• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Tequila McIngbird

Prominent SE Asian Sailor Featured in UK Tabloid

Recommended Posts

well well well. 120 some odd views and not one comment in defense of hazwell??? hmmmm???!!! where are your friends now hazwell? i can only guess thier true colors are showing now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The smart money has Haswell hiding out at Nicole Scott's place.

 

NS has taken him (MH) under her wing, as clearly he is a fellow victim of interwebs bullying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the count is now up to 250 readers and not one of your so called good and close friends have had anything to say on your behalf. how sad.

 

Yes, but 235 of those readers are you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a sample of the Mark Brigade's spin on the aleged rape of a minor.

 

 

 

Members have strongly denied allegations they were well aware as early as 2002 of persistent rumours about their founder and chairman Mark Haswell of being morbidly obese.

 

Critics have pointed out that despite ordering a discreet investigation, senior foundation members failed to quiz Haswell about his enormous girth and seemed more concerned with whether their sponsors would notice that he was grossly overweight.

 

The Mark Brigade however, vehemently denies “turning a blind eye” to more serious allegations as they emerged, insisting it can find “no record” of Haswell ever being accused of obesity or wearing a girdle while he was Chairman.

 

One former senior Foundation member explained:

 

“Sure we all knew he was a lard ass, but it’s stretching things to suggest we would have let him continue to be in close contact with impressionable young people if we had known he was dangerously obese”.

 

Despite these denials, many people are now wondering just how it could be possible, that so many people could have been unaware of Haswell’s morbid obesity, despite his evident openness about it.

 

For their part, a spokesman has denied the reason for their blind support of Haswell, and their evident failure to follow up allegations of his obesity, was because certain members were concerned about evidence emerging that they too may be overweight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing that up. What you are saying is that if you don't give a fuck about this shit then you are also a pedo.

Got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so let's recap here. of all the threads going on here, life bouy opens this one to tell us he is not interested. ok? and like life bouy, gybe set and all the other Brigaders have to hide thier identities. come on. be real men and tell us who you truly are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so let's recap here. of all the threads going on here, life bouy opens this one to tell us he is not interested. ok? and like life bouy, gybe set and all the other Brigaders have to hide thier identities. come on. be real men and tell us who you truly are.

 

I'm Cardinal George Pell...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some guy on literally the other side of the planet is a pedo.

OK - we got that about 20,000 posts ago ;)

If he shows up at my club we'll get the popo to haul him off, but other than that......................

Kent, you must be Mark, for sure, Kent, hi Mark, or Kent, or ...

 

bugger, whatever your name might be :unsure::rolleyes:B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so let's recap here. of all the threads going on here, life bouy opens this one to tell us he is not interested. ok? and like life bouy, gybe set and all the other Brigaders have to hide thier identities. come on. be real men and tell us who you truly are.

 

I am Sparticus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unfortunate Mr. Hackett, that those who will defend such actions are plentiful, and many are sufficiently confident, or perhaps arrogant, to put their names to such defence.

 

Take for example this rather strange if not shameful item which appeared in the Financial Times last Friday. Perhaps a more appropriate headline would have been "In Defense of Paedophiles".

 

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a-11e2-a5ca-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CH7iOSpc

 

Surprisingly, this article is written by Contributing Editor Max Hastings an otherwise respected British author, historian and journalist. I am unsure as to Mr. Hastings motive when comparing child abuse to burglary, other than tarnishing the author as a paedophile apologist, but he continues;

 

"The public obsession with paedophilia now obliges art galleries and auctioneers to exercise extreme care in marketing images of children," and he goes on to state; "Many honourable and admirable people who work with the young must exercise elaborate care to avoid casual physical contact with their charges."

 

Such a statement is nothing short of extraordinary in view of the fact that it is the failure by a significant number of people in authority to exercise due care, which goes to the very heart of the scandals in which both Penn State and the BBC now find themselves embroiled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am still waiting for someone with the balls to stand up and state their name proudly in support/defence of mark hazwell.

 

 

Get comfortable Georgie, you will have a long wait. Because no one posting here gives a flying fuck about this Hazwell creep.

Get it? As I have said in the past if you want to catch the cunt then your time would be better spent seaching in places you havn't looked. Over and over and over and over again.

 

Have you looked up your own arse?

 

headup.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unfortunate Mr. Hackett, that those who will defend such actions are plentiful, and many are sufficiently confident, or perhaps arrogant, to put their names to such defence.

 

Take for example this rather strange if not shameful item which appeared in the Financial Times last Friday. Perhaps a more appropriate headline would have been "In Defense of Paedophiles".

 

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a-11e2-a5ca-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CH7iOSpc

 

Surprisingly, this article is written by Contributing Editor Max Hastings an otherwise respected British author, historian and journalist. I am unsure as to Mr. Hastings motive when comparing child abuse to burglary, other than tarnishing the author as a paedophile apologist, but he continues;

 

"The public obsession with paedophilia now obliges art galleries and auctioneers to exercise extreme care in marketing images of children," and he goes on to state; "Many honourable and admirable people who work with the young must exercise elaborate care to avoid casual physical contact with their charges."

 

Such a statement is nothing short of extraordinary in view of the fact that it is the failure by a significant number of people in authority to exercise due care, which goes to the very heart of the scandals in which both Penn State and the BBC now find themselves embroiled.

 

 

Why do Lawyers post in serif font?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unfortunate Mr. Hackett, that those who will defend such actions are plentiful, and many are sufficiently confident, or perhaps arrogant, to put their names to such defence.

 

Take for example this rather strange if not shameful item which appeared in the Financial Times last Friday. Perhaps a more appropriate headline would have been "In Defense of Paedophiles".

 

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a-11e2-a5ca-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CH7iOSpc

 

Surprisingly, this article is written by Contributing Editor Max Hastings an otherwise respected British author, historian and journalist. I am unsure as to Mr. Hastings motive when comparing child abuse to burglary, other than tarnishing the author as a paedophile apologist, but he continues;

 

"The public obsession with paedophilia now obliges art galleries and auctioneers to exercise extreme care in marketing images of children," and he goes on to state; "Many honourable and admirable people who work with the young must exercise elaborate care to avoid casual physical contact with their charges."

 

Such a statement is nothing short of extraordinary in view of the fact that it is the failure by a significant number of people in authority to exercise due care, which goes to the very heart of the scandals in which both Penn State and the BBC now find themselves embroiled.

 

Why do Lawyers post in serif font?

 

Higher hourly rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

apparently you are!!!!

 

 

 

 

i am still waiting for someone with the balls to stand up and state their name proudly in support/defence of mark hazwell.

 

Get comfortable Georgie, you will have a long wait. Because no one posting here gives a flying fuck about this Hazwell creep.

Get it? As I have said in the past if you want to catch the cunt then your time would be better spent seaching in places you havn't looked. Over and over and over and over again.

 

Have you looked up your own arse?

 

headup.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a sample of the Mark Brigade's spin on the aleged rape of a minor.

 

 

 

Members have strongly denied allegations they were well aware as early as 2002 of persistent rumours about their founder and chairman Mark Haswell of being morbidly obese.

 

Critics have pointed out that despite ordering a discreet investigation, senior foundation members failed to quiz Haswell about his enormous girth and seemed more concerned with whether their sponsors would notice that he was grossly overweight.

 

The Mark Brigade however, vehemently denies “turning a blind eye” to more serious allegations as they emerged, insisting it can find “no record” of Haswell ever being accused of obesity or wearing a girdle while he was Chairman.

 

One former senior Foundation member explained:

 

“Sure we all knew he was a lard ass, but it’s stretching things to suggest we would have let him continue to be in close contact with impressionable young people if we had known he was dangerously obese”.

 

Despite these denials, many people are now wondering just how it could be possible, that so many people could have been unaware of Haswell’s morbid obesity, despite his evident openness about it.

 

For their part, a spokesman has denied the reason for their blind support of Haswell, and their evident failure to follow up allegations of his obesity, was because certain members were concerned about evidence emerging that they too may be overweight.

 

c'mon george how's about a proper apology to some of the guys you've dissed on here?

 

here's a draft

 

 

An apology to SAGS and Mark Haswell

 

In numerous posts on SA, I’ve made a number of defamatory statements about SAGS and one of its members Mark Haswell.

 

I now acknowledge that there's no truth to the statements I made on SA that SAGS are a group of Sailors who welcomed into their midst, a paedophile and fugitive or have in the past been friendly and supportive of a paedophile fugitive.

 

I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to SAGS for any suggestions I may have made on SA that they are by any stretch of the imagination Sailors when they clearly wouldn't know spinnaker if it were bright pink and emblazoned with the words "I'm a spinnaker, come on baby, you know you want me" - I’m sorry for any inconvenience and damage which these untrue statements posted on SA may have caused.

 

I am also happy to correct the assertions I made on SA that Mark Haswell is a Sailor who preys on young children for his sexual gratification:

 

I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to Mark Haswell for any suggestion I may have made that he is or ever has been a real Sailor and I am sorry for any inconvenience and damage which this untrue statement on SA may have caused.

 

I would also like to add that if I unwittingly gave the impression that Mark Haswell is in any way morbidly obese, I unreservedly apologise for that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a sample of the Mark Brigade's spin on the aleged rape of a minor.

 

 

 

Members have strongly denied allegations they were well aware as early as 2002 of persistent rumours about their founder and chairman Mark Haswell of being morbidly obese.

 

Critics have pointed out that despite ordering a discreet investigation, senior foundation members failed to quiz Haswell about his enormous girth and seemed more concerned with whether their sponsors would notice that he was grossly overweight.

 

The Mark Brigade however, vehemently denies “turning a blind eye” to more serious allegations as they emerged, insisting it can find “no record” of Haswell ever being accused of obesity or wearing a girdle while he was Chairman.

 

One former senior Foundation member explained:

 

“Sure we all knew he was a lard ass, but it’s stretching things to suggest we would have let him continue to be in close contact with impressionable young people if we had known he was dangerously obese”.

 

Despite these denials, many people are now wondering just how it could be possible, that so many people could have been unaware of Haswell’s morbid obesity, despite his evident openness about it.

 

For their part, a spokesman has denied the reason for their blind support of Haswell, and their evident failure to follow up allegations of his obesity, was because certain members were concerned about evidence emerging that they too may be overweight.

 

c'mon george how's about a proper apology to some of the guys you've dissed on here?

 

here's a draft

 

 

An apology to SAGS and Mark Haswell

 

In numerous posts on SA, I’ve made a number of defamatory statements about SAGS and one of its members Mark Haswell.

 

I now acknowledge that there's no truth to the statements I made on SA that SAGS are a group of Sailors who welcomed into their midst, a paedophile and fugitive or have in the past been friendly and supportive of a paedophile fugitive.

 

I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to SAGS for any suggestions I may have made on SA that they are by any stretch of the imagination Sailors when they clearly wouldn't know spinnaker if it were bright pink and emblazoned with the words "I'm a spinnaker, come on baby, you know you want me" - I’m sorry for any inconvenience and damage which these untrue statements posted on SA may have caused.

 

I am also happy to correct the assertions I made on SA that Mark Haswell is a Sailor who preys on young children for his sexual gratification:

 

I unreservedly and sincerely apologise to Mark Haswell for any suggestion I may have made that he is or ever has been a real Sailor and I am sorry for any inconvenience and damage which this untrue statement on SA may have caused.

 

I would also like to add that if I unwittingly gave the impression that Mark Haswell is in any way morbidly obese, I unreservedly apologise for that too.

 

 

man you have sense of humor. do not give up your day job. actually, thanks for the laugh. had not had a good one since the day before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing that up. What you are saying is that if you don't give a fuck about this shit then you are also a pedo.

Got it.

 

Aw Shucks, here you are again Life Buoy.

 

Maybe we need to know just why you keep popping up on these Haswell threads? You told us on that other thread that you're "just trolling".

 

Could it be, hell I hate to say it, you're an apologist? Or even worse?

 

Just Askin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for clearing that up. What you are saying is that if you don't give a fuck about this shit then you are also a pedo.

Got it.

 

Aw Shucks, here you are again Life Buoy.

 

Maybe we need to know just why you keep popping up on these Haswell threads? You told us on that other thread that you're "just trolling".

 

Could it be, hell I hate to say it, you're an apologist? Or even worse?

 

Just Askin.

"Here you are again?" You had to search back to a post over 18 months ago to justify your stupid argument? Now that is some fine trolling right there. That's right I forgot. Anyone who says they are sick of your bullshit has this Haswell cunt hiding in their garage.

 

Just Answerin.

 

Would it not occur to your simple little obsessed mind that if someone was hiding the cunt they are unlikely to put their head up? How's the Pulitzer campaign going? I wouldn't bother entering the Investigative Reporting category if I were you sweetie. They might need to see some facts rather than just innuendo. Now back to the Toilet you call home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites