• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Happy Jack

"If Trayvon Obama had a Bro, he'd look like James?"

Recommended Posts

Josh Earnest, principal deputy White House press secretary, said he was not familiar with the murder of Australian jogger Chris Lane during Wednesday’s White House briefing.

 

When asked by Fox News chief White House correspondent Ed Henry about the Chris Lane case, Earnest responded, “I’m not familiar with it, actually.”

 

Henry pressed Earnest, noting that the President spoke about slain teen Trayvon Martin in the Rose Garden and in the briefing room.

“Why hasn’t [the president] spoken out about this? In this case, you said there was a judicial proceeding. There was one in the Trayvon Martin case.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/white-house-spokesman-not-familiar-with-chris-lane-murder/#ixzz2ce9foBmB

Hey Barack, Sharpie, Fartakan " wha sup dudes?

 

Would Trayvon Obama's little bro look like James?

 

130820170718-james-edward-jr-horizontal-

 

 

 

I'm going to say it. The president is a racist or reverse racist. He and many Democrat leaders have never been shy to leap without looking and play the Race Card when It's a white guy or pale Hispanic.

 

Their silence now reeks of racism.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Happy Jack fruitcake...

Ingredients
2 cups packed brown sugar
3 cups all-purpose flour
1 tablespoon baking soda
2 tablespoons ground cinnamon
2 tablespoons ground cloves
2 tablespoons ground allspice
2 tablespoons ground nutmeg
4 eggs
2 tablespoons lemon zest
2 tablespoons vanilla extract
1/2 cup brandy
1 1/2 cups raisins
1 1/2 cups chopped nuts
1 1/2 cups dried mixed fruit
1 1/2 cups butter, melted
3 1/2 cups rum

Directions
1. Dehydrate dried mixed fruit
2. Soak in rum for 3 days
3. Preheat oven to 225 degrees
4. Combine all ingredients in a large bowl
5. Bake for 1 hour
6. Cool on a wire rack

 

Alternate method
Post idiocies on Political Anarchy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Happy Jack fruitcake...

Ingredients

2 cups packed brown sugar

3 cups all-purpose flour

1 tablespoon baking soda

2 tablespoons ground cinnamon

2 tablespoons ground cloves

2 tablespoons ground allspice

2 tablespoons ground nutmeg

4 eggs

2 tablespoons lemon zest

2 tablespoons vanilla extract

1/2 cup brandy

1 1/2 cups raisins

1 1/2 cups chopped nuts

1 1/2 cups dried mixed fruit

1 1/2 cups butter, melted

3 1/2 cups rum

Directions

1. Dehydrate dried mixed fruit

2. Soak in rum for 3 days

3. Preheat oven to 225 degrees

4. Combine all ingredients in a large bowl

5. Bake for 1 hour

6. Cool on a wire rack

 

Alternate method

Post idiocies on Political Anarchy

 

I'm sorry did my post make you uncomfortable? A lot of people seek comfort foods when they are embarrassed, insecure or uncomfortable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the dead Ozzie could be Obama's other son as well.

 

Wow, what a cunt-un-drumb, si como no?........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to say it. The president is a racist or reverse racist. He and many Democrat leaders have never been shy to leap without looking and play the Race Card when It's a white guy or pale Hispanic.

 

One of the things that makes this place unique, here it's the white guys always dealing the Race Card...

 

One bigot is no different than another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A brother from another mother?

 

Interesting definition you have of supporting your president, Slappy Jack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Josh Earnest, principal deputy White House press secretary, said he was not familiar with the murder of Australian jogger Chris Lane during Wednesday’s White House briefing.

 

When asked by Fox News chief White House correspondent Ed Henry about the Chris Lane case, Earnest responded, “I’m not familiar with it, actually.”

 

Henry pressed Earnest, noting that the President spoke about slain teen Trayvon Martin in the Rose Garden and in the briefing room.

“Why hasn’t [the president] spoken out about this? In this case, you said there was a judicial proceeding. There was one in the Trayvon Martin case.

 

 

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/white-house-spokesman-not-familiar-with-chris-lane-murder/#ixzz2ce9foBmB

 

Hey Barack, Sharpie, Fartakan " wha sup dudes?

 

Would Trayvon Obama's little bro look like James?

 

130820170718-james-edward-jr-horizontal-

 

 

 

I'm going to say it. The president is a racist or reverse racist. He and many Democrat leaders have never been shy to leap without looking and play the Race Card when It's a white guy or pale Hispanic.

 

Their silence now reeks of racism.

o_brother_pardoned-153.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack and his White Victim Elk dodged a bullet yesterday down in Atlanta...

 

White guy with an AK-47 walks into a predominantly black elementary school, intending to go out in a blaze of glory...

 

Can you IMAGINE if he'd actually started killing kids?

 

Whew, that was a close one...

 

 

BG1_0613_1.JPG

 

 

648079_web_285e5e50c62c4c989325f3babd82b

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think the dead Ozzie could be Obama's other son as well.

 

Wow, what a cunt-un-drumb, si como no?........

 

 

A brother from another mother?

What? Obama has sister wives? Who knew!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I think the dead Ozzie could be Obama's other son as well.

 

Wow, what a cunt-un-drumb, si como no?........

 

 

A brother from another mother?

What? Obama has sister wives? Who knew!!

 

 

I hear that's a very common practice in Kenya.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I think the dead Ozzie could be Obama's other son as well.

 

Wow, what a cunt-un-drumb, si como no?........

 

 

A brother from another mother?

What? Obama has sister wives? Who knew!!

 

 

I hear that's a very common practice in Kenya.....

Maybe so, but there's a certain cult not that far away that actively partakes in plural wives. I think Jack may know more about them than toi et moi...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack just must be one masochistic mofo for constantly starting threads so moronic he is going to get beat up on, and then he can whine about getting his ass kicked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question for the SuperGenius:

Presumably you were an active/paying member of the Mormon Church prior to the policy change in 1977-78 that permitted blacks as full members. What were you doing to actively bring about that change? If you were indifferent about it or against the policy change, doesn't that make you endorsing a racist policy...making you a racist?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm going to say it. The president is a racist or reverse racist. He and many Democrat leaders have never been shy to leap without looking and play the Race Card when It's a white guy or pale Hispanic.

 

One of the things that makes this place unique, here it's the white guys always dealing the Race Card...

 

>One bigot is no different than another.

 

 

The second quote had nothing to do with race. It was dishonest of you to imply it did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question for the SuperGenius:

Presumably you were an active/paying member of the Mormon Church prior to the policy change in 1977-78 that permitted blacks as full members. What were you doing to actively bring about that change? If you were indifferent about it or against the policy change, doesn't that make you endorsing a racist policy...making you a racist?

 

I understand that Latter day saints believe their church is administered by a living prophet of God as directed by that God. I can understand if you do not believe that then you might make the assumptions you did.

 

And the PC term is Big Brained.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of bigots I see the Rev has been twatting....

 

"Frowned on"? Wow ! That's pretty harsh of the Rev.

 

jesse_jackson_frowned_upon_tweet_8-21-13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Question for the SuperGenius:

Presumably you were an active/paying member of the Mormon Church prior to the policy change in 1977-78 that permitted blacks as full members. What were you doing to actively bring about that change? If you were indifferent about it or against the policy change, doesn't that make you endorsing a racist policy...making you a racist?

 

I understand that Latter day saints believe their church is administered by a living prophet of God as directed by that God. I can understand if you do not believe that then you might make the assumptions you did.

 

Who here is surprised Happy Jack dodged the question? Come one, there has to be at least one... perhaps someone who's only just found these forums?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Question for the SuperGenius:

Presumably you were an active/paying member of the Mormon Church prior to the policy change in 1977-78 that permitted blacks as full members. What were you doing to actively bring about that change? If you were indifferent about it or against the policy change, doesn't that make you endorsing a racist policy...making you a racist?

 

I understand that Latter day saints believe their church is administered by a living prophet of God as directed by that God. I can understand if you do not believe that then you might make the assumptions you did.

 

And the PC term is Big Brained.

o_brother_pardoned-163.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Question for the SuperGenius:

Presumably you were an active/paying member of the Mormon Church prior to the policy change in 1977-78 that permitted blacks as full members. What were you doing to actively bring about that change? If you were indifferent about it or against the policy change, doesn't that make you endorsing a racist policy...making you a racist?

 

I understand that Latter day saints believe their church is administered by a living prophet of God as directed by that God. I can understand if you do not believe that then you might make the assumptions you did.

 

And the PC term is Big Brained.

Did god change his mind about black people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

 

 

I would respond by observing that not only is your question not "monumentally important", it isn't even relevant.

 

Zim was originally questioned and released without charges because it was pretty clear from the getgo that the shooting was the regrettable result of a fight that turned into a legitimate self-defense issue for Zim. The outcome of the trial substantiates this. I contend that the whole circus only came to charges and a trial at all because it was a black victim and a sort-of-white-looking shooter, and the hideous race-baiting perpetrated by the media and outspoken racists like Sharpton and our own President bear this out.

 

That is most obviously NOT the situation in the case being compared here. Is there any indication whatsoever that these three thugs shot Chris Lane out of self defense?

 

You keep trying to drag comparative cases like the subject of this OP down this rathole to distract from the point: the one-way street that is "racism" today, and the grossly distorted way it is handled and reported by our politicians and mass media.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit surprising DRUDGE is running this, kinda spoils the whole "Black on White' narrative...

 

http://www.smh.com.au/world/chris-lane-shooting-a-gang-initiation-says-father-who-called-police-20130822-2sdud.html

 

 

It doesn't dispel shit. And you know that....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest One of Five

Josh Earnest, principal deputy White House press secretary, said he was not familiar with the murder of Australian jogger Chris Lane during Wednesday’s White House briefing.

 

When asked by Fox News chief White House correspondent Ed Henry about the Chris Lane case, Earnest responded, “I’m not familiar with it, actually.”

 

Henry pressed Earnest, noting that the President spoke about slain teen Trayvon Martin in the Rose Garden and in the briefing room.

“Why hasn’t [the president] spoken out about this? In this case, you said there was a judicial proceeding. There was one in the Trayvon Martin case.

 

 

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/21/white-house-spokesman-not-familiar-with-chris-lane-murder/#ixzz2ce9foBmB

 

Hey Barack, Sharpie, Fartakan " wha sup dudes?

 

Would Trayvon Obama's little bro look like James?

 

130820170718-james-edward-jr-horizontal-

 

 

 

I'm going to say it. The president is a racist or reverse racist. He and many Democrat leaders have never been shy to leap without looking and play the Race Card when It's a white guy or pale Hispanic.

 

Their silence now reeks of racism.

 

I'm sorry - but where's the NEWS in any of this?

 

 

A bit surprising DRUDGE is running this, kinda spoils the whole "Black on White' narrative...

 

http://www.smh.com.au/world/chris-lane-shooting-a-gang-initiation-says-father-who-called-police-20130822-2sdud.html

 

 

It doesn't dispel shit. And you know that....

 

It's Eisberg.. please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest One of Five

 

 

I think the dead Ozzie could be Obama's other son as well.

 

Wow, what a cunt-un-drumb, si como no?........

 

 

A brother from another mother?

o_brother_pardoned-156.jpg

 

o_brother_pardoned-160.jpg

 

 

I guess you watched it last night too...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit surprising DRUDGE is running this, kinda spoils the whole "Black on White' narrative...

 

http://www.smh.com.au/world/chris-lane-shooting-a-gang-initiation-says-father-who-called-police-20130822-2sdud.html

I have something to say about that, but a black guy is looking at me so I have to put my phone away. Sucks to be white. Very unfair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm going to say it. The president is a racist or reverse racist. He and many Democrat leaders have never been shy to leap without looking and play the Race Card when It's a white guy or pale Hispanic.

 

One of the things that makes this place unique, here it's the white guys always dealing the Race Card...

 

>One bigot is no different than another.

 

 

and the democrats bringing up the birther argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

A bit surprising DRUDGE is running this, kinda spoils the whole "Black on White' narrative...

 

http://www.smh.com.au/world/chris-lane-shooting-a-gang-initiation-says-father-who-called-police-20130822-2sdud.html

 

 

It doesn't dispel shit. And you know that....

 

It's Eisberg.. please.

 

You're both dreaming if you think this story would have the national attention it has garnered, if instead those thugs had murdered Mr Johnson's son first, and had been apprehended before they could have 'scored' a white boy...

 

Or, if you think Happy Jack would have started a thread about it...

 

Or, perhaps I simply missed the couple of threads that were started here back in June, precipitated by an equally horrific gang initiation murder, and the resultant clamor for Obama and Sharpton to speak out about the crime...

 

http://www.khou.com/news/crime/Final-suspect-arrested-in-savage-gang-initiation-210456301.html

 

And, surely, there must have been an equivalent degree ofl outrage and threads spawned by this one at the time, as well...

 

Ooops, victim's name was "Depree Mims", so perhaps not...

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57577553/ind-teens-shooting-death-part-of-gang-initiation-four-charged/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest One of Five

 

Don't know any knitters?

 

 

I do. And they f'ng rock.....

 

 

 

 

Yes they f-ing DO young man. Yes they do!

 

Do I owe you a pint or five hundred?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

 

I will continue to bring up the fact that the blame for that lies with the law in Florida, not the color of anyone's skin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

It had very little to do with charges not being filed. It had everything to do with the evil white guy with the evil gun hunting down and shooting a 10 year old unarmed little black kid in cold blood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article in Time --

 

Don’t Ignore Race in Christopher Lane’s Murder

The association of young black men with violence doesn't come out of thin air


.....So, it’s just fake to pretend that the association of young black men with violence comes out of thin air. Young black men murder 14 times more than young white men. If the kinds of things I just mentioned were regularly done by whites, it’d be trumpeted as justification for being scared to death of them.

Read the whole thing - Link
If we are going to have a conversation about race and violence, we can't have it based on the premise of Skittles and an iced tea.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article in Time --

 

 

Don’t Ignore Race in Christopher Lane’s Murder

The association of young black men with violence doesn't come out of thin air

.....So, it’s just fake to pretend that the association of young black men with violence comes out of thin air. Young black men murder 14 times more than young white men. If the kinds of things I just mentioned were regularly done by whites, it’d be trumpeted as justification for being scared to death of them.

Read the whole thing - Link

 

If we are going to have a conversation about race and violence, we can't have it based on the premise of Skittles and an iced tea.

 

 

 

Great Article. Doubt if any of our bleeding hearts will read it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Interesting article in Time --

 

Don’t Ignore Race in Christopher Lane’s Murder

The association of young black men with violence doesn't come out of thin air

.....So, it’s just fake to pretend that the association of young black men with violence comes out of thin air. Young black men murder 14 times more than young white men. If the kinds of things I just mentioned were regularly done by whites, it’d be trumpeted as justification for being scared to death of them.

Read the whole thing - Link

 

If we are going to have a conversation about race and violence, we can't have it based on the premise of Skittles and an iced tea.

 

 

Great Article. Doubt if any of our bleeding hearts will read it.

 

Sharpton is pissed off at Rush and Hannity. They are responsible for people forgetting about the travesty that is Trayvon.

 

Oops, the fuck --

 

Twenty-five years after accusing an innocent man of rape, Tawana Brawley is finally paying for her lies.

Last week, 10 checks totaling $3,764.61 were delivered to ex-prosecutor Steven Pagones — the first payments Brawley has made since a court determined in 1998 that she defamed him with her vicious hoax.

A Virginia court this year ordered the money garnisheed from six months of Brawley’s wages as a nurse there.

She still owes Pagones $431,000 in damages. And she remains defiantly unapologetic.

“It’s a long time coming,” said Pagones, 52, who to this day is more interested in extracting a confession from Brawley than cash.

04.1N006.tawana5--300x350.jpg

 

 

 

And this is the guy that is going to lecture the rest of us about lynching?

 

He's a fucking cunt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(In Regatta's stead, my apologies (and his) go out to all of the good cunts out there. You know who you are)...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Interesting article in Time --

 

Don’t Ignore Race in Christopher Lane’s Murder

The association of young black men with violence doesn't come out of thin air

.....So, it’s just fake to pretend that the association of young black men with violence comes out of thin air. Young black men murder 14 times more than young white men. If the kinds of things I just mentioned were regularly done by whites, it’d be trumpeted as justification for being scared to death of them.

Read the whole thing - Link
If we are going to have a conversation about race and violence, we can't have it based on the premise of Skittles and an iced tea.

 

Nor, should such conversations only arise in response to crimes that cross racial lines...

 

Unfortunately, that seems to be the case here - I don't recall any outrage expressed on FOX, or here, to the black-on-black gang initiation murders I linked to earlier in this thread...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Interesting article in Time --

 

Don’t Ignore Race in Christopher Lane’s Murder

The association of young black men with violence doesn't come out of thin air

.....So, it’s just fake to pretend that the association of young black men with violence comes out of thin air. Young black men murder 14 times more than young white men. If the kinds of things I just mentioned were regularly done by whites, it’d be trumpeted as justification for being scared to death of them.

Read the whole thing - Link

 

If we are going to have a conversation about race and violence, we can't have it based on the premise of Skittles and an iced tea.

 

 

Great Article. Doubt if any of our bleeding hearts will read it.

 

You're probably as wrong about that, as you are about pretty much everything else...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Define "bleeding heart". For some reason folks put me in that category, but having read that link apparently I am not. I would greatly appreciate it if you could resolve this dilemma so we know what over-generalisation I belong to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

It had very little to do with charges not being filed. It had everything to do with the evil white guy with the evil gun hunting down and shooting a 10 year old unarmed little black kid in cold blood.

 

It had everything to do with charges not being filed.

 

But go with whatever makes your group the victim. That MO seems to have been working for you so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

 

It had very little to do with charges not being filed. It had everything to do with the evil white guy with the evil gun hunting down and shooting a 10 year old unarmed little black kid in cold blood.

It had everything to do with charges not being filed.

 

But go with whatever makes your group the victim. That MO seems to have been working for you so far.

You are wrong. The outrage was that a WHITE guy was not INSTANTLY charged for shooting an unarmed BLACK teen. Take away the color of the participants in the outrage and it never makes the national news. By the way it is the Trayvon supporters who are playing the innocent victim card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

It had very little to do with charges not being filed. It had everything to do with the evil white guy with the evil gun hunting down and shooting a 10 year old unarmed little black kid in cold blood.

 

It had everything to do with charges not being filed.

 

But go with whatever makes your group the victim. That MO seems to have been working for you so far.

 

If it had everything to do with charges not being filed, why the fuck didn't Sharpton and his elk STFU when charges were filed, the case brought to court, and Zimmerman found not guilty?

 

It had and continues to have a hell of a lot more to do with chrges being brought in a timely manner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

It had very little to do with charges not being filed. It had everything to do with the evil white guy with the evil gun hunting down and shooting a 10 year old unarmed little black kid in cold blood.

 

It had everything to do with charges not being filed.

 

But go with whatever makes your group the victim. That MO seems to have been working for you so far.

 

If it had everything to do with charges not being filed, why the fuck didn't Sharpton and his elk STFU when charges were filed, the case brought to court, and Zimmerman found not guilty?

 

It had and continues to have a hell of a lot more to do with chrges being brought in a timely manner.

What did Sharpton say after charges were brought? The protests stopped when Zimmerman was charged, and did not resume until after the trial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Were the guys who shot Chris Lane questioned and released with no charges?

 

I will continue to bring up that monumentally important aspect every time some racist wants to compare cases based upon the victim and perp's skin color. I mean... If you make these comparisons, you are either racist or stupid. So HJ and the others... Which is it?

 

It had very little to do with charges not being filed. It had everything to do with the evil white guy with the evil gun hunting down and shooting a 10 year old unarmed little black kid in cold blood.

It had everything to do with charges not being filed.

 

But go with whatever makes your group the victim. That MO seems to have been working for you so far.

If it had everything to do with charges not being filed, why the fuck didn't Sharpton and his elk STFU when charges were filed, the case brought to court, and Zimmerman found not guilty?

 

It had and continues to have a hell of a lot more to do with chrges being brought in a timely manner.

What did Sharpton say after charges were brought? The protests stopped when Zimmerman was charged, and did not resume until after the trial.
and why if it was about "no charges" , as Ben likes to argue did the protests restart after the trial?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Don't know any knitters?

 

I do. And they f'ng rock.....

 

 

Golf fucken clap Boothy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

It had everything to do with charges not being filed.

 

But go with whatever makes your group the victim. That MO seems to have been working for you so far.

If it had everything to do with charges not being filed, why the fuck didn't Sharpton and his elk STFU when charges were filed, the case brought to court, and Zimmerman found not guilty?

 

It had and continues to have a hell of a lot more to do with chrges being brought in a timely manner.

What did Sharpton say after charges were brought? The protests stopped when Zimmerman was charged, and did not resume until after the trial.
and why if it was about "no charges" , as Ben likes to argue did the protests restart after the trial?

 

Going by your logic, because the races of Zimmerman and Trayton were reversed during the trial, then reverted back again after the trial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.

 

With my niggas when it's time to start taken lifes.

 

Ayeee I knocked out 5 woods since Zimmerman court! :) lol shit ima keep sleepin shit #ayeee

Didn't you see Jon's post in the other thread The prosecutor already decided that there was not enough to charge with a hate/racial charge. To Clarify Sharpten and crowd want hate crimes filed against Zimmerman because he is half white and Trayvon was black with zero evidence that race played a part. This punks admits he is planning to kill white people because he hates them, goes out and shoots a white guy in the back, but the prosecutor decides NO racial angle. The double standard is strong in this country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.

 

With my niggas when it's time to start taken lifes.

 

Ayeee I knocked out 5 woods since Zimmerman court! :) lol shit ima keep sleepin shit #ayeee

Didn't you see Jon's post in the other thread The prosecutor already decided that there was not enough to charge with a hate/racial charge. To Clarify Sharpten and crowd want hate crimes filed against Zimmerman because he is half white and Trayvon was black with zero evidence that race played a part. This punks admits he is planning to kill white people because he hates them, goes out and shoots a white guy in the back, but the prosecutor decides NO racial angle. The double standard is strong in this country.
It's not racial, it's just an "extra measures of evil."

 

Like a recipe, just start with some Evil, add some boredom, some hated of Whitey,

and for an "extra measure" throw in a bit more Evil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.

 

With my niggas when it's time to start taken lifes.

 

Ayeee I knocked out 5 woods since Zimmerman court! :) lol shit ima keep sleepin shit #ayeee

Didn't you see Jon's post in the other thread The prosecutor already decided that there was not enough to charge with a hate/racial charge. To Clarify Sharpten and crowd want hate crimes filed against Zimmerman because he is half white and Trayvon was black with zero evidence that race played a part. This punks admits he is planning to kill white people because he hates them, goes out and shoots a white guy in the back, but the prosecutor decides NO racial angle. The double standard is strong in this country.

 

 

Yeah, no doubt you are far more familiar than the local DA with the evidence in this case...

 

Still, you've gotta admit, Sharpton has been pretty damn successful, in convincing Whitey to switch teams, on such a widespread scale that goes even into the heartland of America...

 

 

 

"At this point, the evidence does not support the theory that Christopher Lane was targeted based upon his race or nationality," District Attorney Jason Hicks said in a statement.

 

Hicks acknowledged that social media posts allegedly made by some of the defendants are racial in nature, but he said "the evidence is insufficient to establish that race was the primary motive" in Lane's slaying.

hicksfam-387x267.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, in New Jersey --

 

Men enter closed store by accident, pay for purchases

 

WAYNE, NJ (News 12 New Jersey/CNN) - It pays to be on your best behavior, even when you think no one is watching.

That's a lesson learned by a few young men from New Jersey after cameras caught them doing the right thing at a local store.

Sunday night, the management of Buddy's Small Lots got the after-hours call all retailers fear.

"We got a phone call at the police department saying there had been a break in at the store," Marci Lederman of Buddy's Small Lots said.

But when they got to the store, nothing appeared out of place. But the eye in the sky sees everything, so they went to the video tape.

The cameras caught it all. A handful of young men cautiously enter the store before heading downstairs.

They do a little shopping, calling out to a clerk who never shows up. After doing a little mental math, the guys decide to pay for sunglasses and batteries, even though no one's around to force them. (link)

 

 

These were young black men, BTW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.

 

With my niggas when it's time to start taken lifes.

 

Ayeee I knocked out 5 woods since Zimmerman court! :) lol shit ima keep sleepin shit #ayeee

Didn't you see Jon's post in the other thread The prosecutor already decided that there was not enough to charge with a hate/racial charge. To Clarify Sharpten and crowd want hate crimes filed against Zimmerman because he is half white and Trayvon was black with zero evidence that race played a part. This punks admits he is planning to kill white people because he hates them, goes out and shoots a white guy in the back, but the prosecutor decides NO racial angle. The double standard is strong in this country.

 

 

Yeah, no doubt you are far more familiar than the local DA with the evidence in this case...

 

Still, you've gotta admit, Sharpton has been pretty damn successful, in convincing Whitey to switch teams, on such a widespread scale that goes even into the heartland of America...

 

 

>

"At this point, the evidence does not support the theory that Christopher Lane was targeted based upon his race or nationality," District Attorney Jason Hicks said in a statement.

 

Hicks acknowledged that social media posts allegedly made by some of the defendants are racial in nature, but he said "the evidence is insufficient to establish that race was the primary motive" in Lane's slaying.

hicksfam-387x267.jpg

 

WTF does the color of the DA have to do with anything?

 

For the record I think adding hate charges are complete BS killing someone is against the law regardless of the reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest One of Five

 

 

 

90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.

 

With my niggas when it's time to start taken lifes.

 

Ayeee I knocked out 5 woods since Zimmerman court! :) lol shit ima keep sleepin shit #ayeee

Didn't you see Jon's post in the other thread The prosecutor already decided that there was not enough to charge with a hate/racial charge. To Clarify Sharpten and crowd want hate crimes filed against Zimmerman because he is half white and Trayvon was black with zero evidence that race played a part. This punks admits he is planning to kill white people because he hates them, goes out and shoots a white guy in the back, but the prosecutor decides NO racial angle. The double standard is strong in this country.

 

 

Yeah, no doubt you are far more familiar than the local DA with the evidence in this case...

 

Still, you've gotta admit, Sharpton has been pretty damn successful, in convincing Whitey to switch teams, on such a widespread scale that goes even into the heartland of America...

 

 

>

"At this point, the evidence does not support the theory that Christopher Lane was targeted based upon his race or nationality," District Attorney Jason Hicks said in a statement.

 

Hicks acknowledged that social media posts allegedly made by some of the defendants are racial in nature, but he said "the evidence is insufficient to establish that race was the primary motive" in Lane's slaying.

hicksfam-387x267.jpg

WTF does the color of the DA have to do with anything?

 

For the record I think adding hate charges are complete BS killing someone is against the law regardless of the reason.

 

 

 

Careful y ou're going to make a liberal's head explode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Careful y ou're going to make a liberal's head explode.

just to interject here there have been a number of meltdowns in PA and few if any were liberals.

because you are all ready melted. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Careful y ou're going to make a liberal's head explode.

just to interject here there have been a number of meltdowns in PA and few if any were liberals.

 

Capstan was a liberal with a meltdown. And it was epic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Careful y ou're going to make a liberal's head explode.

just to interject here there have been a number of meltdowns in PA and few if any were liberals.

Capstan was a liberal with a meltdown. And it was epic.

What a dirty little tart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Careful y ou're going to make a liberal's head explode.

just to interject here there have been a number of meltdowns in PA and few if any were liberals.

because you are all ready melted. :)

Sez the guy still suffering from the rash from wearing his Bush Supporter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites