• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Kaihoe

Ehman claims TNZ Cheating

372 posts in this topic

If they can turn this radio communication on or off at any time then how does anyone know when it's being used?

 

Honest question, think i saw it addressed deep in the AC RRS somewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pretty evident that ETNZ don't need a big bag of dirty tricks they use to win.

 

It was Oracle that got torn a new one for not telling the truth to the IJ.

 

You just knew that TE would start chucking his toys.

 

I am told they also claimed the official spectator boat was too close.

 

If they gag that guy GGYC could come out the other side of this with their reputation intact.

 

If he gets a bit of momentum they'll just look like losers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can turn this radio communication on or off at any time then how does anyone know when it's being used?

 

Honest question, think i saw it addressed deep in the AC RRS somewhere.

 

When I go offshore how does anyone know if I'm on the phone getting advice from ashore?

 

If the sailing instructions say I can only use publically accessible information but I use a subscription weather service who knows?

 

It's a common question that comes up quite regularly in the long format.

 

It is an area that relies on the integrity of competitors.

 

It would be a bold move to use outside assistance when everything you say and do is recorded.

 

I'd be pissed if someone suggested that I cheated during races and I'd insist they substantiate their statement or apologise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

If they can turn this radio communication on or off at any time then how does anyone know when it's being used?

 

Honest question, think i saw it addressed deep in the AC RRS somewhere.

It would be a bold move to use outside assistance when everything you say and do is recorded.

.

Good point, conversations to people off the boat would likely be obvious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom Ehman has a long history of being at the centre of America’s Cup intrigue. He was at the heart of the court case which led to the 1988 mismatch between Conner’s catamaran and the New Zealand big boat. More recently he was also involved in the Oracle trespassing acusatitions against ETNZ. in the AC45 arena.

Is TE the shock jock of AC law ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not all human brains operate correctly ...sometimes the wires get a little crossed and there is an occasional short circuit...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can turn this radio communication on or off at any time then how does anyone know when it's being used?

 

Honest question, think i saw it addressed deep in the AC RRS somewhere.

 

If so, it's a valid question to be asked of both teams, not just ETNZ. From the article:

 

 

Race director Iain Murray said he had conducted an inquiry about communications and had sought clarification. He said the communications systems were available to both teams, that they had to be switched off before the start of a race, and could only be switched on again after a race was finished.

“We don’t believe they have been cheating at all,” said Murray.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can turn this radio communication on or off at any time then how does anyone know when it's being used?

Honest question, think i saw it addressed deep in the AC RRS somewhere.

I don't suppose the tv would have picked up on it, surprising as you constantly rave about the 'on boat comms'

As you don't sail and are a rabid supporter of ehmans team, you wouldn't know anything about the code of ethics most sailors have when racing...

No surprise you are the first one to support your 'insider snake oil salesman'...

How was the team gear he supplied this year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems baseless too me. I'm surprised that there has not been a protest over TNZ running a 3 boat campaign. After the LV finals, TNZ gave foils to LR to use for two boat testing. Seems to cross a line somehow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

failed with the IJ

 

so he's gone to the media

 

every cycle

 

your respect for some people grows

 

but for others falls

 

imho he's preparing his position next to eb

 

and the lowest level of ac hell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How sad... wasn't someone also claiming Oracle were looking back to their chase boat during an upwind leg last week occasion during races to receive hand signals from whoever was there with the latest incoming wind info or something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the hell is wrong with this guy?

Ehman has a lot to lose if Larry loses the cup, the sugar daddy he has milked for years will lose interest in the AC and GGYC, and no other team in the AC would voluntarily choose to be associated with Ehman.

 

He's desperate, just as he was with the trespassing protest, to the point that he is an embarrassment to Oracle. It's time he STFU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just further proof of why OR were not fit to race or at least should have had 4 races taken off & not 2, by the IJ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What the hell is wrong with this guy?

Ehman has a lot to lose if Larry loses the cup, the sugar daddy he has milked for years will lose interest in the AC and GGYC, and no other team in the AC would voluntarily choose to be associated with Ehman.

 

He's desperate, just as he was with the trespassing protest, to the point that he is an embarrassment to Oracle. It's time he STFU.

Nailed it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

failed with the IJ

 

so he's gone to the media

If you read the actual article, it clearly states " No protest had been lodged with the international jury."

 

There's little in any of it for facts and this is not even a quote but it's apparently at the heart of whatever TE raised to IM:

 

"Tom Ehman, vice commodore of the club and director of external affairs for the Americas Cup Event Authority said that the New Zealanders had a system of radio communication between the support boat and the New Zealand tactician Ray Davies which the Oracle team does not have."

 

My honest question remains: How does anyone know if it's turned on; know if or when RD has 'eagle eyes'? Is there really no way of knowing for certain? Does it come down to 'integrity'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so if spinray is in the "pics or it never happened mode" ... then we all know that this epic new TE affair, is set to be the main focus until the races finish & the legal process begins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Nope, looks like TE's question only went to IM.

'Pics or it didn't happen' is right, there's nothing in that article to prove that RD actually is receiving off-yacht communications. Without anything, all that TE can ask is a negative, 'How do we know they aren't using the system.'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is Tom is just stirring the pot to create some scandal/controversy, which has been lacking since the finals started.

 

Besides, would the AC be without it?

 

Its for the benefit of the punters and to get people to start threads like this one. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is Tom is just stirring the pot to create some scandal/controversy, which has been lacking since the finals started.

 

Besides, would the AC be without it?

 

Its for the benefit of the punters and to get people to start threads like this one. :lol:

TE was overheard saying... We will fight them in the Jury Room, We will fight them in the Courts, We will fight them with the paper chases!

A cub reporter in attendence asked "What about fighting them on the race track" and above the rooms loud raucous sniggering laughter was firmly told...

"Say WhaT???"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(TE)"said that the New Zealanders had a system of radio communication between the support boat and the New Zealand tactician Ray Davies which the Oracle team does not have."

 

I wonder how OR knows this? Seems like something that would be closely held by ETNZ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Nope, looks like TE's question only went to IM.

'Pics or it didn't happen' is right, there's nothing in that article to prove that RD actually is receiving off-yacht communications. Without anything, all that TE can ask is a negative, 'How do we know they aren't using the system.'

In a reference to a famous accusation made by Stars and Stripes skipper Dennis Conner against the New Zealanders in 1986 in Fremantle, Ehman said “why would you if you didn’t want to”. Conner had asked why the New Zealanders would have built their 12-metre yacht in fibreglass (when all the others were being built in aluminium) if they didn’t want to cheat. Asked if he knew what he was saying, Ehman replied: “Yes.”

Most events that allow communication also require that the teams or coaches report the frequencies they will use. The RC needs to know about any conflicts and it provides the RO with a way to contact a coach if needed. It is a very simple matter to monitor that frequency and not any usage during the race. It is dead simple to know if the radio was used during racing.

 

If TE had proof he would be filing with the IJ. Calling TNZ cheaters is crass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was TE a witness in the kingpost debacle?

 

Kind of funny that DDR ends up protecting TE from involvement by being completely without credibility in the jury room.

 

And then TE follows DDR down the same path.

 

This cup was lost by the idiots at the top!

 

GGyc should call TE to the carpet!

 

Impeachment is the best option.

 

Or GGyc becomes complicit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Tom Ehman, vice commodore of the club and director of external affairs for the Americas Cup Event Authority said that the New Zealanders had a system of radio communication between the support boat and the New Zealand tactician Ray Davies wherein they are discussing logistics surrounding the fully-subsidized piss-up for anarchists at Golden Gate Yacht Club."

 

"As vice commodore of the club and director of external affairs for the Americas Cup Event Authority Mr. Ehman considers it is his duty to lay on a boisterous event for anarchists who abandoned work places, families and other obligations in all parts of the world to come to San Francisco to witness the evisceration of Comrade Ellison and his gold medal sailing team".

 

"Details are currently withheld because, being a working-mans yacht club, Golden Gate does not have adequate storage facilities for umbrellas or taniwha. While the chances of rain are remote, leading anarchists are prone to take taniwha to free piss-ups."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

^ Nope, looks like TE's question only went to IM.

'Pics or it didn't happen' is right, there's nothing in that article to prove that RD actually is receiving off-yacht communications. Without anything, all that TE can ask is a negative, 'How do we know they aren't using the system.'

>In a reference to a famous accusation made by Stars and Stripes skipper Dennis Conner against the New Zealanders in 1986 in Fremantle, Ehman said “why would you if you didn’t want to”. Conner had asked why the New Zealanders would have built their 12-metre yacht in fibreglass (when all the others were being built in aluminium) if they didn’t want to cheat. Asked if he knew what he was saying, Ehman replied: “Yes.”

Most events that allow communication also require that the teams or coaches report the frequencies they will use. The RC needs to know about any conflicts and it provides the RO with a way to contact a coach if needed. It is a very simple matter to monitor that frequency and not any usage during the race. It is dead simple to know if the radio was used during racing.

 

If TE had proof he would be filing with the IJ. Calling TNZ cheaters is crass.

 

 

If he had any proof, then he would already have ETNZ in front of the jury.

If ETNZ were doing this, they deserve to forfeit the match, but lets be honest: who is more credible? ETNZ or Ehman.

 

Rather than doing that, he is trying to blacken the name of the only team NOT found guilty of cheating through rumour and innuendo.

The guy is an utter disgrace and should be kept as far away from any sporting endeavour as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your slow

 

I posted this 1 1/2 hours before you started new thread - on whats wrong with oracakle thread - your welcome

 

MAHGUAH_SCALPS_PILGRIMS

Posted Yesterday, 10:07 PM

snapback.png

America's Cup: Ehman raises question of radio communication in ...The IndependentA veiled accusation of cheating has been made against the New Zealand challenger for theAmerica's Cup by a senior member of event organiser and the ...

“We don’t believe they have been cheating at all,” said Murray.

Ehman’s complaint was sent in writing to the New Zealand rules adviser, Russell Green, who replied that the team had not been cheating in any way and specifically not in employing outside assistance. No protest had been lodged with the international jury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This looks basically like Tom Ehman acting as a proxy of Oracle Racing here. It's been done deliberately via him so it can be made to look as if it didn't come from Oracle directly, which it most likely did*, because that would attract nasty backlash and negative PR.

 

(*Seriously, who is in a better position to view the on-boat goings-on during racing - OR and their chase boat people, or Ehman who is watching it on TV?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

From the same pool of filth that Dennis Connor is from so no surprise.

 

There are some humans who walk amongst us who are mere dog turds.

And you would be one of them.

 

Have you ever put yourself on the line for your country - team - or beliefs and then been in a situation where you had to make a big call, or defend your position.

 

Wankers like you, make piss poor statements about people without knowing the full story or ever being in a situation that is difficult.

 

The biggest decisions wankers like you make is weather to get out of bed.

 

 

Dennis Conner has forgotten more than you will ever know about decision making and big calls and He has put team and country ahead of his own image on many occasion. And ...

 

He never left his country and slutted around the world like some.

 

Don,t bag DC when you are a mere pimple on the arsehole of life North Korea!...

 

 

Unless you can back it up and give examples of your life and experiences where you had to make a big call....other than wiping your own arse.... which you probably failed at. Then don't comment on people you don't know and situations you don't understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he had any proof, then he would already have ETNZ in front of the jury.

If ETNZ were doing this, they deserve to forfeit the match, but lets be honest: who is more credible? ETNZ or Ehman.

.

Agree, there is no proof the radio is getting turned on. The closest suggestion that he has it is in this article line:

 

Asked if he knew what he was saying, Ehman replied: "Yes."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

From the same pool of filth that Dennis Connor is from so no surprise.

 

There are some humans who walk amongst us who are mere dog turds.

And you would be one of them.

 

Have you ever put yourself on the line for your country - team - or beliefs and then been in a situation where you had to make a big call, or defend your position.

 

Wankers like you, make piss poor statements about people without knowing the full story or ever being in a situation that is difficult.

 

The biggest decisions wankers like you make is weather to get out of bed.

 

 

Dennis Conner has forgotten more than you will ever know about decision making and big calls and He has put team and country ahead of his own image on many occasion. And ...

 

He never left his country and slutted around the world like some.

 

Don,t bag DC when you are a mere pimple on the arsehole of life North Korea!...

 

 

Unless you can back it up and give examples of your life and experiences where you had to make a big call....other than wiping your own arse.... which you probably failed at. Then don't comment on people you don't know and situations you don't understand.

He he he, the battle of the trolls

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this was true then it would be picked up by any dude with a $300 scanner working the frequencies designated for comms.

 

TE is no fool. What he is doing is trying to grab ETNZ,s attention away from the ball.

 

Great strategy employed by a team desperate to upset a team with a fast boat.

 

But really is just a big nothing... unless ETNZ fall for it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Nope, looks like TE's question only went to IM.

'Pics or it didn't happen' is right, there's nothing in that article to prove that RD actually is receiving off-yacht communications. Without anything, all that TE can ask is a negative, 'How do we know they aren't using the system.'

 

OR should be careful how far they push this given (based on what I've heard from multiple well-connected sources) the same could be asked about OR's foil control system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most events that allow communication also require that the teams or coaches report the frequencies they will use. The RC needs to know about any conflicts and it provides the RO with a way to contact a coach if needed. It is a very simple matter to monitor that frequency and not any usage during the race. It is dead simple to know if the radio was used during racing.

 

While I think the accusation is ludicrous, we are technically a heck of a long way past knowing a frequency being sufficient to monitor radio transmissions. Once you start using spread-spectrum techniques with a frequency-hopping schedule synchronized between the transmitter and receiver but unknown to 3rd parties, it's basically impossible to monitor or even detect. Especially if it's one-way to the boat, so the equipment on the boat never transmits. And then add encryption onto that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who iz more credibel ? Ehman or . . . Stingray ? #

 

 

I cannot now look at sumthing ascribed to eether wun without feeling the same faynt

 

sensayshun of mownting norzeea, and this thred iz, for me, the last stror.

 

 

#

or woud that be like asking "whitsh iz mor helthy ? Arsenick or Syanide ?

 

or - (and this only just poppt into my hed) :

 

 

iz it lyk asking "whitsh iz mor helthy ? Arsenick or Arsenick ?")

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Most events that allow communication also require that the teams or coaches report the frequencies they will use. The RC needs to know about any conflicts and it provides the RO with a way to contact a coach if needed. It is a very simple matter to monitor that frequency and not any usage during the race. It is dead simple to know if the radio was used during racing.

 

While I think the accusation is ludicrous, we are technically a heck of a long way past knowing a frequency being sufficient to monitor radio transmissions. Once you start using spread-spectrum techniques with a frequency-hopping schedule synchronized between the transmitter and receiver but unknown to 3rd parties, it's basically impossible to monitor or even detect. Especially if it's one-way to the boat, so the equipment on the boat never transmits. And then add encryption onto that.

 

Whilst that might be true, there are cameras trained on the teams the whole time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Most events that allow communication also require that the teams or coaches report the frequencies they will use. The RC needs to know about any conflicts and it provides the RO with a way to contact a coach if needed. It is a very simple matter to monitor that frequency and not any usage during the race. It is dead simple to know if the radio was used during racing.

 

While I think the accusation is ludicrous, we are technically a heck of a long way past knowing a frequency being sufficient to monitor radio transmissions. Once you start using spread-spectrum techniques with a frequency-hopping schedule synchronized between the transmitter and receiver but unknown to 3rd parties, it's basically impossible to monitor or even detect. Especially if it's one-way to the boat, so the equipment on the boat never transmits. And then add encryption onto that.

Any such equipment found during the regatta would be a DSQ. Part of the requirement to report/register all comms with the RC is so the RC can monitor usage. If there was a suspicion and the RC found equipment as you describe your sailors just lost some races with DSQs.

 

Just to avoid the possibility of what you describe I would hope that the equipment on the boats is monitored on a daily basis. The system in question seems to be available to both teams if I read IM's statement correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Most events that allow communication also require that the teams or coaches report the frequencies they will use. The RC needs to know about any conflicts and it provides the RO with a way to contact a coach if needed. It is a very simple matter to monitor that frequency and not any usage during the race. It is dead simple to know if the radio was used during racing.

While I think the accusation is ludicrous, we are technically a heck of a long way past knowing a frequency being sufficient to monitor radio transmissions. Once you start using spread-spectrum techniques with a frequency-hopping schedule synchronized between the transmitter and receiver but unknown to 3rd parties, it's basically impossible to monitor or even detect. Especially if it's one-way to the boat, so the equipment on the boat never transmits. And then add encryption onto that.

I can assure you, as can your own guys at Waihopai, that what you claim is utter and complete bullshit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Most events that allow communication also require that the teams or coaches report the frequencies they will use. The RC needs to know about any conflicts and it provides the RO with a way to contact a coach if needed. It is a very simple matter to monitor that frequency and not any usage during the race. It is dead simple to know if the radio was used during racing.

 

While I think the accusation is ludicrous, we are technically a heck of a long way past knowing a frequency being sufficient to monitor radio transmissions. Once you start using spread-spectrum techniques with a frequency-hopping schedule synchronized between the transmitter and receiver but unknown to 3rd parties, it's basically impossible to monitor or even detect. Especially if it's one-way to the boat, so the equipment on the boat never transmits. And then add encryption onto that.

Any such equipment found during the regatta would be a DSQ. Part of the requirement to report/register all comms with the RC is so the RC can monitor usage. If there was a suspicion and the RC found equipment as you describe your sailors just lost some races with DSQs.

 

Just to avoid the possibility of what you describe I would hope that the equipment on the boats is monitored on a daily basis. The system in question seems to be available to both teams if I read IM's statement correctly.

 

Actually Randy, I have to disagree with you.

Any team (including ETNZ) engaging in this sort of activity should not lose some races but rather be DSQ'ed from the whole damned event.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Most events that allow communication also require that the teams or coaches report the frequencies they will use. The RC needs to know about any conflicts and it provides the RO with a way to contact a coach if needed. It is a very simple matter to monitor that frequency and not any usage during the race. It is dead simple to know if the radio was used during racing.

 

While I think the accusation is ludicrous, we are technically a heck of a long way past knowing a frequency being sufficient to monitor radio transmissions. Once you start using spread-spectrum techniques with a frequency-hopping schedule synchronized between the transmitter and receiver but unknown to 3rd parties, it's basically impossible to monitor or even detect. Especially if it's one-way to the boat, so the equipment on the boat never transmits. And then add encryption onto that.

Any such equipment found during the regatta would be a DSQ. Part of the requirement to report/register all comms with the RC is so the RC can monitor usage. If there was a suspicion and the RC found equipment as you describe your sailors just lost some races with DSQs.

 

Just to avoid the possibility of what you describe I would hope that the equipment on the boats is monitored on a daily basis. The system in question seems to be available to both teams if I read IM's statement correctly.

 

Actually Randy, I have to disagree with you.

Any team (including ETNZ) engaging in this sort of activity should not lose some races but rather be DSQ'ed from the whole damned event.

Absolutely agree. which is why I doubt anyone would be stupid enough to try it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No protest, end of the story, let's move on.

How can we move on until a SF media publication makes that official ?

 

Until then it is game on with the lingering doubts that cloud this stormy contest on San Frans waters.

Gotta sell those papers somehow and a news cycle is at least 24 hours... or until the next race and resultant press releases from those jokers at GGYC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe somebody heard something during a race, and TE asked the ETNZ guy about it. If it were me I would also note it to the RD and let them see if there is anything to it, which sounds like the case here.

 

IM found nothing and the matter is over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

From the same pool of filth that Dennis Connor is from so no surprise.

 

There are some humans who walk amongst us who are mere dog turds.

And you would be one of them.

 

Have you ever put yourself on the line for your country - team - or beliefs and then been in a situation where you had to make a big call, or defend your position.

 

Wankers like you, make piss poor statements about people without knowing the full story or ever being in a situation that is difficult.

 

The biggest decisions wankers like you make is weather to get out of bed.

 

 

Dennis Conner has forgotten more than you will ever know about decision making and big calls and He has put team and country ahead of his own image on many occasion. And ...

 

He never left his country and slutted around the world like some.

 

Don,t bag DC when you are a mere pimple on the arsehole of life North Korea!...

 

 

Unless you can back it up and give examples of your life and experiences where you had to make a big call....other than wiping your own arse.... which you probably failed at. Then don't comment on people you don't know and situations you don't understand.

 

 

Hey tosspot, its wether not weather.

Perhaps you should get an edumacation instead of trolling forums noobzilla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe somebody heard something during a race, and TE asked the ETNZ guy about it. If it were me I would also note it to the RD and let them see if there is anything to it, which sounds like the case here.

 

IM found nothing and the matter is over.

If TE knew that why would he mention the radio to the press at all? Why would he say anything to the press until he had an answer out of IM? Smacks of low class cheap shot to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Kim Sung Il, learn how to spell in English before you start correcting people. Whether.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Maybe somebody heard something during a race, and TE asked the ETNZ guy about it. If it were me I would also note it to the RD and let them see if there is anything to it, which sounds like the case here.

 

IM found nothing and the matter is over.

If TE knew that why would he mention the radio to the press at all? Why would he say anything to the press until he had an answer out of IM? Smacks of low class cheap shot to me.

yup - exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Maybe somebody heard something during a race, and TE asked the ETNZ guy about it. If it were me I would also note it to the RD and let them see if there is anything to it, which sounds like the case here.

 

IM found nothing and the matter is over.

If TE knew that why would he mention the radio to the press at all? Why would he say anything to the press until he had an answer out of IM? Smacks of low class cheap shot to me.

 

Somebody heard about it, asked a question, and he answered it? Did he reach-out to the press?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Kim Sung Il, learn how to spell in English before you start correcting people. Whether.

Colourful debate!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Maybe somebody heard something during a race, and TE asked the ETNZ guy about it. If it were me I would also note it to the RD and let them see if there is anything to it, which sounds like the case here.

 

IM found nothing and the matter is over.

If TE knew that why would he mention the radio to the press at all? Why would he say anything to the press until he had an answer out of IM? Smacks of low class cheap shot to me.

 

Somebody heard about it, asked a question, and he answered it? Did he reach-out to the press?

Tom Ehman has a long history of being at the centre of America’s Cup intrigue. He was at the heart of the court case

Maybe letting go of AC33 tactics is a big ask ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

From the same pool of filth that Dennis Connor is from so no surprise.

 

There are some humans who walk amongst us who are mere dog turds.

And you would be one of them.

Have you ever put yourself on the line for your country - team - or beliefs and then been in a situation where you had to make a big call, or defend your position.

Wankers like you, make piss poor statements about people without knowing the full story or ever being in a situation that is difficult.

The biggest decisions wankers like you make is weather to get out of bed.

Dennis Conner has forgotten more than you will ever know about decision making and big calls and He has put team and country ahead of his own image on many occasion. And ...

He never left his country and slutted around the world like some.

Don,t bag DC when you are a mere pimple on the arsehole of life North Korea!...

Unless you can back it up and give examples of your life and experiences where you had to make a big call....other than wiping your own arse.... which you probably failed at. Then don't comment on people you don't know and situations you don't understand.

 

Hey tosspot, its wether not weather.

Perhaps you should get an edumacation instead of trolling forums noobzilla

Yip as predicted! No logical or intellectual reply. Just expletives and play the spelling card to hide any understanding of the discussion.

 

You reply reflects your intelligence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^ RHough This is new to me so I am asking questions, not sure of the background on this one.

 

I don't think that we would hear of everything that the teams may ask of IM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, Ehman. Put up...or STFU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is said without an agenda. Please explain the following in the abandoned race on Saturday (from memory):

  • RC abandons race due to wind limit just after the bottom mark
  • RC tries to call TNZ on radio - assume this is the radio the tactician has - I think it may be a handheld VHF - no answer or change on board - TV shows them oblivious to the radio calls
  • After several tries RC asks 'Kiwi Chase' (or was it 'Kiwi Support') to contact the boat
  • Very shortly afterwards Kiwis take foot off the gas and abandon the race (after crossing Oracle nicely)

Did they hear the call from the RC and decide to keep going anyway (a valid move)? Or did the support boat communicate to them via the 'crew radio'? Or did they come along side and make funny radio gestures?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is said without an agenda. Please explain the following in the abandoned race on Saturday (from memory):

  • RC abandons race due to wind limit just after the bottom mark
  • RC tries to call TNZ on radio - assume this is the radio the tactician has - I think it may be a handheld VHF - no answer or change on board - TV shows them oblivious to the radio calls
  • After several tries RC asks 'Kiwi Chase' (or was it 'Kiwi Support') to contact the boat
  • Very shortly afterwards Kiwis take foot off the gas and abandon the race (after crossing Oracle nicely)

Did they hear the call from the RC and decide to keep going anyway (a valid move)? Or did the support boat communicate to them via the 'crew radio'? Or did they come along side and make funny radio gestures?

The RC contacted both boats, and eventually got a reply from both boats. Was on the PA, at Marina Green.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is said without an agenda. Please explain the following in the abandoned race on Saturday (from memory):

  • RC abandons race due to wind limit just after the bottom mark
  • RC tries to call TNZ on radio - assume this is the radio the tactician has - I think it may be a handheld VHF - no answer or change on board - TV shows them oblivious to the radio calls
  • After several tries RC asks 'Kiwi Chase' (or was it 'Kiwi Support') to contact the boat
  • Very shortly afterwards Kiwis take foot off the gas and abandon the race (after crossing Oracle nicely)

Did they hear the call from the RC and decide to keep going anyway (a valid move)? Or did the support boat communicate to them via the 'crew radio'? Or did they come along side and make funny radio gestures?

The RC contacted both boats, and eventually got a reply from both boats. Was on the PA, at Marina Green.

That is not the way it looked on youtube. Have a look at the video

 

Emirites chase says "I will speak to them on the comms now"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When ETNZ dug their bows in and lost guys overboard they were radioing to see if they were ok. I believe it was IM and other officials that replied not the ETNZ support folk. Radios were not on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has been my experience that many boats that don't expect external contact don't have their radios on. It looks to me that TNZ had their internal comm channel active and not the RC channel. In fact it is likely that they never changed from their team working channel from before the race.

 

When the RC contacts the TNZ support boat the logical thing to try is to call the boat on the last active channel. Failing that you drive up and do a derka derka mohammed jihad to get the boats attention and get them to switch channel to talk to the RC

 

I don't see anything out of line here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(TE)"said that the New Zealanders had a system of radio communication between the support boat and the New Zealand tactician Ray Davies which the Oracle team does not have."

 

I wonder how OR knows this? Seems like something that would be closely held by ETNZ.

 

IMO it's understandable that the Oracle team has no comms system between the ETNZ support boat and Ray Davies. WTF is the issue? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is said without an agenda. Please explain the following in the abandoned race on Saturday (from memory):

  • RC abandons race due to wind limit just after the bottom mark
  • RC tries to call TNZ on radio - assume this is the radio the tactician has - I think it may be a handheld VHF - no answer or change on board - TV shows them oblivious to the radio calls
  • After several tries RC asks 'Kiwi Chase' (or was it 'Kiwi Support') to contact the boat
  • Very shortly afterwards Kiwis take foot off the gas and abandon the race (after crossing Oracle nicely)

Did they hear the call from the RC and decide to keep going anyway (a valid move)? Or did the support boat communicate to them via the 'crew radio'? Or did they come along side and make funny radio gestures?

ETNZ Chase1 is on receive only. In the near-pp when ETNZ lost 2 men men overboard, they had to call Harold Bennet to route message to Chase1.

 

The only relevant issue here is there is one team proven to have cheated, and it's not ETNZ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is said without an agenda. Please explain the following in the abandoned race on Saturday (from memory):

  • RC abandons race due to wind limit just after the bottom mark
  • RC tries to call TNZ on radio - assume this is the radio the tactician has - I think it may be a handheld VHF - no answer or change on board - TV shows them oblivious to the radio calls
  • After several tries RC asks 'Kiwi Chase' (or was it 'Kiwi Support') to contact the boat
  • Very shortly afterwards Kiwis take foot off the gas and abandon the race (after crossing Oracle nicely)

Did they hear the call from the RC and decide to keep going anyway (a valid move)? Or did the support boat communicate to them via the 'crew radio'? Or did they come along side and make funny radio gestures?

:D:D love how people can see a situation, obfuscate the reality to suit the version of the story they're trying to tell.

 

ETNZ and Or were sailing at 30 knots, or close to it. Have you heard how loud it is on deck on those boats when they're going that fast? The guys on board could barely hear anything as was demonstrated perfectly just the other day when Ben Ainslie was interviewed while the boat was foiling after a race. He was concentrating on the interview and could barely even hear what was being asked. Now, imagine how easy it would be to miss an initial hail when you're talking to the crew and grinding.

 

Regardless, the video shows ETNZ being hailed and the long wait for an acknowledgement... by your logic Oracle did the same since we don't hear their correspondence either. The boats eventually both abandon the race within a very short time-span difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is said without an agenda. Please explain the following in the abandoned race on Saturday (from memory):

  • RC abandons race due to wind limit just after the bottom mark
  • RC tries to call TNZ on radio - assume this is the radio the tactician has - I think it may be a handheld VHF - no answer or change on board - TV shows them oblivious to the radio calls
  • After several tries RC asks 'Kiwi Chase' (or was it 'Kiwi Support') to contact the boat
  • Very shortly afterwards Kiwis take foot off the gas and abandon the race (after crossing Oracle nicely)

Did they hear the call from the RC and decide to keep going anyway (a valid move)? Or did the support boat communicate to them via the 'crew radio'? Or did they come along side and make funny radio gestures?

ETNZ Chase1 is on receive only. In the near-pp when ETNZ lost 2 men men overboard, they had to call Harold Bennet to route message to Chase1.

 

The only relevant issue here is there is one team proven to have cheated, and it's not ETNZ.

A ha! So you admit TNZ is cheating, it's just not proved yet!

 

:ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is said without an agenda. Please explain the following in the abandoned race on Saturday (from memory):

  • RC abandons race due to wind limit just after the bottom mark
  • RC tries to call TNZ on radio - assume this is the radio the tactician has - I think it may be a handheld VHF - no answer or change on board - TV shows them oblivious to the radio calls
  • After several tries RC asks 'Kiwi Chase' (or was it 'Kiwi Support') to contact the boat
  • Very shortly afterwards Kiwis take foot off the gas and abandon the race (after crossing Oracle nicely)

Did they hear the call from the RC and decide to keep going anyway (a valid move)? Or did the support boat communicate to them via the 'crew radio'? Or did they come along side and make funny radio gestures?

:D:D love how people can see a situation, obfuscate the reality to suit the version of the story they're trying to tell.

 

ETNZ and Or were sailing at 30 knots, or close to it. Have you heard how loud it is on deck on those boats when they're going that fast? The guys on board could barely hear anything as was demonstrated perfectly just the other day when Ben Ainslie was interviewed while the boat was foiling after a race. He was concentrating on the interview and could barely even hear what was being asked. Now, imagine how easy it would be to miss an initial hail when you're talking to the crew and grinding.

Ummm Bob, think you misundertood the post. Can you please go and have a look at the youtube footage (

). It pretty clearly shows the support boat telling the RC that they will call the ETNZ on the internal comms. That is all I am basing these posts on.

 

I have not read the protocol, but based on this thread (!) it appears that any communication systems between the support team and the boat needs to be switched off for the race.

 

I would suggest it is very very difficult to hear a handheld VHF in those conditions (and not sure if RD was even holding it). But quite easy to hear (I imagine) on the internal comms mounted inside their helmets.

 

I really don't care how long it took them to answer the radio call from the RC - it would be a very low priority. My point is that it was interesting that the support boat relayed a message from the RC to the boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the same article

 

“We don’t believe they have been cheating at all,” said Murray.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the same article

 

“We don’t believe they have been cheating at all,” said Murray.

So do the kiwis pay him to say that or does he get paid by all compeditors equally ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

grasping at straws, shot in the dark, downright offensive...I'm sure Dennis Conner felt the same way when NZ made a similar (exact?) claim.

 

If entirely BS, no problem, just a low road taken by a known douchebag.

 

If true, DSQ and Oracle will be one race away.

 

Oracle did immediately acknowledge that call on the water, then kept going. ENTZ did ignore the fuck out of it until their support boat talked to them doesn't really mean anything in itself nor does chatter on the boat unless they really lost their damn minds. I seriously doubt ENTZ was cheating, with the regatta lead especially.

 

No way they are using the handheld VHF this isn't a beer can race, seriously? Please tell me they aren't!

 

One can buy motorcyclist intended comms for a couple hundred bucks, that boat isn't louder than a Harley going eighty.

 

More likely in my completely uneducated opinion, ENTZ switched off comms when the race was called, prior to responding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

This is said without an agenda. Please explain the following in the abandoned race on Saturday (from memory):

  • RC abandons race due to wind limit just after the bottom mark
  • RC tries to call TNZ on radio - assume this is the radio the tactician has - I think it may be a handheld VHF - no answer or change on board - TV shows them oblivious to the radio calls
  • After several tries RC asks 'Kiwi Chase' (or was it 'Kiwi Support') to contact the boat
  • Very shortly afterwards Kiwis take foot off the gas and abandon the race (after crossing Oracle nicely)

Did they hear the call from the RC and decide to keep going anyway (a valid move)? Or did the support boat communicate to them via the 'crew radio'? Or did they come along side and make funny radio gestures?

:D:D love how people can see a situation, obfuscate the reality to suit the version of the story they're trying to tell.

 

ETNZ and Or were sailing at 30 knots, or close to it. Have you heard how loud it is on deck on those boats when they're going that fast? The guys on board could barely hear anything as was demonstrated perfectly just the other day when Ben Ainslie was interviewed while the boat was foiling after a race. He was concentrating on the interview and could barely even hear what was being asked. Now, imagine how easy it would be to miss an initial hail when you're talking to the crew and grinding.

Ummm Bob, think you misundertood the post. Can you please go and have a look at the youtube footage (

). It pretty clearly shows the support boat telling the RC that they will call the ETNZ on the internal comms. That is all I am basing these posts on.

 

I have not read the protocol, but based on this thread (!) it appears that any communication systems between the support team and the boat needs to be switched off for the race.

 

I would suggest it is very very difficult to hear a handheld VHF in those conditions (and not sure if RD was even holding it). But quite easy to hear (I imagine) on the internal comms mounted inside their helmets.

 

I really don't care how long it took them to answer the radio call from the RC - it would be a very low priority. My point is that it was interesting that the support boat relayed a message from the RC to the boat.

race was already abandoned

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ummm Bob, think you misundertood the post. Can you please go and have a look at the youtube footage (

). It pretty clearly shows the support boat telling the RC that they will call the ETNZ on the internal comms. That is all I am basing these posts on.

 

 

I have not read the protocol, but based on this thread (!) it appears that any communication systems between the support team and the boat needs to be switched off for the race.

 

I would suggest it is very very difficult to hear a handheld VHF in those conditions (and not sure if RD was even holding it). But quite easy to hear (I imagine) on the internal comms mounted inside their helmets.

 

I really don't care how long it took them to answer the radio call from the RC - it would be a very low priority. My point is that it was interesting that the support boat relayed a message from the RC to the boat.

 

Maybe you should take the time to read the Protocol, the RRSAC and check out the Safety Rules for AC34 that were adopted after the Artemis crash.

 

3.8. One Way Communications: One-way communications permitted from AC72

yacht to chase boat during all sailing and racing operations.

 

i.e the chase boat can be in 'receive mode' and not transmit.

 

If ORTUSA are complaining about TNZ having a compliant Safety System then maybe ORTUSA are not in compliance with the Safety Rules.

 

By the way the race had already been abandoned when the RC contacted the TNZ chase boat to relay the message.

 

Back in August in the LV final against LR TNZ had an issue where they lost all hydraulics and were drifting towards the Golden Gate Bridge. The AC72 tried to contact the TNZ chase boat but they did not respond and TNZ relayed a message via the RC to the chase boat and shore crew climbed on the boat and replaced the battery. TNZ were DSQed and the RC filed a procedural protest http://noticeboard.americascup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/JN100.pdf

 

From that protest

 

10. RG submitted in mitigation that ETNZ suffered a sudden failure of all hydraulic

systems on the approach to the windward mark. Dean Barker (skipper of the

ETNZ AC72) immediately called the ETNZ chase boat. He received no response, as the chase boat

was deliberately on ‘receive only’. He then made

an emergency call to Assistant Principal Race Officer Harold Bennett.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ummm Bob, think you misundertood the post. Can you please go and have a look at the youtube footage (

). It pretty clearly shows the support boat telling the RC that they will call the ETNZ on the internal comms. That is all I am basing these posts on.

 

 

I have not read the protocol, but based on this thread (!) it appears that any communication systems between the support team and the boat needs to be switched off for the race.

 

I would suggest it is very very difficult to hear a handheld VHF in those conditions (and not sure if RD was even holding it). But quite easy to hear (I imagine) on the internal comms mounted inside their helmets.

 

I really don't care how long it took them to answer the radio call from the RC - it would be a very low priority. My point is that it was interesting that the support boat relayed a message from the RC to the boat.

 

Maybe you should take the time to read the Protocol, the RRSAC and check out the Safety Rules for AC34 that were adopted after the Artemis crash.

 

>3.8. One Way Communications: One-way communications permitted from AC72

yacht to chase boat during all sailing and racing operations.

 

i.e the chase boat can be in 'receive mode' and not transmit.

 

If ORTUSA are complaining about TNZ having a compliant Safety System then maybe ORTUSA are not in compliance with the Safety Rules.

 

By the way the race had already been abandoned when the RC contacted the TNZ chase boat to relay the message.

 

Back in August in the LV final against LR TNZ had an issue where they lost all hydraulics and were drifting towards the Golden Gate Bridge. The AC72 tried to contact the TNZ chase boat but they did not respond and TNZ relayed a message via the RC to the chase boat and shore crew climbed on the boat and replaced the battery. TNZ were DSQed and the RC filed a procedural protest http://noticeboard.americascup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/JN100.pdf

 

From that protest

 

10. RG submitted in mitigation that ETNZ suffered a sudden failure of all hydraulic

systems on the approach to the windward mark. Dean Barker (skipper of the

ETNZ AC72) immediately called the ETNZ chase boat. He received no response, as the chase boat

was deliberately on ‘receive only’. He then made

an emergency call to Assistant Principal Race Officer Harold Bennett.

 

 

OK, got it - tha sounds like a sensible explanation. Chase boat was in receive only, then when RC could not get in touch, they enabled comms and called the boat over the internal system (seperate to the VHF that the Tactician has). No probs as RC had asked them to get in touch and race was abandoned. Thanks for explaining. I assume there is some way that the RC can tell when the chase boat go from recieve-only to transciever mode on the private comms.

 

I saw RD with a handheld ?VHF? before a prestart early on. I saw JK with a unit mounted on his shoulder when they played their postponment card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the same article

 

“We don’t believe they have been cheating at all,” said Murray.

That was an outrageous comment by Murray. Ehman did not use the word "cheating". But Murray has deliberately tried to link it to cheating - I hope ETNZ lodges a protest against Murray under Protocol 60 and get his fat corrupt arse fined by the Jury.

 

And RHough, there is only one team in AC34 penalised for cheating - you're smart enough to work it out which team it was. And probably still doing it with it's unbelievable performance improvement onvernight.

 

Must be a cultural thang...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

From the same pool of filth that Dennis Connor is from so no surprise.

 

There are some humans who walk amongst us who are mere dog turds.

On behalf of dogs, I wish to protest. I have a nice dog with not a bad bone in his body, therefore his turds are probably nice too ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe the great alphabet soup of paranoia can eavesdrop with some of their satellites to check if this is occurring.

 

Tosser Extraordinaire is going down for the third time and grasping at anything he can.

 

Will someone toss him a kingpost :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

grasping at straws, shot in the dark, downright offensive...I'm sure Dennis Conner felt the same way when NZ made a similar (exact?) claim.

 

If entirely BS, no problem, just a low road taken by a known douchebag.

 

If true, DSQ and Oracle will be one race away.

 

Oracle did immediately acknowledge that call on the water, then kept going. ENTZ did ignore the fuck out of it until their support boat talked to them doesn't really mean anything in itself nor does chatter on the boat unless they really lost their damn minds. I seriously doubt ENTZ was cheating, with the regatta lead especially.

 

No way they are using the handheld VHF this isn't a beer can race, seriously? Please tell me they aren't!

 

One can buy motorcyclist intended comms for a couple hundred bucks, that boat isn't louder than a Harley going eighty.

 

More likely in my completely uneducated opinion, ENTZ switched off comms when the race was called, prior to responding.

They aren't using handhelds they have helmet speakers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

From the same article

 

We dont believe they have been cheating at all, said Murray.

That was an outrageous comment by Murray. Ehman did not use the word "cheating". But Murray has deliberately tried to link it to cheating - I hope ETNZ lodges a protest against Murray under Protocol 60 and get his fat corrupt arse fined by the Jury.

 

And RHough, there is only one team in AC34 penalised for cheating - you're smart enough to work it out which team it was. And probably still doing it with it's unbelievable performance improvement onvernight.

 

Must be a cultural thang...

Did dalton shut down the base the other day to all but need to know people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

They aren't using handhelds they have helmet speakers.

The ACRM radios are handportables, I believe.

TBH, in this day and age ACRM should provide a comms 'black box' radio that provides everything that is needed, and remains under their control - like the F1 ECU's.

Seems daft for a number of teams to develop the same functionality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

They aren't using handhelds they have helmet speakers.

The ACRM radios are handportables, I believe.

TBH, in this day and age ACRM should provide a comms 'black box' radio that provides everything that is needed, and remains under their control - like the F1 ECU's.

Seems daft for a number of teams to develop the same functionality.

Seems as daft as Tech companies making stuff that is OS dependent and will not work with other platforms :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't it make complete sense if the Chase boats were privy to communications from their respective boats? If a crewmember sustained a serious injury, or the boat suffered a serious failure, if the chase boat and the specialists on board had an idea what's going on, they can act accordingly immediately. It wouldn't be smart if the crew knew the rig was going to fall down and the chase boat inadvertently put themselves in a position where the rig could land on them. Good communication could avoid that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

^ Nope, looks like TE's question only went to IM.

'Pics or it didn't happen' is right, there's nothing in that article to prove that RD actually is receiving off-yacht communications. Without anything, all that TE can ask is a negative, 'How do we know they aren't using the system.'

 

OR should be careful how far they push this given (based on what I've heard from multiple well-connected sources) the same could be asked about OR's foil control system.

Also ....four wings any one.....the silly bit is they are all the same!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What the hell is wrong with this guy?

Ehman has a lot to lose if Larry loses the cup, the sugar daddy he has milked for years will lose interest in the AC and GGYC, and no other team in the AC would voluntarily choose to be associated with Ehman.

 

He's desperate, just as he was with the trespassing protest, to the point that he is an embarrassment to Oracle. It's time he STFU.

You are absolutely right .... Ehman has for years been surviving on Oracle ( LE ) interest in AC. If LE loses and quits the AC, Ehman is out of a job !!!! But you would think he made enough money by now not to resort to such tactics !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

From the same article

 

“We don’t believe they have been cheating at all,” said Murray.

That was an outrageous comment by Murray. Ehman did not use the word "cheating". But Murray has deliberately tried to link it to cheating - I hope ETNZ lodges a protest against Murray under Protocol 60 and get his fat corrupt arse fined by the Jury.

 

And RHough, there is only one team in AC34 penalised for cheating - you're smart enough to work it out which team it was. And probably still doing it with it's unbelievable performance improvement onvernight.

 

Must be a cultural thang...

 

So Murray defends ETNZ from Ehman's innuendo and he should be protested?

 

Besides, OTUSA's increased performance upwind (at the cast of reaching speed) can be explained rationally by higher winds (as in race 4), more practice for tacks and ebb tide which makes the upwind leg more open.

 

Get a grip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not a radio communication. Maybe GD been signing this to JS / Oracle Chase boat a bit too often. Sign language is an official language in NZ.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

From the same article

 

“We don’t believe they have been cheating at all,” said Murray.

That was an outrageous comment by Murray. Ehman did not use the word "cheating". But Murray has deliberately tried to link it to cheating - I hope ETNZ lodges a protest against Murray under Protocol 60 and get his fat corrupt arse fined by the Jury.

 

And RHough, there is only one team in AC34 penalised for cheating - you're smart enough to work it out which team it was. And probably still doing it with it's unbelievable performance improvement onvernight.

 

Must be a cultural thang...

The way I read the article TE knew he was saying NZ was cheating without using the word. For IM to cut through the crap and say they don't believe NZ were cheating rather highlights that TE was talking trash.

 

And you know I was having you on about NZ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In NZ cheating is worse than losing. So there's no way ETNZ would risk being crucified at home for being caught. Losing? We'd be gutted, cheating we'd shake our heads in embarrassment and disown the team.

 

I can't speak for the USA but ever since the underarm incident we've seen Australia's discomfort with losing forcing them to do questionable things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the hell is wrong with this guy?

 

He suffers from whiny little biatch syndrome. He has a history of this sort of thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even more fucked up than at first glance..

 

So TE only knew about the radio use at exactly the same time we all did, I.e. When the ETNZ chase boat was specifically asked to contact NZL5 by the RD, whose own attempted communication using the 'Race radio' set up, had failed to attract any attention.

 

Couldn't have been much more public or more legit - but TE tried to make is sound like subterfuge - sad fucker!

 

No Jury Notice yet, but get ready for Case 37 folks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is pretty much last straw. There are a bunch of good folk in TO but if anyone deserves to lose the Cup and get lifetime bans it is TE, LE, RC, and GGYC.

 

If you were Larry, would you be asking for resignations about now? If I was a GGYC member I'd be demanding a recall.

 

The problem is that any action the IJ takes will be contested in court and LE has shown a willingness to spend stupid amounts of money on lawyers.

 

Go Team NZ - There is no I in just beat the fuckers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

all he is doing is galvanising NZ's resolve

 

And you don't think filing a protest over this doesn't galvanize Larry's resolve and give further reason to open his checkbook for legal defense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites