• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.
    • B.J. Porter

      Moderation Team Change   06/16/2017

      After fifteen years of volunteer moderation at SA, I will no longer be part of the moderation team. The decision to step aside is mine, and has been some time in the works but we did not wish to announce it in advance for a number of reasons. It's been fun, but I need my time back for other purposes now. The Underdawg admin account will not be monitored until further notice, as I will be relinquishing control of it along with my administrative privileges. Zapata will continue on as a moderator, and any concerns or issues can be directed to that account or to the Editor until further notice. Anyone interested in helping moderate the forums should reach out to Scot by sending a PM to the Editor account. Please note that I am not leaving the community, I am merely stepping aside from Admin responsibilities and privileges on the site.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

NZL5

ETNZ vs. Oracle: Races 5 and 6.

1,138 posts in this topic

OR don't seem to have any real semi displacement or foiling mode up wind. They are getting the full noise wetted surface drag all the way. and not pointing any higher than ETNZ in that mode. All the practice in the world is not going to change that fact that the design team got it wrong.....

I did notice their nose coming out of the water in at least one shot today, but generally the lower rocker of their design seems to make it a bit harder to go into foil/semi-foil upwind mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oracle changed to small rudders and couldn't control the boat anymore.

There is your answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not convinced that Race 4 was anything but luck. It looked to me like they were doing the same thing - go to the favored side - won the dice roll. Splitting to go to the fast side works - some of the time. Covering works - all of the time. That's why you cover, assuming you have the capability to execute a cover.

 

It's possible that OR doesn't think they're capable of covering. It's possible they're scared to engage too closely. It's possible that things simply unfold too fast for the guys to really manage good tactics.

 

You can't run good tactics until you're running the boat well. Sailing competitively is *all* *about* cognitive load. You get basic sailing automatic, then you can focus on speed issues. You get the sailing fast to be pretty automatic and you start focusing on some basic tactics. You get the basic tactics automatic and you start picking up the shifts. You start picking up the shifts automatically and get into setting up tactics for the next leg, and so on. This is why time in the boat is so very very very important.

 

It's possible that OR simply hasn't got enough time in the boat, they're still working on how to sail the thing fast and struggling with the next step up because there's not enough brainpower left over to manage decent tactics.

 

The cognitive load on these things has to be simply shattering. Just keeping the damned thing upright is a job of work.

 

1min is a lot of 'luck'.

 

Faster upwind, end of story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Kostecki needs to work less and to have a better view from the boat.

Besides, there is something about this boat that its handling compromizes work of the tactician and the helmsman.

That probably wouldn't hurt, but he also needs to bloody well cover. In fact, Jimmy should be able to handle that one himself, isn't he the match racing wunderkind? How the hell is he letting the other guys sail off to the other side of the course, time after time? Was he so rattled by the terrible rounding? I don't know.

Agreed. The only race OR started upwind with a lead and then covered was... Race 4! This one and Race 3 they were playing the course too much, split too far, and lost the lead for it.

 

I'm not convinced OR is significantly slower in a straight line than NZ. People keep pointing out instances where NZ has a speed advantage, but you can never know from our removed perspective if that's due to straightline boat speed or NZ getting a puff. And sometimes it's b/c OR is in the current and NZ isn't. Snapshots like that are not constant enough to be statistically significant.

 

It's clear NZ tacks better, and when OR hasn't covered them they come out better on tactics too, which I think is where most of NZ's margins are coming from. OR has gotta use this postponement to fix the tacking problem, win the start, get to the bottom mark first, then cover loosely upwind. That was recipe for Race 4!, just need to stick with it.

Exactly!

 

OR are slower tacking and lose on each one...So tight covering is not going to help...Fatal design mistakes. No cure for that...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, now we get to see at least 3 races at the weekend before the massive party...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

schadenfreude (by the way I'd love to see ya spell that!).

Haha +1

 

 

Interesting to see that nationalism doesn't reign supreme though, and Oracle have failed to endear themselves to many US fans.

ockquote>

It's basically a competition b/t a Kiwi team and a Kiwi/Aussie team, just with sponsors from different places, and different destinations for Cup. A far cry from the days of Dennis Connor & co.

When you include the designers it's a competition between one Kiwi/Aussie/Seppo team and another Kiwi/Aussie/Seppo team.

 

Isn't Killing involved in the design?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Kostecki needs to work less and to have a better view from the boat.

Besides, there is something about this boat that its handling compromizes work of the tactician and the helmsman.

That probably wouldn't hurt, but he also needs to bloody well cover. In fact, Jimmy should be able to handle that one himself, isn't he the match racing wunderkind? How the hell is he letting the other guys sail off to the other side of the course, time after time? Was he so rattled by the terrible rounding? I don't know.

Agreed. The only race OR started upwind with a lead and then covered was... Race 4! This one and Race 3 they were playing the course too much, split too far, and lost the lead for it.

 

I'm not convinced OR is significantly slower in a straight line than NZ. People keep pointing out instances where NZ has a speed advantage, but you can never know from our removed perspective if that's due to straightline boat speed or NZ getting a puff. And sometimes it's b/c OR is in the current and NZ isn't. Snapshots like that are not constant enough to be statistically significant.

 

It's clear NZ tacks better, and when OR hasn't covered them they come out better on tactics too, which I think is where most of NZ's margins are coming from. OR has gotta use this postponement to fix the tacking problem, win the start, get to the bottom mark first, then cover loosely upwind. That was recipe for Race 4!, just need to stick with it.

Exactly!

 

OR are slower tacking and lose on each one...So as a ETNZ supporter, I agree, OR should get right in there with a tacking duel. Definitely..... :D

 

Yeap, tough for OR slower in the tacks but you still need to cover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget crews, skippers, managers, CEO,s... the real winners of this America's cup is, without doubt, is ETNZ's design team.

 

 

A lot of people pointed this out during the ACWS but a lot of dickheads spent a lot of time talking up their teams and bagging ETNZ.

 

The kiwi team said at the time the AC45s didn't mean much - they were focussed on the AC72.

 

The implications of this must be starting to make more sense to the Oracle fans now.

 

They have spent years on development and more than 100 days sailing and refining the package.

 

Jimmy shows the skills and, especially at the starts demonstrates that in even boats he may well be the best driver, but THAT ISN'T AMERICAS CUP - having the best design, build, crew, lawyers, shore team logistics and so on, that's what Americas Cup is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done ETNZ.

 

However, I really feel for the OTUSA guys who must be facing a big reality check right now. Never good to know your options have been reduced and there's not much left in the bag.

 

Despite the criticism on here of OTUSA pulling the plug on the second race, it was a strategic decision and perhaps not as dangerous for them as some have speculated. I say this because they do have a second boat that although not as fast, is still able to take over if anything happens to B2.

 

Of course, I'm assuming B1 has a measurement certificate and that under the rules it is allowed to sail (if not, then they realy are in trouble).

 

Will we see Sir Ben and some of his crew take over at some stage? Last-ditch effort if it gets to that?

 

A minor problem on B2 won't let them sail boat one. B2 pretty much needs to sink for them to be allowed to race B1, or do I have that wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know which hotel Spinbot is staying in? If you do, please put a call through to them to remove all sharp objects, curtain ropes, any chairs he can break (white plastic chair safest for him now), and put another 10 bibles on his bedside table.

And please don't leave him alone... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not be surprised if Pete Melvin and Gino Morrelli do not already have drafts of proposed AC35 Class Rules and boat designs substantially advanced...

 

Fer sure. Input from the entire design team. Plus rules advisor Russell Green well advanced on a draft protocol.

 

Not gloating here. It's a fact of AC life that any challenger with a hope of winning needs to be working weeks or months in advance on its options for CoR, local bases and infrastructure, funding, boat choices, draft rule, Protocol, etc.

 

EDIT: I've barely managed to read 20% of the posts on the Forum since the match started. So apologies if already covered but NZ Prime Minister John Key has already said the gummint will pony up, if the need arises, for an AC35 defence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking at the replay of today's race. in the upwind leg, It looks like Oracle got a huge knock after tacking at the boundary at Alcatraz. At the tack on the boundary, Oracles lead drops from 30 to 13m but then the lead _should_ start rebuiliding At the same time ETNZ tacks at the boundary. Normally Oracle should see their lead extend as ETNZ slows after the tack but instead, ETNZ tacks AND gains on Oracle (because of the knock). Oracle recognizes this and tacks back towards Alacatraz, but its to late and ETNz has taken a 100m lead. Things go downhill from here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will we see Coutts on the boats before this is over...Bring back Coutts..... :D:D:D ...Pay backs a bitch...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am starting to wonder if ETNZ simply "threw" race 4, simply to tempt OR back for another before crushing them ? Scoreline of 4 - 0, is nicer than 3 -0 ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

OR don't seem to have any real semi displacement or foiling mode up wind. They are getting the full noise wetted surface drag all the way. and not pointing any higher than ETNZ in that mode. All the practice in the world is not going to change that fact that the design team got it wrong.....

 

I've thought for a long time that we had the better boat upwind.

With the planing hulls, if ETNZ hits a wave or goes nose down, the planing hulls are more likely to push the boat back up quickly.

Compare this to Oracle's hulls, in the same situation they are far more likely to "stub their toes".

 

It would appear this situation is exarcerbated in the tacks.

Would agree. The wide planing surface(s) adjacent to the dagger board on ETNZ give them a third 'mode', that gets them thru maneuvers when they come off the foils. Those OTUSA displacement hulls look sticky as soon as the boat is off the foils.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far every upwind leg has pretty much had every City Front SF racer shaking their head regarding the OR team tactics. Hell just about every J/24 local who has bashed up and down the city front knows where some of the mistakes were with the OR tactics. When they were in the lead they went out of their way to hand NZ the lead again.

 

BTW Larry has raced the city front enough to know that something is up with the tactics being called on the boat and you better believe he is watching and conferring with some skilled sailors familiar with the city front and whats going on with the tactics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, on a typical day with the Westerly breeze, that foiling tack might give Oracle the most bang for their Alcatraz-cone buck, right? Get them in the cone on both port and stbd for a while. They shoulda known this wasn't the case today. This lack of attention to detail is killing them.

 

Instead, they needed to figure out the "layline" to the edge of that cone and hit that. That would basically mean tacking right where ETNZ eventually tacked. It would have a) given them a better tack, and B) given them a controlling position going into that area. ETNZ's only recourse then is to go to shore to salvage a split, and would thereby lose out on getting to the Alca-cone. I think this simple change in breeze direction, and a failure to recognize it's impact made the whole race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Race 5.

 

No lucky wind shift for OTUSA - so no win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That he should approach the problem of navigating a 40KSB afresh as compared to a 4KSB?

had a good laugh at the 40 knot shit box comment. :D:D

 

A totally bad ass, sweet looking yacht, that screams around the course at unreal speeds - Any where else, in any other race on the planet, it would be incredible. But all it takes is one other boat to make it a (comparative) shit box.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ GD said " one of us has got it right, and one of us is wrong" on the design ! I can imagine that Nick Holroyd et al will be complemented for their thinking !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back to boat - in Andratx - fucking soccer took precedent in the bar (bloody grokles) - getting ready for second race, and it's called off.

I know we won it .... BUT WHERE????

The start, downwind - on the beat - did anyone make a big boo boo ?????

 

Que???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JK is a total disaster!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not read any of the thread but watched this in the pub and was shocked to see Oracle do that. Get JK off the boat. Too much group think.

 

I guess thats because I don't rate him and never have.

 

But IMHO Oracle threw away that race. Actually, JK threw away that race. And the a few of the earlier ones.

 

On the other hand, boat speed makes any tactician look like a god and Ray is looking pretty good at the moment...

 

One design high end yachting... Ray would be in my top 5. JK would just about make it into my top 15-20. And I've sailed with against the lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will we see Coutts on the boats before this is over...Bring back Coutts..... :D:D:D ...Pay backs a bitch...

Maybe he could drill it through the RC boat...now that would be very special:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^ Too much beer. Xlot don't pick on my lack of spelling and grammar. My putting today was shite too....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Press confence underway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slingsby is telling it like it is. Are Oracle guys allowed to do that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

And they are not even dressed in Prada gear....

:D Revenge is a dish ..

 

As a consolation, guess which past race is being shown again (R4, of course)

 

Cheap shot about the Prada gear.

 

In light of that, especially nice to get a comment from Italian partisan re the ACTV choice (1 out of 5) to show R4

Cheap shot against arrogant RC calling us spoiled rich kids dressed etc,,,,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Race 5.

 

No lucky wind shift for OTUSA - so no win.

We don't have "lucky" wind shifts on SF Bay. They're as predictable as time, to the extent that we name the damn things. It's is why we're so perplexed by the tactical calls. If you sail here, there are no surprises.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing OR can do from here. They just don't have any legs upwind. Upwind speed makes you look like a tactical genius and if you don't have speed upwind any normal tactics might as well go out the window.

Other than completely modifying their hulls to suit better maneuvers they are pretty much F**ked.

 

Weeeeelcome Home...etnz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slingsby is telling it like it is. Are Oracle guys allowed to do that?

Haha

 

JS very good answering back to journos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, Spithill asked if they were replacing JK and he avoided the question, didn't say no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Press conference about to start.

Link please

You can find it in a new thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JS getting all the questions surprise surprise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Annoying reporter: "Jimmy how safe are you feeling in your job right now?"

 

JS: "You can be a rooster one day a feather duster the next, mate."

 

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL

Q - Jimmy, how safe do you feel in your job?

A - "You can be a rooster one day, and a feather duster the next"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not be surprised if Pete Melvin and Gino Morrelli do not already have drafts of proposed AC35 Class Rules and boat designs substantially advanced...

 

gino said as much

 

hope he and pete have signed for the next cycle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This reminds me of 1992 Coutts and Butterworth were put on in the end they were the best but they couldn't bring it back from where they were.

OR are in the same position if they make crew changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's well within the rules for Oracle to duck out of this afternoon's race but my first reaction was "Those bloody cowards!".

 

But in reality it's much better they do it now than down the track, say if ETNZ made it to 8 points after the morning race on a day before a rest day.

 

Now OR can't piss in their porridge and make them wait a couple of days to seal the deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the Jimmy of old I like. Good honest answers from the heart..no cockiness evident. I hope they get their boat sorted and be a bit more competitive...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was actually impressed with how JS handled that media conference. He didn't have room to be cocky and wasn't, but still had some humour left in him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are the commentators saying that ETNZ need to win another 5 races. They only need to win another 4 races, that would result in:

 

ETNZ - 8 Race wins = 8 pts

 

Or - 9 Race wins = 9pts - 2pts = 7 pts.

 

ETNZ need to win 8 races not 9 and Or need to win 10 races not 11.

 

 

Bob Fisher is also making the same mistake .... http://www.sail-world.com/UK/Americas-Cup:-One-Race---One-Step-Closer-for-the-Kiwis---Day-3/114305

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are the commentators saying that ETNZ need to win another 5 races. They only need to win another 4 races, that would result in:

 

ETNZ - 8 Race wins = 8 pts

 

Or - 9 Race wins = 9pts - 2pts = 7 pts.

 

ETNZ need to win 8 races not 9 and Or need to win 10 races not 11.

Bob202 will be along shortly to kick you in the nuts!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are the commentators saying that ETNZ need to win another 5 races. They only need to win another 4 races, that would result in:

 

ETNZ - 8 Race wins = 8 pts

 

Or - 9 Race wins = 9pts - 2pts = 7 pts.

 

ETNZ need to win 8 races not 9 and Or need to win 10 races not 11.

You are an idiot.

 

It is first to 9 POINTS.

 

So they need 5 more points.

 

It is not best of 17.

 

Can someone pin this in the forum.

 

Fucking retards....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To clarify I don't actually think that OR are cowards, it was just my initial reaction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far every upwind leg has pretty much had every City Front SF racer shaking their head regarding the OR team tactics. Hell just about every J/24 local who has bashed up and down the city front knows where some of the mistakes were with the OR tactics. When they were in the lead they went out of their way to hand NZ the lead again.

 

BTW Larry has raced the city front enough to know that something is up with the tactics being called on the boat and you better believe he is watching and conferring with some skilled sailors familiar with the city front and whats going on with the tactics.

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the ACWS was here in Newport last summer I had several opportunities to speak to Jimmy Spithill both on the record (I was covering the event for a local paper) and off. Seeing him at the press conference today reminded me of what I liked about him when we spoke. He's really good under pressure, he's not afraid to be candid, and all in all he's a real credit to the sport.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the Jimmy of old I like. Good honest answers from the heart..no cockiness evident. I hope they get their boat sorted and be a bit more competitive...

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was actually impressed with how JS handled that media conference. He didn't have room to be cocky and wasn't, but still had some humour left in him.

You reckon Jimmy checked the forum?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone catch Jimmy's line towards the end of the original (race) broadcast (shortly after his interview, I think)? Can't remember exactly and the replay is not online yet (and it might get scrubbed anyway) but it went something like "We're gonna go for a sail now... He can stay on the boat or get off... It's up to him..."

 

Sounded like at least somebody's ass is in the sling... Wonder who "he" is? JK? TS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You gotta like, Jimmy.

 

Asked how safe he feels in his position after race 5, he replies, 'Mate you can be a rooster one day and a feather duster the next'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the Jimmy of old I like. Good honest answers from the heart..no cockiness evident. I hope they get their boat sorted and be a bit more competitive...

 

+1

 

He is much more impressive today :)

 

I would hate to have a camera in my face every day, easy to get "caught out" so to speak, and we all make those mistakes!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spithillwould play the card is because he lost trust in his tactician, and didn't want to risk another race. Kostecki is out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone catch Jimmy's line towards the end of the original (race) broadcast (shortly after his interview, I think)? Can't remember exactly and the replay is not online yet (and it might get scrubbed anyway) but it went something like "We're gonna go for a sail now... He can stay on the boat or get off... It's up to him..."

 

Sounded like at least somebody's ass is in the sling... Wonder who "he" is? JK? TS?

 

""We're gonna go for a sail now..." 100% he definitely said that, I couldn't believe the TV commentators didn't pick it up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm not convinced that Race 4 was anything but luck. It looked to me like they were doing the same thing - go to the favored side - won the dice roll. Splitting to go to the fast side works - some of the time. Covering works - all of the time. That's why you cover, assuming you have the capability to execute a cover.

 

It's possible that OR doesn't think they're capable of covering. It's possible they're scared to engage too closely. It's possible that things simply unfold too fast for the guys to really manage good tactics.

 

You can't run good tactics until you're running the boat well. Sailing competitively is *all* *about* cognitive load. You get basic sailing automatic, then you can focus on speed issues. You get the sailing fast to be pretty automatic and you start focusing on some basic tactics. You get the basic tactics automatic and you start picking up the shifts. You start picking up the shifts automatically and get into setting up tactics for the next leg, and so on. This is why time in the boat is so very very very important.

 

It's possible that OR simply hasn't got enough time in the boat, they're still working on how to sail the thing fast and struggling with the next step up because there's not enough brainpower left over to manage decent tactics.

 

The cognitive load on these things has to be simply shattering. Just keeping the damned thing upright is a job of work.

 

1min is a lot of 'luck'.

 

Faster upwind, end of story.

 

I know jc172... tends to be quick to jump to conclusions, but in this case I think he is right.

1 minute+ on a single upwind leg is a hell of a lot of luck.

 

ETNZ have a faster boat upwind and dumbass tactics by Oracle made it look worse for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spithill was asked directly if Kostecki's job was safe. He answered that no one's job is safe, which is a pretty good indication of what might be about to happen. He also said that he was very satisfied with Kyle Langford's effort thus far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is the Jimmy of old I like. Good honest answers from the heart..no cockiness evident. I hope they get their boat sorted and be a bit more competitive...

+1

+1 just don't improve the boat... :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They actually let me in that wharehouse in April, i've actually seen it touched it and blighted it,but they never knew i was rooting for the Kiwis,i love to see the yanks when they have a right hot nail up thier ass.It's a comedy show just watchin em.Wonder where the guy at the end of race 4 on Sunday is at now that was shoutin USA USA USA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I would not be surprised if Pete Melvin and Gino Morrelli do not already have drafts of proposed AC35 Class Rules and boat designs substantially advanced...

 

gino said as much

 

hope he and pete have signed for the next cycle

 

That sounds almost like "cheating".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's presser:

 

JS: "... It was obvious, unless we make some changes, there was a real chance we were not going to win the second race of the day. We have to do what we can and we will. ... "

 

Sounds like it is not a matter of if they are going to make personnel changes but who is gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only reason that Spithillwould play the card is because he lost trust in his tactician, and didn't want to risk another race. Kostecki is out.

 

I think that would be a disasterous move for them in terms of morale and upsetting the settled combinations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am starting to wonder if ETNZ simply "threw" race 4, simply to tempt OR back for another before crushing them ? Scoreline of 4 - 0, is nicer than 3 -0 ?

 

Sandbagging during the AC finals would be a pretty big call when these boats gain and lose so fast...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, OR not "cowards" for doing this, it's just smart strategy, like in Basketball, using your timeouts near the end of a losing game to reset, buy time, fix problems, engineer a comeback, etc.

.

Good analogy, it is a good time to call this timeout.

 

It was one Hell of a Race until that bottom mark but man o man what a disaster that decision led to. Strategy needs to take a deep breath.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Did anyone catch Jimmy's line towards the end of the original (race) broadcast (shortly after his interview, I think)? Can't remember exactly and the replay is not online yet (and it might get scrubbed anyway) but it went something like "We're gonna go for a sail now... He can stay on the boat or get off... It's up to him..."

 

Sounded like at least somebody's ass is in the sling... Wonder who "he" is? JK? TS?

 

""We're gonna go for a sail now..." 100% he definitely said that, I couldn't believe the TV commentators didn't pick it up

 

Reported here aaages ago that Jimmy said that they played their delay card in order to regroup rather than for boat issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I'm not convinced that Race 4 was anything but luck. It looked to me like they were doing the same thing - go to the favored side - won the dice roll. Splitting to go to the fast side works - some of the time. Covering works - all of the time. That's why you cover, assuming you have the capability to execute a cover.

 

It's possible that OR doesn't think they're capable of covering. It's possible they're scared to engage too closely. It's possible that things simply unfold too fast for the guys to really manage good tactics.

 

You can't run good tactics until you're running the boat well. Sailing competitively is *all* *about* cognitive load. You get basic sailing automatic, then you can focus on speed issues. You get the sailing fast to be pretty automatic and you start focusing on some basic tactics. You get the basic tactics automatic and you start picking up the shifts. You start picking up the shifts automatically and get into setting up tactics for the next leg, and so on. This is why time in the boat is so very very very important.

 

It's possible that OR simply hasn't got enough time in the boat, they're still working on how to sail the thing fast and struggling with the next step up because there's not enough brainpower left over to manage decent tactics.

 

The cognitive load on these things has to be simply shattering. Just keeping the damned thing upright is a job of work.

 

1min is a lot of 'luck'.

 

Faster upwind, end of story.

 

I know jc172... tends to be quick to jump to conclusions, but in this case I think he is right.

1 minute+ on a single upwind leg is a hell of a lot of luck.

 

ETNZ have a faster boat upwind and dumbass tactics by Oracle made it look worse for them.

Actually, Amolitor was referring to OR's win in Race 4 as luck, to quote: "I'm not convinced that Race 4 was anything but luck". It's called tautological English, the use of the double-negative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am starting to wonder if ETNZ simply "threw" race 4, simply to tempt OR back for another before crushing them ? Scoreline of 4 - 0, is nicer than 3 -0 ?

 

Sandbagging during the AC finals would be a pretty big call when these boats gain and lose so fast...

 

Agreed, smells like bullshit to me.

Besides, ETNZ have already said they had wing hydraulics problems in race 4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spithill was asked directly if Kostecki's job was safe. He answered that no one's job is safe, which is a pretty good indication of what might be about to happen. He also said that he was very satisfied with Kyle Langford's effort thus far.

Yes. He did say that about K L.

 

But to me his body language was saying something else.

 

All is not well in camp OTUSA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The only reason that Spithillwould play the card is because he lost trust in his tactician, and didn't want to risk another race. Kostecki is out.

 

I think that would be a disasterous move for them in terms of morale and upsetting the settled combinations.

 

Yeah loyalty goes a long way for morale. Win or lose together. Changing crew around is not going to help. TNZ learnt that lesson in the early 90's!!!!

Who would replace JK now. How will they build that relationship in the start box in 24hrs??

 

Wheels falling off...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I would not be surprised if Pete Melvin and Gino Morrelli do not already have drafts of proposed AC35 Class Rules and boat designs substantially advanced...

 

gino said as much

 

hope he and pete have signed for the next cycle

 

That sounds almost like "cheating".

The prerogative of the defender is that they make all the rules, can do advanced planning and can steer the defence. These advantages have all been conferred onto OR in this cycle and the outcomes of how they have used their advantages and greater resources are now on display.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how long do they delay the Youtube replay?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They actually let me in that wharehouse in April, i've actually seen it touched it and blighted it,but they never knew i was rooting for the Kiwis,i love to see the yanks when they have a right hot nail up thier ass.It's a comedy show just watchin em.Wonder where the guy at the end of race 4 on Sunday is at now that was shoutin USA USA USA

 

There are yanks in OR's warehouse?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to note that this is the first time ever in the entire history of AC that a boat has chosen not to sail when they obviously can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

did it look like JS had a boot sole print on his crotch when getting back on the boat ??? :o:o:o:o:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it the first time in AC history where a "postponement card" was even available?

Isn't it the first time in AC history where boats are traveling at freeway speed?

Isn't it the first time in AC history where boats have wings?

 

I'm too tired to point out all the history breaking records being set here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Did anyone catch Jimmy's line towards the end of the original (race) broadcast (shortly after his interview, I think)? Can't remember exactly and the replay is not online yet (and it might get scrubbed anyway) but it went something like "We're gonna go for a sail now... He can stay on the boat or get off... It's up to him..."

 

Sounded like at least somebody's ass is in the sling... Wonder who "he" is? JK? TS?

 

""We're gonna go for a sail now..." 100% he definitely said that, I couldn't believe the TV commentators didn't pick it up

He was talking to Juan Vila. Techy, navigator chap. Been round the world a couple of times. He had a pelican case in his hand. He said: "You can stay on Juan if you like."

 

Not JK's biggest fan here but I doubt he is gone.

 

Convo on the boat with Coutts: "What should I say to the media when we are slower?" Coutts: "Fuck knows,.... I've not lost one yet before..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have heard from GD that OR have put smaller rudders on he said it may work for them in a straight line but they will have huge trouble manovering the boat.

 

Answers a few questions

Stingers had no questions. He was all for it. Now he is just waiting for that badly aimed bullet to hit anybody on the ETNZ team in the foot. Sorry Stingers, just could not waste that gift opportunity, after all, smaller rudders would match with smaller elevators. Right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah loyalty goes a long way for morale. Win or lose together. Changing crew around is not going to help. TNZ learnt that lesson in the early 90's!!!!

Who would replace JK now. How will they build that relationship in the start box in 24hrs??

 

Give JS a match racer for his tactician and it could change the dynamic. The only race OR won was the one they match raced instead of fleet raced. Worth a shot imho.

 

Otherwise, what's the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

shit day for otusa, i know i'll be drowning in some adult beverages this afernoon.

 

but from the start of race 1 until the midpoint of race 5, i was starting to think kiwis were an ok bunch on here, and the posts showed it. but just as they get ahead in race 5, all the kiwi jackasses come in here and start talking shit again, calling out otusa as pussies and whatnot. fucking assholes. respect level has dropped back down significantly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unbelievably bad tactics on Oracle. Poor crew work, little communication, people angry - just strange.....

 

You know - I get a bit pissed when sloths take the piss out of movers.

These guys are at the top of their league and for a minutes worth of race at the finish, some here take the piss.

If you are that good, get out there and do it.

I can't, I'm not that good.

Neither are 99.9% of everyone on the forum - so don't slag.

Keep it constructive.

Not cuntstructive.

There is a difference.

Both OR and TNZ are at the absolute top of (our???) their league. They are the absolute creme-de-la-creme, so give them some respect.

If you cannot - let us all know where YOU are better.

I know that I am not. I have a few miles under my belt wandering around the world, but I do not have their expertise in racing .

 

And neither do 99.9% of you lot.

So dont't take the piss.

Give them some respect.

 

Any questions??? .....:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ray Davies commenting on having speed to burn upwind, and trying not to smile too much....

 

 

Don't think I've ever seen Ray Davies that relaxed and happy. He was positively fizzing!

 

Liked what we saw of Tom Slingsby too. In fact a good press conference performance by all four. Jimmy's feather duster one liner was a pearler!

 

No guarantees from JS about crew roster on Thursday. Understandable, but will we see JK on the boat? Seems unlikely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^ Too much beer. Xlot don't pick on my lack of spelling and grammar. My putting today was shite too....

No longer in that business, regrettably - blew a fuse as snaerk appeared ..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great presser and all 4 do the sport proud :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am starting to wonder if ETNZ simply "threw" race 4, simply to tempt OR back for another before crushing them ? Scoreline of 4 - 0, is nicer than 3 -0 ?

 

Sandbagging during the AC finals would be a pretty big call when these boats gain and lose so fast...

 

I would absolutely agree in a normal regatta, but ETNZ could chuck two races, and it wouldn't change anything for them. The later OR figure out where their weakness is, and how to fix it means ETNZ keep adding points on the board, and gives OR less time to catch up ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite, Connor's '88 catamaran had a wing sail.

 

Isn't it the first time in AC history where boats have wings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OTUSA - please explain the point of wearing crash hats of you don't have the straps done up tight?!!

It's a safety thing.

 

Like NOT wearing your seat belt, so you can get out of the car quickly after a crash. :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites