. When CL hired me to design for them I thought I was hot shit. I was honored. I went to Hong Kong. But that's another long story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the Cheoy Lee "Clipper 48" One of my first boat maintenance gigs was onboard her. Used to belong to Buffett.

 

http://www.cheoyleea...sc/Euphoria.htm

 

Euphoria.jpg

 

 

The Clippers were designed by Luders. They have FG hulls and decks. Mostly built in the late '60s, I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ted Brewer worked for Luders during the time the CL's came out of that office. So technically Semi is correct. But to me they are Ted's work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I was in Hong Kong (1970, on R&R from RVN), the Star Ferries running from HK to Kowloon were built by CL, according to plate mounted somewhere visible. I always imagined they had a yard for large commercial projects as well as the yacht building business.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Semi:

The only sign I recall on the Star ferries was the one warning passengers about pick pockets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone sure made a pigs ear out of the brightwork below decks on that Ebay CL48. It looks like they were is a rush to "gloss over" what was there !!

 

Having lived for many years in HK, I enjoyed sailing on a number of Cheoy Lee's cruisers. ( Offshore 27 - a bit like a folk boat but with keel hung rudder, Bermuda 30 ketch, 35 ketch I think it was a Robb design)

 

post-5483-0-33006100-1352155574_thumb.jpg

post-5483-0-55146100-1352155606_thumb.jpg

post-5483-0-68660300-1352155935_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The advertising copy for the Bermuda 30 said the design was "modified Herreshoff." I later decided that meant "enlarged H-28."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup pretty much....from one of many websites on the CL Bermuda 30.

 

The Choey Lee Offshore 31 was a rework of the Bermuda 30, which was a rework of the Herreshoff H-28. They were built in wood and glass. While the H-28 was a wonderful boat for its day, the wooden Offshore 31's and Bermuda 30's violated Herreshoffs cautions about raising the sheer, and adding a doghouse. The H-28's were intended to be constructed of light materials with minimal interiors, while the wooden Cheoy Lees had comparatively heavy planking, decks, and interiors.

 

Depending on who you believe, ballasting was reduced to compensate for the extra weight, injuring stability and motion comfort, and the sail area was reduced to compensate for the reduced stability. That combination resulted in a boat that reportedly was not as good in lighter air or heavier conditions than the H-28 that they were based on.

 

The problem got much worse with the glass boats as their hull weights went up greatly over the wooden boats and their ballast weight was further reduced. They also went to iron and concrete ballast further reducing stability. I have sailed some of these and they are useless in light to moderate conditions and not very good in heavier going. They don't up wind worth a darn (while the original H-28 sailed remarkably well for a long keeled ketch).

 

Build quality was sketchy and a proper restoration would leave little more than the somewhat sloppily laid up hull. You could build a boat from scratch and end up with a much nicer boat than restore an Offshore 31 that has not been maintained.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joli:

Those are old rumors and I spent a lot of time in Taiwan yards and never saw burlap being used. Most Taiwan hulls were massivley laid up with mat and roving. If there was one consistant problem with most of the Taiwan yards it was that "when in doubt add more laminate". I think the longevity and resale of almost all of my Taiwan boats proves that there were many good builders there, some better than others.

 

The Cheoy Lee pictured is not mine. It's a Brewer design. The OP's Yachtworld link is my 48. Mine were good designs built to CL's standards whih at the timne were not very high. The ballast was cast iron as far as I know. CL was an unusual yard in that the sons of the founder ran they yard and at least one was a college educated NA. His name was But Yang Lo, good old But Yang. They did all their own engineering. I did no structural drawings for them at all. In the end I thought it was becoming a problem as I noticed some changes to the designs, for instance they built the CL 35 with a deck stepped mast and I cleary designed a keel stepped mast, An angry exchange of letters followed. I could see problem on the horizon so I chose not to do anymore boats with them.

 

Bob, I consider it a treasure to yachtsman that you are so ego-nuetral to balance design from execution in your old age! No stroking intended but I can't help admire your candid, objective differentiation between the two. Thanks for the continued education.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I know it's not an apples : apples comparison - but the Cheoy Lee Fast Cat ferry we ride on here recently hit a similar sized metal monohull in the port quarter and the mono was sunk with significant loss of life. The glass Cheoy Lee sustained only moderate damage to one of the bows! All passenger made it home. Seems like they know how to make something strong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mungster:

I have no idea what you said but I sense that it was good. So thank you. I'll just continue doing what I think you think I am doing.

 

Me? ego neutral? Try saying that to my face!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I own an older Cheoy Lee (1966 Offshore 40) and they are all solidly built. This 1980 model must be one of the last sailing yachts they did before they decided there was more money in gin palaces. I mention "solidly built" because that's the one factor not visible in the pics.

 

As for maintenance at the time of sale, I really cannot believe that the seller would have spent alot on revarnishing just to take the pics. I'm convinced the photos reflect a genuinely well-maintained yacht.

 

OK, so maybe the engine is seized.. At this price, you can justify replacing it..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It says "hull material...fiberglass"...is that an error?

 

A lot of the early Cheoy Lee boats were glass hulls with wooden decking and/or houses. What could possibly go wrong?

 

With all due respect, this just isn't true..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I own an older Cheoy Lee (1966 Offshore 40) and they are all solidly built. This 1980 model must be one of the last sailing yachts they did before they decided there was more money in gin palaces. I mention "solidly built" because that's the one factor not visible in the pics.

 

As for maintenance at the time of sale, I really cannot believe that the seller would have spent alot on revarnishing just to take the pics. I'm convinced the photos reflect a genuinely well-maintained yacht.

 

OK, so maybe the engine is seized.. At this price, you can justify replacing it..

 

The Rhodes Reliant is a great looking boat no matter who builds it.

 

I used to sail a Cheoy Lee version. Other than being dismasted in calm seas we had no problems.

 

2250040_1-1.jpg

 

no%20mast_zps2f99d715.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It says "hull material...fiberglass"...is that an error?

 

A lot of the early Cheoy Lee boats were glass hulls with wooden decking and/or houses. What could possibly go wrong?

 

With all due respect, this just isn't true..

 

Hmm well in my boat hunt I looked at two boats that the owners described as Cheoy Lee built that had wooden cabin sides. Nicely rotted in one case and concealed under some recently applied glass cloth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bridge?

 

One of the shroud hounds parted from the mast from dry rot.

 

A chartered boat. We took it out the next year with a mast furler. A bad choice, to my eye.

 

WindFlower-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a customer call me out to look at a project once. It was a 100ft+/- Custom Cheoy Lee yawl. She had gone into a shipyard in Bayou La Batre AL for a bow thruster installation. Job was completed, she tanked up and left for Florida. First thing that happened docking in Key West the thruster foundation broke loose, shiipyard said 'bring her back we'll fix it right up'. So back to Alabama, they put her right into the slings and picked her up,,,,,with full tanks. :o The hull pulled away from all the bulkheads and stiffeners allowing diesel and freshwater to flood the boat. They wanted us to try and put humpty back together again.. We took the job on a strict T&M basis but it was quickly decided that the hull was a total loss. Now this was an much older boat but the very interesting thing, when we took hull samples, she was constructed entirely of Chopped Strand Mat.. Not a stitch of roving in the entire boat. Never had much faith in CL's after that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a customer call me out to look at a project once. It was a 100ft+/- Custom Cheoy Lee yawl. She had gone into a shipyard in Bayou La Batre AL for a bow thruster installation. Job was completed, she tanked up and left for Florida. First thing that happened docking in Key West the thruster foundation broke loose, shiipyard said 'bring her back we'll fix it right up'. So back to Alabama, they put her right into the slings and picked her up,,,,,with full tanks. :o The hull pulled away from all the bulkheads and stiffeners allowing diesel and freshwater to flood the boat. They wanted us to try and put humpty back together again.. We took the job on a strict T&M basis but it was quickly decided that the hull was a total loss. Now this was an much older boat but the very interesting thing, when we took hull samples, she was constructed entirely of Chopped Strand Mat.. Not a stitch of roving in the entire boat. Never had much faith in CL's after that.

 

 

From: http://astro.temple..../rr/history.htm

 

(About the Cheoy Lee Rhodes Reliant and Offshore 40)

 

- The Rhodes Reliants were built as Rhodes specified, using a mat/woven roving combination fiberglass lay-up. The Offshore 40 was built with fiberglass mat only (recommended by Lloyds). There are only a few reports of blistering for either hull. The different lay-up plans (woven roving vs. mat) were also used on the deck moldings as well as the bonding straps joining the hull with the deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We had one of the late 1970's Richards designed Offshore 41's. Beautiful lines, pretty pretty boat. Flexible doesn't even begin to describe. She had a deck stepped mast and, due to the big open layout and circular dinette, NO bulkheads in way of the the chainplates. The yard didn't bother trying to bond the cabinets and furniture to the hull, it just sort of floated around.

 

She came with the toerail drips pre-installed, until we were done rebedding all of the hardware she was truly a Cheoy Leaky. A turning block pulled out of the toerail in about 20 kts upwind under #3. Still, I loved that boat. Until her, I only got on boats to go to starting lines, I learned to love cruising from that gal.

 

Parts of the deck were apparently cored with potting soil, and you could easily recover a lost stainless screw from the bilge with a magnet, but damn, she was pretty.

 

The slightly older ones were probably better made, IIRC Sailman's brother has a Rhodes Reliant, and those have a good rep.

 

She's probably the reason I own a Hinckley. I loved that boat, and just wanted her made a little better. I'm not saying she was bad, she was just built with cosmetic, as opposed to structural, priorities. She was much bigger inside than my SW-42, but Sparky inspires confidence in a blow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CL:

"Potting soil"? Funny you should say that. I was hired by a young guy to inspect a cheap Taiwan boat he had bought without a survey on the East Coast and shipped to my marina. He stole the boat but it was in really bad shape. I don't know what the orginal deck core was but what was left of it fell out looking like old coffee grounds. Potting soil would be close. He claimed he could "re-core" the deck. I told him that I was dubious. Now four years later the boat is stil sitting in the yard with no sign of any work being done. I told the guy, maybe 35 years old, to run away from the boat as quickly as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hurricane damaged boat?

That would be a question I'd ask. Everything has been repainted, new varnish everywhere, new interior upholstery, rebuilt engine. It's in the Gulf of Mexico. I'd get an abstact of title if it was previously CG documented. Caveat Emptor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites