• Announcements

    • Zapata

      Abbreviated rules   07/28/2017

      Underdawg did an excellent job of explaining the rules.  Here's the simplified version: Don't insinuate Pedo.  Warning and or timeout for a first offense.  PermaFlick for any subsequent offenses Don't out members.  See above for penalties.  Caveat:  if you have ever used your own real name or personal information here on the forums since, like, ever - it doesn't count and you are fair game. If you see spam posts, report it to the mods.  We do not hang out in every thread 24/7 If you see any of the above, report it to the mods by hitting the Report button in the offending post.   We do not take action for foul language, off-subject content, or abusive behavior unless it escalates to persistent stalking.  There may be times that we might warn someone or flick someone for something particularly egregious.  There is no standard, we will know it when we see it.  If you continually report things that do not fall into rules #1 or 2 above, you may very well get a timeout yourself for annoying the Mods with repeated whining.  Use your best judgement. Warnings, timeouts, suspensions and flicks are arbitrary and capricious.  Deal with it.  Welcome to anarchy.   If you are a newbie, there are unwritten rules to adhere to.  They will be explained to you soon enough.  
C. Spackler

Do cost controls in the AC defeat the whole point?

Recommended Posts

Fun is proportional to the square root of the number of teams involved.

Nothing contains cost - each team spends about 10% more than it raises.

What does make sense is to ban expensive adventures that provide relatively little benefit to the sport at large. Enriched uranium, special coatings and tank testing all come to mind. Do they yield speed, yes. Can the make the difference across the line, yes. Do they increase the number of participants, no. Do they make more fun, hardly.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cost controls are pointless.

If the class rule is a glorified  laser, there will be teams that will spend 100 million making their laser the fastest one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, jaysper said:

Cost controls are pointless.

If the class rule is a glorified  laser, there will be teams that will spend 100 million making their laser the fastest one.

For sure, but the entry level for fleet fillers and learners is lower => more participants of varying quality that will make a more interesting event with probably wider broadcast reach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cost controls only impact where the money is spent. 

This time round they are clearly saying they do not want to spend it on the (sailing) staff.

The more to spend on creating fancy artifacts presumably. 

Pretty shocking thing for a team of the people to get involved with but at least we're back to a design challenge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rennmaus said:

For sure, but the entry level for fleet fillers and learners is lower => more participants of varying quality that will make a more interesting event with probably wider broadcast reach.

Which is why I have espoused the idea of making it compulsory for all competitors to purchase a OD boat that measures to the AC75 class rule. Like an AC45 but able to be raced in the cup itself.

That way you can have as many pre regatta events where challengers face off against defender without revealing anything much at all PLUS teams like GTF can use this boat "as is" in the LVC or even modify it within the class rules. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, morrisre said:

Cost controls only impact where the money is spent. 

This time round they are clearly saying they do not want to spend it on the (sailing) staff.

The more to spend on creating fancy artifacts presumably. 

Pretty shocking thing for a team of the people to get involved with but at least we're back to a design challenge

I predict that the nationality rules will have precisely fuck all impact on this cup cycle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, jaysper said:

Which is why I have espoused the idea of making it compulsory for all competitors to purchase a OD boat that measures to the AC75 class rule. Like an AC45 but able to be raced in the cup itself.

That way you can have as many pre regatta events where challengers face off against defender without revealing anything much at all PLUS teams like GTF can use this boat "as is" in the LVC or even modify it within the class rules. 

 

This was addressed by GD some time ago. AC36 (and everything that hangs off it) was to be more easily understood.

So not three boat types like the last AC and not 2 either it seems - as you suggest....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now