Sol Rosenberg

Drip Drip Drip

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Sean said:

Almost sounds like he’s admitting guilt. Similar to “I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected”

Applying the Dog/Lerner Standard...

Trump Confessed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, El Boracho said:

"I don’t leave. Big difference. I don’t leave. ..."

Gives me some hope. Three reasons: Trump always lies, is always wrong, and always flip-flops. So therefore he's leaving.

Just ask his ex-wives. And the porn stars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Applying the Dog/Lerner Standard...

Trump Confessed!

Saying he had nothing to do with it is a confession?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Dog said:

Saying he had nothing to do with it is a confession?

What he actually said in its entirety is of no importance. The Dog Lerner Standard is about cherry picking and moving the football under the pile after the tackle. 

He clearly confessed to Russia helping him get elected. Sauce for the goose, sauce for the Doggy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Dog said:

Saying he had nothing to do with it is a confession?

Yes

1- because Trump lies

2- because he -also- said he did

Now, have you finished reading Page 2 yet? You've had plenty of time

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

What he actually said in its entirety is of no importance. The Dog Lerner Standard is about cherry picking and moving the football under the pile after the tackle. 

He clearly confessed to Russia helping him get elected. Sauce for the goose, sauce for the Doggy. 

He did not confess to anything. If you view requires reading a denial as a confession you have some work to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Dog said:

He did not confess to anything. If you view requires reading a denial as a confession you have some work to do.

I agree that the Dog/Lerner standard was bullshit, and made fun of it at the time.  Enjoy the aroma of it, whilst I apply it to your olfactories.  

He confessed!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

I agree that the Dog/Lerner standard was bullshit, and made fun of it at the time.  Enjoy the aroma of it, whilst I apply it to your olfactories.  

He confessed!  

War is peace... Freedom is slavery... Ignorance is strength... and now, Denial is confession.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Dog said:

War is peace... Freedom is slavery... Ignorance is strength... and now, Denial is confession.

Deep breath.  Take in all the Doggy Style.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dog said:

War is peace... Freedom is slavery... Ignorance is strength... and now, Denial is confession.

Such is your legacy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Swimsailor said:

So you need a trusted Trump interpreter, like Dog, to lead you to the miracles contained within the utterances of the rambutan retard terror of twitter. Only a member of the faithful knows the truth and can tell the masses, the masses can not comprehend the demigod on their own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/11/2017 at 10:41 AM, Dog said:

I suspect the leakers are from Trump Tower. That's where the meeting took place, that's where any emails relative to the meeting would have been received.

 

In case anyone forgot the "fraud" Dog was lecturing us on for two years..... @Dog totally understands e-mail and tech.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Swimsailor said:

Focus...The statements  “I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected” and "Russia did not help me" are contradictory but they are clearly not a confession.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Dog said:

Focus...The statements  “I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected” and "Russia did not help me" are contradictory but they are clearly not a confession.

I think you need focus... he clearly confessed Russia helped him get elected...word for fucking word... then back tracked.  Again, do we believe what Trump says first or what he says later?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dog said:

Focus...The statements  “I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected” and "Russia did not help me" are contradictory but they are clearly not a confession.

Do you believe Russia helped get Trump elected?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Swimsailor said:

I think you need focus... he clearly confessed Russia helped him get elected...word for fucking word... then back tracked.  Again, do we believe what Trump says first or what he says later?

Confessed...Look it up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sean said:

Do you believe Russia helped get Trump elected?

Yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Dog said:

Confessed...Look it up

Confessed, admitted, acknowledged, recognized, verified, actualized, said...are you sure you know English?  And again, when should we believe him?  How come you don't want to answer that question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Swimsailor said:

Confessed, admitted, acknowledged, recognized, verified, actualized, said...are you sure you know English?  And again, when should we believe him?  How come you don't want to answer that question?

admitted, acknowledged, recognized, verified, actualized  what? Stop trying to bullshit us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Dog said:

admitted, acknowledged, recognized, verified, actualized  what? Stop trying to bullshit us.

It's called English.  Synonyms.  Words.  Words have meaning.  Fuck, no wonder Trump loves the uneducated.  And once more, please answer my question.  When do we take Trump at his word?  When he says something? When he corrects himself?  When he goes back on his correction?  I'd really like to know.

And just so we're clear...

con·fess
[kənˈfes]
VERB
confessed (past tense) · confessed (past participle)
  1. admit or state that one has committed a crime or is at fault in some way.
    "he confessed that he had attacked the old man" ·
    synonyms:
    admit · acknowledge · reveal · make known · disclose · divulge · make public · avow · declare · blurt out · profess · own up to · tell all about · bring into the open ·
    • admit or acknowledge something reluctantly, typically because one feels slightly ashamed or embarrassed.
      "I must confess that I was slightly surprised" ·
      synonyms:
      acknowledge · admit · concede · grant · allow · own · say · declare · affirm · accept · recognize · be aware of/that · realize · be conscious of/that
    • declare (one's religious faith).
      "150 people confessed faith in Christ"
    • declare one's sins formally to a priest.
      "I could not confess all my sins to the priest" ·
    • (of a priest) hear the confession of (someone).
      "St. Ambrose would weep bitter tears when confessing a sinner"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Swimsailor said:

It's called English.  Synonyms.  Words.  Words have meaning.  Fuck, no wonder Trump loves the uneducated.  And once more, please answer my question.  When do we take Trump at his word?  When he says something? When he corrects himself?  When he goes back on his correction?  I'd really like to know.

And just so we're clear...

con·fess
[kənˈfes]
 
VERB
confessed (past tense) · confessed (past participle)
  1. admit or state that one has committed a crime or is at fault in some way.
    "he confessed that he had attacked the old man" ·
    synonyms:
    admit · acknowledge · reveal · make known · disclose · divulge · make public · avow · declare · blurt out · profess · own up to · tell all about · bring into the open ·
    • admit or acknowledge something reluctantly, typically because one feels slightly ashamed or embarrassed.
      "I must confess that I was slightly surprised" ·
      synonyms:
      acknowledge · admit · concede · grant · allow · own · say · declare · affirm · accept · recognize · be aware of/that · realize · be conscious of/that
    • declare (one's religious faith).
      "150 people confessed faith in Christ"
    • declare one's sins formally to a priest.
      "I could not confess all my sins to the priest" ·
      And you believe saying“I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected” "Russia did not help me", is a confession? Really?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is clearly confessing the illegitimacy of his presidency due to Russia's involvement.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in the "you didn't build that" days, it was OK to ignore the sentence before and after a statement.

Nowadays, not so much.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Dog said:

nd you believe saying“I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected” "Russia did not help me", is a confession? Really?

Let's break this down...

"I had nothing to do with (denial of involvement) Russia helping me to get elected (confession or acknowledgement of Russia helping him get elected)" "Russia did not help me (backtrack of previous acknowledgement)"

It's not that hard.

And for the 4th time, which statement do we believe?  Did Russia help or didn't they?  

50 minutes ago, Mike G said:

Back in the "you didn't build that" days, it was OK to ignore the sentence before and after a statement.

Nowadays, not so much.

Back in those days we had a POTUS who actually knew English and how to speak in complete sentences.  Educated people really didn't have a hard time understanding.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

He is clearly confessing the illegitimacy of his presidency due to Russia's involvement.  

Please... it takes some serious self delusion to believe that one.

Trump confessing the illegitimacy of his presidency...Ha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mike G said:

Back in the "you didn't build that" days, it was OK to ignore the sentence before and after a statement.

Nowadays, not so much.

Really...how does Trump's "Russia did not help me" play into the notion that he was offering a confession?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Dog said:

Really...how does Trump's "Russia did not help me" play into the notion that he was offering a confession?

Well, first he said Russia did help him.  How come you won't answer which one we should believe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And before Shitstain said Russia did help him, he asked them to help him.

Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.

And then they helped him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Dog said:

Yes

That would make him an illegitimate President. Thanks for clearing that up. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Olsonist said:

And before Shitstain said Russia did help him, he asked them to help him.

Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.

And then they helped him.

You were supposed to forget that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Swimsailor said:

I think you need focus... he clearly confessed Russia helped him get elected...word for fucking word... then back tracked.  Again, do we believe what Trump says first or what he says later?

So..........  where does this fall under "drip drip..." I am still waiting for an imdictment......

Asking for a friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, warbird said:

So..........  where does this fall under "drip drip..." I am still waiting for an imdictment......

Asking for a friend.

Well, tell your friend Trump wasn't indicted because of DOJ policy.  Word is still out on impeachment.  Learn how government works then come back to class.

And I'm beginning to think even Trumpistas don't know when Trump is telling the truth.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Swimsailor said:

Well, tell your friend Trump wasn't indicted because of DOJ policy.  Word is still out on impeachment.  Learn how government works then come back to class.

And I'm beginning to think even Trumpistas don't know when Trump is telling the truth.  

Trump himself doesn't know, how is anyone else supposed to?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Swimsailor said:

Well, tell your friend Trump wasn't indicted because of DOJ policy.  Word is still out on impeachment.  Learn how government works then come back to class.

And I'm beginning to think even Trumpistas don't know when Trump is telling the truth.  

So an indictment for something or other is waiting till 2024?

Asking for a friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, warbird said:

So an indictment for something or other is waiting till 2024?

Asking for a friend.

 

Conflicted Turkey thinks Shitstains got another 6 years before he gets indicted for something or other.

Meanwhile back at the ranch:

Trump approval rating: 43.9% ( Up 0.2 from a week ago)

At least 6 Democratic presidential hopefuls would defeat President Trump in a head-to-head matchup if it were held now, according to a new Quinnipiac University national poll that surveyed 1,214 registered voters nationwide.

The bottom line: In descending order, former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Kamala Harris, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Cory Booker all polled higher in a direct one-to-one matchup with Trump.

By the numbers: The phone survey, conducted June 6–10, found...

  • Biden 53%, Trump 40%
  • Sanders 51%, Trump 42%
  • Harris 49%, Trump 41%
  • Warren 49%, Trump 42%
  • Buttigieg 47%, Trump 42%
  • Booker 47%, Trump 42%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, warbird said:

waiting till 2024?

Your boy’s got some work to do.

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail

Quinnipiac 6/11/19

Biden/Trump - 52/40

Sanders/Trump - 51/42

Warren/Trump - 49/42

Harris/Trump - 49/42

Buttigieg/Trump - 47/42

Booker/Trump - 47/42

 

 


 
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Swimsailor said:

Well, tell your friend Trump wasn't indicted because of DOJ policy.  Word is still out on impeachment.  Learn how government works then come back to class.

And I'm beginning to think even Trumpistas don't know when Trump is telling the truth.  

It's hard to see something that isn't there, or to hear a sound that wasn't.....

If Trump claims that he spoke in a forest, and a tree fell down, and no one was there to see, or hear it.... Did it happen? Or if even Jared Kushner or John Bolton, or Bill Barr were there..... Did it happen?

 

Unlikely, but.....

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, warbird said:

So an indictment for something or other is waiting till 2024?

Asking for a friend.

Your friend is an idiot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Dog said:

Really...how does Trump's "Russia did not help me" play into the notion that he was offering a confession?

Kind of the same way his declaration that he had no business deals in Russia, that he had never met Putin, etc etc, all play into the notion that he lies almost as much.... and almost as transparently...... as you do

-DSK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sol Rosenberg said:
4 hours ago, Olsonist said:

And before Shitstain said Russia did help him, he asked them to help him.

Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.

And then they helped him.

You were supposed to forget that. 

He was joking

It was just locker room talk.

All politicians lie, Obama promised me I could keep my doctor!

-DSK

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Navig8tor said:

 

Conflicted Turkey thinks Shitstains got another 6 years before he gets indicted for something or other.

Meanwhile back at the ranch:

Trump approval rating: 43.9% ( Up 0.2 from a week ago)

At least 6 Democratic presidential hopefuls would defeat President Trump in a head-to-head matchup if it were held now, according to a new Quinnipiac University national poll that surveyed 1,214 registered voters nationwide.

The bottom line: In descending order, former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Kamala Harris, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Cory Booker all polled higher in a direct one-to-one matchup with Trump.

By the numbers: The phone survey, conducted June 6–10, found...

  • Biden 53%, Trump 40%
  • Sanders 51%, Trump 42%
  • Harris 49%, Trump 41%
  • Warren 49%, Trump 42%
  • Buttigieg 47%, Trump 42%
  • Booker 47%, Trump 42%

Loser , Commmie,  Idiot,  Fauxcahontis.......

Really??????:lol::lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"I had nothing to do with Russia helping me win the election!..... You know who helped me win? ME! I did it all myself!"

 (Paraphrased for the nit pickers)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mrleft8 said:

"I had nothing to do with Russia helping me win the election!..... You know who helped me win? ME! I did it all myself!"

 (Paraphrased for the nit pickers)

Beat me to it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, warbird said:

Loser , Commmie,  Idiot,  Fauxcahontis.......

Really??????:lol::lol:

Proof,  that just like your pathetic leader you must resort to schoolyard taunts because,  you really have nothing else.

Now run along and get some talking points from Faux then,  try to remember them,  before offering a true reflection of your IQ for all to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Swimsailor said:

And I'm beginning to think even Trumpistas don't know when Trump is telling the truth.  

It’s not that they don’t know when he is telling the truth. 

It’s that they don’t care when he lies. 

Because (pick one) - 

Hillary was worse!

or 

He makes Liberal heads explode!

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Fakenews said:

Yes, we know the story. Where did he confess that his presidency was illegitimate?

It's really amazing, the TDS afflicted want so much to believe Trump is illegitimate they imagine he confessed to it.

Donald Trump confessed... yeah that happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr was perfectly positioned to advance the Russia collusion narrative. He had a rare set of relationships -- ties to opposition researchers and the FBI -- and would use his links to both in 2016 to connect federal law enforcement to those advancing Trump-Russia conspiracy theories..."

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/06/10/it_started_with_a_lie_bruce_ohrs_linchpin_role_in_russiagate.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Dog said:

Yes, we know the story. Where did he confess that his presidency was illegitimate?

It's really amazing, the TDS afflicted want so much to believe Trump is illegitimate they imagine he confessed to it.

Donald Trump confessed... yeah that happened.

He admitted Russia interfered.

Do you believe that elections in which foreign interests interfere are legitimate?

Not that I believe a do over is required.  Maybe just an increase in policies, procedures, and equipment to ensure it never happens again.

After weeks of refusing to even consider such a thing, Senator McConnell now says he will allow a briefing on election security measures to take place. 

Whether or not anything meaningful emerges from this closed door briefing remains to be seen, and Senator McConnell seems reluctant to indicate support of any such measure.

Why would anyone oppose such a thing?  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Dog said:

Yes, we know the story. Where did he confess that his presidency was illegitimate?

It's really amazing, the TDS afflicted want so much to believe Trump is illegitimate they imagine he confessed to it.

Donald Trump confessed... yeah that happened.

To be fair to Trump (and you) he probably doesn’t realize that admitting a foreign government helped you win POTUS makes you illegitimate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Fakenews said:

To be fair to Trump (and you) he probably doesn’t realize that admitting a foreign government helped you win POTUS makes you illegitimate.

Dude...That Russian meddling in our elections is a given, it does not void the result.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Dog said:

Dude...That Russian meddling in our elections is a given, it does not void the result.

Sadly It doesn’t, but it does make him illegitimate.

PS what’s with the dude bit.  I always pegged you for a 60 something loser not a twenty something loser.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Fakenews said:

Sadly It doesn’t, but it does make him illegitimate.

PS what’s with the dude bit.  I always pegged you for a 60 something loser not a twenty something loser.

If Russian meddling in our elections renders the president illegitimate then they are all illegitimate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Dog said:

If Russian meddling in our elections renders the president illegitimate then they are all illegitimate.

 

That makes no sense, whatsoever, you are nothing more than a Troll, looking to stir the grits...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, billy backstay said:

 

That makes no sense, whatsoever, you are nothing more than a Troll, looking to stir the grits...

Why does it not make sense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dog said:

Why does it not make sense?

 

Keep stirring the pot doggy style, I am done here...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Dog said:

If Russian meddling in our elections renders the president illegitimate then they are all illegitimate.

What evidence can you provide of Russian meddling in prior elections?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

Go for the “prove the negative” Doggo. It’s what Rush would do. 

 

Why waste your time and keystrokes on Dog?  He is only here to foment arguments, and stir up shit, not worth our time to respond.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, billy backstay said:

 

Why waste your time and keystrokes on Dog?  He is only here to foment arguments, and stir up shit, not worth our time to respond.

When you got an easy layup, you take it. 

Ps: I thought you were “done here”. (See what I mean?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, billy backstay said:

 

Why waste your time and keystrokes on Dog?  He is only here to foment arguments, and stir up shit, not worth our time to respond.

Every once in a while it forces Dog to take a position. That comes in handy when someone from the other party takes office and he does the Party Animal Flip Flop. 

Thats fun. Think of this as planting crops that will be harvested the next time a democRAT is in office. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

What evidence can you provide of Russian meddling in prior elections?

Just wait. He'll be back with a link to Infowars or the Daily Storm Trooper. When we laugh that off, he'll claim that "meddling" doesn't mean what we think and some Russian guy voted twice in Alabama, so technically he is right. Nothing new here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Navig8tor said:

 

Conflicted Turkey thinks Shitstains got another 6 years before he gets indicted for something or other.

Meanwhile back at the ranch:

Trump approval rating: 43.9% ( Up 0.2 from a week ago)

At least 6 Democratic presidential hopefuls would defeat President Trump in a head-to-head matchup if it were held now, according to a new Quinnipiac University national poll that surveyed 1,214 registered voters nationwide.

The bottom line: In descending order, former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Kamala Harris, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Cory Booker all polled higher in a direct one-to-one matchup with Trump.

By the numbers: The phone survey, conducted June 6–10, found...

  • Biden 53%, Trump 40%
  • Sanders 51%, Trump 42%
  • Harris 49%, Trump 41%
  • Warren 49%, Trump 42%
  • Buttigieg 47%, Trump 42%
  • Booker 47%, Trump 42%

Fake news......

 

3E8D36F7-48AE-48D3-BA9C-ACBC9DE75401.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Sol Rosenberg said:

0A7453A6-E2C2-4D84-B6B0-684628B3F840.jpeg

 

That's the University Ave bridge over I80 in Berkeley going northbound. If you keep going to the left in the picture, you end up in the Berkeley Marina, BYC, Cal Sailing, etc. FWIW, Larry Ellison got his start at Cal Sailing and Lowell North and Arvel Gentry sailed there when they were students at Berkeley. Friday night beercan racing at BYC in August is not for the faint of heart though doable by the short of coin.

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.8665104,-122.3035399,3a,60y,353.71h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKyV0QHJBMKVoFXukAYBG9Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

The guy who did that poster is known as the Freeway Blogger.

http://www.freewayblogger.com/index.htm

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Olsonist said:

 

That's the University Ave bridge over I80 in Berkeley going northbound. If you keep going to the left in the picture, you end up in the Berkeley Marina, BYC, Cal Sailing, etc. FWIW, Larry Ellison got his start at Cal Sailing and Lowell North and Arvel Gentry sailed there when they were students at Berkeley. Friday racing at BYC in August is not for the faint of heart though doable by the short of coin.

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.8665104,-122.3035399,3a,60y,353.71h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKyV0QHJBMKVoFXukAYBG9Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

The guy who did it is known as the Freeway Blogger.

http://www.freewayblogger.com/index.htm

And let's not forget to take the I580 exit just ahead and zip over to Richmond Yacht Club to enjoy some summer weather in the Richmond Riviera.The best small boat club in the Bay. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sean said:

Fake news......

 

3E8D36F7-48AE-48D3-BA9C-ACBC9DE75401.jpeg

Why would anyone believe anything out of Trump at this point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Blue Crab said:

Turd circling the bowl?

Or is the Dementia getting better oops I mean worse:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump likes to be in competition with mentally weak people. He said so himself just the other day.... Makes him look smart (he thinks).

 Of course, if he's in competition with mentally strong people, he just walks out, and files a law suit

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the chinks in the Trump "armour" are beginning to appear.

A key witness for the Special Counsel.

Do wonder if the White House Counsel is going to be present and invoke Executive Privilege at every question.

AXIOS

Former White House communications director Hope Hicks has agreed to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on June 19, the committee announced Wednesday.

Why it matters: Hicks will be the first former Trump official to appear before a Democratic committee investigating whether the president attempted to obstruct justice. However, Hicks may decline to answer certain questions if the president asserts executive privilege over events relating to her time in the White House.

  • Last week, the president instructed Hicks not to turn over documents related to her time in the administration, in defiance of a subpoena from the committee.

Details: The "transcribed interview" will "include questions related to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign and efforts by President Trump, his associates, and other Administration officials to obstruct justice and investigations into Presidential misconduct," per the statement.

  • Statement from Chairman Jerry Nadler: “It is important to hear from Ms. Hicks, who was a key witness for the Special Counsel.  Ms. Hicks understands that the Committee will be free to pose questions as it sees fit, including about her time on the Trump Campaign and her time in the White House." 
  • "Should there be a privilege or other objection regarding any question, we will attempt to resolve any disagreement while reserving our right to take any and all measures in response to unfounded privilege assertions.  We look forward to her testimony and plan to make the transcript promptly available to the public.”

The backdrop: Hicks is one of five former White House officials formally subpoenaed by the committee. Others include former White House counsel Don McGahn, former White House strategist Steve Bannon, former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, and former White House deputy counsel Ann Donaldson.

  • Trump has said he does not want any of his current or former aides to testify before Congress.

Hicks did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he's done nothing wrong, as he asserts, why would he try to block people from testifying that he did nothing wrong?.....

 It's like the whole tax thing..... If he did nothing wrong, why not show it, and get it out of the way?

 On the other hand...... (Very little hands, by the way, everyone is saying it) if he has something to hide.......

 Too bad Nixon isn't still alive to tell him how this story ends up......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

Frankly, I am surprised he had time to design the new paint scheme, what with all the golfing he swore he would be too busy to do.

"We had different choices, here," Trump said, pointing to images he said he designed himself. "These are all slightly different."

 

His first choice was voted down...

BI_Coasters_747_N610BN_DFW_1_530x@2x.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Bus Driver said:

Frankly, I am surprised he had time to design the new paint scheme, what with all the golfing he swore he would be too busy to do.

"We had different choices, here," Trump said, pointing to images he said he designed himself. "These are all slightly different."

 

Clearly he doesn't understand camouflage and radar deflection.....

 Honesty deflection he understands......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And, wow. Trump has doubled down, backing Don Jr's meeting in Trump Tower where he bartered sanctions for dirt on Hillary. 

Trump went ahead and told George Stephanopolous that if he was offered assistance by a foreign government to get reelected, he'd accept it. He might not even tell the FBI. What better way to cover for his son being interviewed by the Senate Intelligence committee, but to claim that "everyone does it" and that, despite what his own FBI Director says, it's not a crime because he'd do it.

And lets not forget Donny Jr, who  had to deny the testimony of several accusers that he committed campaign fraud for the second time. He's in jeopardy of perjury charges.

 

Share this post