• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Seaferns

FEDERATION DISCRIMINATES AGAINST SAILORS

20 posts in this topic

some of you may have seen occasional updates from me regarding the problems being faced by sailors and the sport of sailing here in India. most of these problems stem from the fact that the national governing body for sailing - Yachting Association of India - has zero stakeholders involved in the active management. Decisions are made by Admirals and Generals who have probably never even been on the water. And the President, the Chief of Naval Staff is either too busy blowing up submarines during peace time http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-08-14/news/41410044_1_submarine-indian-navy-sindhugosh or giving the families of serving officers a taste of the real thing http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/01/indian-warship-sunk-during-day-at-sea-for-military-families/


the most recent action by the Yachting Association of India was to deny the renewal of Annual Associate Membership for myself and 3 other sailors. the reason? because our "actions in the past have been noted to be injurious to the character / interests of the Yachting Association of India."


All 4 sailors have been part of the National Squad for Match Racing over the past 3 years, and have consistently been placed first or second in the Match Race National Championships.


This refusal of membership will mean that these 4 sailors cannot compete at the upcoming Asian Games selection trials or go on to represent India at the Asian Games, where Match Race is one of the disciplines.


Does anyone know how exactly we could petition ISAF to reverse this decision? What is the proper channel? Who is the contact person? Any and all ideas appreciated at this stage.

post-8458-0-88589500-1381425537_thumb.jpg

post-8458-0-64752100-1381425590_thumb.jpg

post-8458-0-28642500-1381425827_thumb.jpg

post-8458-0-18292300-1381426121_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were these peoples palms greased with the right amount of grease? I know at least InChina a little goes a long way.. Kind of like brill cream .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Didn't someone die recently at a Indian dinghy regatta? Anyone remember that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clean - you might want to drop the letters - not sure those folks agreed to have their letters published. Maybe they did, but it's hard to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ferns; i assume you are one of the recipients of the letter? Are there any other documents from the Federation about these alleged acts that have assaulted the character of Indian Yachting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ferns; i assume you are one of the recipients of the letter? Are there any other documents from the Federation about these alleged acts that have assaulted the character of Indian Yachting?

Give them a call. The yachting association of India has got to have a call centre surely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

ferns; i assume you are one of the recipients of the letter? Are there any other documents from the Federation about these alleged acts that have assaulted the character of Indian Yachting?

Give them a call. The yachting association of India has got to have a call centre surely.

Yes the call center is in Halifax....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain to ISAF.

Yachting Association of India should not be a government run program.

It can be government funded but it should be up to the citizens that actual got Yachting to run the program.

 

Maybe this proves that India is still a 3rd World Country with Nukes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ferns; i assume you are one of the recipients of the letter? Are there any other documents from the Federation about these alleged acts that have assaulted the character of Indian Yachting?

 

just to clarify one of letters is addressed to me. the other 3 athletes have no problem whatsoever placing these letters in a public domain so i'm not breaching any confidences by sharing this information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain to ISAF.

Yachting Association of India should not be a government run program.

It can be government funded but it should be up to the citizens that actual got Yachting to run the program.

 

Maybe this proves that India is still a 3rd World Country with Nukes.

 

I have already written to Ben Barger from the ISAF Athletes Commission with a copy of Alistair Fox who is head of competitions. I'd appreciate any information on other channels within the ISAF maze which may yield quicker results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While your letters are interesting, What precipated the rejection?

 

as to what precipitated the rejection, firstly i'd like to clarify that

(A) YAI's choice of words 'application for annual associate membership' is calculated to deceive - these athletes were not applying for membership. indeed they had been admitted as members several years ago. these athletes were only paying their annual subscriptions. YAI has not accepted the payment, and has termed it as a rejection of "application for annual associate membership"

(B) the Constitution of the Yachting Association of India (YAI) provides 4 clear scenarios under which membership may be terminated (1) the member requests in writing to 'retire' his membership - the athletes concerned have not made any such request (2) the member is adjudicated bankrupt - the athletes concerned have not been adjudicated bankrupt (3) the General Body can terminate the membership of any member provided the member is given a chance to present their case - this is clearly not the case here, since YAI last held a General Body meeting in April of 2011 and there has been no General Body meeting since (4) subscription remains unpaid for more than 1 year after it becomes due - this is not the case since the subscriptions of the athletes became due on 1 January 2013 and one year had not elapsed.

 

i can hazard a guess as to why these applications were rejected:

Between 2005 and 2009 Match Racing in India became something of a phenomenon, largely due to the Match Race Association of India, its open door policy, free coaching camps, and altogether an absence of red tape and bureaucracy. the match racing fraternity went from strength to strength and very soon neighbouring countries like Bahrain, Thailand, Qatar were catching the fever. Indian teams have been regular participants at match race events on Russian, Polish and Baltic match race circuits. Skippers like Arbuzov and Hansen became friends. and in turn India became the first Asian country to host a Grade 2 event the Mumbai International Match Race - which saw participants like Olli Pekka / Jes Gram Hansen / Laurie Jury. Medals in Match Race at every Asian Sailing Championship and Asian Games where MR has featured are testimony to the proficiency teams in this format of racing. This level of autonomy worried the powers that be at the YAI. Match racing was robbing a lot of attention from the pet project of YAI which was 29er sailing. Since most MR teams and campaigns were self funded there was no way that YAI could break this momentum except refuse to sanction the grading forms for events held in India. this was the reason why the successful Mumbai International Match Race could not continue.

In 2010, YAI tried its best to sabotage the Asian Games Match Race campaign so that the teams debacle would be reason enough to bury the discipline. The team asked for established match race coaches like Hansen / Arbuzov / but the YAI appointed an unknown coach with dubious credentials - DAve Atkinson. Despite the uphill battle the MR team returned from AG 2010 with a silver medal, barely a month later the Match Race Association of India was shut down by the YAI. At this point of time several match racers in the country wrote strong letters of support for the Match Race Association of India, urging YAI not to try and fix something which was actually a Model Federation in its design and functioning. Since then these sailors who spoke up against the actions of the Federation have been marked with a target. YAI cannot run the risk of match race securing yet another asian games medal thereby further diverting lime light from its pet 29er program. YAI cannot terminate the membership of the skippers who have been accepted as Life Members of YAI. Hence they have destroyed the team by hitting out at key team members.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

While your letters are interesting, What precipated the rejection?

 

as to what precipitated the rejection, firstly i'd like to clarify that

(A) YAI's choice of words 'application for annual associate membership' is calculated to deceive - these athletes were not applying for membership. indeed they had been admitted as members several years ago. these athletes were only paying their annual subscriptions. YAI has not accepted the payment, and has termed it as a rejection of "application for annual associate membership"

( B) the Constitution of the Yachting Association of India (YAI) provides 4 clear scenarios under which membership may be terminated (1) the member requests in writing to 'retire' his membership - the athletes concerned have not made any such request (2) the member is adjudicated bankrupt - the athletes concerned have not been adjudicated bankrupt (3) the General Body can terminate the membership of any member provided the member is given a chance to present their case - this is clearly not the case here, since YAI last held a General Body meeting in April of 2011 and there has been no General Body meeting since (4) subscription remains unpaid for more than 1 year after it becomes due - this is not the case since the subscriptions of the athletes became due on 1 January 2013 and one year had not elapsed.

 

i can hazard a guess as to why these applications were rejected:

Between 2005 and 2009 Match Racing in India became something of a phenomenon, largely due to the Match Race Association of India, its open door policy, free coaching camps, and altogether an absence of red tape and bureaucracy. the match racing fraternity went from strength to strength and very soon neighbouring countries like Bahrain, Thailand, Qatar were catching the fever. Indian teams have been regular participants at match race events on Russian, Polish and Baltic match race circuits. Skippers like Arbuzov and Hansen became friends. and in turn India became the first Asian country to host a Grade 2 event the Mumbai International Match Race - which saw participants like Olli Pekka / Jes Gram Hansen / Laurie Jury. Medals in Match Race at every Asian Sailing Championship and Asian Games where MR has featured are testimony to the proficiency teams in this format of racing. This level of autonomy worried the powers that be at the YAI. Match racing was robbing a lot of attention from the pet project of YAI which was 29er sailing. Since most MR teams and campaigns were self funded there was no way that YAI could break this momentum except refuse to sanction the grading forms for events held in India. this was the reason why the successful Mumbai International Match Race could not continue.

In 2010, YAI tried its best to sabotage the Asian Games Match Race campaign so that the teams debacle would be reason enough to bury the discipline. The team asked for established match race coaches like Hansen / Arbuzov / but the YAI appointed an unknown coach with dubious credentials - DAve Atkinson. Despite the uphill battle the MR team returned from AG 2010 with a silver medal, barely a month later the Match Race Association of India was shut down by the YAI. At this point of time several match racers in the country wrote strong letters of support for the Match Race Association of India, urging YAI not to try and fix something which was actually a Model Federation in its design and functioning. Since then these sailors who spoke up against the actions of the Federation have been marked with a target. YAI cannot run the risk of match race securing yet another asian games medal thereby further diverting lime light from its pet 29er program. YAI cannot terminate the membership of the skippers who have been accepted as Life Members of YAI. Hence they have destroyed the team by hitting out at key team members.

"Absolute power corrupts, absolutely"

 

I feel for you ferns, and I agree that representations should be addressed to ISAF.

ISAF will most likely back the incumbents and take NO action.

 

That's what they do. It is what it is.

 

However, an intelligent and un-emotive appeal to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) may be another angle to attack. Even though MR is not an Olympic event, the sport of yachting IS!

 

Bucking any bureaucracy is extraordinarily difficult. A bureaucracy made up of Generals with big guns is not something I’d like to tackle.

 

But I wish you luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you establish your own match racing organization and totally side step yai?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that was the intention once the Yachting Association of India refused to sanction the Grade 2 Mumbai International Match Race

however the MNA has to sanction the grading forms and the results if they are to be counted towards the sailor's ISAF ranking

hence there is no way to circumvent the MNA

the only other avenue is to get recognized directly by ISAF as special event like WMRT and since our operations are local and mostly focused on the west coast of India, with a calendar of 4-5 grade 3 events and one grade 2 event annually, I am not sure ISAF would look favourably upon giving us recognition as a 'special event'

thanks for your interest in our cause and participating in this dialogue

Can you establish your own match racing organization and totally side step yai?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

during the best years of match racing there were 2 indian teams in the top 50

and 4 indian teams in the top 100

in addition weekend clinics would have 100 match racers (around 20 teams) out on the water over a Saturday and sunday alternately racing and umpiring

however after the de-recognition of the federation in 2010, things have gone downhill

a shortage of domestic events meant that the majority of sailors had no opportunity to enhance their ranking

also, the several aspiring umpires which this scene had generated and who were gaining experience had no logical reason to continue their pursuit of umpiring

no racing = no improvement on the part of sailors or on the part of umpires

in the last 2 years to my knowledge there have just been 2 MR events in India - one event as the Grade 3 Nationals, the other event was an ungraded event sailed

thank you for your interest in this cause and I look forward to your thoughts on any way in which we can revive the sport here.

What's the site of match racing in India now? You mention growth in 05-09.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites