• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Happy Jack

Prosecutorial misconduct

41 posts in this topic

(Reuters) - Ben Kruidbos, Corey's former director of information technology, was fired after testifying at a pre-trial hearing on June 6 that prosecutors failed to turn over potentially embarrassing evidence extracted from Martin's cell phone to the defense, as required by evidence-sharing laws.

 

Trial law requires prosecutors to share evidence with defense attorneys, especially if it helps exonerate defendants. The requirement is known as the Brady disclosure.

 

Kruidbos testified last month in a pre-trial hearing that he found photos on Martin's phone that included pictures of a pile of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semi-automatic pistol.

 

Kruidbos had emailed de la Rionda in late January and attached a report containing the text messages and images he had retrieved from Martin's cell phone, his lawyer said.

 

Zimmerman's chief defense attorney Mark O'Mara has said he didn't receive the material until June, shortly before the murder trial began.

 

"We will be filing a whistleblower action in (Florida's Fourth Judicial District) Circuit Court," said Kruidbos' attorney Wesley White, himself a former prosecutor who was hired by Corey but resigned in December because he disagreed with her prosecutorial priorities. He said the suit will be filed within the next 30 days.

 

Corey and lead prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda declined to comment. A spokeswoman for Corey referred Reuters to Kruidbos' termination letter, previously made public, in which Corey's office accused him of hacking confidential information from state computers.

 

The six-page letter, dated July 11, charges Kruidbos with "deliberate, willful and unscrupulous actions" that make him untrustworthy and calls his questioning of de la Rionda's actions regarding the cell phone evidence "a shallow, but obvious, attempt to cloak yourself in the protection of the whistleblower law."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're going to need a good victory dance to go along with trying to extend discovery violations into prosecutorial misconduct, Dum Dum.

 

lfl-butt-jiggle-celebration-dance.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

--------------

 

These prosecutors could be in serious trouble. Of course I expect the Zimmerman haters to argue that the judge did not allow this evidence in the trial. Unfortunately for them and the prosecutor a later ruling to exclude evidence has zero to do with the requirement to share it in discovery.

 

More evidence that fix was in to get Zimmerman.

 

Zimmerman could walk away with millions if he sues everyone that libeled him and from the sate if the prosecution broke laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy Jacking Off Again?

 

Really? You think withholding exculpatory evidence from the defense is nothing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SOL, while the vids are amusing.... I'm missing the new recipes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SOL, while the vids are amusing.... I'm missing the new recipes.

Dinner:

 

1006296_139671596241744_1159083795_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh, I LOVES me some grilled tuna.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1001613_417990764981975_1326148246_n.jpg

 

If you noticed the compound bow, before anything else, you may need glasses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

998338_417910964989955_790295613_n.jpg

 

If the ass known as Simple Jack looked like that, most everyone else around here would be Happier to see him here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1001613_417990764981975_1326148246_n.jpg

 

If you noticed the compound bow, before anything else, you may need glasses to remove the dick from your mouth.

 

Fixed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1044051_417545728359812_943802953_n.jpg

 

 

Bimini top, mirrored ball, blow up doll, and a camo booty. There are many ingredients to that picture, and I'm not sure I want to know the story. Looks like a bad Columbus Day Regatta story in the making.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Simple Jack carries his troll with his sights on the end zone!

 

Football-Fail-011.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1013397_407639256017126_63327733_n.jpg

 

 

Winner!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


And then Corey calls Harvard Law School demanding that Dershowitz be fired. The woman has a few loose screws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice tits and ass, but whilst shooting the messenger, anyone want to come to her support?

 

After the jury cleared Zimmerman, she called him a "murderer"?

 

Do some research on her. She is dangerous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a thread about the prospect of prosecutorial misconduct. See post 7 and determine the viability of that pursuit for yourself. What better way to salvage a worthless troll thread than with a recipe discussion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a thread about the prospect of prosecutorial misconduct. See post 7 and determine the viability of that pursuit for yourself. What better way to salvage a worthless troll thread than with a recipe discussion.

 

I was scrolling up to post 7. I didn't make it. Having a smoke on the deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10dv0w3.jpg

 

Why do you objectify women and reduce then to sexual playthings? Are the obamatons on SA all misanthropic misogynists? Objectifying women shame. Real chips of the ole Bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is a thread about the prospect of prosecutorial misconduct. See post 7 and determine the viability of that pursuit for yourself. What better way to salvage a worthless troll thread than with a recipe discussion.

 

I was scrolling up to post 7. I didn't make it. Having a smoke on the deck.

Not worth wasting time on this topic, enjoy the deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

10dv0w3.jpg

 

Why do you objectify women and reduce then to sexual playthings? Are the obamatons on SA all misanthropic misogynists? Objectifying women shame. Real chips of the ole Bill.

Please don't say SA posters are like the Mormons. The Mormons objectify women, treat them as chattel and are all misanthropic misogynists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

This is a thread about the prospect of prosecutorial misconduct. See post 7 and determine the viability of that pursuit for yourself. What better way to salvage a worthless troll thread than with a recipe discussion.

 

I was scrolling up to post 7. I didn't make it. Having a smoke on the deck.

Not worth wasting time on this topic, enjoy the deck.

 

On a serious note - you live in FL and are a member of the bar. What do you think of her? From what I've read about her, she seems somewhat scary.

 

Check this - http://video.foxnews.com/v/2549559243001/zimmerman-trayvon-and-the-medias-race-narrative/?playlist_id=921261890001

 

I'm no huge fan of Fox, but I have a great deal of respect for Gretta and Stossel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

This is a thread about the prospect of prosecutorial misconduct. See post 7 and determine the viability of that pursuit for yourself. What better way to salvage a worthless troll thread than with a recipe discussion.

 

I was scrolling up to post 7. I didn't make it. Having a smoke on the deck.

Not worth wasting time on this topic, enjoy the deck.

 

On a serious note - you live in FL and are a member of the bar. What do you think of her? From what I've read about her, she seems somewhat scary.

 

Check this - http://video.foxnews.com/v/2549559243001/zimmerman-trayvon-and-the-medias-race-narrative/?playlist_id=921261890001

 

I'm no huge fan of Fox, but I have a great deal of respect for Gretta and Stossel

TV lawyers disgust me, for the most part.

 

I was very impressed with the performance of all of the attorneys in the trial. They all behaved very well, and put on good cases. The discovery sanctions stuff is serious, but not all that uncommon. The state has so much power, that it is really serious when they jerk a defense attorney around for discovery.

 

I am troubled by the stuff that both she and O'Mara are saying. That it is playing out in the press instead of in court is disgusting. They both would be well served to read Florida Bar v. Nunes, 734 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1999).

 

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12087587961566537473&q=734+So.+2d+393&hl=en&as_sdt=4,10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yeah...Like I'm the one HJ has jumping through hoops.

Must have touched a nerve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a thread about the prospect of prosecutorial misconduct. See post 7 and determine the viability of that pursuit for yourself. What better way to salvage a worthless troll thread than with a recipe discussion.

I was scrolling up to post 7. I didn't make it. Having a smoke on the deck.

Not worth wasting time on this topic, enjoy the deck.

On a serious note - you live in FL and are a member of the bar. What do you think of her? From what I've read about her, she seems somewhat scary.

 

Check this - http://video.foxnews.com/v/2549559243001/zimmerman-trayvon-and-the-medias-race-narrative/?playlist_id=921261890001

 

I'm no huge fan of Fox, but I have a great deal of respect for Gretta and Stossel

TV lawyers disgust me, for the most part.

 

I was very impressed with the performance of all of the attorneys in the trial. They all behaved very well, and put on good cases. The discovery sanctions stuff is serious, but not all that uncommon. The state has so much power, that it is really serious when they jerk a defense attorney around for discovery.

 

I am troubled by the stuff that both she and O'Mara are saying. That it is playing out in the press instead of in court is disgusting. They both would be well served to read Florida Bar v. Nunes, 734 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1999).

 

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12087587961566537473&q=734+So.+2d+393&hl=en&as_sdt=4,10

I was impressed with the attorneys as well, but I was troubled that prosecutors in the court room had to resort to supposition and emotion over actual facts. Their melodramatic closing argument was great TV, but not what I would expect from the state who's role is to seek justice.

 

Murder 2 was a huge stretch which would never have had much of a chance getting past a grand jury. The way I see it, Corey dealt de la Rionda a Jack high card and he had no choice but to work the bluff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Yeah...Like I'm the one HJ has jumping through hoops.

Must have touched a nerve.

Must have missed the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites