Sol Rosenberg

Drip Drip Drip

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

32DA6326-48CB-4349-8C4E-2BF0F1EA36EA.jpeg

With the possible exception of Russian collusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Dog said:

With the possible exception of Russian collusion.

Poor Dog. Did that strike too close to home?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Poor Dog. Did that strike too close to home?

It's just that the Russia collusion fiction contradicts the notion that truth can be created repeating a lie even after two years and 177 pages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Dog said:

It's just that the Russia collusion fiction contradicts the notion that truth can be created repeating a lie even after two years and 177 pages.

Have you read the Mueller report yet?  Neither have I.  Until then, go ahead and keep doing what the cartoon suggests.  The Doggy Style.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Mismoyled Jiblet. said:

which was my point about the Republicans on the committee asking Schiff to resign. They say it "conclusively refutes" Schiff. If they've actually read it, or gotten more of a summary than the public - who leaked the info to them  (which should be a scandal in and of itself imo). If they haven't read it, they are just cynically bullshitting. There aren't any other options as I see it.

Which goes for everyone. It's not public. Either someone leaked the info to you or you are abusing your access. Or you are bullshitting.

I'll go with "Bullshitting" for 500 Alex.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Have you read the Mueller report yet?  Neither have I.  Until then, go ahead and keep doing what the cartoon suggests.  The Doggy Style.  

No...but I know it does not and will not find collusion no matter how many times it is alledged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dog said:

No...but I know it does not and will not find collusion no matter how many times it is alledged.

So you are doing what the cartoon shows.  Doggy Styling.  Good lemming. 

BTW, the report was never going to find criminal collusion.  It isn't a crime in this context.  But you probably knew that, which is why you use the word. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This mobius strip of logic is interesting...... For about a minute.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Checking in for a friend. Collusion indictments yet? A secret ruble account? Friend has been waiting for 177 pages!:ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

Your friend will be needing to read another 300+ pages.

And that is without attachments.  

What was Mueller's assignment again?  Oh, that's right.  He is supposed to investigate ties between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign, and report back to the AG, and if he deems it necessary and appropriate, to bring charges.  It's funny how Good Americans forget all but that last part. 

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

And that is without attachments.  

What was Mueller's assignment again?  Oh, that's right.  He is supposed to investigate ties between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign, and report back to the AG, and if he deems it necessary and appropriate, to bring charges.  It's funny how Good Americans forget all but that last part. 

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html

No way would Mueller bring charges against you know who. He punted to Congress, as I think he needed to. Let them have their Complete Exoneration for a bit longer. It will make things more entertaining when and if the whole story comes out publicly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

"Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is doubling down again on his condemnation of President Trump, claiming for the second time in a week there is evidence of collusion with the Russians".

This is a serious charge and he's just sitting on this evidence. For fucks sake, what is he waiting for.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-adam-schiff-continues-to-double-down-on-trump-collusion-calls-presidents-behavior-deeply-unpatriotic-unethical-and-corrupt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still page 177. My friend thought the charges and conviction news would be here br now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Dog said:

"Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is doubling down again on his condemnation of President Trump, claiming for the second time in a week there is evidence of collusion with the Russians".

This is a serious charge and he's just sitting on this evidence. For fucks sake, what is he waiting for.

It is and he's most likely waiting to see what they leave in the report and what they take out. I think that's a good thing to wait for, don't you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/28/2019 at 12:21 PM, Dog said:

You might think it's okay for a campaign to actually procure dirt from the Russians and for agents in our own government to use said dirt to fraudulently obtain a warrant to spy on Americans.

Why won't you admit that they had more, much more than the dossier? The intel community knew that Flynn, Manafort, Papadopolous and others were talking to Russians. They have the intercepts for god's sake.

But that doesn't fit your narrative, so you put on your blinders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that will almost guarantee Donny will shut down the Mexico border he will be desperate for a big look over here, predictable and SAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

Well that will almost guarantee Donny will shut down the Mexico border he will be desperate for a big look over here, predictable and SAD

FREE TRADE IS GREAT!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time, is a great percolater of truth.

Cue the "he meant to say, but was misinterpreted by the FAKE news media..........." excuses and deflection.

One has towonder how long before they take a page out Bills playbook......... it depends on what your definition of "is" is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

Time, is a great percolater of truth.

Cue the "he meant to say, but was misinterpreted by the FAKE news media..........." excuses and deflection.

One has towonder how long before they take a page out Bills playbook......... it depends on what your definition of "is" is

Isn't that an exit on the Jersey Pike up near the Tappanzee bridge?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Nailing Malarkey Too said:

Pird pird pird

 

Time for evening meds Jack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Nailing Malarkey Too said:

Hey, all you drips. "Who's (still) Yer President?"  Ahhhh ha ha ha ha ha ah 

And, Jack thinks this passes for "civil discourse".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Bus Driver said:

And, Jack thinks this passes for "civil discourse".

He's not the sharpest tool in the drawer.

 But he doesn't need to be, considering his competition are his "friends" who are duller than he, on most days.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Navig8tor said:

Time, is a great percolater of truth.

Cue the "he meant to say, but was misinterpreted by the FAKE news media..........." excuses and deflection.

One has towonder how long before they take a page out Bills playbook......... it depends on what your definition of "is" is

That worked.

What we have here is Bill Light....

And it was legal!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fakenews said:

The mueller report is leaking and it’s is not looking good for Trump despite’s Barr’s spin.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/mueller-report-worse-for-trump-than-barr-reported-investigators-say-nyt?ref=home

Here's some excerpts from the Times -

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

 

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

At stake in the dispute — the first evidence of tension between Mr. Barr and the special counsel’s office — is who shapes the public’s initial understanding of one of the most consequential government investigations in American history. Some members of Mr. Mueller’s team are concerned that, because Mr. Barr created the first narrative of the special counsel’s findings, Americans’ views will have hardened before the investigation’s conclusions become public.

Mr. Barr has said he will move quickly to release the nearly 400-page report but needs time to scrub out confidential information. The special counsel’s investigators had already written multiple summaries of the report, and some team members believe that Mr. Barr should have included more of their material in the four-page letter he wrote on March 24 laying out their main conclusions, according to government officials familiar with the investigation. Mr. Barr only briefly cited the special counsel’s work in his letter.

However, the special counsel’s office never asked Mr. Barr to release the summaries soon after he received the report, a person familiar with the investigation said. And the Justice Department quickly determined that the summaries contain sensitive information, like classified material, secret grand-jury testimony and information related to current federal investigations that must remain confidential, according to two government officials.

snip

Mr. Barr has come under criticism for sharing so little. But according to officials familiar with the attorney general’s thinking, he and his aides limited the details they revealed because they were worried about wading into political territory. Mr. Barr and his advisers expressed concern that if they included derogatory information about Mr. Trump while clearing him, they would face a storm of criticism like what Mr. Comey endured in the Clinton investigation.

Legal experts attacked Mr. Comey at the time for violating Justice Department practice to keep confidential any negative information about anyone uncovered during investigations. The practice exists to keep from unfairly sullying people’s reputations without giving them a chance to respond in court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Sean said:

Here's some excerpts from the Times -

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

 

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

At stake in the dispute — the first evidence of tension between Mr. Barr and the special counsel’s office — is who shapes the public’s initial understanding of one of the most consequential government investigations in American history. Some members of Mr. Mueller’s team are concerned that, because Mr. Barr created the first narrative of the special counsel’s findings, Americans’ views will have hardened before the investigation’s conclusions become public.

Mr. Barr has said he will move quickly to release the nearly 400-page report but needs time to scrub out confidential information. The special counsel’s investigators had already written multiple summaries of the report, and some team members believe that Mr. Barr should have included more of their material in the four-page letter he wrote on March 24 laying out their main conclusions, according to government officials familiar with the investigation. Mr. Barr only briefly cited the special counsel’s work in his letter.

However, the special counsel’s office never asked Mr. Barr to release the summaries soon after he received the report, a person familiar with the investigation said. And the Justice Department quickly determined that the summaries contain sensitive information, like classified material, secret grand-jury testimony and information related to current federal investigations that must remain confidential, according to two government officials.

snip

Mr. Barr has come under criticism for sharing so little. But according to officials familiar with the attorney general’s thinking, he and his aides limited the details they revealed because they were worried about wading into political territory. Mr. Barr and his advisers expressed concern that if they included derogatory information about Mr. Trump while clearing him, they would face a storm of criticism like what Mr. Comey endured in the Clinton investigation.

Legal experts attacked Mr. Comey at the time for violating Justice Department practice to keep confidential any negative information about anyone uncovered during investigations. The practice exists to keep from unfairly sullying people’s reputations without giving them a chance to respond in court.

What Bill and Hillary did flummoxed so many....

Can Trump ride their coattails to riches?  

The drama and lasting glory of gifted politicians!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nailing Malarkey Too said:

Hey, all you drips. "Who's (still) Yer President?"  Ahhhh ha ha ha ha ha ah 

No-one. Now take your meds and have a lie down, gramps, you're getting a little over excited and the sun has down. You know how that affects you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Nailing Malarkey Too said:

Hey, all you drips. "Who's (still) Yer President?"  Ahhhh ha ha ha ha ha ah 

And so was Nixon until he quit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Bent Sailor said:

It is and he's most likely waiting to see what they leave in the report and what they take out. I think that's a good thing to wait for, don't you?

No...I think it would be unpatriotic to sit for two years on evidence that demonstrates that the country is being led by a Russian stooge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Dog said:

No...I think it would be unpatriotic to sit for two years on evidence that demonstrates that the country is being led by a Russian stooge.

Even if that evidence is classified? Funny how you think it's OK for the report to redact classified info but Schiff shouldn't... almost like you're a flaming hypocrite willing to castigate a Democrat whatever he does but support a Republican who does the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Bent Sailor said:

Even if that evidence is classified? Funny how you think it's OK for the report to redact classified info but Schiff shouldn't... almost like you're a flaming hypocrite willing to castigate a Democrat whatever he does but support a Republican who does the same.

Well you don't sit on it. If you're in congress and you have evidence the president is in bed with the Russians you make a criminal referral. How fucking stupid do you have to be to believe him.?

As for redactions, I don't recall you commenting on the redactions made to the FISA warrant applications. (Not that any comment you might make would be relevant)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Dog said:

Well you don't sit on it. If you're in congress and you have evidence the president is in bed with the Russians you make a criminal referral. How fucking stupid do you have to be to believe him.?

If it's in the report, then the people he'd be making a criminal referral to are already aware of it. How fucking stupid do you have to be not to know that already? Moron.

 

5 minutes ago, Dog said:

 As for redactions, I don't recall you commenting on the redactions made to the FISA warrant applications. (Not that any comment you might make would be relevant)

Good thing we don't rely on your recollection for anything then. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Bent Sailor said:

If it's in the report, then the people he'd be making a criminal referral to are already aware of it. How fucking stupid do you have to be not to know that already? Moron.

 

Dude...Schiff's evidence does not exist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Dog said:

Dude...Schiff's evidence does not exist.

I imagine if you'd proven at all credible on the subject, your opinion would matter to me. As you haven't, it doesn't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Dog said:

Dude...Schiff's evidence does not exist.

Perhaps, or maybe Barr applied for the AG post by stating publicly that he believes in the almighty unitary executive, and that he who is Trump can do no wrong.

Barr’s “summary” of Mueller’s report, especially on the question of obstruction of justice, does not accurately reflect Mueller’s findings according to news reports. It’s a whitewash, which you are perfectly happy to swallow. As usual.

You’re getting very good at suppressing your gag reflex. Congratulations, doggyswallower! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dog said:

How fucking stupid do you have to be to believe him.?

Says Dog in here believing what Trump and Nunes say.

You've got a fucked up masochism fetish fido.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dog said:

Dude...Schiff's evidence does not exist.

He sat there in committee and read it off to the fucking faces of a bunch of gaslighting pieces of shit, who sat there ant took it like lying pieces of shit do when confronted by the truth, without a peep of their gaslighting bullshit in response.  So go watch the video of it, you gaslighting lying piece of shit.  No matter how many times you repeat your bullshit, it will not grow into the truth.  Bullshit is not a fucking plant. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

He sat there in committee and read it off to the fucking faces of a bunch of gaslighting pieces of shit, who sat there ant took it like lying pieces of shit do when confronted by the truth, without a peep of their gaslighting bullshit in response.  So go watch the video of it, you gaslighting lying piece of shit.  No matter how many times you repeat your bullshit, it will not grow into the truth.  Bullshit is not a fucking plant. 

Ha...He says on page 177 of his drip...drip...drip thread. What was this more than circumstantial evidence then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dog said:

Ha...He says on page 177 of his drip...drip...drip thread. What was this more than circumstantial evidence then?

all but ten pages of it are your efforts to gaslight us to make us think that we did not see what we saw, as Rep. Schiff so aptly put it to a different group of gaslighters. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

all but ten pages of it are your efforts to gaslight us to make us think that we did not see what we saw, as Rep. Schiff so aptly put it to a different group of gaslighters. 

What was this more than circumstantial evidence?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dog said:

What was this more than circumstantial evidence?

the things that Rep Schiff identified?  What portion of it do you claim was circumstantial evidence?  Lets focus on one thing.  Pick one thing that he identified in his discussion and debunk it.  Can you do that?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sol Rosenberg said:

the things that Rep Schiff identified?  What portion of it do you claim was circumstantial evidence?  Lets focus on one thing.  Pick one thing that he identified in his discussion and debunk it.  Can you do that?  

I didn't claim any of it was circumstantial. It was Mr. Schiff who claimed it was not. Now you are claiming that he made it public so, one more time, what is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dog said:

I didn't claim any of it was circumstantial. It was Mr. Schiff who claimed it was not. Now you are claiming that he made it public so, one more time, what is it?

I didn't think so.  Don't worry, you are in good company.  None of the gaslighters who were there to hear him in person could identify anything Rep. Schiff said that was incorrect either. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sol Rosenberg said:

I didn't think so.  Don't worry, you are in good company.  None of the gaslighters who were there to hear him in person could identify anything Rep. Schiff said that was incorrect either. 

I didn't think so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dog said:

I didn't think, so.

You forgot the comma.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some first class Doggie Styling going on in this thread. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sean said:

Some first class Doggie Styling going on in this thread. 

Good lemming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Here we go again ........

In bid to remain out of jail, Michael Cohen tells Congress he has more to add

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/04/politics/michael-cohen-letter/

Excerpt -

Washington (CNN) — President Donald Trump's former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen is offering Democrats new information in a bid to stay out of jail while he cooperates with Congress. 
Cohen's attorneys Lanny Davis and Michael Monico told lawmakers in a letter Thursday that Cohen has discovered substantial files on a hard drive that might be helpful to investigators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This has to be very troubling for Trump.  Expect a spat of Angry tweets tomorrow.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Ishmael said:

You forgot the comma.

Coma..... And it's not forgotten, just ignored.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Fakenews said:

Assange is getting expelled from the Ecuadorian embassy in the next hours if not already. What secrets will he spill?

Depends how quickly he's picked up by the US. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bent Sailor said:

Depends how quickly he's picked up by the US. 

Hopefully before the Polonium Tea Party.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/3/2019 at 7:00 PM, Sean said:

Here's some excerpts from the Times -

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

 

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

At stake in the dispute — the first evidence of tension between Mr. Barr and the special counsel’s office — is who shapes the public’s initial understanding of one of the most consequential government investigations in American history. Some members of Mr. Mueller’s team are concerned that, because Mr. Barr created the first narrative of the special counsel’s findings, Americans’ views will have hardened before the investigation’s conclusions become public.

Mr. Barr has said he will move quickly to release the nearly 400-page report but needs time to scrub out confidential information. The special counsel’s investigators had already written multiple summaries of the report, and some team members believe that Mr. Barr should have included more of their material in the four-page letter he wrote on March 24 laying out their main conclusions, according to government officials familiar with the investigation. Mr. Barr only briefly cited the special counsel’s work in his letter.

However, the special counsel’s office never asked Mr. Barr to release the summaries soon after he received the report, a person familiar with the investigation said. And the Justice Department quickly determined that the summaries contain sensitive information, like classified material, secret grand-jury testimony and information related to current federal investigations that must remain confidential, according to two government officials.

snip

Mr. Barr has come under criticism for sharing so little. But according to officials familiar with the attorney general’s thinking, he and his aides limited the details they revealed because they were worried about wading into political territory. Mr. Barr and his advisers expressed concern that if they included derogatory information about Mr. Trump while clearing him, they would face a storm of criticism like what Mr. Comey endured in the Clinton investigation.

Legal experts attacked Mr. Comey at the time for violating Justice Department practice to keep confidential any negative information about anyone uncovered during investigations. The practice exists to keep from unfairly sullying people’s reputations without giving them a chance to respond in court.

Worried about wading into political territory? From the guy who wanted to be Trump's AG and be the guy who first got the Mueller report. 

  Man, did that guy wander into the wrong kitchen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bets on how long Barr lasts before donny throws him under the bus?

He does it to all his best people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Navig8tor said:

Bets on how long Barr lasts before donny throws him under the bus?

He does it to all his best people.

Treating his life support like toilet paper is eventually going to backfire. Eventually. There seems to be a never-ending supply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

I don’t support Trump but 

HEY LOOK, something shiny!

Hey look, something inane.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Now go back to complaining about thread length. 

Amazing how many drips one administration can generate in such a short time. 

0E4A538D-38CC-437D-869B-05DD1561572C.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Dog said:

Hey look, something inane.

From you we expect no less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Ishmael said:

From you we expect no less.

And another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Sean said:

 

Here we go again ........

In bid to remain out of jail, Michael Cohen tells Congress he has more to add

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/04/politics/michael-cohen-letter/

Excerpt -

Washington (CNN) — President Donald Trump's former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen is offering Democrats new information in a bid to stay out of jail while he cooperates with Congress. 
Cohen's attorneys Lanny Davis and Michael Monico told lawmakers in a letter Thursday that Cohen has discovered substantial files on a hard drive that might be helpful to investigators.

Explain to me why he did no bargain this trove before he was convicted?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Nailing Malarkey Too said:

Explain to me why he did no bargain this trove before he was convicted?  

I’ll let Davis an Monico explain it to you. Again.

“Cohen's attorneys Lanny Davis and Michael Monico told lawmakers in a letter Thursday that Cohen has discovered substantial files on a hard drive that might be helpful to investigators.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Nailing Malarkey Too said:

Explain to me why he did no bargain this trove before he was convicted?  

Because.  Human.  Now he dumps little don under the bus.  Because he is human.  He made mistakes.  Now, he is pissing on allegedly the most powerful man in the world.  You know, Putin's puppet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Sean said:

I’ll let Davis an Monico explain it to you. Again.

“Cohen's attorneys Lanny Davis and Michael Monico told lawmakers in a letter Thursday that Cohen has discovered substantial files on a hard drive that might be helpful to investigators.”

let him do it from prison

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nailing Malarkey Too said:

What will Aprils DRIP count be?

image.png.46c771f343d60e981104647e1052efb2.png

Unfortunately for little don, the past will keep overcoming the present.  He has no future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Nailing Malarkey Too said:

What will Aprils DRIP count be? Will it continue to decline or is another disappointment brewing?

image.png.46c771f343d60e981104647e1052efb2.png

Is that a chart of Trump's lies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smell the fear. Leave the distraction game to Dog, Dum Dum. He’s way better than you are at bullshitting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Controversial Trump pick gets World Bank top job

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-47832806

David Malpass' previous job job was as Chief Economist for Bear Stearns. After Bear Stearns collapsed in 2008, he'd been unemployed, always a good sign for any future World Bank President.  Even in 2008, Bruce Bartlett gave Malpass as an example of partisan bias in economic forecasts.

https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/09/partisan-bias-and-economic-forecasts/

But in 2016, Malpass hitched his star onto Shitstain. Loyalty has its privileges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly loyalty requires no talent unfortunately the jobs they get appointed to do, do.

Universally they appear to go in and upend any and all “tried and true” frameworks and show they are making a difference to the only person that matters, Donnie.

Reducing their office to an ineffectual extension of a dysfunctional administration mired in do do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And we thought Wag the Dog was a far fetched parody of a Presidency...,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Sean said:

And we thought Wag the Dog was a far fetched parody of a Presidency...,

Far fetched only means you didn't throw the stick far enough.  Fuckers got it and brought it back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Sean said:

 

Here we go again ........

In bid to remain out of jail, Michael Cohen tells Congress he has more to add

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/04/politics/michael-cohen-letter/

Excerpt -

Washington (CNN) — President Donald Trump's former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen is offering Democrats new information in a bid to stay out of jail while he cooperates with Congress. 
Cohen's attorneys Lanny Davis and Michael Monico told lawmakers in a letter Thursday that Cohen has discovered substantial files on a hard drive that might be helpful to investigators.

Maybe he is serving up somebody or something else that would interest unAmerican types. He was RNC Finance Chair. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites