Quotidian Tom

Twitterer In Chief

Recommended Posts

It never happened but if it did there's nothing wrong with it but since it never happened it doesn't matter.

Where have I heard that before?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Mrleft8 said:

If I looked like that, I'd hire someone to kill me in my sleep.

If I had a dog who looked like that, I'd shave his butt and teach him to walk backwards

- DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the Donnie probably rode the short limo to his snooty private school, is it safe to assume that he even knows what quid pro quo means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Lark said:

One MAGA coworker is a daily reality check.    Racist that dropped Netflix because it put too many non white people in her face.   Thinks Sen Clinton was a child molester.   Knows the news is all lies.   Since her husband just retired from the guard (and transferred into the defense industry for better money) she is all pro military, pro veterans, etc.    I assume that Colonel Vindman’s Purple Heart won’t count since he is a foreigner.    Or else it’s just fake news.    Worst of all, she is a millennial.    

I thought for a second we must work together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Serious meltdown this morning (or was it last night?)

Trump's never actually been in a court before has he?

:biggrin:

Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
FollowFollow @realDonaldTrump
More

It was just explained to me that for next weeks Fake Hearing (trial) in the House, as they interview Never Trumpers and others, I get NO LAWYER & NO DUE PROCESS. It is a Pelosi, Schiff, Scam against the Republican Party and me. This Witch Hunt should not be allowed to proceed!

:food:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Shortforbob said:

Serious meltdown this morning (or was it last night?)

Trump's never actually been in a court before has he?

:biggrin:

Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
FollowFollow @realDonaldTrump
More

It was just explained to me that for next weeks Fake Hearing (trial) in the House, as they interview Never Trumpers and others, I get NO LAWYER & NO DUE PROCESS. It is a Pelosi, Schiff, Scam against the Republican Party and me. This Witch Hunt should not be allowed to proceed!

:food:

Anyone they've called to testify that might have something good to say declines to show up.  Not sure what he's griping about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/3/2019 at 8:26 PM, Cal20sailor said:

Trump likes using hoes.  

WFD sir!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMFG

tweeted just now

Retweets Boltons 11 sept message

of course 9/11 is also today..or yesterday depending on where you live

 Donald J. Trump Retweeted

As we reflect this week on the horrific 9/11 attack, it’s important to remember how far we’ve come in combatting radical Islamist terrorist groups but also how much work is left. We stand strong against regimes that sponsor terror & encourage violence against the US & our allies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trevor Noah said we should view Twitter as a kind of Presidential baby monitor, keeping an eye on Trump.

"Hold on, he's up and he wants to nuke a hurricane. Gotta go!" :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Plenipotentiary Tom said:

Trevor Noah said we should view Twitter as a kind of Presidential baby monitor, keeping an eye on Trump.

"Hold on, he's up and he wants to nuke a hurricane. Gotta go!" :lol:

It's not that 

Why would he re tweet Bolton at all..Is he using 11 sept as some sort of cryptic message/threat to Bolton ...or...does he really think yesterday was the anniversary 9/11..no one is that dumb...it's weird.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Shortforbob said:

It's not that 

Why would he re tweet Bolton at all..Is he using 11 sept as some sort of cryptic message/threat to Bolton ...or...does he really think yesterday was the anniversary 9/11..no one is that dumb...it's weird.

Calm down Bob.  Most of the world displays date as day/month/year or ascending lengths of time.  However we do month/day/year for no apparent reason.  Trump was simply pointing that fact out.  The idiot gives us enough shit to make fun of, let's not make stuff up where it doesn't exist.  

I was in Mannheim years ago staying the night on my way from Paris to Frankfort for my flight home.  My car was struck in the parking lot and I filed a report at the local police station.  I'm sweating as I am looking at my watch as this young German police officer typed a form with one finger.  After about 15 minutes, he comes to the date of my birth, 10/13/xxxx.  He types it in as such and looks at it confused knowing there is not a 13th month, realizes what he's done, grabs the form, rips it out of the typewriter and rips it in two.  I let out a small scream.  Made the flight by a few 10s of minutes.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still doesn't explain why he'd retweet Bolton, about 11/9 on 9/11.

1) Bolton is now a looser

2) 11 September was two months ago

3) If he's trying to remind everyone that "he" killed Baghdadi, well..OH thats right..Mooslims..

4) It's still a weird juxtapose 

5)he really is disconnected enough to think the towers came down on 9/11, prolly saw the date on an email from somewhere "Not America" and it triggered the tweet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shortforbob said:

Still doesn't explain why he'd retweet Bolton, about 11/9 on 9/11.

1) Bolton is now a looser

2) 11 September was two months ago

3) If he's trying to remind everyone that "he" killed Baghdadi, well..OH thats right..Mooslims..

4) It's still a weird juxtapose 

5)he really is disconnected enough to think the towers came down on 9/11, prolly saw the date on an email from somewhere "Not America" and it triggered the tweet.

He also tweeted confeve.  I wouldn’t read much into this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shortforbob said:

Still doesn't explain why he'd retweet Bolton, about 11/9 on 9/11.

1) Bolton is now a looser

2) 11 September was two months ago

3) If he's trying to remind everyone that "he" killed Baghdadi, well..OH thats right..Mooslims..

4) It's still a weird juxtapose 

5)he really is disconnected enough to think the towers came down on 9/11, prolly saw the date on an email from somewhere "Not America" and it triggered the tweet.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/john-bolton-went-around-mick-mulvaney-and-released-aid-to-ukraine-before-resigning-report/

days before Trump says something about Bolton..... oh fuck it.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Amati said:

That's great, at least now Bolton and the House Committees will have something to talk about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Shortforbob said:

It's not that 

Why would he re tweet Bolton at all..Is he using 11 sept as some sort of cryptic message/threat to Bolton ...or...does he really think yesterday was the anniversary 9/11..no one is that dumb...it's weird.

All good, has the same numbers in it (or something).

 

 

 

 

 

 

And sometimes when people are under stress numbers can get mixed up, back in the 80s my front yard was burning down & I repeatedly dialed 991.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Cal20sailor said:

That's great, at least now Bolton and the House Committees will have something to talk about. 

And the OMB, and the lawyers involved, and Trump, and etc etc.  Christ this is getting boring and tawdry...... what I can’t believe is that Bolton wants to wait on going before Congress with this- even 2 months out, Bolton will be beside the point.  For a hawk, this seems prissy.  Sometimes you gotta act.  Now, God damnit, now!

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-11-09/state-department-freed-ukraine-money-before-trump-says-he-did?srnd=premium

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Delay, deflect, deny....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, animeproblem said:

All good, has the same numbers in it (or something).

 

 

 

 

 

 

And sometimes when people are under stress numbers can get mixed up, back in the 80s my front yard was burning down & I repeatedly dialed 991.

I still think 999 :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Understand completely, & it would be simpler that way, of course my country revels in being contrary to common sense!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The punchline to that little tale is that the neighbors largely had the fire under control by the time the pros showed up, after my wife ran out out of the house topless yelling FIRE! I miss those breasts quite a bit (cancer).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, animeproblem said:

^Understand completely, & it would be simpler that way, of course my country revels in being contrary to common sense!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The punchline to that little tale is that the neighbors largely had the fire under control by the time the pros showed up, after my wife ran out out of the house topless yelling FIRE! I miss those breasts quite a bit (cancer).

Actually 999 is UK emergency services number. Interesting and practical reason. it was the fastest number to call on a dial phone. the 9 being the shortest "travel" on the dial. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shortforbob said:

Actually 999 is UK emergency services number. Interesting and practical reason. it was the fastest number to call on a dial phone. the 9 being the shortest "travel" on the dial. 

?.... 9 is the second longest travel on a rotary phone. 1 is the shortest.

image.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, animeproblem said:

^Understand completely, & it would be simpler that way, of course my country revels in being contrary to common sense!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The punchline to that little tale is that the neighbors largely had the fire under control by the time the pros showed up, after my wife ran out out of the house topless yelling FIRE! I miss those breasts quite a bit (cancer).

Your wife is a true hero, what a way to save the day!

- DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Shortforbob said:

Actually 999 is UK emergency services number. Interesting and practical reason. it was the fastest number to call on a dial phone. the 9 being the shortest "travel" on the dial. 

????

It's the longest travel on a dial other than 0.

It was chosen because it was the easiest to find and dial in the dark or blinded by smoke etc. The caller didn't have to find another dial hole like with 911.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Mrleft8 said:

?.... 9 is the second longest travel on a rotary phone. 1 is the shortest.

image.png

Oooops I WAS WRONG!! :D

 

The General Post Office, which ran the telephone network, proposed a three digit number that could trigger a special signal and flashing light at the exchange. The operators could then divert their attention to these priority calls.

In order to find the new emergency number in the dark or thick smoke it was suggested an end number was used so it could be found easily by touch.

111 was rejected because it could be triggered by faulty equipment or lines rubbing together. 222 would have connected to the Abbey local telephone exchange as numbers in the early telephone network represented the first three letters (ABBey = 222, 1 was not used due to the accidental triggering). 000 could not be used as the first 0 would have dialled the operator.

999 was deemed the sensible choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See, now the USA decided on 911 because it would make a great date for terrorists to attack the USA, and even republicans wouldn't forget it....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/9/2019 at 1:07 PM, Shortforbob said:

Still doesn't explain why he'd retweet Bolton, about 11/9 on 9/11.

1) Bolton is now a looser

2) 11 September was two months ago

3) If he's trying to remind everyone that "he" killed Baghdadi, well..OH thats right..Mooslims..

4) It's still a weird juxtapose 

5)he really is disconnected enough to think the towers came down on 9/11, prolly saw the date on an email from somewhere "Not America" and it triggered the tweet.

Looking into Trump’s mind brings to mind the quote “that way madness lies”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sean said:

Extremely stable genius -

 

 

Not really agreeing with the orange one but that was a very un smart move for Schiff to improv the conversation.  It gives the Trumpsters something to sink their teeth into where there really isn't anything else.  Have no idea what he was thinking other than grandstanding it served no purpose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, bridhb said:
5 hours ago, Sean said:

Extremely stable genius -

 

 

Not really agreeing with the orange one but that was a very un smart move for Schiff to improv the conversation.  It gives the Trumpsters something to sink their teeth into where there really isn't anything else.  Have no idea what he was thinking other than grandstanding it served no purpose.

 

Yeah, that was pretty dumb.

But the Republicans seem to have a couple of main points to pound the table about

1- the hearings should NOT be private public

2- we must get testimony from Hunter Biden

3- READ THE TRANSCRIPT (as redacted by the White House)

4- nobody actually heard the phone call

5- the whistleblower who actually heard the phone call is a rabid lefty Democrat and must be "confronted" by Trump (apparently threatening to kill him isn't confrontational enough)

6- the process is unConstitutional and flawed and is just another attempt to undo the 2016 election

7- we should wait until the next election (giving Trumpublicans another year to work on supressing the vote and getting further Russian interference)

Other than the above, it's just more the same cycle of "I didn't do it, well yes I did but it's not illegal, alright it's illegal but you can't indict a sitting President so I'm really innocent" except that this is a big enough, stinky enough, deal that it's going to override pretty much any distraction they can dream up.

- DSK

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Sean said:

Extremely stable genius -

 

 

"Republicans should put up their own transcripts!"
 

That, right there, is the current problem.  They want their version of the facts to be accepted. 

Just like the "transcript" of the phone the WH labeled as not being a verbatim account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, bridhb said:

Not really agreeing with the orange one but that was a very un smart move for Schiff to improv the conversation.  It gives the Trumpsters something to sink their teeth into where there really isn't anything else.  Have no idea what he was thinking other than grandstanding it served no purpose.

Yeah, Schiff screwed the pooch on that one. Too easy for the Trumpsters to distort what was an obvious parody. But “doctored transcripts”? Repubs “should put out their own transcripts”? WTF?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sean said:

Yeah, Schiff screwed the pooch on that one. Too easy for the Trumpsters to distort what was an obvious parody. But “doctored transcripts”? Repubs “should put out their own transcripts”? WTF?

 

5 minutes ago, Sean said:

Yeah, Schiff screwed the pooch on that one. Too easy for the Trumpsters to distort what was an obvious parody. But “doctored transcripts”? Repubs “should put out their own transcripts”? WTF?

They probably meant “alternative” transcripts.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

"Republicans should put up their own transcripts!"
 

That, right there, is the current problem.  They want their version of the facts to be accepted. 

Just like the "transcript" of the phone the WH labeled as not being a verbatim account.

Alternative facts is the correct term I believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You really have to wonder if all Trumpistas are simply stupid rather than corrupt. T

“The President has until September 30th to give this aid to Ukraine. He gets it out on September 11th., 3 weeks before the deadline. So, we give our ally aid, and Joe Biden is not investigated. Remember that, they get the aid and we get nothing in return. The Democrats........want that to be an impeachable offense? Good luck with that!” @JesseBWatters

So..They're bitching because Ukraine got aid and they got no dirt on Biden in return..and this is a Defence? 

And Trump reTweets it ..seriously it's almost unfair!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Shortforbob said:

You really have to wonder if all Trumpistas are simply stupid rather than corrupt. T

“The President has until September 30th to give this aid to Ukraine. He gets it out on September 11th., 3 weeks before the deadline. So, we give our ally aid, and Joe Biden is not investigated. Remember that, they get the aid and we get nothing in return. The Democrats........want that to be an impeachable offense? Good luck with that!” @JesseBWatters

So..They're bitching because Ukraine got aid and they got no dirt on Biden in return..and this is a Defence? 

And Trump reTweets it ..seriously it's almost unfair!! 

I'm curious about this deadline. Who/what imposed a time limit "until Sep 30"? It's not his money to withhold anyway, the Constitution very specifically gives this power to Congress, from whom Trump did his damndest to keep it secret

Trump didn't release the aid until AFTER the scandal broke, and well after Ukraine was taking losses due to loss of military support.

- DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Steam Flyer said:

I'm curious about this deadline. Who/what imposed a time limit "until Sep 30"?

Might have been GFY2019 funds that had to be expended in GFY2019.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Shortforbob said:

You really have to wonder if all Trumpistas are simply stupid rather than corrupt. T

“The President has until September 30th to give this aid to Ukraine. He gets it out on September 11th., 3 weeks before the deadline. So, we give our ally aid, and Joe Biden is not investigated. Remember that, they get the aid and we get nothing in return. The Democrats........want that to be an impeachable offense? Good luck with that!” @JesseBWatters

So..They're bitching because Ukraine got aid and they got no dirt on Biden in return..and this is a Defence? 

And Trump reTweets it ..seriously it's almost unfair!! 

They've moved on from:
didn't happen

to

well, maybe it happened, but it's not illegal (no Quid!)

to
Well, maybe it's illegal, but it's a nothing berder...

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Cal20sailor said:

Might have been GFY2019 funds that had to be expended in GFY2019.  

I know what that means, but I originally read "go fuck yourself 2019 funds"

 

I've been on PA too much.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^ Yeah, but he signed it on his own stationary in Trump towers just because.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mrleft8 said:

^^^^ Yeah, but he signed it on his own stationary in Trump towers just because.....

Friend said that Tweet is fake. 

Its right there, on President Trump’s feed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mrleft8 said:

^^^^ Yeah, but he signed it on his own stationary in Trump towers just because.....

"Stationery".

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, justsomeguy! said:

"Stationery".

With an ass that size it was definitely signed on his stationary

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Shortforbob said:

You really have to wonder if all Trumpistas are simply stupid rather than corrupt. T

“The President has until September 30th to give this aid to Ukraine. He gets it out on September 11th., 3 weeks before the deadline. So, we give our ally aid, and Joe Biden is not investigated. Remember that, they get the aid and WE get nothing in return. The Democrats........want that to be an impeachable offense? Good luck with that!” @JesseBWatters

So..They're bitching because Ukraine got aid and they got no dirt on Biden in return..and this is a Defence? 

And Trump reTweets it ..seriously it's almost unfair!! 

Who is the “we” in that sentence?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Left Shift said:

Who is the “we” in that sentence?

The selfserving GOP is the we, democRATS are unworthy of inclusion.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

Boom!

mueller.jpg

It's too bad he was so reticent at the hearing. A bit of fire like this would have helped immensely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Fakenews said:

Donald wants you all to know that Nancy’s teeth are falling out.  Reminds me of the time he was slurring his words because his dentures were loose.

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-rants-against-speaker-nancy-pelosi-teeth-were-falling-out-of-her-mouth/

 

Pay wall won't let me see....  Oh well I can imagine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mrleft8 said:

Pay wall won't let me see....  Oh well I can imagine.

I see no paywall...I had to turn off Adblock, but I'm getting used to that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/24/2018 at 5:46 AM, Plenipotentiary Tom said:
On 6/10/2017 at 6:43 AM, Uncooperative Tom said:

Do we have a first amendment right to follow him on Twitter?
 

It's an interesting argument but I think they'll lose because the government didn't make his Twitter account available nor "set it aside" so it's not a "designated public forum" for this legal purpose.

Well, they won!

The President can't block people. We have a first amendment right to follow him. I haven't exercised this one. It would have been fun to try to annoy him into blocking me, I suppose, but now it's too late.

Back in 2017, this thread was about whether the President could block people on Twitter, with the Prez arguing that it's not an official line of communication or some such.

That was then.

Now we declare war via Tweet

Or declare war crimes. Whichever.
 

Quote

 

...

"These Media Posts will serve as notification to the United States Congress that should Iran strike any U.S. person or target, the United States will quickly & fully strike back, & perhaps in a disproportionate manner," Trump tweeted on Sunday evening.

Rep. Justin Amash (I–Mich.) says all that needs to be said on this one:


 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If one of the Christians who supports him would kindly explain to him the meaning of Good Friday, I wonder if he would understand how much of an idiot he is for the "Happy" wish.

gf.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

If one of the Christians who supports him would kindly explain to him the meaning of Good Friday, I wonder if he would understand how much of an idiot he is for the "Happy" wish.

gf.jpg

im not gonna  shit on him for this. he;'s a fucking imbecile... there was at least some effort to NOT be a douchebag from him.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder in September if he'll tweet "Happy 9/11 Day." Or maybe "Happy Pearl Harbor Day" in December. Fucking moron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, bhyde said:

I wonder in September if he'll tweet "Happy 9/11 Day." Or maybe "Happy Pearl Harbor Day" in December. Fucking moron.

I'm pretty sure he did a "Happy Memorial Day"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Raz'r said:

I'm pretty sure he did a "Happy Memorial Day"

Yes he did. At least he is constantly stupid.

I'll be sure to tweet "Happy Dead Trump Day" when the dipshit kicks off. Hopefully that will be before "Happy Dead Democracy Day."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, dacapo said:

im not gonna  shit on him for this. he;'s a fucking imbecile... there was at least some effort to NOT be a douchebag from him.  

Zackly.

Just think, if years and years ago, the people in his life had rewarded him when he tried to be nice, he'd be a different person today.

He'd still be an imbecile of course

- DSK

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Steam Flyer said:

Zackly.

Just think, if years and years ago, the people in his life had rewarded him when he tried to be nice, he'd be a different person today.

He'd still be an imbecile of course

- DSK

I've said it before - his father must have been a real piece of work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, bhyde said:

I wonder in September if he'll tweet "Happy 9/11 Day." Or maybe "Happy Pearl Harbor Day" in December. Fucking moron.

To tie in the religious angle, it would be interesting to see him wish "Happy Tisha B'av" to Jews or "Happy Day of Ashura" to Muslims.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m waiting for 1/20/21 for happy he’s not in office any longer day

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Looks like Fauci might be headed for the exit -

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sean said:


Looks like Fauci might be headed for the exit -

 

That's no surprise.  You are NEVER allowed to tell the emperor he has no clothes. That's traitorous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shortforbob said:

This one's pretty funny.

 
 
kUuht00m_bigger.jpg
 
I am working hard to expose the corruption and dishonesty in the Lamestream Media. That part is easy, the hard part is WHY?

He really needs a good punch in the kisser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Ishmael said:

He really needs a good punch in the kisser.

He needed that 60 years ago.

And 59 years ago

and 58...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Ishmael said:

He really needs a good punch in the kisser.

he is what he is 

say the punches for those who are too blind to see .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Sean said:


Looks like Fauci might be headed for the exit -

 

This was inevitable.  A man grounded in facts and science working for Trump.  That's oil and water.

He'll can his ass.  His base will support the decision.  Watch for it here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When one of the "Fox & Friends" cohosts finally speaks up.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EVj68g4XQAEp7my?format=jpg&name=medium

EVj694-WAAES0UX?format=jpg&name=medium

EVj6_AwWkAA38zo?format=jpg&name=medium

EVj6_pvXsAASqTn?format=jpg&name=medium

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the party affiliation of the Governor of Massachusetts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Cal20sailor said:

What's the party affiliation of the Governor of Massachusetts?

RINO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/13/2020 at 1:12 AM, Ishmael said:

He really needs a good punch in the kisser.

There's a good German phrase for that . .  

 

ein Gesicht, das geschlagen werden muss 

literally, a face that wants to be smacked  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

There's always a Tweet.  Always.

Screen Shot 2020-04-22 at 12.47.49 PM.png

How very prescient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

There's always a Tweet.  Always.

Screen Shot 2020-04-22 at 12.47.49 PM.png

Did that really come from the shitstain? Not a prank?

If so, WTF was he trying to say?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually the more I think about that tweet the fucker has given up, his ratings are in the shitter and trying to drive a rudderless ship is just too hard.

Yep its always  hard when the first thing you do is divide a nation, its really hard then to have the divided focus on saving their lives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites