• Announcements

    • UnderDawg

      A Few Simple Rules   05/22/2017

      Sailing Anarchy is a very lightly moderated site. This is by design, to afford a more free atmosphere for discussion. There are plenty of sailing forums you can go to where swearing isn't allowed, confrontation is squelched and, and you can have a moderator finger-wag at you for your attitude. SA tries to avoid that and allow for more adult behavior without moderators editing your posts and whacking knuckles with rulers. We don't have a long list of published "thou shalt nots" either, and this is by design. Too many absolute rules paints us into too many corners. So check the Terms of Service - there IS language there about certain types of behavior that is not permitted. We interpret that lightly and permit a lot of latitude, but we DO reserve the right to take action when something is too extreme to tolerate (too racist, graphic, violent, misogynistic, etc.). Yes, that is subjective, but it allows us discretion. Avoiding a laundry list of rules allows for freedom; don't abuse it. However there ARE a few basic rules that will earn you a suspension, and apparently a brief refresher is in order. 1) Allegations of pedophilia - there is no tolerance for this. So if you make allegations, jokes, innuendo or suggestions about child molestation, child pornography, abuse or inappropriate behavior with minors etc. about someone on this board you will get a time out. This is pretty much automatic; this behavior can have real world effect and is not acceptable. Obviously the subject is not banned when discussion of it is apropos, e.g. talking about an item in the news for instance. But allegations or references directed at or about another poster is verboten. 2) Outing people - providing real world identifiable information about users on the forums who prefer to remain anonymous. Yes, some of us post with our real names - not a problem to use them. However many do NOT, and if you find out someone's name keep it to yourself, first or last. This also goes for other identifying information too - employer information etc. You don't need too many pieces of data to figure out who someone really is these days. Depending on severity you might get anything from a scolding to a suspension - so don't do it. I know it can be confusing sometimes for newcomers, as SA has been around almost twenty years and there are some people that throw their real names around and their current Display Name may not match the name they have out in the public. But if in doubt, you don't want to accidentally out some one so use caution, even if it's a personal friend of yours in real life. 3) Posting While Suspended - If you've earned a timeout (these are fairly rare and hard to get), please observe the suspension. If you create a new account (a "Sock Puppet") and return to the forums to post with it before your suspension is up you WILL get more time added to your original suspension and lose your Socks. This behavior may result a permanent ban, since it shows you have zero respect for the few rules we have and the moderating team that is tasked with supporting them. Check the Terms of Service you agreed to; they apply to the individual agreeing, not the account you created, so don't try to Sea Lawyer us if you get caught. Just don't do it. Those are the three that will almost certainly get you into some trouble. IF YOU SEE SOMEONE DO ONE OF THESE THINGS, please do the following: Refrain from quoting the offending text, it makes the thread cleanup a pain in the rear Press the Report button; it is by far the best way to notify Admins as we will get e-mails. Calling out for Admins in the middle of threads, sending us PM's, etc. - there is no guarantee we will get those in a timely fashion. There are multiple Moderators in multiple time zones around the world, and anyone one of us can handle the Report and all of us will be notified about it. But if you PM one Mod directly and he's off line, the problem will get dealt with much more slowly. Other behaviors that you might want to think twice before doing include: Intentionally disrupting threads and discussions repeatedly. Off topic/content free trolling in threads to disrupt dialog Stalking users around the forums with the intent to disrupt content and discussion Repeated posting of overly graphic or scatological porn content. There are plenty web sites for you to get your freak on, don't do it here. And a brief note to Newbies... No, we will not ban people or censor them for dropping F-bombs on you, using foul language, etc. so please don't report it when one of our members gives you a greeting you may find shocking. We do our best not to censor content here and playing swearword police is not in our job descriptions. Sailing Anarchy is more like a bar than a classroom, so handle it like you would meeting someone a little coarse - don't look for the teacher. Thanks.
    • B.J. Porter

      Moderation Team Change   06/16/2017

      After fifteen years of volunteer moderation at SA, I will no longer be part of the moderation team. The decision to step aside is mine, and has been some time in the works but we did not wish to announce it in advance for a number of reasons. It's been fun, but I need my time back for other purposes now. The Underdawg admin account will not be monitored until further notice, as I will be relinquishing control of it along with my administrative privileges. Zapata will continue on as a moderator, and any concerns or issues can be directed to that account or to the Editor until further notice. Anyone interested in helping moderate the forums should reach out to Scot by sending a PM to the Editor account. Please note that I am not leaving the community, I am merely stepping aside from Admin responsibilities and privileges on the site.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Doug Lord

Gunboat G4 Foiler

1,061 posts in this topic

The first full foiler(as far as I know) from Gunboat: http://www.gunboat.com/series/gunboat-g4 You know it's a Revolution now!

Could be a good race between this and Morelli and Melvins California 45: http://forums.sailinganarchy.com/index.php?showtopic=145992&hl=california

 

Renders of Gunboat G4:

post-30-0-43495200-1399903098_thumb.jpg

post-30-0-02901000-1399903120_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't sound like they're planning on having it fly, more to just keep it from nose diving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't seem like they'd use UptiP foils for just foil assist-the uptip foils have an integral altitude control system. Theres another render on the page with "C" foils which could be ideal for foil assist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were to risk my money on a revolutionary new project like this I would first try some proof of concept prototyping, with something of a realisticly similar displacement and sailplan. Like add foils to an old Concer or even Sig 45.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Super cool! Thanks Doug. YouTube video is dated Oct 7, 2013 - what took so long to get the news here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Super cool! Thanks Doug. YouTube video is dated Oct 7, 2013 - what took so long to get the news here?

 

Thanks-did you notice the difference between the foils on the renders I posted and the foils in the video? They would not have caught my eye-"just" foil assist. But the UptiP foils-now thats a cat of a different color! Thanks to Peter Huston on the "trickle down " thread this morning.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no way in hell that thing gets out of the water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marketing types know to sell the customer what they want. Remember those mid-80 cruisers with Am Cup keel winglets?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

actually it was here when it was introduced. If you read the narrative the idea isn't foiling it's being able to push hard off wind without stuffing a bow and, you don't have to tack or gybe the boards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2. C-FOIL DAGGERBOARDS: When you achieve a 2.4 ton displacement, lifting foils make a significant contribution to performance. The C-foil daggerboards provide lift, reduce drag, and keep things safe when pressed downwind. Thanks to their symmetric shape, both foils can be left down. There is no need to raise or lower the boards when tacking or jibing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doug's right, there's a full foiling version. Pretty cool boat. Not sure how many have sold, but definitely not vapor. Tooling has been made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

full foiling even with a fully tricked-out salon and berths?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2. C-FOIL DAGGERBOARDS: When you achieve a 2.4 ton displacement, lifting foils make a significant contribution to performance. The C-foil daggerboards provide lift, reduce drag, and keep things safe when pressed downwind. Thanks to their symmetric shape, both foils can be left down. There is no need to raise or lower the boards when tacking or jibing.

 

But the renderings aren't C-foils any more but the sharp (and trendy) J-foil shape. These don't seem to make much sense if you are not trying to fly though...

 

Is it a change of plan and will they try to make it fly or is it just for looks? I don't see why it couldn't fly but it would probably take a fair bit of wind.

 

Wait and see I guess...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be the first offshore fully foiling boat unless you think of Hydroptere as an ocean going boat. Pretty surprising proposition given their current clients and products.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be the first offshore fully foiling boat unless you think of Hydroptere as an ocean going boat. Pretty surprising proposition given their current clients and products.

 

imho it won't be really an offshore boat -more like coastal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget the M&M California 45 foiler-more of a daysailer and less a cruiser than this boat. They probably wouldn't have done new renders showing the UptiP foils if they didn't intend to fully fly. The "C's" would have been fine for foil assist......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say these J foil renderings are just to excite the fantasies of potential buyers...

 

AC45s had 1.4ton displacement and needed a wing and 5 pros to fly.

 

Both Cali 45 and G4 will be pushing reality to get below twice that displacement, with soft sails and crewed by 2-3 mere mortals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say these J foil renderings are just to excite the fantasies of potential buyers...

 

AC45s had 1.4ton displacement and needed a wing and 5 pros to fly.

 

Both Cali 45 and G4 will be pushing reality to get below twice that displacement, with soft sails and crewed by 2-3 mere mortals.

 

Remember this when you're tempted to think like that:

post-30-0-04446000-1400021671_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say these J foil renderings are just to excite the fantasies of potential buyers...

 

AC45s had 1.4ton displacement and needed a wing and 5 pros to fly.

 

Both Cali 45 and G4 will be pushing reality to get below twice that displacement, with soft sails and crewed by 2-3 mere mortals.

I tend to agree. If you look at the GC 32 up tip boards they're huge. To get stable flight it looks like they need a huge lifting surface. Quadruple the displacement and simplify further for "cruise-ability" and I think you have a very difficult problem to solve. PJ is a clever guy though and he's got some clever people backing him up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be the first offshore fully foiling boat unless you think of Hydroptere as an ocean going boat. Pretty surprising proposition given their current clients and products.

 

wrong:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said fully foiling not full of foils.

In videos that haven't had the playback speed doubled it is clear that the boat is not fast even during the moments it gets all its hulls out of the water momentarily:

If the foils get so large that their induced drag approaches or exceeds the drag of the hull(s) they are lifting then what's the point of foiling?

IMHO, the renders of the G4 are already looking too big and draggy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PJ publicly derided M&M for suggesting TNZ foils on a gunboat - looks like he's come around on that idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good biz guy will give his customers what they want, of course, assuming it won't kill them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the article that was posted out front it sounds like c-foils are still going to be the main plan. They should help a great deal making cruising more comfortable and faster. The fully foiling option will be just that, an option if there is enough interest.

 

How cool would it be to go cruising around in the Carib and doing your island hops full up on foils (heck, might even make navigation easier if you can just go over the reefs rather than around them).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How cool would it be to go cruising around in the Carib and doing your island hops full up on foils (heck, might even make navigation easier if you can just go over the reefs rather than around them).

 

 

What a dumbass... they'll be jumping over the reef structures on foils and not a scratch on the Gunboat. Just ask DL. He's jumped a Gunboat on foils before and he'll tell you all about it.

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

the discussion above of (take your pick) really full foiling, area of foils, shape of foils does not, at first glance, make any mention of either TWS or boat speed. An AC45 can foil in not a lot of TWS and has speed through the water considerably better than that windspeed when it does. It can do this at a pretty wide range of angles too, because it is lighter by far than the G4 and the rig (wing) are prepped for it. I doubt the GC32 has as broad a foiling range as the AC45, but that is not the point.

 

It is going to take more TWS and more (pre-foiling) boat speed, like a fair bit more, to make the leap on the G4. That is a fact not lost on anybody involved. Nor is the reality that foiling will be a max speed TWA 110-130 scenario as opposed to all TWA. As Rudo mentioned, the first thing to do is to work on the area of transition, where we are generating 1/3 or more of the boats weight as hydrodynamic lift in place from hydrostatic displacement. We are pretty confident that within the envelope of operation it will be worth it shed all of that wetted surface by producing lift and drag at the foils. So, we are getting the boat and the foil package ready for exactly that. But we will walk before we run and fly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

How cool would it be to go cruising around in the Carib and doing your island hops full up on foils (heck, might even make navigation easier if you can just go over the reefs rather than around them).

 

 

What a dumbass... they'll be jumping over the reef structures on foils and not a scratch on the Gunboat. Just ask DL. He's jumped a Gunboat on foils before and he'll tell you all about it.

 

.

Now I'm not sure if you picked up the sarcasm I intended in that comment. Probably not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big Squid,

 

I saw Williwaw in action in person. It was very fast, especially by 1970s standards. Keiper was a pioneer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

STYACHT, thanks for the intelligent contribution to the discussion.

 

I know the polars link on the front page shows the C-Foils but the polar chart looks a little wacky. Are the max speeds off the wind really that deep? I could see max vmg being that deep, but would expect boat speeds to be higher in the +-120 range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

correction:

David Keiper was well respected and his boat foiled very well for the technology available then. The technology available now with UptiP foils is way superior to what Keiper used and is certainly capable of being used in an application like the G4.

Gunboat has a rep for quality and performance and they sure as hell wouldn't draw pretty pictures of UptiP foils just for the fun of it.

 

PS There is more to the use of foils than just speed! Foils can improve the ride and improve handling in rough conditions. And flying at any speed is just plain fun.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

who said it was just a pretty picture?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

correction:

David Keiper was well respected and his boat foiled very well for the technology available then. The technology available now with UptiP foils is way superior to what Keiper used and is certainly capable of being used in an application like the G4.

Gunboat has a rep for quality and performance and they sure as hell wouldn't draw pretty pictures of UptiP foils just for the fun of it.

 

PS There is more to the use of foils than just speed! Foils can improve the ride and improve handling in rough conditions. And flying at any speed is just plain fun.

 

 

Doug, I've gotta ask, where did the Capitol P on uptip come from...surely acute Ls is a more descriptive way of putting it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

the discussion above of (take your pick) really full foiling, area of foils, shape of foils does not, at first glance, make any mention of either TWS or boat speed. An AC45 can foil in not a lot of TWS and has speed through the water considerably better than that windspeed when it does. It can do this at a pretty wide range of angles too, because it is lighter by far than the G4 and the rig (wing) are prepped for it. I doubt the GC32 has as broad a foiling range as the AC45, but that is not the point.

 

Doug,

The GC32 will foil in lighter TWS than I have ever seen an AC45 foil and I have never seen an AC45 foiling upwind, ever, in any wind conditions... There are a number of reasons for this, mostly related to the foil design and righting moment, but also platform stiffness and a few other bits.

 

The G4 looks cool, and I think there will be some fun rides on the boat. I don't envy your job of engineering the foils for full flight!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^

I watched the Artemis AC45 fly upwind just yesterday - but rather sporadically - and not very close to the wind. So, from what I have seen, the statement that it cannot foil upwind is more or less accurate.

 

But don't know if they have attempted to optimize for upwind foiling either. Somebody said that Adam May retrofitted the foiling setup in something of a rush - and it worked first time (albeit with NO at the helm)!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

STYACHT, thanks for the intelligent contribution to the discussion.

 

I know the polars link on the front page shows the C-Foils but the polar chart looks a little wacky. Are the max speeds off the wind really that deep? I could see max vmg being that deep, but would expect boat speeds to be higher in the +-120 range.

 

Lat21, I am pretty sure the reason is the CL CD we have used as a starting point for the sails. We are dealing with JB from NS, and were kind enough to get some data on a number of downwind sail designs for boats of this type, in the form of a trendline. Not having any better data for the sails in our VPP, this was input. As we get down the track with sail design we will get more accurate data from NS, and I fully expect this to change the polars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hi all,

 

the discussion above of (take your pick) really full foiling, area of foils, shape of foils does not, at first glance, make any mention of either TWS or boat speed. An AC45 can foil in not a lot of TWS and has speed through the water considerably better than that windspeed when it does. It can do this at a pretty wide range of angles too, because it is lighter by far than the G4 and the rig (wing) are prepped for it. I doubt the GC32 has as broad a foiling range as the AC45, but that is not the point.

 

Doug,

The GC32 will foil in lighter TWS than I have ever seen an AC45 foil and I have never seen an AC45 foiling upwind, ever, in any wind conditions... There are a number of reasons for this, mostly related to the foil design and righting moment, but also platform stiffness and a few other bits.

 

The G4 looks cool, and I think there will be some fun rides on the boat. I don't envy your job of engineering the foils for full flight!

Macca,

 

I stand corrected. Thanks for that.

 

I do recall seeing the GC32 foiling in very little wind recently. Impressive to say the very least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

correction:

David Keiper was well respected and his boat foiled very well for the technology available then. The technology available now with UptiP foils is way superior to what Keiper used and is certainly capable of being used in an application like the G4.

Gunboat has a rep for quality and performance and they sure as hell wouldn't draw pretty pictures of UptiP foils just for the fun of it.

 

PS There is more to the use of foils than just speed! Foils can improve the ride and improve handling in rough conditions. And flying at any speed is just plain fun.

 

Doug, I've gotta ask, where did the Capitol P on uptip come from...surely acute Ls is a more descriptive way of putting it!
Just ignore it. He does this sort of thing where he makes up terms and then regurgitates them endlessly hoping people latch onto them. It's just a desperate attempt to be relevant. Then when he gets really antsy, he starts changing font colors and using long lines of equal signs after posts. It's a bit weird, but if you just ignore him, the threads stay mostly on track.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

 

AC45s had 1.4ton displacement and needed a wing and 5 pros to fly.

 

Both Cali 45 and G4 will be pushing reality to get below twice that displacement, with soft sails and crewed by 2-3 mere mortals.

The numbers on the GB site indicate with loo, fresh h2o etc there will only be about 1000 lbs allotted to humans and all the things a boat is full of.

Won't the owners want to share their fun a bit more generously without dogging their new toys?

Although, on second though, that could be me, one pro crew, and a half dozen supermodels... never mind. ;)

 

Also from the renderings it is amusing to note those who distinguish themselves poorly at the the heads may exit via a round aperture to commune with marine life without further embarrassment above decks.

3613.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

correction:

David Keiper was well respected and his boat foiled very well for the technology available then. The technology available now with UptiP foils is way superior to what Keiper used and is certainly capable of being used in an application like the G4.

Gunboat has a rep for quality and performance and they sure as hell wouldn't draw pretty pictures of UptiP foils just for the fun of it.

 

PS There is more to the use of foils than just speed! Foils can improve the ride and improve handling in rough conditions. And flying at any speed is just plain fun.

 

 

Doug, I've gotta ask, where did the Capitol P on uptip come from...surely acute Ls is a more descriptive way of putting it!

 

I don't know about that. Take the front page where Scott or Clean interviewed the Gunboat guys: Scott or Clean used the term "J" foils while Gunboat guys used the term "L" foils-both were referring to UptiP foils. The a,b,c's of these foils are not well understood-even though the inventor uses the term "L" foils. But with UptiP there is no doubt that I am referring to the uptip "L" foils invented by Morrelli and Melvin/Team New Zealand along with the single main foil/two rudder T foil configuration which is critical to the foils performance.

I was trying to find a way that I could talk about these foils in a way that there is no doubt what I'm talking about. When you have different people referring to the same foil as "J" or "L" it's confusing to a lot of people and the configuration is not included/understood. I'm hoping that by using "UptiP" both the foil type and the configuration on the boat will be understood.

 

Pictures-L to R- 1) "L" foil +single main and 2 rudder T foils(Tspeer pix), 2) UptiP foil, flying Phantom,(from Foilers!), 3) "J" foil from Hobie Trifoiler, Greg Ketterman:

post-30-0-33370300-1400165790_thumb.jpg

post-30-0-26750800-1400165832.jpg

post-30-0-90746400-1400165961_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Doug, I've gotta ask, where did the Capitol P on uptip come from...surely acute Ls is a more descriptive way of putting it!

 

...... I'm hoping that by using "UptiP" both the foil type and the configuration on the boat will be understood.

3352-Stop-trying-to-make-fetch-happ-D2L5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I acutally like the term. It is spot on!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking at the rendering, obviously not a lot of effort has been put into the boat design at this stage. You can not actually get into the rear bunk because it would be impossible to open the door . If there was no door you would have to climb over the head........Nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's not a head its a pizza oven

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

inventor uses the term "L" foils

therefore those nobodies muddying the waters with other names, STFU

ahem, Doug.

...go play with your models.

 

Also, that door -- no worries mate, it's just a curtain!

But point taken, some needed bulkheads etc, may be omitted from the early renderings...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...... Also from the renderings it is amusing to note those who distinguish themselves poorly at the the heads may exit via a round aperture to commune with marine life without further embarrassment above decks.

3613.jpg

whaa that comment made my day!!!

 

Thanks for sharing your thoughts in here.

Good observations on the privacy panels. We are working to omit a few bulkheads in there, and use full fabric panels with zip doors.

 

Cheers,

Rudo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My comment ties in to the AC trickle down thread:

 

Aside from beam rule limitations for the AC, I'm trying to understand where some sort of V hydrofoils wouldn't be better for the Gunboat- my concern has been the same as Tom Speer's- tip vortices.

 

Once the tip is out of the water what is the difference between the L or UptiP and a V or the like:

 

\|

 

\/

 

?

 

Twist?

 

I should post a pic of Mayfly. But a V foil rotated up is completely out of the water, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul, if you haven't already, read what Tom is quoted as saying in post 126 of the "trickle down" thread and what Dario Valenza discovered almost at the end of the same thread. A quick summary is that Tom Speer says its real draggy sailing with the UptiP tip out of the water and Dario found that sailing with both UptiP foils in the water worked downwind when leeway was low.......

If you go to Tom Speers website he compares "V" foils with T foils and ladder foils: http://www.tspeer.com/Hydrofoils/generic.pdf

 

Picture below of Doug Halsey's "Broomstick" whose two main foils are "V" foils. He's a member on boatdesign-and a good guy-you could pm him with any questions.

post-30-0-65532800-1400360691_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^

Aren't the V foils pictured above self correcting? The symmetry we see in the FP, GC, and proposed Gunboat foils are certainly looking more V - and less L.

 

Speers talks about drag from tip rupture as a no no for Americas Cup boats - but it seems to me that both the GC and FP are happy to air the foil tip. And for that matter, the AC72's did the same downwind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If by "self-correcting" you mean that they automatically maintain altitude- yes. But they do it like surface piercing foils-the faster they go the less foil in the water which is not how UptiP foils work(mostly) : UptiP foils generally work by the coupling between lift and leeway as explained by Tom Speers. However, Dario Valenza's experimental foils-both UptiP-worked sort of like "Broomsticks" foils downwind when leeway was low and both foils were down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are cantilevered foils as light and strong as foils supported on a minimum of 2 points?

 

Another approach?

 

post-906-0-78635400-1400400108_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big fan of foiling and believe it will make its way to cruising applications sooner rather than later (and Gunboat seems an ideal platform to start with) but am having a hard time believing this Gunboat "press?"

 

PJ posts here regular both to support his brand and to criticize others a time back about foils on Gunboats.

 

His silence on this topic - foils on the G4 - maybe speaks volumes. Or maybe not. But it sure is odd that the voice of the company is so quiet on this. He has never been the shy type before.

 

Speak up Peter. How real is this? What is the plan? Goals for the project? Costs and expectations?

 

Wess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how much power it would take to make it foil under power as well as under sail? And what the fuel efficiency numbers would look like. Motorsailing would be interesting also with maybe a quick boost from the motor to kick it up on the foils.

 

The one time my Solcat hooked up in a puff was surprising: Running the 15 hp Yamaha at half throttle with just the jib up, doing about 8 knots. Puff fills the jib just right and the apparent wind kicks in, unloads the Yammie enough to pop up the rpms and suddenly I'm doing 15 or so. Of course this was ~100 yards off the beach, headed in to pick up the admirable, and you really need 3 hands to steer the rudders, handle jib sheet, steer / throttle the Yammie. Not too crazy, but did get my attention, including an appreciation for motorsailing apparent wind machines, lots to learn there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the comparing this boat to the others in the Gunboat line works. This clearly has a different mission brief, and I'm interested to see what they come up with. I don't see the target for this boat being cruisers. It's nice that you can sleep overnight, but I doubt my wife would spend a single night on the boat. This is more accommodation for crew at an away regatta...

 

Depending on the price, the G4 could be a hot OD platform for the M32 crowd looking for the next level of speed.

 

Re: foiling... I think you'll see very gradual development of technique similar to AC racing where groupthink was upwind foiling was slow, but once the right technique was determined, it became the way to go. In any event, it will be fun to watch the lessons emerge, and as a group we need to celebrate ventures like this. The only boat (IMHO - no offense to any other designers out there...) that I've raced against that came close to this design spec is Merlin, the Wormwood 35, and without foils that was a FAST boat.

 

I really like that there's lots of trickle-down that the G4 team and Peter seem to be bringing from AC foiling, which is how it should be. Don't sleep on the Johnstone boys... this could be the development of an entirely new class of coastal racer (just like they did with the J24, J105 and J120)...

 

All this with only one cup of coffee...will be a good day I think. Thor - too funny on the pizza oven.

 

Best,

 

C

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

de rien, mon ami

but if only i'd had some rum to hand,

less words...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said fully foiling not full of foils.

In videos that haven't had the playback speed doubled it is clear that the boat is not fast even during the moments it gets all its hulls out of the water momentarily:

If the foils get so large that their induced drag approaches or exceeds the drag of the hull(s) they are lifting then what's the point of foiling?

IMHO, the renders of the G4 are already looking too big and draggy.

 

It was a very fast boat. His book describes many examples of that. I think its also easy to see in the frame above the reduced foil surface actually in the water.

 

In his book he also describes many situations while cruising the pacific that indicate the ladder system with its reserve lift is ideally suited for cruising. Such as plowing into a trough running with the sea, and letting the bow pop up on its own. The beauty of this system is it not only provides reserve lift, but it requires no pitch control and has no moving parts. Something that all of the AC trickle down and up tip foils require.

 

Williwaw used a ladder system on the almas (as well as the rudder) to prevent leeway in a very similar fashion to the inward pointed up tip foils that doug has been describing. The ladder system, I'm sure everyone is aware of, reduces wetted surface the faster you go making it more efficient making you faster etc. It also contributes to ride hieght through ventilation like the up tip. His boat only required a few settings of the foil AOA and he would stop and change them by hand to suit conditions. A far cry from the OR72 board control system and optimization available today.

 

The main foil however was a single foil attached at the almas and the main hull, and had brackets which reduced the area of ventilation. It was supported on both sides due to the limitation of the materials available at the time, extruded aluminum, it also rotated up to the bow. Additionally the boat was very thin ply/epoxy, and had an extremely low windage deck. However it had an extremely inefficient rig, and was still able to easily achieve beam reach fully foiling.

 

If you want to make an ocean crossing foiler it needs to be simple and automatic, carry reserve lift, and possess variable lift/drag ratio for take off vs cruise speeds. Something that Williwaw is alone in achieving. Ive always thought if someone were to try again they'd start there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Found this longer video of Williwave. About 3 min into the video you get a good look at the foils. They must have made a lot of unnecessary drag with all those vertical struts. It would be interesting to see how this ladder system would work on a cruser, if it build with modern materials.

 


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Doug-great video. Do you think the G4 will be capable of upwind foiling?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, um, I noticed that the G4 specs say draft board down is 2.14 meters/8.0 feet. But 8 feet is 2.438 meters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to www.catsailingnews.com the first G4 has been pulled. Interesting that the renders showing the UptiP foils(below) are not shown on the catsailingnews page or on the Gunboat G4 page today: http://www.gunboat.com/series/gunboat-g4

So they've apparently backed off the idea of a full flying foiler and are going with foil assist with "C" foils?

 

http://www.catsailingnews.com/

post-30-0-83346100-1417122519_thumb.jpg

post-30-0-05214200-1417122543_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Gunboat Facebook page:

 

"Plugs for Gunboat G4 daggerboards. Large lifting foils will make the G4 the first flying cruising boat."

 

These are not C foils or Uptip but some hybrid. Given the depth of the horizontal section, it's hard to imagine the leeward foil will ever get close to the surface.

 

 

10435899_10152877213044521_5223210329998

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Gunboat Facebook page:

 

"Plugs for Gunboat G4 daggerboards. Large lifting foils will make the G4 the first flying cruising boat."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Gunboat Facebook page:

 

"Plugs for Gunboat G4 daggerboards. Large lifting foils will make the G4 the first flying cruising boat."

 

These are not C foils or Uptip but some hybrid. Given the depth of the horizontal section, it's hard to imagine the leeward foil will ever get close to the surface.

Thanks for finding that picture-never occurred to me to look on facebook. Kinda weird "UptiP" foils-be great to see how they work....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to www.catsailingnews.com the first G4 has been pulled. Interesting that the renders showing the UptiP foils(below) are not shown on the catsailingnews page or on the Gunboat G4 page today: http://www.gunboat.com/series/gunboat-g4

So they've apparently backed off the idea of a full flying foiler and are going with foil assist with "C" foils?

 

http://www.catsailingnews.com/

They had to make changes because they just couldn't bring themselves to say something as stupid as uptip, let alone capitalize random letters like a little retarded child.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoken like a true Monkey..............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Spoken like a true Monkey..............

I'd rather speak like a monkey than a Doug...

 

Monkeys know where the capital letters go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a jungle around here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell you what Doug, buy yourself a Gunboat and I'll apologize profusely. Since we both know that'll never happen, get hired on for a design like a Gunboat, and I'll apologize profusely. Since that won't happen either...

Go PlaY WitH YourselF!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DroopY LooP is perpetually in the naughty corner - not just because he pisses everyone off, but also his mommy catches him touching himself in his special place.....

 

FFS DL - whatever contribution you might have is drowned out by the childish manner in which you spew your message.

 

Stop referring to this development as a "Revolution" - firstly, as seen in this post, sailing hydrofoils have been around since 1970, or even earlier.

 

44 years of developing hydrofoils on sailboats that lift out of the water is evolution - the mechanism and specific shape characterictics of the foils are still just achieving the same effect. Let it go......

 

Secondly, you insult anyone who has been involved in a real revolution - which are by nature short, violent, murderous affairs with much carnage and fallout - none of which should be lessened by your purile excitement over toy boats.

 

You also mention in your details - Justice - Tip for ya: show some respect to people and you might get some respect back.

 

I know, this is the typing eqivalent of pissing in the wind - but I live in hope that you get the message.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

douG for future reference use the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CamelCase when creating names, at least then you can point to some naming protocol as proof that you did not just pull something out of your...

 

From the Gunboat Facebook page:

 

"Plugs for Gunboat G4 daggerboards. Large lifting foils will make the G4 the first flying cruising boat."

 

These are not C foils or Uptip but some hybrid. Given the depth of the horizontal section, it's hard to imagine the leeward foil will ever get close to the surface.

Thanks for finding that picture-never occurred to me to look on facebook. Kinda weird "UptiP" foils-be great to see how they work....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow!!! sexy carbon beast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lesburn for the wikipeadia link to Camel Case

 

Best part was the quote referring to people trying to introduce such distortions with misplaced and extra capital letters:

 

However, they described the system as "too hopelessly contrary to use at present."

 

It's entirely possible that it was limP dickS ancestors pissing them off 106 years ago....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said fully foiling not full of foils.

In videos that haven't had the playback speed doubled it is clear that the boat is not fast even during the moments it gets all its hulls out of the water momentarily:

If the foils get so large that their induced drag approaches or exceeds the drag of the hull(s) they are lifting then what's the point of foiling?

IMHO, the renders of the G4 are already looking too big and draggy.

 

Those "ladder" hydrofoil's look like the ones I saw on a runabout/speedboat back in the late 1950's, or maybe early 1960's. I always enjoyed seeing it get up on its "legs" and take off screaming away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another video of Williwaw-actual speed. Proof positive that you can cruise a foiler:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

45 seconds in: "FAST" "960 NM in 6 days"

note: 960 miles / (6days x 24hrs.) = 6.7 knots average speed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Big Squid - don't go using facts to prove your point

 

Or yoU knoW whO will get his panties in a wad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not quite sure what to make of this article-is the guy implying that the G4 will fly with its auxiliary power alone??! Interesting stuff regardless:

http://swizzlesportsmedia.com/gunboat-g4-is-a-fully-foiling-tesla/

 

No, thats a bunch of greenie wanks circlejerking about the fact that the G4 will only have one electric motor it seems for when the sailing stops. Sounds like no twin screws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

douchE looP - point out the part in the article where it is suggested that it will foil under power.

 

It's scary to pry into the mind of a retard - but would be enlightening all the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

douchE looP - point out the part in the article where it is suggested that it will foil under power.

 

It's scary to pry into the mind of a retard - but would be enlightening all the same.

Man you make me laugh.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mili - anything to help the day pass better.

 

Oi! douche looP - Chop, Chop - Me and Mili (and probably many more) want to know where in the article it says that it will foil under power.

 

I'm sure your mama taught you; it's rude to keep people waiting - and we ain't waiting for you to build one of your creations (thankfully!) so go ahead and enlighten us!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

correction:

David Keiper was well respected and his boat foiled very well for the technology available then. The technology available now with UptiP foils is way superior to what Keiper used and is certainly capable of being used in an application like the G4.

Gunboat has a rep for quality and performance and they sure as hell wouldn't draw pretty pictures of UptiP foils just for the fun of it.

 

PS There is more to the use of foils than just speed! Foils can improve the ride and improve handling in rough conditions. And flying at any speed is just plain fun.

 

 

Doug, I've gotta ask, where did the Capitol P on uptip come from...surely acute Ls is a more descriptive way of putting it!

 

I don't know about that. Take the front page where Scott or Clean interviewed the Gunboat guys: Scott or Clean used the term "J" foils while Gunboat guys used the term "L" foils-both were referring to UptiP foils. The a,b,c's of these foils are not well understood-even though the inventor uses the term "L" foils. But with UptiP there is no doubt that I am referring to the uptip "L" foils invented by Morrelli and Melvin/Team New Zealand along with the single main foil/two rudder T foil configuration which is critical to the foils performance.

I was trying to find a way that I could talk about these foils in a way that there is no doubt what I'm talking about. When you have different people referring to the same foil as "J" or "L" it's confusing to a lot of people and the configuration is not included/understood. I'm hoping that by using "UptiP" both the foil type and the configuration on the boat will be understood.

 

Pictures-L to R- 1) "L" foil +single main and 2 rudder T foils(Tspeer pix), 2) UptiP foil, flying Phantom,(from Foilers!), 3) "J" foil from Hobie Trifoiler, Greg Ketterman:

 

 

A clarification on the use of UptiP foils above- Pete Melvin says this: ( http://www.cupinfo.com/en/americas-cup-pete-melvin-foils-multihulls-13146.php )

 

“At Team New Zealand, we developed a new type of foil that allows you to keep your height above the water more or less steady. No one had been able to do that before, at least not on a course-racing boat that was not going downwind. We developed that mostly on our SL33 test boats -- they came with the stock constant curvature “C” foils and with those kinds of foils, you can generate 50% boat weight lift before they get unstable. But we noticed that when we could get one boat up fully foiling for a few seconds it would really accelerate away from the other boat – and that got the wheels turning. How, with such a huge potential benefit, can we achieve stable flight downwind? So our design team came up with the “up-tip” type of boards. We refined those on the 33s and our 72 is designed to do that and fortunately it worked right of the box.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like someone's off their medsagain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

correction:

David Keiper was well respected and his boat foiled very well for the technology available then. The technology available now with UptiP foils is way superior to what Keiper used and is certainly capable of being used in an application like the G4.

Gunboat has a rep for quality and performance and they sure as hell wouldn't draw pretty pictures of UptiP foils just for the fun of it.

 

PS There is more to the use of foils than just speed! Foils can improve the ride and improve handling in rough conditions. And flying at any speed is just plain fun.

 

 

Doug, I've gotta ask, where did the Capitol P on uptip come from...surely acute Ls is a more descriptive way of putting it!

 

I don't know about that. Take the front page where Scott or Clean interviewed the Gunboat guys: Scott or Clean used the term "J" foils while Gunboat guys used the term "L" foils-both were referring to UptiP foils. The a,b,c's of these foils are not well understood-even though the inventor uses the term "L" foils. But with UptiP there is no doubt that I am referring to the uptip "L" foils invented by Morrelli and Melvin/Team New Zealand along with the single main foil/two rudder T foil configuration which is critical to the foils performance.

I was trying to find a way that I could talk about these foils in a way that there is no doubt what I'm talking about. When you have different people referring to the same foil as "J" or "L" it's confusing to a lot of people and the configuration is not included/understood. I'm hoping that by using "UptiP" both the foil type and the configuration on the boat will be understood.

 

Pictures-L to R- 1) "L" foil +single main and 2 rudder T foils(Tspeer pix), 2) UptiP foil, flying Phantom,(from Foilers!), 3) "J" foil from Hobie Trifoiler, Greg Ketterman:

 

 

A clarification on the use of UptiP foils above- Pete Melvin says this: ( http://www.cupinfo.com/en/americas-cup-pete-melvin-foils-multihulls-13146.php )

 

“At Team New Zealand, we developed a new type of foil that allows you to keep your height above the water more or less steady. No one had been able to do that before, at least not on a course-racing boat that was not going downwind. We developed that mostly on our SL33 test boats -- they came with the stock constant curvature “C” foils and with those kinds of foils, you can generate 50% boat weight lift before they get unstable. But we noticed that when we could get one boat up fully foiling for a few seconds it would really accelerate away from the other boat – and that got the wheels turning. How, with such a huge potential benefit, can we achieve stable flight downwind? So our design team came up with the “up-tip” type of boards. We refined those on the 33s and our 72 is designed to do that and fortunately it worked right of the box.”

 

So, Doug. Having kindly provided us with evidence that TNZ and Pete Melvin call them "up-tip" type of boards, can you now answer why you feel the need to change what they call it to a single, unhyphonated word with a capital letter at the front and back. Can you tell us why somebody (you) who had nothing at all to do with the foils in any way has any right to try to stylise the name differently to the original designers? It stinks of arrogance, self importance and is totally disrespectful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As usual, I disagree with you emphatically, Simon! I designed and built my own UptiP foils for my test model and they worked perfectly. Surely that entitles me to a "U" and a "P". My actual rationale for "UptiP is in the material you quoted. I know you don't read much and have damn poor reading comprehension, but, go ahead, try it again.......

post-30-0-69038500-1426374340_thumb.jpg

post-30-0-31926700-1426374430_thumb.jpg

post-30-0-93195600-1426374716_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As usual, I disagree with you emphatically, Simon! I designed and built my own UptiP foils for my test model and they worked perfectly. Surely that entitles me to a "U" and a "P". My actual rationale for "UptiP is in the material you quoted. I know you don't read much and have damn poor reading comprehension, but, go ahead, try it again.......

You provide no rational for going from "up-tip" which TNZ/Pete Melvin uses to your "UptiP". Also, because you copied somebody else's idea in a model boat doesn't mean you have the right to rename it. Finally, why on earth do you feel that there is a need to change the name. everybody is happy with "up-tip", although just about everybody in the foiling world tends towards a lettering convention such as L, J or Z.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simon, you really don't read well! I've rarely seen uptip used-most people still call them "J", "L", "L/V" and on and on. But I like UptiP , Simon and will continue to use it from now on.

You give yourself away when you say I copied someone else's UptiP foils. A cursory look would be all that an informed person would need to realize how wrong that is. Here's another view:

 

 

Fire Arrow ama foils with iFlap( intrinsic 15 degree flap near tip) :

post-30-0-52583800-1426377874_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does every god damn thread here devolve into "shut up doug"! Can we all just accept that he's a frequent contributor and he'll keep calling them UptiP, and just move on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does every god damn thread here devolve into "shut up doug"! Can we all just accept that he's a frequent contributor and he'll keep calling them UptiP, and just move on?

yes... please....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I apologize for my role in this. I will not respond to this kind of crap any more-I'm sick of it too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does every god damn thread here devolve into "shut up doug"! Can we all just accept that he's a frequent contributor and he'll keep calling them UptiP, and just move on?

 

I accept he's a frequent contributor, and you're right every thread he is involved ends in the same, you've got to admit something's wrong with the man,perhaps because he's an arrogant. You also are a frequent contributor and I never heard you getting into trouble with anyone.

 

 

Doug: I hope you stick to your words. And next time you post something try to get down from your pedestal and make it easier for us simple mortals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SimonN wrote:
So, Doug. Having kindly provided us with evidence that TNZ and Pete Melvin call them "up-tip" type of boards, can you now answer why you feel the need to change what they call it to a single, unhyphonated word with a capital letter at the front and back. Can you tell us why somebody (you) who had nothing at all to do with the foils in any way has any right to try to stylise the name differently to the original designers? It stinks of arrogance, self importance and is totally disrespectful.


Doug Lord replied:
As usual, I disagree with you emphatically, Simon! I designed and built my own UptiP foils for my test model and they worked perfectly.


This is a pure subjective opinion based upon a few still photos and all too brief and highly edited video snippets.
My own opinion is that the up-tip foil is a Morelli/Melvin creation that DL has used as inspiration for his own retrograde developments.
I use the word retrograde because in all of DL’s creations they are of lower quality in design, and finish.
They employ poor section control and enlarged chord. This might allow early lift off in lower windspeed but their increased wetted surface area alone would inhibit top end speed – the raison d’etre of hydrofoiling – so what’s the point?
In every area of full size hydrofoils we see foils becoming skinnier in section, narrower in chord and more refine in plan form. The complete opposite of DL’s versions.

The analogy that leaps out at me is that of DL’s versions being the crap Chinese Swiss Army Knife fakes that we would have all seen – just not a good homage of the original.

DL wrote - Surely that entitles me to a "U" and a "P".

And yet having developed poor chinese quality fakes of the original – I can’t help but think that when I look at the pictures of DL’s latest hydrofoiling garden ornament – a contemporary version of Williwaw’s crazily hectic ladder foils – all struts and too much drag for not enough outright speed – I like Williwaw, and in defense of what is 45 year old technology they did the best they could with the most advanced materials that they could use.
What’s DL’s excuse for making a current day model have more lifting surfaces and struts than the Red Baron had back in World War I on his wood and fabric aircraft?
Yet he still feels the arrogance and pomposity to feel he can rename these foils as he sees fit.

DL wrote - My actual rationale for "UptiP is in the material you quoted. I know you don't read much and have damn poor reading comprehension, but, go ahead, try it again.......
Then DL continues with his bearting of SimonN by questioning his Reading ability and Comprehension.

Back in Post #84 DL wrote:
“I'm not quite sure what to make of this article-is the guy implying that the G4 will fly with its auxiliary power alone.......”


http://swizzlesports...-foiling-tesla/

I have already asked twice and now make a third request.
Before questioning other people’s comprehension skills – point out the part in the article where it suggests that the G4 will foil under power.
I know that I will (probably) not get an answer – because it will highlight DL’s own lack of comprehension.
However a lack of response will be just as damming as the many people who will read this article and see that it does not make this claim and that DL is a Douchebag of triple A quality and Godzilla proportions. (Unlike the quality or scale of his boats....)
I know my requests were not made politely, either here or before – but I am only responding in the manner and tone that DL sets himself – who when it becomes as clear as day that he is mistaken (or god forbid wrong) only responds with silence or a “I will not respond to this kind of crap any more-I'm sick of it too.” As if taking the high ground will protect his own self inflated opinion of himself.

Then we go into a quiet period of little or no DL postings, for a few hours, days or weeks (take your pick) and then he will begin the whole inflammatory process again.

The problem boils down to the fact that whatever tiny proportion of DL’s postings are interesting, true or good - get drowned out by the volumes of puss he does put out; and in a manner (either over zealous, self claiming, arrogantly put or defended) that encourages his detractors to look for his mistakes and stuff ups.

DL has no-one to blame for all of this than himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

"The problem boils down to the fact that whatever tiny proportion of DL’s postings are interesting, true or good - get drowned out by the volumes of puss he does put out; and in a manner (either over zealous, self claiming, arrogantly put or defended) that encourages his detractors to look for his mistakes and stuff ups."

 

+ 1 Thats what i was trying to say

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0