• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.
    • B.J. Porter

      Moderation Team Change   06/16/2017

      After fifteen years of volunteer moderation at SA, I will no longer be part of the moderation team. The decision to step aside is mine, and has been some time in the works but we did not wish to announce it in advance for a number of reasons. It's been fun, but I need my time back for other purposes now. The Underdawg admin account will not be monitored until further notice, as I will be relinquishing control of it along with my administrative privileges. Zapata will continue on as a moderator, and any concerns or issues can be directed to that account or to the Editor until further notice. Anyone interested in helping moderate the forums should reach out to Scot by sending a PM to the Editor account. Please note that I am not leaving the community, I am merely stepping aside from Admin responsibilities and privileges on the site.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Tequila McIngbird

Prominent SE Asian Sailor Featured in UK Tabloid

29 posts in this topic

Guys at the shop usually sent me links to the babes on page 3 :blink:

 

You gotta scroll down the page about half way.

 

Not Page 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well well well. 120 some odd views and not one comment in defense of hazwell??? hmmmm???!!! where are your friends now hazwell? i can only guess thier true colors are showing now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the count is now up to 250 readers and not one of your so called good and close friends have had anything to say on your behalf. how sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

facepalm-gif-877.gif

 

 

Oh No. Not this shit again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The smart money has Haswell hiding out at Nicole Scott's place.

 

NS has taken him (MH) under her wing, as clearly he is a fellow victim of interwebs bullying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the count is now up to 250 readers and not one of your so called good and close friends have had anything to say on your behalf. how sad.

 

Yes, but 235 of those readers are you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a sample of the Mark Brigade's spin on the aleged rape of a minor.

 

 

 

Members have strongly denied allegations they were well aware as early as 2002 of persistent rumours about their founder and chairman Mark Haswell of being morbidly obese.

 

Critics have pointed out that despite ordering a discreet investigation, senior foundation members failed to quiz Haswell about his enormous girth and seemed more concerned with whether their sponsors would notice that he was grossly overweight.

 

The Mark Brigade however, vehemently denies “turning a blind eye” to more serious allegations as they emerged, insisting it can find “no record” of Haswell ever being accused of obesity or wearing a girdle while he was Chairman.

 

One former senior Foundation member explained:

 

“Sure we all knew he was a lard ass, but it’s stretching things to suggest we would have let him continue to be in close contact with impressionable young people if we had known he was dangerously obese”.

 

Despite these denials, many people are now wondering just how it could be possible, that so many people could have been unaware of Haswell’s morbid obesity, despite his evident openness about it.

 

For their part, a spokesman has denied the reason for their blind support of Haswell, and their evident failure to follow up allegations of his obesity, was because certain members were concerned about evidence emerging that they too may be overweight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing that up. What you are saying is that if you don't give a fuck about this shit then you are also a pedo.

Got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well life buoy 15, you truly are funny. but do not give up your day job. oh, you need to learn english comprehension.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so let's recap here. of all the threads going on here, life bouy opens this one to tell us he is not interested. ok? and like life bouy, gybe set and all the other Brigaders have to hide thier identities. come on. be real men and tell us who you truly are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so let's recap here. of all the threads going on here, life bouy opens this one to tell us he is not interested. ok? and like life bouy, gybe set and all the other Brigaders have to hide thier identities. come on. be real men and tell us who you truly are.

 

I'm Cardinal George Pell...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some guy on literally the other side of the planet is a pedo.

OK - we got that about 20,000 posts ago ;)

If he shows up at my club we'll get the popo to haul him off, but other than that......................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some guy on literally the other side of the planet is a pedo.

OK - we got that about 20,000 posts ago ;)

If he shows up at my club we'll get the popo to haul him off, but other than that......................

Kent, you must be Mark, for sure, Kent, hi Mark, or Kent, or ...

 

bugger, whatever your name might be :unsure::rolleyes:B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so let's recap here. of all the threads going on here, life bouy opens this one to tell us he is not interested. ok? and like life bouy, gybe set and all the other Brigaders have to hide thier identities. come on. be real men and tell us who you truly are.

 

I am Sparticus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am still waiting for someone with the balls to stand up and state their name proudly in support/defence of mark hazwell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unfortunate Mr. Hackett, that those who will defend such actions are plentiful, and many are sufficiently confident, or perhaps arrogant, to put their names to such defence.

 

Take for example this rather strange if not shameful item which appeared in the Financial Times last Friday. Perhaps a more appropriate headline would have been "In Defense of Paedophiles".

 

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a-11e2-a5ca-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CH7iOSpc

 

Surprisingly, this article is written by Contributing Editor Max Hastings an otherwise respected British author, historian and journalist. I am unsure as to Mr. Hastings motive when comparing child abuse to burglary, other than tarnishing the author as a paedophile apologist, but he continues;

 

"The public obsession with paedophilia now obliges art galleries and auctioneers to exercise extreme care in marketing images of children," and he goes on to state; "Many honourable and admirable people who work with the young must exercise elaborate care to avoid casual physical contact with their charges."

 

Such a statement is nothing short of extraordinary in view of the fact that it is the failure by a significant number of people in authority to exercise due care, which goes to the very heart of the scandals in which both Penn State and the BBC now find themselves embroiled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am still waiting for someone with the balls to stand up and state their name proudly in support/defence of mark hazwell.

 

 

Get comfortable Georgie, you will have a long wait. Because no one posting here gives a flying fuck about this Hazwell creep.

Get it? As I have said in the past if you want to catch the cunt then your time would be better spent seaching in places you havn't looked. Over and over and over and over again.

 

Have you looked up your own arse?

 

headup.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unfortunate Mr. Hackett, that those who will defend such actions are plentiful, and many are sufficiently confident, or perhaps arrogant, to put their names to such defence.

 

Take for example this rather strange if not shameful item which appeared in the Financial Times last Friday. Perhaps a more appropriate headline would have been "In Defense of Paedophiles".

 

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a-11e2-a5ca-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CH7iOSpc

 

Surprisingly, this article is written by Contributing Editor Max Hastings an otherwise respected British author, historian and journalist. I am unsure as to Mr. Hastings motive when comparing child abuse to burglary, other than tarnishing the author as a paedophile apologist, but he continues;

 

"The public obsession with paedophilia now obliges art galleries and auctioneers to exercise extreme care in marketing images of children," and he goes on to state; "Many honourable and admirable people who work with the young must exercise elaborate care to avoid casual physical contact with their charges."

 

Such a statement is nothing short of extraordinary in view of the fact that it is the failure by a significant number of people in authority to exercise due care, which goes to the very heart of the scandals in which both Penn State and the BBC now find themselves embroiled.

 

 

Why do Lawyers post in serif font?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unfortunate Mr. Hackett, that those who will defend such actions are plentiful, and many are sufficiently confident, or perhaps arrogant, to put their names to such defence.

 

Take for example this rather strange if not shameful item which appeared in the Financial Times last Friday. Perhaps a more appropriate headline would have been "In Defense of Paedophiles".

 

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a-11e2-a5ca-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CH7iOSpc

 

Surprisingly, this article is written by Contributing Editor Max Hastings an otherwise respected British author, historian and journalist. I am unsure as to Mr. Hastings motive when comparing child abuse to burglary, other than tarnishing the author as a paedophile apologist, but he continues;

 

"The public obsession with paedophilia now obliges art galleries and auctioneers to exercise extreme care in marketing images of children," and he goes on to state; "Many honourable and admirable people who work with the young must exercise elaborate care to avoid casual physical contact with their charges."

 

Such a statement is nothing short of extraordinary in view of the fact that it is the failure by a significant number of people in authority to exercise due care, which goes to the very heart of the scandals in which both Penn State and the BBC now find themselves embroiled.

 

Why do Lawyers post in serif font?

 

Higher hourly rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

apparently you are!!!!

 

 

 

 

i am still waiting for someone with the balls to stand up and state their name proudly in support/defence of mark hazwell.

 

Get comfortable Georgie, you will have a long wait. Because no one posting here gives a flying fuck about this Hazwell creep.

Get it? As I have said in the past if you want to catch the cunt then your time would be better spent seaching in places you havn't looked. Over and over and over and over again.

 

Have you looked up your own arse?

 

headup.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good one Georgie- stinging retort.

Now go find your pedo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a sample of the Mark Brigade's spin on the aleged rape of a minor.

 

 

 

Members have strongly denied allegations they were well aware as early as 2002 of persistent rumours about their founder and chairman Mark Haswell of being morbidly obese.

 

Critics have pointed out that despite ordering a discreet investigation, senior foundation members failed to quiz Haswell about his enormous girth and seemed more concerned with whether their sponsors would notice that he was grossly overweight.

 

The Mark Brigade however, vehemently denies “turning a blind eye” to more serious allegations as they emerged, insisting it can find “no record” of Haswell ever being accused of obesity or wearing a girdle while he was Chairman.

 

One former senior Foundation member explained:

 

“Sure we all knew he was a lard ass, but it’s stretching things to suggest we would have let him continue to be in close contact with impressionable young people if we had known he was dangerously obese”.

 

Despite these denials, many people are now wondering just how it could be possible, that so many people could have been unaware of Haswell’s morbid obesity, despite his evident openness about it.

 

For their part, a spokesman has denied the reason for their blind support of Haswell, and their evident failure to follow up allegations of his obesity, was because certain members were concerned about evidence emerging that they too may be overweight.

 

c'mon george how's about a proper apology to some of the guys you've dissed on here?

 

here's a draft

 

 

An apology to SAGS and Mark Haswell

 

In numerous posts on SA, I’ve made a number of defamatory statements about SAGS and one of its members Mark Haswell.

 

I now acknowledge that there's no truth to the statements I made on SA that SAGS are a group of Sailors who welcomed into their midst, a paedophile and fugitive or have in the past been friendly and supportive of a paedophile fugitive.

 

I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to SAGS for any suggestions I may have made on SA that they are by any stretch of the imagination Sailors when they clearly wouldn't know spinnaker if it were bright pink and emblazoned with the words "I'm a spinnaker, come on baby, you know you want me" - I’m sorry for any inconvenience and damage which these untrue statements posted on SA may have caused.

 

I am also happy to correct the assertions I made on SA that Mark Haswell is a Sailor who preys on young children for his sexual gratification:

 

I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to Mark Haswell for any suggestion I may have made that he is or ever has been a real Sailor and I am sorry for any inconvenience and damage which this untrue statement on SA may have caused.

 

I would also like to add that if I unwittingly gave the impression that Mark Haswell is in any way morbidly obese, I unreservedly apologise for that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..................... and inappropriately wasting too many out of context electrons on SA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a sample of the Mark Brigade's spin on the aleged rape of a minor.

 

 

 

Members have strongly denied allegations they were well aware as early as 2002 of persistent rumours about their founder and chairman Mark Haswell of being morbidly obese.

 

Critics have pointed out that despite ordering a discreet investigation, senior foundation members failed to quiz Haswell about his enormous girth and seemed more concerned with whether their sponsors would notice that he was grossly overweight.

 

The Mark Brigade however, vehemently denies “turning a blind eye” to more serious allegations as they emerged, insisting it can find “no record” of Haswell ever being accused of obesity or wearing a girdle while he was Chairman.

 

One former senior Foundation member explained:

 

“Sure we all knew he was a lard ass, but it’s stretching things to suggest we would have let him continue to be in close contact with impressionable young people if we had known he was dangerously obese”.

 

Despite these denials, many people are now wondering just how it could be possible, that so many people could have been unaware of Haswell’s morbid obesity, despite his evident openness about it.

 

For their part, a spokesman has denied the reason for their blind support of Haswell, and their evident failure to follow up allegations of his obesity, was because certain members were concerned about evidence emerging that they too may be overweight.

 

c'mon george how's about a proper apology to some of the guys you've dissed on here?

 

here's a draft

 

 

An apology to SAGS and Mark Haswell

 

In numerous posts on SA, I’ve made a number of defamatory statements about SAGS and one of its members Mark Haswell.

 

I now acknowledge that there's no truth to the statements I made on SA that SAGS are a group of Sailors who welcomed into their midst, a paedophile and fugitive or have in the past been friendly and supportive of a paedophile fugitive.

 

I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to SAGS for any suggestions I may have made on SA that they are by any stretch of the imagination Sailors when they clearly wouldn't know spinnaker if it were bright pink and emblazoned with the words "I'm a spinnaker, come on baby, you know you want me" - I’m sorry for any inconvenience and damage which these untrue statements posted on SA may have caused.

 

I am also happy to correct the assertions I made on SA that Mark Haswell is a Sailor who preys on young children for his sexual gratification:

 

I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to Mark Haswell for any suggestion I may have made that he is or ever has been a real Sailor and I am sorry for any inconvenience and damage which this untrue statement on SA may have caused.

 

I would also like to add that if I unwittingly gave the impression that Mark Haswell is in any way morbidly obese, I unreservedly apologise for that too.

 

 

man you have sense of humor. do not give up your day job. actually, thanks for the laugh. had not had a good one since the day before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing that up. What you are saying is that if you don't give a fuck about this shit then you are also a pedo.

Got it.

 

Aw Shucks, here you are again Life Buoy.

 

Maybe we need to know just why you keep popping up on these Haswell threads? You told us on that other thread that you're "just trolling".

 

Could it be, hell I hate to say it, you're an apologist? Or even worse?

 

Just Askin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for clearing that up. What you are saying is that if you don't give a fuck about this shit then you are also a pedo.

Got it.

 

Aw Shucks, here you are again Life Buoy.

 

Maybe we need to know just why you keep popping up on these Haswell threads? You told us on that other thread that you're "just trolling".

 

Could it be, hell I hate to say it, you're an apologist? Or even worse?

 

Just Askin.

"Here you are again?" You had to search back to a post over 18 months ago to justify your stupid argument? Now that is some fine trolling right there. That's right I forgot. Anyone who says they are sick of your bullshit has this Haswell cunt hiding in their garage.

 

Just Answerin.

 

Would it not occur to your simple little obsessed mind that if someone was hiding the cunt they are unlikely to put their head up? How's the Pulitzer campaign going? I wouldn't bother entering the Investigative Reporting category if I were you sweetie. They might need to see some facts rather than just innuendo. Now back to the Toilet you call home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites